CompuServe Thread

#LightWave Madness

61 messages in this thread
#53964From: Rodney MassmanApr 4, 1993 1:02 PM
Hmmm, 3.0 huh? I'm curious what changes are made in LightWave of 2.0. Curiouser also – I heard some outrageous price somewhere around here that to upgrade from 2.0 to 3.0 was a whopping $2000.00! I find that hard to believe as that's more like the asking price of a New Toaster. The thought of upgrading to 3.0 within a year of purchasing the 2.0 is mind numbing not to mention that now I'm finally getting a grasp on texturing, mapping and surfacing – they go and change the rules on me!! How REVOLTING!!! :> I'll definitely check out the JVC BR's -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#53972From: Peter GreciApr 4, 1993 1:57 PM
I personally Feel the next Toaster Upgrade will be $500 or so, but the PRICE to BUY a new Toaster will go up considerably MORE than $500. This is only an OPINION, no facts are here. I'd say the next Toaster System will be $3000 on the Street compared to the $1999 that most places have itt for now.
#54002From: John GrossApr 5, 1993 2:51 AM
That 2000.00 upgrade price from LW 2.0 to New.0 is strictly a RUMOR. I repeat a RUMOR! No prices as of yet have been announced. JG
#54094From: Rodney MassmanApr 6, 1993 11:32 AM
I just wish I could get the Toaster to animate right now without having to also buy a Single Frame Controller, Single Frame Recorder, and then later when I'd like to wipe and fade to another sequence have to buy two more VCR's plus an Editor VCR. It'd be sharp if you were already a production company that already had the budget or these items in hand. For the standard Production Hobbyist that has House, Car, Bike, Credit Card, Utility, as well as a Toaster/GVP 030 Combo Payments it presents a bit of a problem in getting anything started with the Toaster, like perhaps being able to market any anims to be able to buy that SFR etc… I hate to appear as the penny pincher but there has to be a way to animate the frames without also having to buy a SFR and Controller plus the Toaster. Amazing how effortless and Revolutionary the Toaster Demo Tape made it out to be and didn't point out in the Demo that you also had to have that SFC, SFC Controller, Frame Editor and all the countless other considerations and costs to get the same result as the REVOLUTION demo. Granted, when you've got the right equipment, the toaster can do some spectacular things. I guess my andpoint is that maybe I didn't really know what I was getting into. But I had visions of sugar plumbs dancing in my head when I saw the Rev demo and what I cou do with the Toaster. So here I am a year later, without those fantastic animations and fades/wipes because of the additional expenses in picking up the highly specialized equipment that's needed to accomplish the end goal. ..But I have a Toaster…that's about to be outdated by a rumored 3.0 and $3500 less, I'm still paying on The add said something to the effect of 'The Video Toaster can replace a $120,000 studio at only the price of $2500'. If ever there is a 3.0 update to the Video Toaster I would certainly hope an inclusive program would be available to at least convert the 24bit IFF's to 16 and allow you to use a standard IFF anim program to view your creations. I've tried Rend24 and from what I've seen I could have done the same with VideoScape 3d. The add mentioned a VCR and a Video Camera you'd need, and that's it. So, knocking on the door of NewTek – if your targeting the Amiga User in DeskTop Video, you've got to provide him with the tools to animate – not simply to render a frame and hand him the ball to animate it somehow. The add didn't say I'd need an upteen dozenth thousand dollars to MAKE that production studio as well as the Toaster. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54122From: Peter GreciApr 6, 1993 6:36 PM
Quick mention here Dude, I dunno WHERE Beantown is but Jeff Hanna in Illinois will GLADLY output your Anim Frames to SVHS a Frame at a Time for a MEASLY 10 cents a frame. Let me know if ye'd like the # to Contact this Gent. He accepted Frames on Syquest 44 meg and 88 meg Carts last time I Typed to him on here or possibly Genie and may also accept them on Backup tapes now as well. Good Luck in yer Business Ventures.
