CompuServe Thread

Cando Update Bug?

7 messages in this thread
#53250From: Nancy DevittMar 22, 1992 9:54 PM
Has anyone received their Cando updates? I'd call the company before attempting an installation. My copy seems to have EATEN my program files. Beware…..Nancy (NComming from Canada 8->)
#53454From: Steven D. KapplinMar 25, 1992 10:26 PM
Nancy, I don't know if you meant what you wrote. The installer deletes files on the master disks, then replaces with new ones. However, I had a terrible problem with soft disk errors. I must have tried the installation 10 times, but at some point disk errors would leave the installation in limbo with warm boot the only way out. I finally ended up with my master disks totally garbaged. I couldn't even install onto a newly formatted set of blank disks. Eventually, I just dearchived the files and copied them onto the hard drive manually. Indeed the update procedure is flawed. I just got my upgrade today, but I plan to notify Inovatronics and suggest they arrive at an alternative strategy, unless my case was unusual. At this point I have a working new version on the hard drive, but I no longer have any master disks.
#53721From: John DublerMar 28, 1992 1:29 PM
For those of us who received 1.6 at AmiExpo in Long Beach, there was a problem with the update. For me, the problem was that the install would not update the particular program disk I used. Inovatronics blamed the problem on 2.0, and sent me another 1.6 update that worked. I'm now a happy 1.6 user, and the auto install did a great job on my hard drive. It saved my old CanDo icon so I could copy the old tooltypes (these weren't copied for me automatically, unfortunately), and didn't overwrite any of my decks. In the envelope, a flyer mentioned a new "Auto Update" policy to automatically send out updates ASAP and bill a credit card (no more than $50 each) and including a money back guarantee. It sounds like they may plan to step up updates, and may be shooting for something later this year. You wouldn't know anything about that, would you? *** jd
#53736From: Steven D. KapplinMar 28, 1992 5:17 PM
John, Well, I can't say my updating went quietly. I eventually just copied files from the decompressed archives on the update disk. My original diskettes are no longer viable, but I do have 1.6 running successfully on the hard drive. I, too, got the flyer about the auto update program, but haven't decided yet to return it. I don't know any more about it than you, if your source is the same as mine, the flyer that came with the update. I am hoping to see a later version with a major change in the interface which might make scripting a lot easier to do. I hate the constant switching back and forth as I try to keep track of everything. I would really prefer a more programming-like environment, but I realize there are definite tradeoffs to provide the ease of development which CanDo implements. Perhaps if it had a multi-window environment with one window for the code development and another for the object manipulation, and yet another to test the script for debugging. Well, obviously there are a multitude of ways to do it, and no one way will make everyone happy, I know that. It's still the best of it's sort in the market. Nothing else short of ARexx with rexxarplib can provide such an easy program development which is virtually complete in almost every way, short of the oddball way of having more than one window open at a time! And to think, the PC world is so excited about Visual Basic and Windows!!
#53708From: Douglas FleischmanMar 28, 1992 11:08 AM
I just recently installed my CanDo 1.6 upgrade without a problem. When installing such a package I allways use a set of backup disks and not the originals, then if I have a problem I call the company before I attempt to continue. I hope you get your 1.6 upgrade up and running.
#54039From: Nancy DevittMar 31, 1992 12:48 PM
I always use backup disks, but, in this case, because I have such faith in In Inovatronics, I updated BOTH my backups and my masters WITHOUT CHECKING TO SE SEE IF THE BACKUP HAD WORKED. (A fatal error, and not a very bright one.) Anyway, all is well now…..Nancy
#54302From: Douglas FleischmanApr 4, 1992 11:31 AM
I am happy to hear all is well. I am sure you will like 1.6!