CompuServe Thread

GIFDXF

6 messages in this thread
#102088From: New Riders PublishingMay 16, 1994 7:33 PM
Steven, >> We asked what the problem was and they said that their staff couldn't >> maintain the proper aspect ratio when the images were scaled in >> Pagemaker. I said simple, "just hold down the shift key while dragging the >> corner handle." No Go. Well, it turns out this isn't exactly 100% true — although it is a factor in a way. While it may seem like a simple thing to you to resize a figure, our production department does over 20 books per month and runs 24 hours a day. This high volume makes it necessary to stick to standards. Every exception to the standard layout causes a delay and can introduce errors. When all the delays are added together, it could cause things to slip by days (or worse — weeks). Delays are death in the computer book industry. It caused little or no delay in the book's production to have you make all of the images conform to 800×600. Think of it as making sure you get your royalty checks as soon as possible <g>. I don't like defending the production department (they make us jump through some really silly hoops on other issues), but you made me do it. <g> I hope everyone is enjoying Inside 3D Studio. Keep a look out for 3D Studio Special Effects this summer — it's hot. ____kevin
#102238From: Steven ElliottMay 17, 1994 10:39 AM
Ahhhh, There you are Kevin! As a CAD consultant and a former CAD manager I am quite familiar with the importance of standards. I am also familiar with the difference between a production standard and ignorance of the multiple techniques to achieve that standard. Proportionally scaling a pre-cropped graphic and cropping a fixed scale graphic are two different techniques to achieve the same standard. It's just that the production staff knows only the one way. I believe the term that you used to describe the production staff at that time was, "a bunch of trained monkeys." I know now the level of expertise that I'm working with and I can work around it. > It caused little or no delay in the book's production to have you make all > of the images conform to 800×600. Tell that to our wives who didn't see Phil or me for a couple of weeks while we maintained our writing schedule AND reshot all of those graphics. It may not have delayed your schedule; it really #@$#%# ours. The important point is that "Inside 3D Studio" was completed and the final product turned out pretty darn good! As an architect I know that nothing of value ever gets built without a lot of horror stories and screw-ups occuring on all sides. What counts is the quality of the end product and NRP does deserve some credit for publishing a good book. Still friends? <G> Steven
#102292From: New Riders PublishingMay 17, 1994 2:50 PM
Steven, I've been here all along. I'm a big-time lurker. I knew that line about reshooting the figs would bring back the pain (he said grimacing). Being single, that project completely killed my previously shaky social life. It still has not recovered one bit. (Can you hear the violins?) I hope you, Phill, and your wives are enjoying the fruit of your labor. At least you guys get royalties. I didn't get one extra cent or one minute of comp-time for my overtime. (Boy! Those violins are getting really loud!) Greg only gets the publicity. >> Still friends? <G> Without a doubt! You guys were great to work with and you did a fine job. You were always professional and took pride in your work. It's great to have you, Phill, and Gregg working with me again on the 3D Studio Special Effects book.
#102352From: Steven ElliottMay 17, 1994 6:15 PM
Yeah, I was a little suprised at how intense that old wound felt when it opened up again. I'll have to go out and get drunk tonight just to ease the pain <G>. As for enjoying the fruits of our labor, my contract says the fruit won't ripen for another month or so… but it should be sweet! Tell Rusty that you're being abused and that you deserve a raise! Huge amounts of overtime, no bonuses, no comp-time, you know if you slashed your salary by 50% you could almost qualify as an architect.
#102482From: Phillip L. MillerMay 18, 1994 6:25 AM
Gee, I didn't find out about this erroneosly titled thread until last night and it looks like I missed all the fun. And to think, no one even brought up the issue of someone loosing TWO copies of TWO image packed Syquest cartridges! <g> – whoops, was that anther old wound?<g>
#102900From: New Riders PublishingMay 19, 1994 4:08 PM
All I can say is that I'm glad it wasn't me! <g> (Or you guys.) ____kevin