#54281From: Rodney MassmanApr 9, 1993 1:37 AM
Good Grief, I thought everyone knew where BeanTown was — Lima, Ohio! Silly 🙂 Had about 4 people ask me where BeanTown is heheh Guess I'll change my sign off. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54525From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffApr 11, 1993 11:35 PM
Beantown is Boston too ;-}
#54625From: Rodney MassmanApr 13, 1993 9:42 AM
Yea, but Lima beans have better taste… ;> -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54163From: Paul ToalApr 7, 1993 5:16 AM
Has your bubble burst? Dreams been shattered? Are you peeking into a world of hopeless expenses. Do you think you've been deceived? Well….. Goodnews Rodney. There are many of us that have been tromping the halls of CI$ and watching the birth of a true revolution for years. The Toaster is a part of that and many of us have been where you are now. Go back and watch the demo tape again. Then watch the video "A minds Eye". Think about what you REALLY want to do and then come back and talk to us. We are very good at what we do. We can help put your dreams on a video tape, polished, done, and perfect. For starters- You can rent the equipment you need and stay way ahead for a very long time. This will give you the chance to find the equipment that works best for your projects. You can also have someone record your rendered pics onto tape for a nominal cost, even via snail mail. You can do whatever you dream. It may take some time, waiting, testing and compromise, but it can be done, and not cost you too much money. You really are in for a treat, just hang on and ask for as much help as you need. –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#54282From: Rodney MassmanApr 9, 1993 1:37 AM
Oh, I don't think this is my first day on the job Laddy, I'm just not so big I can't ask for some help or advice from those with which we have something in common. I've been in the computer arena since the Vic-20 and before. I'm not going to say I'm a Videographer, I'm a hobbiest who enjoys computer animation, and a collector of them. I own the Mind's Eye along with every Amiga Animation tape that's been made by AmigaWorld – I might mention also, that I found no mention of the Amiga in The Minds Eye. I decided long before I bought the Toaster what I wanted to do when I was working with VideoScape 3d. I think this base is a tremendous asset to all of us – being that were not in a Videographers only club and I don't feel the slightest bit alienated by your past message. Thanks for the advice. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54325From: Peter GreciApr 9, 1993 2:07 PM
Rodney, none of the footage on the Minds Eye or it's sequel were generated on Personal Computers. If I'm not mistaken it's all Appollo's, Sun's and SGI's. Don't feel bad that the Amiga didn't make it onto these Video's. Perhaps the next release if their is one will have some FX from the Amiga from Quantum Leap or Babylon 5
#54367From: Rodney MassmanApr 10, 1993 1:31 AM
The beauty of 3d animation is that it is possible and quite attainable to do what the author did using certain equipment. It's like: 'Hey, I can do that!" and you probably could if you watched it a few times. Then you think, how did this guy think of this?! It's about as far along as artistry can come. The originality, the storyline. It's really fun watching someones creativity come to fruitation. The artists creativity, then is discovered, and not the equipment that's the beauty. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54416From: Peter GreciApr 10, 1993 5:57 PM
Get the new AW Amigamations tape, I think you'll enjoy it tho I would have picked a Different Winner than Fred the Floaty
#54469From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPApr 11, 1993 1:24 PM
Is that tape out already? Guess I'll have to go back through my issue of AW and find out how to order it! Steve
#54471From: Peter GreciApr 11, 1993 2:41 PM
I picked up the Amigamations Tape at WOCA last weekend and saw it advertised in the new issue of Amigaworld that I got 2-3 days ago in the mail. It's pretty good Eric Fleischer has 2 anims on there including the Winner Fred the Floaty and another called "Commuter Chip"
#54167From: john bennettApr 7, 1993 8:11 AM
The Toaster isn't quite the place to Start, when it comes to video production. But it is a GREAT place to start in 3D rendering/animation. VTR's, TBC's, and video cameras are all necissary before you even think of using the toaster, or doing any video production. DCTV is the way to go for getting your anims to tape. Thats the least expensive (DCTV $299) solution and also almost necissary for doing ;test anims before going to tape with SFR The future of video is definately digital, and DCTV is one of the first devices capable of displaying full screen hi-res, hi-color images at near realtime speeds on your present system NOW. ….John
#54283From: Rodney MassmanApr 9, 1993 1:38 AM
Sounds like DCTV is what I'm going to have to get! So, it's still a valuable tool even after you purchase the SFR? I was concerned about throwing money away to DCTV when it could go towards the SFR – which more and more is looking like the Sony EVO-9650 Hi8. There's only one problem with it though, it can't dub over to VHS for a beta copy! There was a review on it in Video Toaster User Oct/Nov '92. The reviewer liked it so well he bought one himself! :> -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54326From: Peter GreciApr 9, 1993 2:07 PM
WHAT????? I see no reason that you cant dub from the 9650 to VHS. Maybe I'm bonkers. Well thanx to the MAGIC of Autopilot's offline reader I just went and looked up the article in VTU about 9650. NOWHERE in the article does it say you CAN'T Dub to VHS. What it DOES say is there is no 3/4" DUB OUT. You simply use the Composite out to dub to VHS or get a S-Video to BNC Cable and you can dub to VHS. Hope this Allay's yer fears dude.
