CompuServe Thread

#Internet CD-ROM list

7 messages in this thread
#47670From: Jim WhitlowMay 4, 1993 5:48 PM
RE: " It gets very tedious reading the _same_ text a dozen times or more. " Who says you have to?? As your online message reading skill grows you will doubtless learn to breeze right past quotes that you do not need. If this communication was vocal and folks quoted quotes you'd have little choice but to listen through it if you wished to remain in the conversation. But since the messages are written skilled readers can quickly scan to the dialog that they await (if any). Now, how long did it take you to grasp the quote at the beginning of this note? If you read it word for word and considered it likewise you are indeed in trouble <g>. Other readers, though, may need to read more carefully in order to understand my message. Also, without the quote I'd likely have spend just as many words establishing what my response was aimed at. Relax a bit, please. —GeM
#47741From: Adrian Godfrey [D]May 5, 1993 12:43 PM
Jim, The way you quoted in your CI$ message was fine. That ought to be sufficient as a reminder, but verbatim quoting of _everything_ that's gone before is the irritating part. Sure I don't have to actually _read_ it, but I _do_ have to pay for the download (and the phone call) plus network surcharges if it's the 'wrong' time of day. Just in case, it's the Internet we're talking about here and not Compuserve. There are lots of things, that I skip past on CI$, but at least it's _new_ text coming through on the downloads. Best Adrian
#47884From: Jim WhitlowMay 7, 1993 6:54 AM
Hey, I didn't mean to imply that I don't understand, Adrian. In fact I do, especially where obvious laziness is involved. "Some" individuals are simply too lazy to piecemeal their quoting. Properly done, piecemeal quoting quite often _shortens_ the amount of overall text. Piecemeal can simply be one sentence or phrase that cue's the memory of readers, or several quotes tiered into the text body as appropriate. We all know, do we not, that simple cut and pasting of the entire message being replied too is significantly easier and often quicker than carefully selecting the appropriate parts. Selecting appropriate phrases requires additional mental activity on the part of the writer. Hang in there, my friend. —GeM PS: You know, we have a lot of whiners here on CompuServe. Most of them are concerned with anything that pads their bills. Hey, I understand even though I can easily afford any amount of CIS'ing, but some of 'em pad the bills of others via their whining. Heck, they often whine about sign-offs, humor, and even, <shameface>, post scripts.
#47953From: Adrian Godfrey [D]May 8, 1993 4:52 AM
Hi Jim, Just takes a bit of thinking<g>. I hope my last few messages didn't give the impression of whining. That wasn't what I intended. I was just trying to show what I had experienced with the Internet mailing lists I was a member of from time to time. You'll learn a lot from reading the lists, it just takes time<g>, which there's always never enough of. Best Adrian
#48083From: Jim WhitlowMay 10, 1993 10:35 AM
RE: " I hope my last few messages didn't give the impression of whining. " No problem, Adrian. If any problem, it was probably mine. You see, I have endured a great deal of whining about message quotes from numerous individuals. Ironically, I've often lost sight of what whiner's were talking about due to _their_ lack of quoting cue's <G>. Hey, I carry on quite a number of conversations at any given time. Happy Trails, —GeM
#48144From: Adrian Godfrey [D]May 11, 1993 3:31 AM
Jim, Multitasking eh<bg>? I've cut my CI$ forums down a bit recently, but they're still in the 15 to 20 range although I don't visit them all every day. Adrian
#48167From: Jim WhitlowMay 11, 1993 11:52 AM
You got it! Sounds like you are more of a CompuServe junkie than I, however. Happy Trails, —GeM