CompuServe Thread

#Single-Framming

31 messages in this thread
#19391From: Anthony RamirezMay 19, 1992 7:40 PM
I would like some dirrection in solving a dilemma I have. I make animations on my A-3000 with DCTV and it has been working great until I started running out of memory playing back the anims I make. So I got more memory, now at 14 megs about to go to 18 megs, but my anims keep getting larger and larger and larger. I am sure that eventually I'll start running out of memory again, and I still have a problem with too much movement causing slow play-back, especially in 4 bit-plane DCTV. Now I am only doing this at home so I don't have a big budget, I know that single-framing is the answer but what would be the best way for `home' use? If I can have a nice set-up I would probably do side-jobs and hopefully eventually get a job at this. I have thought about the 16mm film alternative then transferring to tape but I have just been thinking of another alternative. I am sure that productions houses sell their older decks to get newer ones, would it be worth looking into getting one and a SFController? How much would these decks sell for USED(ball-park figures)? What should I be worried about in these decks? What format should I stay away from? Does anybody have any for sale? Any help in this area would be much appreciated. – via Whap!
#19394From: Peter GreciMay 19, 1992 11:06 PM
one thing I have to warn you about here mate.When it comes to using a VTR for Single Framing Animation it Kicks the SH*T out of the VTR's Mechanism be VERY VERY Careful of buying used Single Frame Accurate VTR's as they may well not be that accurate anymore due to the TREMENDOUS Strain onthe Transport mech that all that rewinding/prerolling puts on the machine.You may want to look to a Service Buraue for yer Single Frame output needs rather than purchasing VERY Expensive Equipment or go with yer 16 mm Film idea.I saw in a Recent Review in Amazing Amiga a comparison of a LOW Priced Film Recorder(about $1800) which is Analog and the Polariod Digital Ci-3000 (about $5000) and both had excellent output,both also have Pin Accurate Motion Picture Film Recorder Backs avail which are PERFECT for Single Framing.So for Approx $3000 total ya can get the Analog Model with the Motion Picture Filmback(guessing on the motion picture film back price it may be considerably less than the $1200 I'm guesssing at here)
#19480From: Anthony RamirezMay 23, 1992 2:53 PM
Thanks for your commets, I know that SF-VTR's are strained alot due to all the rolling and winding especially if you render directly to tape where it just sits there paused half the night. I think if I don't find one I will try the 16mm film route. Has anyone here tried that? Single framming with a Bolex movie camera and then transferring that to tape? – via Whap!
#19494From: Wayne ColeMay 23, 1992 11:47 PM
Anthony, There are a lot of used and "b" stock 3/4 editting decks showing up on the market at the price of some high end consumer S-VHS stuff. Most of it is frame accurate and if there is a pro video repair place nearby, most 3/4" can be upgraded to SP. You might even be able to find one at a pro repair place that has been "overhauled". wmc
#19583From: Anthony RamirezMay 27, 1992 6:40 PM
Wayne, thanks for the info on the Frame accurate decks, I'll ask a friend of mine (who does computer animations) to fill me in on Pro Video Repair shops. I don't know why I hadn't thought of that, thanks again. – via Whap!
#19512From: Peter GreciMay 25, 1992 12:09 AM
Theres a Excellent Article Detailing Single Framing with a Bolex in a Back issue of AVid magazine,I think it was the Janruary issue MIDGARD GRAPHICS, CREATORS OF QUALITY ANIMATION.
#19589From: Anthony RamirezMay 27, 1992 9:27 PM
Yeah I know about the article it is in AVid of Jan 92, I've had a copy of it and that is why I ask if anyone has done it. Just curious to know if it is worth it or not. – via Whap!
#19603From: Peter GreciMay 28, 1992 3:28 PM
I haven't done it myself,tho it's more due to laziness to go find Film for my Camera than anything else.Keep those Anims Coming dude and Don't forget the Amigaworld Contest for Animator's Deadline is in October I believe for entries
#19673From: Anthony RamirezMay 31, 1992 6:10 PM
So, you do have a Bolex camera? I don't have one so before I went out and bought one I was wondering if anyone had done it. It would seem like there is noone here who has done any single-framming with a Bolex 16mm camera. Have you seem any of my anims? If so, I'd like to hear from anybody, whether you like them or not. As far as the contest is concerned I do want to submitt something like my ED-209 anim but I'll have to wait and see if I can get it to look `just right'. – via Whap!
