#NEWTEK SPEAKS
4 messages in this thread
While I'm not Newtek, your letter did catch my eye.
While some sections of Europe are infamous for pirating software, we never
realized you folks were also pirating the whole darn computer. <grin>
Sorry Bub, but there are not 16 million Amigas floating around Europe. The
Amiga hasn't reached the 16 million mark, (of which a large percentage were
500's), let alone 16 million 2000/3000/4000 machines that could handle the
Toaster.
Were there actually 16 million Amiga users who wanted to buy a Toaster, Newtek
would be far larger and richer than they are today.
As to why Newtek has not come out with a PAL based Toaster, is unknown to me.
One would tend to think the total PAL market, would equal the NTSC market, but
perhaps there isn't the demand, or there may be some fatal flaw in the chips
Newtek selected to use, that prohibits doing a native PAL version. (Or it
could simply be arrogance, in believeing they are the only solution, and you'll
take what you get.) I doubt incompetence is at the root of the matter.
(Another possiblity is that as C='s position deteriorated, Newtek has been
preoccupied with developing a survival plan/machine.)
^^^
( )
( )
( )
(( )))
((( (( ))) )))
(((( ))))
((( )))
( !!!!!! )
!!!!!!
!!!!
I hope I got the !!
right house. !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
_______________
Perhaps making a PAL Toaster isn't easy. I think they depended on NTSC's
quirks to make the Toaster work. Pulling the same tricks with PAL may not have
been possible.
It would have required substantially more bandwidth to do the DVEs in
color in PAL, so a PAL Toaster would have been a lot more expensive.
What I wonder about is whether NewTek will be able to survive once NTSC
starts being replaced. Admittedly, it might not be canned for a very very
long time, but it still may happen relatively soon, and there really
aren't any tricks to pull with digital streams and MPEG – a VTASC
derivative just won't be possible.
Paul