#AniStudio playback
9 messages in this thread
Does Animator Studio play sound flicks smoother and faster in Windows than does
the Windows Player using .FLC and .WAV files with a script?
>> Does Animator Studio play sound flicks smoother and faster in Windows than
does the Windows Player using .FLC and .WAV files with a script? <<
lots of variables here… how big are your files. 🙂 -dave
Typical values for some 2-minute animations are:
FLC: 10 to 20 MB total over about 2,000 frames, average delta or frame update
values on the order of 5 to 10 KB, playing fullscreen smoothly in DOS at
640×480 at 15 fps.
WAV: Corresponding 8-bit soundtrack uncompressed at about 5 MB.
Production such as these play smoothly in sync in Windows player only if I
reduce the resolution (i.e., screen size) of the flic to about 1/3 and played
the sound from a ram drive.
Hardware: 486-DX50 ISA bus.
That previous information was supplied in answer to "Dave" after I asked
whether Ani Studio plays faster in Windows than Ani Pro. Why did he not
respond? Is he only able to give the typical shallow resonses usually found on
this virtually useless forum?
hi stephen. 🙂
#: 174001 S4/Animator Studio/Pro [AMMEDIA]
06-Jun-95 20:14:52
Sb: #171529-AniStudio playback
Fm: Stephen Arthur 74072,402
To: Stephen Arthur 74072,402 <—- posting to self
That previous information was supplied in answer to "Dave" after I asked
whether Ani Studio plays faster in Windows than Ani Pro. Why did he not
respond? Is he only able to give the typical shallow resonses usually found
on this virtually useless forum?
not knowing which dave you are posting to (there are at least 25 i can think of
here regularly, making sure you get a response back on your question in case.
AStudio does not play back most flics with the speed of Anipro (PharLap is very
quick). i typically look for messages i personally should respond to when they
are posted directly to me. i figured, since this was posted to self, that you
had answered your question. <g>
my CIS ID, should you wish any assistance, is 76260,453. more than happy to try
to answer your questions or point you in the right direction. please help us out
by pointing your posts in the right direction too.
as for the typical shallow responses, a response is sometimes only as good as
the question being asked. please repost any questions you are unsatisfied with
(in responses) and we'll take another crack at them.
as for the forum being useless, no one is forcing you to use it stephen. 😉
lotta good and knowledgible folks here who don't "owe" you a response and
probably don't take too kindly to being labeled as such. either way, the spirit
of the forum is to share information and solutions with one another in a
constructive manner. we hope this is your intent here too.
🙂
-dave
Pay attention — the information WAS POSTED TO "DAVE" in direct reply to his
question on ID 73204,3522, May 23. I replied with the requested information
and got no response after over 2 weeks.
The Dave I responded to is at NAAUG — if you bothered to follow back the
message trail you'll see what happened, instead of trying to blame me for the
lack of communication.
>> The Dave I responded to is at NAAUG — if you bothered to follow back the
message trail you'll see what happened, instead of trying to blame me for the
lack of communication. <<
stephen, NAAUG (the North American Autodesk User Group) is not a support
outfit… they are a user group. the address represents over 35 volunteers,
several of them "Daves". if someone posted you a message, it was most likely to
try to help you, not to upset you.
whenever you post a question here in public forum, anyone has the potential to
answer it. if one person responds, that does not mean that person assumes the
sole accountability for "forum response". sometimes messages don't get answered
at all (depending on the tone or clarity of the question). the sysops and
section leaders try to get a response out to everyone in a timely manner, but
this doesn't always happen. it often helps to have several responses on a given
question. it is equally in the hands of the poster to repost the question if
answers have not been adequately helpful. take this example:
poster: i have a problem.
answer: sorry to hear that. i had that problem once too.
no resolution, but anyone tracking the thread will say "hey, he got an answer".
there isn't any feature that allows people here to know that you are still
waiting on a "better" answer. and no, expecting sysops to reread 3000 messages
a day every day to see if anything's still hanging is pretty impossible.
what i usually recommend, when someone posts a question, is that he/she keep an
eye on "his/her thread"..if an answer comes in but is not adequate, post a
response which notifies the responder and others that you are still waiting for
a hopeful answer. if no answer happens in a day or so, there is nothing wrong
with reposting the question as a new thread (which makes the question very
obvious to all including sysops that it is "unanswered"). on the other hand, if
i post a message and get no answer for a month and then come back furious that
"i've had to wait a month"… who's really accountable? <g>
the forums are a collaborative voluntary effort, supported in a big way by
professional volunteers. the premise is for people from all walks of life to
help each other reach resolutions to problems. it takes proactivity on both
sides of a question/answer to move ahead. when a message doesn't get a
response, there are several possibilities:
a) others don't see the question (people speed through sections)
b) others don't understand the question (despite accurate lingo)
c) others don't have an answer (assume someone else might)
d) others think the question has been answered (even though incompletely)
e) no one wants to answer (waste of their time)
if everyone who frequented this forum worked for Autodesk, i could understand
the frustration… but that isn't the case here. in fact, the majority of
people who help find solutions to problems posted are just professional who
have fun doing so.
this is the nature of most forums. there's nothing unique about this one in
these regards. and most forums i frequent wouldn't be writing out a lengthy
reply like this one to explain these realities to you. people typically try to
respond when they feel their efforts are appreciated.
depending on tone of question, silence can also be an answer.
'nuff said on my part. if i see you post a question here, i'll continue to do
what i can to answer it or see that it gets answered by someone else. for what
it's worth, my apologies if i have contributed to your frustration in using the
forum. it was not intentional.
-dave
Stephen,
Sorry your having problems. I hope to turn this forum into something you can
say good things about.
Of course Ani Studio does not play faster under Windows than Ani Pro.
Ani Pro is the fastest thing on the planet. Dos with Pharlap is an extremely
mature place, while Windows is just hitting puberty.
Here's some tips on Playback. If you open up the Ani Studio file browser and
select a file, then hit the playback button, media player is used to play the
animation. It plays back whether flic, 8 bit avi or whatever.
If you load a file into Ani Studio, its turned into a 24 bit lossless avi file.
This file is not intended for playback, but rather for painting and
compositing. When you finish your work, save out a version with another CODEC,
like Indeo 3.2 or Cinepak if you want 24 bit, MicroSoft RLE or FLC if you want
8 bit. Play those with the browser, or Soundlab or the player for fast
playback.
You can also get really fast playback via SMACKER from RAD Software.
They compress flc files down to 1/4 their original size and then its zoooom.
Check it out. They're in Salt Lake City, Utah.
–marK