CompuServe Thread

Film Recording

4 messages in this thread
#115663From: John TissavaryAug 2, 1994 4:49 AM
There are quite a few film recording services around. Check some of the trade mags like POST, Producer, or Film & Video. Most are located in Los Angeles. I just found one in Canada that's cheaper, though, and their sample film looked quite good, but I'm not a REAL expert in that field. Let me know if you want more details. John Tissavary (LUNA cie)
#116468From: Stephen ArthurAug 5, 1994 1:24 AM
Please let me know about the Canadian film recording service — I live in Vancouver, B.C. I'm most interested in analog recorders, not super high res SGI stuff. In fact I'm wondering about buying one of those, but no idea of the cost. (Especially something that can record from flics, rather than series of gifs, tgas, etc.) Thanks a lot for the response — yours is the first knowledgeable response I have received after many forum queries several months ago.
#116727From: John TissavaryAug 6, 1994 1:57 PM
I think we've crossed our wires here, Stephen. Film recording I'm talking about is for doing super hi-res work. I was talking about rendering to 2k pixels per frame and sending it to a service bureau to put on 35mm movie film. Definitley not cheap, definitely not simple, and definitely not real-time (maybe with a few Crays <g>). For getting flics to video tape cheaply, your best choice is a scan converter that can hook up to your VGA card via some sort of pass through connector. These things cost less than $500, typically. I've never used one, so I can't say much else about it. John Tissavary (LUNA cie, inc)
#116910From: Stephen ArthurAug 7, 1994 8:29 PM
I can't tell what the source of the confusion is, but I was not talking about video output, which I already do. Also, video transfered to film is limited to about 300 lines. I want to do 1024 by 768 pixels per frame, which would be a total of 786K pixels per frame — so I also don't know what you mean when you say "super hi-res" at "2k pixels per frame". I was also not talking about real time. Perhaps you would like to clear up the confusion. (I'm looking to 16 mm film output because its already higher res than the computer frame, so 35 mm is unnecessary).