WordPerfect 5.nada
16-Nov-91 23:04:28
Sb: #40566-WordPerfect 5.nada
Fm: Mark D. Manes 74030,744
To: WPCorp PC Testing 72460,461
Excuse me? Feldercarb!
Did WordPerfect just now get around to looking at the bottom-line? Or was
this revelation about "the revenues recieved are not nearly enough to
finance a full-fledged development effort" discovered when it was learned
that Commoodre would not finance this effort?
Your company must really think the average Amiga owner is stupid. Contrary
to your company's belief their are many Amiga users who do serious work
with their systems and also just happen to believe in a "better mousetrap"
that is the Amiga. I am not some ex-c64 game pirate who wants to write a
few notes to his 'way kool friends in europe'. I am a person who has
control over software purchasing decisions for an entire campus, and yes, I
own an Amiga, and yes, I have owned, worked with, and programmed PCs.
Heck, I have even used WordPerfect on a PeeCee! See I am part of the
"mainstream". All I ever wanted from your company was a decent port of a
decent (read not the best) word processor. What do I get instead? I get a
buggy program and a whole lot of BS from sales droids. "WPCorp PC Testing"
has gotta be a sales droid position because I believe that WordPerfect
Corp. has never hired anyone to test their amiga products. Don't believe?
Why don't you try to install WordPerfect's latest under AmigaDOS Release 2?
Heck, try it under 1.3!
Lets take a trip down memory lane shall we?
1 I supported WordPerfect with my hard earned cash, when the program
should have never been released. It took nearly a year and a half
before the program became even remotely stable. Even when it became
stable it did not follow what little established standards that
did exist on the amiga. It was crude as a cob, and still is today.
Rule: When you are in business sometimes it is important to provide a
quality product. Sometimes name is not enough. Oh yes, you will sell a
few to the suckers who buy for a name (me!) but believe me when I tell you
I did nothing to help WordPerfect sales after I had the "Word
Perfect" experience. Does that come to you as a surprise?
2 WordPerfect claimed that they had recovered their _entire_
development cost in the first few months of release.
Rule: There are a lot of people who buy a product believing a company is
crediable based on a name and a good history on another platform.
3 WordPerfect released WordPerfect Library
Rule: Hey if we can fool them stupid Amiga owners once, hey we can do it
again. Well that was the plan, wasn't it? Fool me once, shame on you,
fool me twice, shame on me! Guess what!? You didn't get me a second time!
4 WordPerfect is the company that started all of this stuff about
doing a feasability study on doing the WordPerfect 5.1 port
not anyone else. They did agree to go to AmiExpo and show it, they
pulled a 'no-show' without even an explanation.
Rule: In a time of recession, why not suck milk out of all the cows we
can… Hello Commodore, yeah, about that WP 5.1 wouldn't it be neat
if…..???
5 I contacted WordPerfect when they were doing this "study" and was
given the strong impression that many had called and written and it
looked "good" for an updated WordPerfect. The comment it "looked
good" was said by the WordPerfect represenative not me. Why do a
study if the "the revenues received are not nearly enough to
finance a full-fledged development effort"? Was there just enough
funds to do half-baked development effort? Just what was the
thinking? Did WordPerfect stumble on a copy of 'vi' source that they
thought they could port over and label WP 5.1?
Rule: Get them Amiga Users hoppin'! If they are hoppin' they will ping
loud and clear, Commodore will have to finance the port, after all it would
really hurt Commodore if WordPerfect abandoned the Amiga.
5 I happen to know one of the beta testers, and was _told_ that he/she
had been contacted to do beta testing for the new version. This was
two months ago. He/She was told that the program had just finished
alpha and was a port of the Mac version.
Rule: Make the beta tester hopefuls believe something exists, that
doesn't. Translation: Add a bit of gas to that there fire. The more
Amiga users pinging about WP the more likely Commodore will opt to pay for
it.
——–In my opinion, WordPerfect owes the Amiga marketplace an apology.
They blew it from day one. They hired PCers to do the "port". They
released it before it was ready. They didn't even have the sense to become
registered Commodore commercial developers! You didn't think that tidbit
had slid from my memory did you?
I am also aware that Commodore pushed to have WordPerfect released before
it was ready. See, I am trying to to be fair. However, even after this
early release bug fixes did not arrive for some time.
The Amiga marketplace is quite big enough to support a good product from
WordPerfect. Don't believe it? Try producing a good product… I
certainly have been patient enough waiting for one.
Let me tell you about your latest upgrade you offered Amiga owners:
1 The Install program is broken, it guru's my machine(s) when I ran it.
I had to finish the install by hand.
2 The fonts in the printer control program are broken under 2.0 if
you decide to use another font. Clue: Most people who use 2.0 no
longer use topaz, time to get rid of a null in a text structure I
guess. If you want to force user to use topaz, specify it. A NULL
in the text structure under 2.0 gives you the system default font,
which believe it or not is usually not topaz, and get this, it is
usually bigger than 8 points!
No, the reason the WordPerfect product and WordPerfect Library did not
succeed on the amiga is simple. The program is a poorly done port of an
IBM program, and done by a company that has lost its edge.
Let me go further to say that I believe that this whole WordPerfect
5.1 study was designed to get funds from Commodore. It was probably
thought by the bean-counters at WordPerfect that if they stirred the
pot a bit on WordPerfect 5.1 for the Amiga, they probably could talk
Commodore into sinking a few million into WordPerfect Corp. Commodore
for once, wisely said, "forget it…". So instead of telling the
truth or just letting it go you (your company) decides to rub our
noses in the fact that a _big_ IBM software house has _dropped_ our
beloved machine. Well sir, good ridiance to you and your company.
Let me tell you that I am going to effect your bottom line on your PC and
VAX version of WordPerfect. I grant it will only be a few hundred copies,
but a person has got to do what he has got to do right? From this point on
I will never authorize the purchase of WordPerfect for any of our PC labs
on our campus, and will never put a version of WordPerfect on the VAXen I
administrate. No, it won't put you out of business but it will give me
satisfaction, and hey, after four years I think I deserve a bit of
satisfaction, don't you?
I am also immediately purchasing ProWrite from New Horizons. They support
their product, and hey they have stuck it out for long enough. I should
have done this long time ago.
Your company sir, is lying.