CompuServe Thread

#Flyer as digital VCR

7 messages in this thread
#102050From: henry tellerFeb 18, 1995 10:39 PM
Fred, I have several customers who use a TBC when duping tapes. They feel that the TBC strengthens the signal and makes a better dupe. Hank Videology, Inc. Where you get P.O.M.P. under all circumstances
#102069From: Fred BerneyFeb 19, 1995 7:27 AM
Hank, I agree that the TBC can give you a stronger video signal, but my point was that anything you put inbetween one recorder and another will give you some kind of loss somewhere. AV/Video ran some articles a few years ago about this. I'll try and see if I can find them. We not talking big time loss or even something that you could see. But, I think the point of the article was that all devices put in line will give you somekind of loss and therefor use them sparingly. It is probably a trade off. The TBC helps the signal more than it the slight amount of noise that it may be adding to the signal. Noise, that was what the article was about. Anything you put on line will add just a slight amount of noise. I knew it would come to me if I thought about it long enough. The article was written by Peter Utz. Fred
#102123From: henry tellerFeb 19, 1995 11:08 PM
Fred, If you and the other Flyers here keep feeding me video info, I'll have to become a videographer – thanks for the input. Hank Videology, Inc. Where you get P.O.M.P. under all circumstances
#102229From: David WelshFeb 21, 1995 5:17 AM
Most of the loss in dubbing I believe comes from the recording of the information onto the tape and the getting the information back off of the tape. Running through a device like a flyer won't save this generational loss in analog dubbing. I do agree with the response about the tbc. TBC's can let you tweak footage in a way that maximizes the signal before it is recorded. Maybe the flyer will allow you to do this as well, if it has certain tbc type settings within it. Where the flyer obviously helps is in mastering tape, where you don't lose as much going from the source footage to the edited master, as you would in analog editing. But then again, I guess this depends on just how much you lose in digitizing. Just my two cents.
#102238From: henry tellerFeb 21, 1995 6:34 AM
One of my customers has hooked the Toaster's output to a DA and does all his duplication directly. This provides him with several first generation masters for his client and one for his files. He could run this process several times and never wear out the Toaster master. Hank Videology, Inc. Where you get P.O.M.P. under all circumstances
#102558From: David WelshFeb 25, 1995 10:34 AM
Hank, you mean that his master is coming off of a hard drive working in conjunction with the Flyer, so that he's going from digital to analog. If this is the case, then sounds like a neat way to get first generation analog dubs to be. –David
#102629From: henry tellerFeb 26, 1995 7:55 AM
David – That's right. Directing the Toaster/Flyer output to a D/A for multiple dupping, produces first generation copies for your files and the client's. Everyone wins – Hank Videology, Inc. Where you get P.O.M.P. under all circumstances