#Rel 12
23-Feb-92 19:27:22
Sb: #34303-#Rel 12
Fm: Tony Tanzillo [LISP TM] 71241,2067
To: Peter K. Sheerin 71621,3173
Peter – I hate to tell you this, but you're going to have some dissent on
your hands. I for one am not interested in any further bastardization of
External references. They were designed as a means of including a canonical
representation of one drawing, in another. I will instead campaign for
another type of "externally-defined thing" (I can't be more specific than
that, sorry), that will bring all of the functionality that you seek to have
in external references, without making them so complicated that nobody but
you and Mark Burns will know what to do with them.
I'm not interested in making AutoCAD more complex for the sake of complexity
alone. What you and Burns want from external references conflicts with their
very essence (a canonical representation of an external drawing).
I don't want to start a war or raging debate on this here, but I'm telling you
now that I will veheminently oppose any futher hack jobs on this feature, in
favor of a more rational alternative.
-TonyT.