#54368From: Rodney MassmanApr 10, 1993 1:31 AM
I'll read it again later but you know the article I'm speaking of. I thought I read that's what he said – I haven't got it here in front of me and I'm near on going to bed. Man, I liked the look of that SFR – It'd look just right on my desk here. I'll have to get a spot ready for it. The things I could do with that baby! -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54075From: Paul ToalApr 6, 1993 1:05 AM
If you can afford a $6000 VCR, $2000 for an upgrade is is a piece of cake. It takes big bucks to play with the big boys. –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#54099From: Rodney MassmanApr 6, 1993 12:54 PM
Yea, I agree strongly!! Now, it's the $6000 for the VCR that's giving me the headache, I've already spent $6000 for the Computer. I already consider myself a Big Boy, just in Little Boys shoes (Budgetwise that is) 🙂 I have no doubt in my mind that I can rival the likes of Local Television stations that use their Toaster for wipes and fades on their news (which by the way they currently use) or in their commercials. I need to get started, and I need to do it now, but $3000 – $6000 may as well be a cool million right now. At least until I can get all this paid off to go back into debt with a SFR and controller. What I really want to do here is get by with a software solution to animating my LW IFF Animation saves until I can afford to take that bank loan for the REAL equipment I need so very badly!!! So far I've gotten 2 recommendations: 1) JVC BRS622 SFR 2) SONY 9650 Hi8 SFR which doesn't even require a SFC I also got a recommendation for a JVC BRS605 – but it's a bit risky for the money as being VERY low end. If I've got to spend GOOD money I need to spend it wisely, on something that will go the distance. A wise investment to build my DeskTop Video Empire (Feel a bit Imperialistice!) Right now, today though, I need a software solution, like, where the heck is IFFtoDCTV and I've got to dl View 3.6…until I raise or can borrow the $3000 – $6000. I work in the Auto Industry so, to say the least, I've got to be careful how I spend my hard earned dollars!!! Better to be getting out of debt than to be up to your neck and get laid off. So it's best to start with something that can eventually build towards that JVC or Sony and jump into that Big Boys boat and exchange videos and accept commercial bids. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54123From: Peter GreciApr 6, 1993 6:36 PM
IFF2DCTV is probably in the LIBS here bro, check area 14 of Amigaarts I think it is part of the ADAM archive. But as I mentioned DCTV anims REQUIRES DCTV otherwise all you will see is mish mosh. The DCTV Hardware converts the Mish mosh into a High Color image. For now Try using HAM 4096 Colors for yer anims at least you can put a demo reel together. If $300 isn't too hard a pill to swallow get a DCTV and do a bit better job. As with Everything you must Spend $$$ to make $$$
#54284From: Rodney MassmanApr 9, 1993 1:38 AM
Yea, I think your right. And I did check out the Libs for IFF2DCTV – No go. I'll grab ADAM and see what damage I can do with that until DCTV comes this way. From the sound of it I can use it even after I buy the SFR. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54327From: Peter GreciApr 9, 1993 2:07 PM
Go for it tho till ya get DCTV hardware ADAM is USELESS
#54369From: Rodney MassmanApr 10, 1993 1:31 AM
Yea, just gathered that when I was given the low down on what exactly DCTV consisted of. Oh well, at least it's nice to know I'm plodding along on the right course as to using Rend24 and ViewTek – that's about all the ammo I got until I can pick up DCTV. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54160From: Wayne ColeApr 7, 1993 4:34 AM
The 622 wont doit – need the JVC BR-S822 for SF. wmc – via Autopilot!
#54285From: Rodney MassmanApr 9, 1993 1:38 AM
Ok, well what if we put the JVC BRS822 next to the Sony EVO-9650? -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54603From: Ben AvechucoApr 13, 1993 1:31 AM
I have a JVC BR-S822 with the timecode card and I am VERY happy with it. At first, I didn't wait for the single frame editor card to arrive, I just started trimming my edits by hand to record my first animations.
