CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Amiga at Work

#Fast_File_System

15 messages in this thread
#90132From: Oct 19, 1987 6:51 PM
Bill, WP is made to be flexible, as you mentioned, most of the stuff you want to do could be done with macros. I don't think it's a good idea to have directories with more than 20-30 files, makes things hard to find. That's just my personal opinion. We are looking at improving the file requestor, but don't count on it in the near future. // \X/ Lynn
#90256From: Ben BlishOct 19, 1987 11:38 PM
Lynn: the "addressing" restriction has to do with the fact that the A1000 amiga box was defined to use only the lower half of the memory space, mostly. That caused some people (Obviously trained at Intel and in the employ of IBM) to use the upper bits of the address register for flag bits. <Gack>. When CSA's (for instance) '020 box was added, with it's 32 bit pc and it's 32 bit ram in a "new" location that used those bits showed up, said programs took a defacation. There is a warning against it in some of the 1.2 dox, and that's what he was refferring to. OR should be. –Ben–
#90256From: Ben BlishOct 19, 1987 11:38 PM
Lynn: the "addressing" restriction has to do with the fact that the A1000 amiga box was defined to use only the lower half of the memory space, mostly. That caused some people (Obviously trained at Intel and in the employ of IBM) to use the upper bits of the address register for flag bits. <Gack>. When CSA's (for instance) '020 box was added, with it's 32 bit pc and it's 32 bit ram in a "new" location that used those bits showed up, said programs took a defacation. There is a warning against it in some of the 1.2 dox, and that's what he was refferring to. OR should be. –Ben–
#90266From: Steve AhlstromOct 20, 1987 12:05 AM
"…[not] a good idea to have directories with more than 20-30 files…"? Shouldn't that be left up to the individual and not a software product? Please see RJ Mical's file requester in DL 10 — it's an excellent implementation.
#90291From: Ben BlishOct 20, 1987 1:18 AM
Or go look at the requester in Scheme — it's better. <grin> –Ben–
#90291From: Ben BlishOct 20, 1987 1:18 AM
Or go look at the requester in Scheme — it's better. <grin> –Ben–
#90266From: Steve AhlstromOct 20, 1987 12:05 AM
"…[not] a good idea to have directories with more than 20-30 files…"? Shouldn't that be left up to the individual and not a software product? Please see RJ Mical's file requester in DL 10 — it's an excellent implementation.
#90391From: Jim VentolaOct 20, 1987 9:47 PM
Lynn-If you get the chance, look at the current issue of the AMIGAN. They have some nice things to say about your file requestors. NEARLY perfect, they say. And they wonder why other programmers insist on reading in directories before being asked. It is a good publication and they promise a review of WP for next issue. As an English teacher, I especially applaud them for crusading for manual writers to take the time to learn the difference between "it's" and "its"–something all too many technically oriented people don't bother about. // Jim
#90397From: Nick Sullivan/TransactorOct 20, 1987 10:17 PM
Jim, just want to echo your applause for the Amigan, the least pretentious and least known of the Amiga-specific publications, and the only one I always read cover to cover. Dick Barnes (the editor) writes the most thorough articles and reviews I've seen for our computer, and he neither pulls punches nor reserves praise. If I was selling software in the Amiga marketplace, I'd take Barnes' review of it very seriously indeed. Anyone out there who hasn't seen his magazine (which looks like a well-made newsletter but far outclasses that term) should try to get a look at it. (BTW, its full name is "The Amigan Apprentice and Journeyman", for those who didn't catch that in Jim's previous message.) Nick
#90413From: Rodney SomersteinOct 21, 1987 12:15 AM
Could you please post info on how to subscribe to the Amigan? Rodney Somerstein 73167,2165
#90429From: Nick Sullivan/TransactorOct 21, 1987 6:23 AM
The Amigans P.O. Box 411, Hatteras, N.C. 27943 Membership (they call it that rather than a subscription) is $24 US per year in the US and Canada, $34 US elsewhere. The membership form in the AA&J asks for the number of drives and the type of printer you use, besides your name and address. There is also a space to fill in which issue you want to start with… I don't have the latest one here, but I believe they're up to something like vol 2, iss 2 (6 issues / volume = 1 year). Nick
#90429From: Nick Sullivan/TransactorOct 21, 1987 6:23 AM
The Amigans P.O. Box 411, Hatteras, N.C. 27943 Membership (they call it that rather than a subscription) is $24 US per year in the US and Canada, $34 US elsewhere. The membership form in the AA&J asks for the number of drives and the type of printer you use, besides your name and address. There is also a space to fill in which issue you want to start with… I don't have the latest one here, but I believe they're up to something like vol 2, iss 2 (6 issues / volume = 1 year). Nick
#90413From: Rodney SomersteinOct 21, 1987 12:15 AM
Could you please post info on how to subscribe to the Amigan? Rodney Somerstein 73167,2165
#90397From: Nick Sullivan/TransactorOct 20, 1987 10:17 PM
Jim, just want to echo your applause for the Amigan, the least pretentious and least known of the Amiga-specific publications, and the only one I always read cover to cover. Dick Barnes (the editor) writes the most thorough articles and reviews I've seen for our computer, and he neither pulls punches nor reserves praise. If I was selling software in the Amiga marketplace, I'd take Barnes' review of it very seriously indeed. Anyone out there who hasn't seen his magazine (which looks like a well-made newsletter but far outclasses that term) should try to get a look at it. (BTW, its full name is "The Amigan Apprentice and Journeyman", for those who didn't catch that in Jim's previous message.) Nick
#90391From: Jim VentolaOct 20, 1987 9:47 PM
Lynn-If you get the chance, look at the current issue of the AMIGAN. They have some nice things to say about your file requestors. NEARLY perfect, they say. And they wonder why other programmers insist on reading in directories before being asked. It is a good publication and they promise a review of WP for next issue. As an English teacher, I especially applaud them for crusading for manual writers to take the time to learn the difference between "it's" and "its"–something all too many technically oriented people don't bother about. // Jim