CompuServe Messages

Windows Debate

    19-Nov-90 19:26:02
Sb: #3907-Windows Debate
Fm: Bob Rakosky 75156,336
To: Syndesis 76004,1763
Well, actually Windows did "walk" my program – it was definitely too slow to call it "running". 🙂 I know about going into the PIF editor to change some of the parameters, but the defaults did look reasonable to me. I've experimented with running this game on 3 different MS-DOS multitasking kludges: Windows, Desqview, and SimulTask386 running on a SVR3 unix system. The simultask was a little flakey (primarily 'cause I didn't have the mouse configured quite right), but didn't show nearly the type of slowdown that Windows does. Desqview adds so little detectable overhead that the performance is not noticably worse than when running it on the same machine without any multi-tasking system. Of course, it does slow down when running under Desqview if I have a "make" running in the background, but even then it's much faster overall than when running under Windows with nothing else significant running. What can I say? The public (and the trade press) seems willing to buy anything that Bill Gates says is good for them. …BobR White Wolf Productions