#54223From: Erik FlomApr 8, 1993 1:21 AM
Take the advice on others in this forum, rent the recording time as needed. Rend24 is MORE THAN ADEQUATE for roughing out your animations. Once you've got it perfect, and the client is ready to pay, then have it dubbed to tape. It seems that you are unaware of exactly how much cheaper and easier it is to do 3-D animations than it was just a few years ago. If you want to play with the big boys, you gots to pay the price . . . (Just be thankful that price is a tenth of what it used to be when this technology first came online). If you are going out to VHS in the near future, then Rend24 will be almost adequate, and I bet that DCTV Anim7s would more than fill the bill. If you are interested in doing the best QUALITY animations possible, then spend the money for a single framing deck of high-quality (don't waste your time with something that's going to 'maybe work, 99% of the time'). If you are interested in getting your stuff on tape, then use a real-time playback solution like DCTV and/or Anim7 and just dump it to tape. It's the quality of the idea, not the quality of the dub that will sell people… Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom
#54286From: Rodney MassmanApr 9, 1993 1:38 AM
Yea, tried Rend24 with ViewTek and converted the Anims over to Anim7 format. Wow, that Rend24 really does a number on those 24bitters. Takes it straight from Star Wars to The Jetsons. Thankfully, the price has come down on the video equipment otherwise half of us wouldn't be here talking about it and the companies selling it wouldn't be either. Your right I think, about DCTV it's basically the consensus (I think I spelled that right) that that's the way to go from here. I'm still going to putter with Rend24 and ViewTek till I pick that up. There's no doubt in my mind I'm going to end up with a SFR – probably next year. My chief concern is that my equipment I have now, may be becoming obsolete with the advent of the AGA issue, so after the SFR, then a new computer — Shheeesh! No dought, a new SFR after that….. 🙂 -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54328From: Peter GreciApr 9, 1993 2:07 PM
In a year we may see AFFORDABLE Recordable Optical Disks which IMHO is a better avenue than a Single Frame VTR. They are currently priced out of most peoples league tho.
#54458From: Paul ToalApr 11, 1993 6:44 AM
Whad'ya mean not affordable! They're down to $18,000 now, piece of cake. –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#54472From: Peter GreciApr 11, 1993 2:41 PM
hehehehehehehehehe for a mere $6000 LESS I can get a Saturn Automobile hehehehehehe. I'll be VERY Happy when Recordable Optical Disks are under $2000
#54338From: Erik FlomApr 9, 1993 3:31 PM
Oh well, you can't get blood from a turnip, and Amiga HAM graphics are pretty rough for the current video market. But, it does make a great way to preview animations (I usually set one up every night before I go to bed.) I have as yet to even SEE a DCTV unit in operation, so I can't say for sure that it works, but everyone else thinks so. they're probably right. You should SERIOUSLY consider just buying the Personal SFC, and wait for a year or so to get the recorder ('til the dust settles.) You should be able to find a local facility that would rent the recorder on an hourly basis, and you just bill that to your client. I've found that a mixture of 24bit animations and HAM preivew ainms are more than adequate for selling clients on an idea. Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom
#54370From: Rodney MassmanApr 10, 1993 1:32 AM
Thats the problem – see in Lima, were in the Northwest Corner of Ohio, and absolutely nothing is near except Toledo or Columbus – and Lima is a small town. Anything that high priced is not going to be able to be rented-let alone carried in stock. Some VCR's don't require the SFC as it's already built into the unit, at least that's true for the one I've got my eye on. But, yes I think I'm stuck with the Jerky Jetson's until I pick up DCTV. I'd like something psuedo-realistic that has fluid motion. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54387From: Nathan WahlApr 10, 1993 8:35 AM
Rodney, I'm in Oak Harbor, about 20 miles east of Toledo. There are a few places in Toledo that you can go to to use frame accurate decks; you may also use your HAM anims as a demo if you're selling to video houses, and be able to use THEIR equipment to record the 24-bit stuff. You'll need to have an SFC for most places, because they won't have that. For the cost, the Nucleus unit would be hard to beat; I've probably recorded 10K frames with it, and haven't had a problem yet. It'll work with most decks used that are frame accurate (they also need an internal timecode board and a serial (9-pin) connection, but don't worry about that if you're going to a pro, as they typically buy 'the good stuff'). If you don't mind driving about 70 miles some day, let's get together for a few hours at my place, and I'll show you my setup. Bring some frames, and we'll stick 'em on tape so you can see the process. I'll give you a call when I get back from vacation (about a week), and see whats up. BTW, the anim I did for the local PBS station is being played about 8 times a day now for their auction promos. Oops, make that about 20, just saw it again, what a thrill! HANG IN THERE AND KEEP PLUGGING, IT'LL HAPPEN!!! (Hey, anybody else out there live around here? I feel a party coming!) … Nate, E.V. Navigating on AP *** 3D TV! ***
