WordPerfect 5.nada
16-Nov-91 17:07:05
Sb: #40823-WordPerfect 5.nada
Fm: Black Belt Systems 76004,1771
To: Nancy Devitt 73157,3606
I submit all my manuscripts double spaced on paper, because that's
what editors generally prefer. :^) For my columns, such as the one in
digital digest, I submit ASCII text, because that's the ONLY egneral
interchange format there is. WP notwithstanding.
On my portable, I use a PC version of UEDIT, my editor, and I write in
TeX, as usual. ASCII files, nothing else. Then, when I get to the
AMiga, I print em on the laser. No sweat, no problem with
portability. There are IBM versions of TeX (and DEC, and etc ad
nauseum… in fact, there are probably more versions of TeX than of
WP :^)
I have to laugh when Amiga users point a shaky finger at TeX and
curse "It's a TYPESETTER!" and run off screaming. Sure, it makes text
output, and it can manipulate type better than WP, but it can also do
everything ELSE that WP can do, better, and about a zillion things
that WP can't do at all.
I don't recommend TeX for the average Amiga user, but then again, I don't
recommend WP for an Amiga user unless someone has a gun to their head for
WP compatibility, either, because I think (and have always thought) that it
isn't worth the time it takes to learn to use it.
As far as not being able to take a "purely amiga approach to writing", I've
had no trouble in the past, even though some tools (like WP) are pretty
bad. There are others. Now, I expect to stay with TeX until somethin as
poweful comes along that allows the speed and flexibility and SMARTS that
TeX has. The problem with things like PageStream is that the DTP system
doesn't know enough about the document. I can't link illustrations to a
column location – if the text moves, I have to reposition everything
manually. Yech. I don't do that anymore. :^)