CompuServe Thread

#9600 Modem

34 messages in this thread
#41583From: Brian GottliebNov 24, 1991 2:08 PM
I'm looking to buy a new 9600 baud modem. I'm not sure what one to b though. Price is a major concern so obviously I'm going to buy a third party modem. I want it to have v.32/v.42 and mnp 2-5, that's the latest I think. The ZOOM, ATI, and Cardinal are all in the low to mid $300. Which is the best, or if you know of a cheaper modem in the same range, help would be appreciated.
#41642From: Gord JeoffroyNov 24, 1991 9:20 PM
Brian, Actually, V.32bis/V.42bis are the latest. Also, you'll want to be careful about the phrase "9600 baud" — is the 9600 raw speed, or speed after compression? There are a lot of 2400 baud modems out there that provide "9600" by using compression; on the other hand, there are true 9600 baud modems that offer even higher throughput with compression. Considering that you said the modems you're looking at are "all in the low to mid $300," I'd guess you'd be getting a 2400 baud modem that gives you 9600 baud througput with compression. Better make sure that's good enough for you. –Gord
#41662From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 25, 1991 12:51 AM
Gord, And if you really want to get nit-pickey….so called "2400 baud" modems are only 600 baud modems with 4 bits per baud giving a 2400 bps data rate. Don
#41739From: Mike SchillerNov 25, 1991 9:41 PM
Don: And I use an older 9600 baud v.32 modem that doesn't support error correction, seems like there aren't many of these around any more. The only problem that I have with this modem (beside occasional line noise) is that many BBS' assume that you've got an error free connection just because you're using a v.32 9600bps modem. -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#41820From: Gord JeoffroyNov 26, 1991 9:56 PM
You serious? How's this 600/2400 bps trick work? Gads, what underhandedness! Me, I'm gonna buy a USR and take no chances…
#41843From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 27, 1991 1:13 AM
Yes…I'm serious. 'baud' has a strict definition, although just about anyone who isn't a communications engineer doesn't follow the definition. Baud is the number of discrete signaling events per second, also known as state changes per second. Early on in communications, each state change represented a single bit thus X baud also represented X bps (bits per second). However, methods have been developed to modulate the signaling signal so that each state change of the signal represents 2, 4 or more bits of data. Thus the bps rate is the number of bits per baud times the true baud rate. For 2400 bps modems…it's 4 bits per baud and the true baud rate is 600 baud. I *believe* 9600 bps modems 8 bits per baud with a true baud rate of 1200.
#41848From: Tim ByersNov 27, 1991 7:56 AM
From what I've read, there is a theoretical baud limit in every voice telephone line of about 2400 baud, due to the fact that the typical voice line has a useable bandwidth of 300HZ to 3.3KHZ (about 2400HZ). Which, considering the quality of the average phone line between home and the CO, it's amazing that any modulation can occur! And already there's talk of dial-up 19.2K!
#41856From: Jeff SchweigerNov 27, 1991 9:02 AM
I believe that v.32 9600 bps is 2400 baud (4 bits/baud). I'll look it up.
