CompuServe Thread

KPT Demo

12 messages in this thread
#158330From: LEE STEELMar 10, 1995 11:02 PM
What is the difference between the 1 and 2 disk versions of the HSC/KPT Demo? -Lee
#159298From: Nik Grant [adesk]Mar 16, 1995 10:53 AM
Lee – as you've found out, HSC/KPT support is not in this forum. They've probably got a forum on CI$ somewhere, but I don't know what it is. Animator Studio, by the way, will be able to read Photoshop compatible KPT filters, so we may be able to answer this question after AAStudio's been out for a while.
#159330From: LEE STEELMar 16, 1995 12:42 PM
Are you not aware of HSC Gradient Designer for 3D Studio? There are 2 different Demo versions here in the library. One is a single disk version then a few days later they uploaded a 2 disk version. I simply wanted to know what the difference between the two demos was. -Lee
#159697From: John K. JordanMar 18, 1995 10:45 PM
Hi Lee, I missed your first message, but concerning the HSC demos – the first one they uploaded had just a few presets to play with and most of them were useless due to missing bitmap files. I brought this to their attention, and although they never answered me, the newer (2-disk) demo has LOADS of preset effects and includes all the bitmap files. In fact there are so many to play with, it is difficult to scroll through them all! (they follow a different drummer when it comes to user interfaces and it seems that they have a thing against scroll bars on scrollable lists – I find their method cumbersome) It is a lot of fun to play with. JKJ
#159744From: LEE STEELMar 19, 1995 1:42 PM
Thanks John, Couldn't get any response to this question at all from anyone including the sysops. Eventhough I am a registered user of the product I want to keep up an accurate library for my Users Group. Now I just wish I could get someone to comment on the supposed "1.0.6" Vibrant drivers. I can't get anyone from their tech support to comment on that question either. -Lee
#159745From: LEE STEELMar 19, 1995 1:42 PM
I just downloaded the new Vibrant drivers a second time and what came across this time WAS 1.0.6. Either the very first posting was wrong and someone fixed it without responding to my questions or some bizzare event caused a different file of the same name with older drivers (1.0.5) to download with the same name (vib3ds.zip). Anyway I'm set now. I guess this is the price one pays to download as soon as somthing hits the forum. As far as the Gradient Demo goes, Are you able to use the available (demo) gradients that come with these files in the Materials Editor? If so, this means that the BXP is FULLY functional and anyone with the DEMO version could use .grd files created by someone with the Registered Version. If this is the case everyone will have access to the files created by KPT Gradient Designer just by having the BXP on their system. I'm sure once several people start to experiment with this product they will post some interesting .grd files here that everyone will be able to use. -Lee
#159796From: John K. JordanMar 19, 1995 10:45 PM
>>demo gradients… Yes, I could use all the demo gradients from MatEd (and VideoPost, I think). I picked *.* and then a .GRD file. I rendered some of the animated examples out to PAR for playback – very impressive! Although I thought I'd probably never use effects like that myself, I just got a project that could use it – I need to show a magnetic field for a new electronic transmission being patented. A rotating radial gradient mapped to an appropriately transparent object may do the trick. I really like being able to check out these demo versions. JKJ
#159815From: LEE STEELMar 20, 1995 7:27 AM
I really think that most users will be more inclined to buy a routine if they have had the chance to actually experiment with the final output in some limited form. "rotating radial gradient" Once Aaron has worked out the turbulance when you try to pick a .grd file from LenZ/Eyebrowse then the combination of LenZ and KPT will be a very powerful duo. -Lee
#159923From: John K. JordanMar 20, 1995 10:27 PM
>>LenZ/Eyebrowse… Could you tell me… Is Eyebrowse an integral part of LenZ, or more explicitly, can you run LenZ without Eyebrowse? (I've never liked what I've heard about Eyebrowse – I bought a copy but never installed it so I'm probably being a little unfair) JKJ
#159975From: LEE STEELMar 21, 1995 8:34 AM
I'm not very fond of Eyebrowse either but in the case of LenZFX as I understand it you get a "lite" version and it seems that you are locked into it. Eyebrowse is very slow and cumbersome on my 486/66 but I must admit that it IS nice to be able to view the thumb-nail images of the different effects when looking for "just the right one". Eyebrowse will also create thumbnail images of the effects you create which are saved as .lzf files. I am told by DavidA that there is a way to dissable the "lite" version by removing the .bxp file related to eyebrowse in the lenzfx directory. Then the software will call your registered copy but I don't think you can disable it all together and use the standard 3DS scroll lists (a feature I would like added). Each time you "tweak" your effect you must save it before you render. This calls eyebrowse every time. -Lee
#160015From: John K. JordanMar 21, 1995 12:44 PM
>>LenZ/Eyebrowse inseparable… Thank you for your response. Sometime I wish I didn't write software myself – I get frustrated by things that don't work the way _I_ want them to. <g> I guess I was looking for a excuse to buy it in spite of the hardware lock. I think I'm over it now… JKJ
#160057From: LEE STEELMar 21, 1995 2:44 PM
Sorry if I managed to talk you out of LenZFX. It actually DOES create some very incredible effects although it is my personal opinion that this is NOT a replacement for Yost Disk #1. There is a certain romance in the simplicity and directness of Mr.Yost's routines. Both sets of routines have their place. -Lee