#Particle FX
16-Nov-94 21:53:58
Sb: #1826-#Particle FX
Fm: Michael S. Flynn 74551,142
To: Pawel Bodytko 70733,644
Pawel,
If you don,t mind my imput, if you ar seriously thinking of spending
around $4,000 for a new machine just for a rendering speed increase, a PowerMac
or Pentium may not be the best choice. One of the draw backs of which I'm sure
you're aware of on the PC side, is that companies are very slow to embrace new
technology, so while software written or re-compiled for the PowerMac was
available before the machine, PC users are still waiting for Pentium-compiled
applications. Hash, however, is compiling AM for Windowss NT, and although they
are having trouble getting it to work on the Intel chipset, it will run on a
DEC chip. That gives us AM users the option of buying a 300 mhz DEC.
One other thing I am going to wait for is Windows 95. AM is already a 32
bit app. If Windows 95 gives a big enough performance increase, it might even
be a better idea to buy 2-3 DX2/66's for rendering – they should be cheap
enough by then. The P6 is on the way from Intel, but after their deal with HP,
I get the feeling that the P6 may be the end of the x86 line of processors.
Intel has made it public for some time that they will be producing RISC chips
in the near future. If that is the case, I am thinking of not even bothering
with the Pentium at all. We would need pretty much all new software in the next
2-3 years to run on an Intel RISC chip, so I am thinking that I may sell my
comic book collection and buy a couple of DEC's. They are quite a few companies
that are committed to writing or re-compiling code for Windows NT, and
Microsoft is committed to having Windows NT run a number of different chipsets.
Intel and IBM/Motorola are not going to be producing 300 mhz or faster chips in
the near future; they are targeting a different set of users. I've been
thinking that if am I as committed to animation as I think I am, then maybe I
should buy equipment that is really designed to handle the workload.
Michael S. Flynn