WordPerfect 5.nada
15-Nov-91 15:50:06
Sb: #40566-WordPerfect 5.nada
Fm: Todd Evans 74030,1022
To: WPCorp PC Testing 72460,461
If WordPerfect Amiga had compared favorably with the other available
Amiga word processors in both price and quality, you would have had a good
selling software package on your hands. Because your market ing
researchers didn't have the brains to realize that Amiga users are just not
going to pay the kind of money WP wanted for a fair to good Word Processor.
They would rather spend about half the dough and get a better Word
Processor. You would have had a better profit on the product if you had
realized the market you were getting yourself into and priced it
accordingly. Also, it would have been nice if you had realized the
computer you were writing it for and used the outstanding capabilities it
offered you, instead of ignoring them and writing a clone of the PC
version.
You're developing for the NeXT? What kind of installed user base does
that have? 60,000 machines? Less? More? Definitely no where even close
to 3,000,000 and growing. Of course anyone stupid enough to buy the
overpriced NeXT would be willing to shell out at least $500 for a word
processor. Most Amiga users just aren't.
Maybe WordPerfect should look at releasing WP5, scaled down, yet
productive, at a lower, more realistic price in tune with the other
software available for the Amiga.