#41983From: Mike SchillerNov 28, 1991 9:51 PM
Don: It's refreshing to see somebody that knows what the terms really mean! Am I correct that a Bell212A modem (or that standard if you like) is only 300 baud/1200bps? A long time ago (well, about 12 years ago) I helped a friend who was customizing the MODEM program (for CP/M) to handle Bell202C modems (1200 baud OR bps half duplex). This was back in the time when a high speed modem (1200bps) was a rarity, and very expensive (if you could even buy one), and we had a pair that we paid $800.00 for (212A's that is). We were doing the work for half duplex, as there were many 202's available at flea markets in the $10.00-$20.00 range. I believe that the 202's are still used by ham operators, as they're about the only modems that have only one carrier tone, only on when sending, quiet when recieving. It's truly amazing the advances that have been made over the last few years, now I have a 9600bps modem that is starting to be considered slow (it can't go higher than 9600!), back 12 years ago, 300 was the norm, and my 'letter quality printer' was a Teletype ASR33 running at the blazing speed of 110 baud! What little programming I still remember (not much) was learned in a HS computer science class that used a PDP11/70 with TTYs as terminals, and PAPER TAPE as the storage media (for students at least). I remember taking those tapes home, and loading them into my NorthStar thru the TTY I had at home, talk about a program taking a long time to load! Sorry for rambling, your message just sort of made me remember to old days (I'm not too sure how 'good' they were) -Mike Schiller In sunny Fort Lauderdale
#41995From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 28, 1991 11:42 PM
Mike, On the 212a, I'm almost positive that it's 600 baud dibit quadrature phase shift keying. In fact, looking at the specs of an old modem it shows it's 1200 bps mode as "Quaternary Differential Phase Shift Keyed". That would imply 4 phase shift "positions" possible ( a binary 00, 01, 10, or 11) or dibit transmission. Don
#42024From: ShraddhanNov 29, 1991 4:57 PM
Aaah! The good old days! The first computer I ever used was the university mainframe – an Elliott 803B. It was the fully expanded version – 8192 words of memory at 39 bits (plus parity) each. The Algol compiler and run-time code took up about 75% of this, and longer programs had to be compiled out onto paper tape. I had the luxury of having two high speed paper tape readers, capable of almost 330 charcters per second (5 bits per character), but running at such a high speed, the readers were prone to making errors, and I remember I had to slug the code somewhat to drop the speed to a still fast 300 chars/sec. The output devices were a pair of high-speed paper tape punches, which zipped long at 100 characters per second. The output tape then had to be wound up and carried next door to a spare Creed teleprinters (there were three in all, for maximum throughput), where the output was printed at a tolerably fast 10 chars/sec. The computer was controlled via a keyboard, about the size of a desk, at which instructions could be entered in machine code. Of course, as with all the best computers, there was also a loudspeaker. The speaker was pulsed every time a jump or floating point math instruction was executed (yes, it even had a math co-processor!), and with a bit of cunning, you could write a program to play a tune. The processor was perhaps a little slow by modern standards – 576 microseconds for most instructions (excluding floating point math), but only 288 microseconds for a jump instruction. Yes, microseconds, not the new-fangled nanoseconds, but bearing in mind that it was a serial processor (i.e. it carried out its instructions on a bit-by-bit basis, not byte-by-byte), this was quite understandable. Ah, the joys of twenty years ago! Shraddhan – via Whap!
#42052From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 30, 1991 1:05 AM
Shraddhan, 20 years ago…geeze, you're a kid <grin>! 30 years ago, I programmed via punch cards and wire looms. 25 years ago, via punched tape and a Teletype printer (at 110 baud) 20 years ago, I quit programming for about 10 years. Don
#41677From: Tim ByersNov 25, 1991 8:04 AM
Brian, It's certainly not in the $300 range, but the US Robotics Courier Dual Standard is what is found in CompuServe comm centers. With it you can connect at true 9600bps with V.42bis (compression). As others have mentioned, beware of the new 2400bps modems that have V.42bis if you plan on dialing CompuServe. Some of these modems fake you into thinking you've connected at 9600bps by saying "CONNECT 9600". In reality 9600 is only your potential max with the V.42bis compression. If you try to dial a CompuServe 9600bps number with one of these modems you'll get dropped. On the other hand, CompuServe does not support V.42bis at speeds below V.32 9600bps. Have fun! Tim
#41730From: John PendergrassNov 25, 1991 8:14 PM
I have an ad here in front of me from EggHead Software, listing the Practical Peripherial 9600SA (standalone) modem for $499.99. Say it offers v.32, v.42bis, MNP/5 protocols. If I'm looking for an Amiga/CIS compatible modem, is this a good one? (boy all these protocols are confusing!) ————— Just a side note: they also advertise a Zoom 2400 Exernal modem with Send/Receive Fax for $99.99. Man those IBMers get all the price breaks! –jp–seattle–
#41740From: Jim Nangano/SYSOPNov 25, 1991 10:05 PM
jp, I've been using a Practical Peripherals 9600SA modem for a while now. It works well with CIS. I've had no problems with it at all. Hope this helps… …BobR
#41769From: Betty Clay/SYSOPNov 26, 1991 12:41 AM
John, I've been using the Practical Peripherals 9600SA since December or January. I think it's a great modem – gives me real good service. In addition to that, they have a forum right here on CIS to support it (GO PPIFORUM). Practical is a division of the Hayes company, I believe. Betty
#41787From: Steve AhlstromNov 26, 1991 10:49 AM
John, The most frequently used 9600 baud modem on CIS is the PM9600SA. It's an excellent modem (it's what I use), has a 5 year warranty, excellect quality control (Practical Peripherals is owned by Hayes), and has great support via Practical Peripherals forum here on CompuServe (GO PPIFORUM). -sja
#41803From: Tim ByersNov 26, 1991 4:11 PM
I would bet the Practical Peripherals modem is a good one. Here's how I see the standards: V.24 2400bps V.32 9600bps straight V.42 9600bps with error detection/correction V.42bis any?bps with compression (there's also a V.32bis out there that is something else!) Anyway, these V.xx standards are defined by the CCITT (a body of folks which create datacomm standards), whereas the MNP levels were created by a different group (stands for Microcom Networking Protocol I think). From what I've read and heard, MNP 4 is error correction, MNP 5 is data compression, but in the 2: 12:1 range. V.42bis can approach 4:1 depending on the kind of file (ASCII compresses better than binary). Apparently in the public arena, the CCITT standards are starting to gain more acceptance than the MNP. But you still get them all with the better modems you buy.