#19686From: Paul ToalJun 1, 1992 12:46 AM
I just finished single-framing with a 16mm Bolex, but from my RGB, the NTSC monitor will be next. A secret- do it at night, with no lights. Did you get any docs with your Bolex? –Paul Whappin' from the Wine Country
#19816From: Anthony RamirezJun 5, 1992 11:11 PM
So you do have a Bolex? I don't have one, I was asking if anyone has used one to single-frame and get thier comments before I make my decision. So, are you satisfied with your set-up? Have you had any problems setting it up or using it? How much does it `really' cost for the film, developing and converting to video? Would you recommend it as an alternative to someone? If you want some docs for your Bolex I assume you can call the company and ask them since they still make them, right? – via Whap!
#19826From: Paul ToalJun 6, 1992 3:41 AM
I just sent off the film for developing, I'll keep you posted. It'll be about $70 for 4 min total to S-VHS tape. –Paul Whappin' from the Wine Country
#19708From: Peter GreciJun 2, 1992 2:11 AM
The only one of your Anims I've seen was the Decloak of the Romulan Warbird which as I already mentioned I thought was VERY well Done. Nope I don't have a Bolex I have an old 8mm Movie Camera
#19817From: Anthony RamirezJun 5, 1992 11:11 PM
I think the De-Cloaking Warbird is the only one I have u/l'ed here when I get some time I'll u/l some more. I must have missed it when you mentioned your comment about my anim, glad you liked it. A friend of mine said that you could single-frame with a old 8mm movie camera but I think you would lose some resolution there. Have you done anything with it, like pretend to be Steven Spielberg, lately? – via Whap!
#19857From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPJun 7, 1992 8:09 PM
I did some experimentation with a Super-8 movie camera (remember those, people? <g>) filming the screen a frame at a time. While it was acceptable for testing an animation, I wouldn't want to try to do anything which needs any kind of quality output with it. Colors often didn't quite match from frame to frame, likewise luminance. And that was only after I got ahold of a camera with an adjustable shutter speed, so I could set it to 1/30th (and sometimes 1/15th, which often produced better results) of a second exposure time. I got much worse results with the first camera I tried which had a fixed shutter speed. Most frames would be exposed brightly in one part and dimly in another. Made for terrible output. –>Steve Bennett
#19891From: Anthony RamirezJun 8, 1992 10:13 PM
Well, I had thought about the quality and thought it might not be so great but I have never owned any movie camera so the only thing I know of is some of those old home movies and we all know how those looked. I really hope that 16mm will give me acceptable results, if I do decide to go with it, since I am really eager to break the `ram' barrier. If you know what I mean. – via Whap!
#19895From: Peter GreciJun 9, 1992 1:40 AM
I haven't used my 8mm film camera in Centuries.Hope to see more of yer Work soon mate
#20006From: Anthony RamirezJun 13, 1992 8:03 PM
>Hope to see more of yer Work soon mate Well I have done some stuff with Listerine and RoboCop (ED-209) but these anims are much too large for BBS(around 10-20 megs of anims for each movie) so the only pratical way would be on video tape, unfortunately. – via Whap!
#19402From: R.SATOHMay 20, 1992 11:32 AM
How about SVHS decks with a flying erase head. I also have similar setup and I know that 18 megs will give you something like 10 seconds of animation. You can cut each of these shot on a video decks and edit some sequences. But I think this will still cost you. <-and the quality will not be so good. I guess you pay for the price. – THANX R.SATOH ->via Whap!
#19481From: Anthony RamirezMay 23, 1992 2:53 PM
I haven't used any SVHS decks, all I got right now is a consumer 4head VCR, and I have been chaining my anims on tape (I'll play 1 anim- pause the tape- play the next one- pause again, ect…) but I think I'll go with 16mm camera since I am only doing this at home. – via Whap!
#19513From: Peter GreciMay 25, 1992 12:11 AM
I do my Anims the same as you dude I'm using 8mm equipment tho As long as ya get a decent Frame Rate in Realtime its not so bad I'm Seriously looking at the Polaroid CI-5000 and Pin Registered Motion Picture Film back for future purchase
#19590From: Anthony RamirezMay 27, 1992 9:28 PM
So you use 8mm video? I am sure it looks a little better than VHS, right? The problem I am having is `decent Frame Rate in Realtime' in some animations and the fact that I am limited to the length of the animation (ram limitations), I can't even think of doing 400 frame anims. If I am going to have to spend lots of money then I will probably get a SF-VTR and do it the `right' way, but if I go that route it won't be for a while, not much `dinero' right now. – via Whap!
