#Instructor Certification
2 messages in this thread
Ken,
I applaud the goal of getting ALL AutoCAD instructors, not just those in ATCs,
certified. But such universal standardization is doomed from the start. Is
there ANY sort of universal standardization for ANY type of instruction in the
US? In fact, are there any companies or schools that are truly using/teaching
any universal standards? Maybe a few. But imagine the chore to get all
companies and schools to teach the same standards, THE SAME WAY!
Autodesk will have its hands full just trying to police its own efforts to get
all ATC instructors to even take the AC exam, much less become certified. As I
stated in a message a few weeks ago, it is a difficult, nay almost impossible
task to get all ATCs to adhere to published policy. For example, how many ATCs
are members of Compuserve? How many do you see talking here?
Unless you are capable of enforcing something, don't make it a rule. Make it
voluntary, with enticements. "If you get certified, you will have the benefits
of…"
Standardization is fine to a point. But blanket standardization must be
subject to intense scrutiny. Such as the ill-conceived effort to develop a US
standard for education, testing, certification etc. How many states have this
now?
Shoe
Shoe:
Thanks for the insight. I agree on the point that it would be impossible (and
impracticle) to develop a standardized method of instruction for AutoCAD.
However, I don't think that's our goal here. I believe that we (notice the WE)
are attempting a method of ensuring that all the current and future AutoCAD
teachers/instructors/trainers are delivering the message clearly and
effectively, and they are truly capable of delivering it. How that message gets
delivered is gonna depend on the person delivering it, as well as the people in
the audience receiving it. There is no such thing as a "standard teaching
method" that applies to all audiences and teachers.
On requiring all ATC's to be certified, I would agree that I don't think this
is a "must do" kind of thing that gets added to the growing P & P manual (that
nobody reads anyway). I think the existing ACE requirement is sufficent
(assuming it gets enforced). But, as you say, we should make it clear that if
an ATC wants to be competitive, they should get certification for ALL their
instructors.
Good to hear from you on this. Keep 'em coming.
-KLF