CompuServe Thread

Hi-res background prob

11 messages in this thread
#194600From: Loren C. BucklinOct 9, 1995 5:02 PM
Thanks for the reply Dave. Here goes . . .Yes, we are supplying a printer with hi-rez image. We need to output the GIF we have. What is the best way to re-render it?. It doesn't exist as an object file. Can we map it to a flat object in 3dstudio? Thanks Loren
#194986From: Brett ShermanOct 11, 1995 9:42 PM
I just jumped in on the thread, so I'm not sure what exactly you are talking about. But, I also had a problem with the background image file in rendering. The problem was this. 3D Studio wants the background image to be the same size as the file you are rendering to. If not, it chops the image or shows a blank space. To remedy this use Video post. Instead of designating a background in the 3D Editor, put your background on the first line of Video Post and put the 3D scene on the second line. Then 3D Studio will resize the background to the size of the output image (assuming you set the VP properties of the background image correctly). If this wasn't your problem, sorry.
#196079From: Loren C. BucklinOct 19, 1995 8:50 AM
One of the more interesting solutions. We are set to try it soon. Thanks Brett. Loren
#194990From: david W. mennenohOct 11, 1995 10:13 PM
Well Loren, I'd say you're out of luck. No, you can't map the image and have 3DS resize it. I mean it would work but it will still look bad. It would be the same as resizing it in Photoshop or anything else. 3DS will typically make a resize look nicer than photoshop but not enough to compensate for what you're doing. Although I don't know much about it, and have never tried it, there is software available that's supposed to accomplish very nice resizing using fractal techniques. You may want to contact Iterated Systems about it. Or maybe someone else will have more info. When you're doing stuff for print keep the following in mind: You always want to produce work at the intended output resolution. LPI is normally 1/2 of the required DPI. So, if you want to print an image using a 133 line screen at 4×5 inches – you would need to supply an image that was 1064×1330 pixels. Your printer should be able to tell you the exact formula. Otherwise you could have someone recreate the image, depending on what it was, at the required resolution. Hope this helps. DM
#195008From: EDWARD HARVEYOct 12, 1995 1:15 AM
<< there is software available that's supposed to accomplish very nice resizing using fractal techniques. You may want to contact Iterated Systems about it. I tried it for just the purpose of resizing images several times larger and sent it back when the results wernt much better than Photoshop. In fact the resulting artifacts are pretty obvious. This software ( I cant recall the namre ) is good for compressing images though. Ed
#195179From: david W. mennenohOct 13, 1995 12:00 AM
Thanks for the feedback Ed. DM
#196077From: Loren C. BucklinOct 19, 1995 8:50 AM
Thanks for your help Ed. Loren
#195039From: David RhotenOct 12, 1995 10:26 AM
Dave & Loren: Depending on the image, and how much you're blowing it up, yes — Iterated Systems' "Images Incorporated" does a GREAT job. For example, I took the small "forest w/ stump" portion of the first uploaded sample of WorldBuilder (about 1/4 of a 640×480 image) and used Images Inc to blow it up to 800×600 for use as my Win3.1x/NT wallpaper (much better in NT w/ support for 24-bit wallpaper!). I did run a sharpen filter on it afterwards, but as I say, depends on the image and the enlargement % (it can also reduce the res of an image if you need). The latest version is Images Incorporated 4.0 (what a dumb name!), and can be had for around $100 mail order. Check out MicroWarehouse (they're available online on CIS) — I think they carry it. Dave
#195180From: david W. mennenohOct 13, 1995 12:02 AM
Thanks for the info Dave. Hopefully Loren will be able to use that as an alternative to starting over from scratch. DM
#196078From: Loren C. BucklinOct 19, 1995 8:50 AM
Thanks a bunch for the lead. Loren
#196080From: Loren C. BucklinOct 19, 1995 8:51 AM
Thanks Dave. I thought this would be to easy. Loren