#54439From: Rodney MassmanApr 10, 1993 9:52 PM
Well, a tempting offer to say the least! Yea, lets get together sometime. My first acquisition will be DCTV to start with until I can afford a SFR. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54408From: Erik FlomApr 10, 1993 3:00 PM
Are there any local TV stations? If so, then they must do some local production. Better yet, try hooking up with a local PBS station, if one exists. (You could probably work out a deal trading animation for access to their recorders.) My qualms with the new PC-VCRs (to mention ONE type that has already been discontinued) is that they are too new to the market. The integrated units are still being sold at inflated prices which should drop in the next year. The quality of the recordings is not going to be near what you'd get from a professional deck, and by buying a specific recorder, you are locked into supplying your product in that format. Personally, I've never used Hi8, but I've heard enough complaints about the high dropout count to know that I wouldn't trust Hi8 for the rigors of protracted single frame recording. (In most cases, the deck has to pre-roll the tape for EVERY frame recorded to tape – this puts alot of wear on the tape & mechanism.) Just my $.02, Erik Flom
#54440From: Rodney MassmanApr 10, 1993 9:52 PM
My main concerns would be on the Head of the SFR, as long as it doesn't wear easily because that would be the first thing that would go out on a VCR. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54495From: Erik FlomApr 11, 1993 5:52 PM
Head wear is a good thing to consider too. Considering that Hi8 achieves its superior results by using a more abrasive metal tape, there's another strike against any Hi8 SFR system I could think of. Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom
#54591From: John GrossApr 12, 1993 11:54 PM
I use a hat for head wear. JG
#54618From: Rodney MassmanApr 13, 1993 7:54 AM
So your saying that Hi8 decks wear faster than say, S-VHS? Now, I got this EVO-9650 memorized as the one to get and it's the only one that's really made with your computer in mind. How long would you say it would take before you'd have to have some serious work done on it? -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54556From: Jim S. RoofApr 12, 1993 12:26 PM
Here's a combination that's worked for me. I use a Panasonic AG-7750 with Fuji H471S S-VHS tape. I have not seen a dropout in the 10 months I have used this tape. No other formulation has come close to the consistancy of this product.
#54577From: Erik FlomApr 12, 1993 7:52 PM
I have a friend who's worked at several post houses, and he swears by Fuji. Personally, I have few reservations about using S-VHS for SFR, but I just don't think Hi8 could give me a low enough dropout count. I'M waiting for the non-linear solution myself . . .:^) Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom
#54626From: Rodney MassmanApr 13, 1993 9:42 AM
I wonder what kind of a deck they used to record that space station in the Revolution tape? Noticed a slight jog in one frame of it too. Oh, by the by, I looked over the tape last night while I was downloading a file, and sure enouph – when the guy was playing around with the chess pieces in LightWave – the 1st voice says 'And I can do all this?' The video goes to Allan Hastings' Bee buzzing and the telephone render turning and opening. The 2nd voice says 'Yes, and for only $2500!' Aaaarrrggghhh!! -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54900From: Nathan WahlApr 16, 1993 2:22 PM
Erik, What I'm finding around here is that S-VHS isn't really that popular yet; the local houses I've checked with either do real timecode/SFR/Broadcast ($$$) OR they have S-VHS, but not both. The old standards 3/4 (mostly) and Beta SP are usually what's asked for. The local PBS station has them, 1" (ancient), and a couple of MII decks that they're not too thrilled about. The local commercial stations use all that and D2. They don't seem to mind you bringing in your own equipment to use if the quality is up to snuff (toaster or your editor). They may not be as amenable to letting one use Hi8. The moral of the story is that S-VHS is good for at home and in some other cases, but there's always another way to get what you need done if the price is right. BTW, after using a 3/4 deck, the 7750 seems sorta clunky. … Nate, Emerald Video. Flyin' IFR on AP
#54417From: Peter GreciApr 10, 1993 5:57 PM
Well once ye get my Tape you'll see some Second Generation DCTV thruput. Since I use DCTV almost exclusively
#54496From: Erik FlomApr 11, 1993 5:53 PM
Yeah, I saw the results. Much better than just straight HAM. (Makes me jealous.) Keep On Toastin' Erik Flom
#54568From: Peter GreciApr 12, 1993 6:19 PM
Yea, tho it will NEVER replace a GOOD SFR but for many folks it is a DREAM come true to have High Color Anims run FAST without mortgaging the house.
