#Mac vs Amiga ?
20-Dec-90 15:27:25
Sb: #10231-#Mac vs Amiga ?
Fm: Christopher Laprise 70431,2172
To: Harry Baya 76702,513
"Although there are exceptions, most still graphics on the Amiga are not as
impressive as plain 8-bit on the Mac, and the mix of standards adds
confusion and incompatibility…"
Incorrect. The Amiga's color is 12-bit and it has it's strengths as well
as 8-bit on the Mac. However, they are just not comparable.. The Mac
requires an adaptor anyway, and a product such as a HAM-E adaptor ($300)
will provide 18-bit (24-bit palette) while retaining a high degree of
compatability.
The confusion you speak of doesn't exist in reality.. Cut and paste
between video modes is acomplished by using a quick re-map function in most
paint/animate software. Similar operations would be necessary between two
8-bit images with different palettes, not to mention transitions between 8
and 24-bit.
I can show you several graphics utilities that use windows (although on
the Amiga, multiple screens are nearly as versatile as windows).
In any case, realtime animation is not possible on the Mac and even
converting mere 8-bit images to NTSC is far more costly given that Mac
displays operate at non-standard rates.