#19604From: Peter GreciMay 28, 1992 3:34 PM
8mm's SPECs are better than VHS but in the real world the difference is not Evident looking at it,the only good thing is the 8mm holds up to multi generations a bit better.My Next Machine will be either Hi8 or SVHS or Possibly if I can geta good deal on a used 3/4" Umatic If yer Having trouble with Frame Rate with DCTV anims make sure ya use 3 bit pics instead of 4 bit pics it makes a HUGE difference in speed and no percievable difference to picture quality.I use ADAM to convert down to 3 bit(I wish Imagine gave ya the option of 3 or 4 bits) I have 9 megs but only a measly 512k Chip Ram and have done 600 Frame DCTV anims no problem at all.It also depends on how BUSY the screen is druing the Animation.I try to limit myself to 3 Starships,Stars(scrolling) possibly a planet(usually left stationary) or a Starbase,I also tend to intersperse 2D animation in my Animations as well,such as First showing 3 Fighters in Formation,then Show 2D "Cockpit" view out the window with Status reports then show fighters again etc MIDGARD GRAPHICS, CREATORS OF QUALITY ANIMATION.
#19628From: Vic WagnerMay 29, 1992 3:47 PM
Speaking of 'Hi8' have you found any reasonable 'table top (i.e. NOT camcorder)' units? I can find several Hi8 camcorders around, but have seen only ONE desktop unit. Not that I mind using the 'corder, but it doesn't look like a particularly good 'edit deck'
#19631From: Peter GreciMay 29, 1992 3:56 PM
Ya might wanna take a gander at the NEW Sony CVD-1000 Hi8 machine It supposedly can be mounted in any 5 1/4 inch Drive bay on a computer it is made Specifically for DTV fiends According to reports I've heard Best Price I've seen thus Far was Computability with a price of $1429 Delivered.Theres also the EVO 9700 or 9800 I forget exact model # that has 2 Hi8 Decks in it as well as a built in Edit Controller One Deck Is Playback only I believe.Dunno the price on that Jammy tho Hope this Helps ya Mate MIDGARD GRAPHICS, CREATORS OF QUALITY ANIMATION.
#19639From: Charles FigueiredoMay 29, 1992 7:38 PM
Peter: > Ya might wanna take a gander at the NEW Sony CVD-1000 Hi8 machine It > supposedly can be mounted in any 5 1/4 inch Drive bay on a computer it is Do you know if this machine is capable of accurate single frame recording? Regards Charles
#19643From: Jim SteeleMay 29, 1992 9:00 PM
Re: the CVD1000 and single-framing… I called Sony on it, they said no. Jim
#19710From: Peter GreciJun 2, 1992 2:17 AM
I don't think the CVD-1000 is a Single Frame capable unit in the sense of using for Animation,but I believe it is Accurate Single Frame for Editing
#19726From: Charles FigueiredoJun 2, 1992 10:43 PM
Peter: > I don't think the CVD-1000 is a Single Frame capable unit in the sense of > using for Animation,but I believe it is Accurate Single Frame for Editing Thanks very much for the quick response. What's the difference between the two: single frame capable for animation purposes and single frame accurate for editing? I think this has been the source of my confusion for the last two months. Different people have have given opposite answers to my queries about the single frame capabilities of various machines. I look forward to your clarifying response! Regards Charles
#19648From: Chris GentschMay 30, 1992 4:31 AM
Vic, Sony makes several industrial Hi8decks that are excellant, including one specifically designed for single framing, I believe it is the EVO9650. I sam it demoed at a show doing a great job. I use the othr sony decks like the EVO9800 and 9700s with good results for a variety of editing purposes, but usually edit to and single frame to Betacam, which is really your best bet for pro work. The new 2800s are under $15,000 and make great single framers and with built in editing, are the basis of a good editing system with inputs of just about any kind. Expensive, yes, but less than half the price of betacam last year. ///////e
#19674From: Anthony RamirezMay 31, 1992 6:10 PM
Well I have been using 3bit-planes but I think there is a large difference in image quality between the two. In 3bit-planes there is color banding in gradiated areas, whereas in 4bit-planes you don't see any. I may use 4bit-plane if there is going to be minimal movements but usually that is not the case for me. It sounds like you do anims the same as me. My latest anim I have done is of ED-209 from RoboCop and it is a combination of about 12 anims some of which where done in D-Paint(sensors and read-outs). Btw, What is that `MIDGARD GRAPHICS, CREATORS OF QUALITY ANIMATION'? – via Whap!