#54611From: john bennettApr 13, 1993 6:18 AM
I don't think I would say Non-linear (Digital) will NEVER replace high end SFR's or VTR's. Give the h/w s/w people a couple years and we'll be seeing some Incredible stuff I bet (cheap). Its impossible for Anyone to predict the incredible leaps in computer h/w. Too bad the programmers can't even come close to keeping up with the advances in h/w technology. I WANT MY DMI Editmaster, Wish they'ed perfect the s/w after it's hit the streets like Newtek did with the Toaster. ….John
#54651From: Jim S. RoofApr 13, 1993 2:56 PM
I heard somewhere that the Editmaster required the Vivid24 board to operate. It sounds goofy to me but does anyone know for sure?
#54742From: Peter GreciApr 14, 1993 3:23 PM
John, either my msg was ambiguous or you read more into my msgs than I meant. I was talking about DCTV NOT NON LINEAR Editing when I said it would never replace a SFR. At Least I think thats what I was talking about to Erik.
#54383From: Paul ToalApr 10, 1993 3:52 AM
Rodnet- I got some more goodnews/advice. You might want to hold off on the SFR. DCTV is the tool of choice now for lightwave, but just around the corner is the "BOX". These are devices about to be released that spew your 24 bit IFF's out of this "BOX" in real time. All this for around $2000. This is probably the next step in Lightwave magic. Keep an eye on DMI and Impulse. Oh- and a BIG harddrive. –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#54441From: Rodney MassmanApr 10, 1993 9:52 PM
Thanks, yea I'm working on picking up DCTV. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *
#54151From: Wayne ColeApr 7, 1993 3:19 AM
Rodney, I mentioned the 2K number as a rumor. Previous rumors haave had it at the 900-1300 range. As for the features, I doubt you'll haave to unlearn what you already know. More likely there will just be a whole lot more to learn! I cant wait to see it. SOunds like Lee demoed a problem I posed as a upgrade wish way back when – the animated ribbon streamer. Lots of other folkes must have asked for some non-rigid body support too. I think that is the MOST important thing that could be added. And it would not be easy or done in a small amount of code. As for the time, well they are working maily, I believe, in Assembly. For a product of that size the development time doubles when assembly is used over a high end language. However, since it is a realtime I/O device the Toaster probably MUST have assembly drivers. wmc – via Autopilot!
#54188From: Peter GreciApr 7, 1993 4:35 PM
Wayne, quick note here, Lee Stranahan really didn't DEMO a Ribbon Streamer per se but created one with the new Deformation mapping function. Maybe I'm picking Nits here. Anyway he created the Streaming Ribbon in like 30 seconds.
#54231From: Wayne ColeApr 8, 1993 2:24 AM
Peter, Hopefully they will demo it at NAB. The deformation map is probably and easy thing to implement as opposed to like a true kinematic model. But hey – if it looks right and the customer is happy, your there, right? wmc – via Autopilot!
#54258From: Peter GreciApr 8, 1993 5:34 PM
I think it's safe to assume NewTek will show the new version of LW3D at the "Toaster Pavilion" at NAB in Vegas. And yes as long as an Effect "WORKS" and is easy to create who CARES what its called.
#54207From: John GrossApr 7, 1993 10:33 PM
The Toaster is all Assembly while LightWave is still done in C at this point. JG
#54232From: Wayne ColeApr 8, 1993 2:24 AM
Oh! Guess that explains why Lightwave is potentially going to have its upgrade avialble first (if you believe the rumors). Personally, I think they would be better off keeping non-realtime stuff in high level language just for the ease of update and lower depndence on specific programmers for specific code. Actually, it doesn't matter – just that I think assembly is great except when there is LOTS of code and short deadlines. wmc – via Autopilot!
#54287From: Rodney MassmanApr 9, 1993 1:38 AM
I know, it's just the possibility, and more and more the likelihood (I need a dictionary!) of it happening. Lessee now, SFR, then Computer, then New Toaster…..Ugh. -Rodney Massman * On AutoPilot in Beantown, The Buckeye State *