#3D Studio Pros Needed
8 messages in this thread
We have an urgent need for SEVERAL Experienced 3D Studio Pros. Environment
building (ie interiors, landscapes, cityscapes, etc.) expertise a plus.
Please call Mike or Doug at 212/627-0970. This is a NY metro opportunity only
(sorry no tele-commuting!). Our Game is taking off now and we have to staff up
immediately.
Hurry!
>> Sorry no tele-commuting! <<
That's too bad as most of the best 3DS'ers are in California. <g>
-JE
I think I might learn to resent that ! (not)
Some of us 3D'ers live over here in the greenery and relaxation of England
'don't you know' – 'eh – what !'
(drag on stereo types !)
Yes I Know that almost Zero work may be seen on the nets, but for me at least,
copywright resides with the employer (downer dudes !) which prevents our best
work from being seen !
AndyP 😉
>> I think I might learn to resent that! (not) <<
Andy, I worded that very carefully. <g>
I said _most_ of the best animators live in California.
That does not imply the best animators only live in California.
The fact is there are more 3DS'ers per Capita in California than anywhere. And
given that there is strong industry here for animation there are quite a few
"best" ones.
The fact is there are "best" 3DS'ers all over the World. But as there are so
many 3DS'ers in California and many many "best" ones it seems foolish to
restrict to a specific geographic area. I'd like to see this psychological
barrier broken down. I have successfully tele-computed cross country and I see
it as the wave of the future. I'd like to see more management take the view
with corporate downsizing etc. that this is a viable alternative. This would
benefit people like you in England, or those in Germany, Africa or wherever, as
well as those of us residing in California. Alot of people just don't want to
give up the control, but its more a question of what type of control. Animators
are a pretty independent bunch anyway. And with ISDN or T2 its not unrealistic
to have global reach. This was my point really. But I couldn't resist taking a
poke at a New Yorker saying local talent only. And very accurately I might add.
<g>
>> Yes I know almost ZERO work appears on the nets, therefore the best work
can't be seen. <<
There seems to be a lot of difference of opinion on this but I totally concur
with your observations. I have had many clients who will not allow me to show
work outside that I've done for them. Other people act like this is the
exception not the rule. Not in my experience.
-JE
Tele computing ….
ahhhhhh, bliss !
no jibe etc taken at all, nice to tap into threads where acceptance of
technological solutions appears commonplace and not rare.
AndyP 😉
John:
I did not mean to say that tele-commuting was not possible, its just that we
needed tapes of some sample work that day for a presentation. Also this will
be a very hands on project and will require much testing and redoing, etc. so
we sort of wanted someone who could work in house (or close to it). And
finally there is the small consideration of the cost of a T2 or ISDN connection
and the equipment that goes with it–it don't work on a low budget (or so I
have been lead to believe).
J.G. you took my pot shot very well. <g> I understand all the reasons you've
given for wanting to use local talent. However, I'd like to express the fact
that ASOFT is a great resource with a fairly large talent pool and people
willing to work with you to get the job done. Unfortuneately for you in your
circumstance a lot of us are in California. But I don't think this should be
consider a limitation normally.
I understand the comment that "this will require much testing and redoing,
etc." But often this is used as an excuse for poor planning, or for lack of
understanding of what a contractor is getting into. As a independent I would
want to steer clear of this.
Another sounder which was posted recently went along these lines…
>> XYZ company is looking to establish a group of independent creative people,
who will each be responsible for an assigned animation sequence. We will
provide you with all the information, storyboards, and descriptions necessary
to begin. <<
This is the approach to take if you're really interested in taping into this
resource pool.
>> its just that we needed tapes of some work that day for a presentation.
This goes back to planning. Deadlines like that are unworkable and as the name
implies "deadly". <g>
>> it don't work on a low budget. <<
The best way to make a low budget work, is to pre-plan everything in advance
that way you will get the maximum benefit for the effort. Unfortuneately a lot
of contractors aren't willing to take the time to do this, and expect the
independent to work on a project and take up the slack. If its done on a "per
job" basis, this will kill the animator(s).
FYI ISDN typically runs about $28 a month for the line. Initial hook-up runs
about $200 but many phone companys will amortizing this over a two year period
with the cost being ultimately born by the local telephone company. The data
throughput is typically greater than 4 X's as high as 14.4 All things
considered its a very cost effective way to tap into this great resource pool.
The other cost is the ISDN equipment which is a little high but again over a
two year period is fairly inconsequential. The phone companys are really trying
to push this technology, so deals can be made.
This is just general information if you are interested in tapping into this
great resource and maximizing its potential. I think you would find its well
worth your while.
Thanks for your response and your initial inquiry,
-JE
Hi J.G.,
Interesting concept "NY metro opportunity only"….., but wait, what was that
sound?
A country boy whispers, "The gun goes off, the foot is severely wounded!"
Question #1: Why didn't you put an add in a "NY metro" paper, i.e. computer
animators wanted?
OR
Question #2: Give me a compelling reason to move to "NY metro"? Fame, fortune
or the ever popular "excellent opportunity"?
Bryce W.
CF/X Image, Inc. at the big red stick animation outpost down south!