#41931From: William GorderNov 28, 1991 8:15 AM
Tim, you've got the standards close but not *quite* right, if memory serves… v.22 1200 bps v.22bis 2400 bps v.42 — not related to speed, LAP-M error correction v.42bis — not related to speed, data compression v.32 9600 bps v.32bis 14400bps (all of the above speeds are full-duplex) Some others (*not standards*) of note: HST 14400bps(half-duplex),300?bps back channel PEP 18000bps(half-duplex),1200bps back channel One other thing to remember is that MNP-5 is “stupid'', meaning it will attempt to compress the data stream even when it is *expanding* it! (a common occurance with archived files) V.42bis is “smart'' in that if it sees that the data stream is expanding it turns the data compression off. Also, I believe that v.42/v.42bis include MNP-4,5 as fall-back standards. I've heard of a new standard in the works, (called v.fast?), that is supposed to be 19200bps. I once read an amusing comment about v.32/v.32bis modems… a fellow said "These modems have more computing power than most of the computers they're connected to", which is probably true in our case if you're using an un-accelerated Amiga. The nice thing is that v.32 modems are on their way to becoming a commodity like v.22bis modems are now… Prices are dropping very rapidly, soon we'll probably see v.32 for under $300 on a regular basis. Later, Bill – via Whap!
#41979From: Jonathan HirschmanNov 28, 1991 9:18 PM
Bill– I'm seeing them for $399 at my local CompuAdd store—GVC v.32bis/v.42 9600 baud modem – promises 38,000+ bps. Jonathan Jonathan – from Albany, NY, via whap!
#41988From: Tim ByersNov 28, 1991 10:35 PM
Bill, You have aptly pointed out the difference between an A500-mind like mine, and an A3000-mind like yours! That's what I get for going off the top of my head. Thanks! Tim
#42136From: Christopher LapriseDec 1, 1991 12:21 AM
I've seen Zoom's V.32/42 & V.32bis (upto 12.4Kbps) for $399 in Nov. Computer Shopper. It got good marks in a moden-roundup review in the same issue. Another one they recommended that I found for $379 was the ATI. Look 'em up in the product index.
#42162From: John PendergrassDec 1, 1991 11:13 AM
Chris, thanks for the product advice. The main question I have (I guess) is about the protocols used…. are there others (than V.32/42 and V.32bis) that are likely to become the 'standard'? Or are these the 'standard'? I'd hate to spring $400+ on a 9600 modem and find out that I chose the wrong one later. If that's a strong possibility, then I'd rather wait till things sort out. Any advice? –jp–seattle–
#42739From: George EllisDec 7, 1991 3:10 PM
John: If you buy a modem with V.32, V.32bis, and MNP 1-5, you should be current for some time. V.32 is the current standard for 9600 with V.32bis the up and coming standard for I believe 14,400. BTW, if you can wait until the first part of January for your modem purchase, then take a look at Supra's soon to be released modems. 9600, V.32, send/receive fax external – street price around $229. 14,400, V.32bis, send/receive fax external – street price around $329. Fax software will probably add a few bucks. I know that Winfax for Windows is $40 and Bitfax is $20, so Amiga software shouldn't be too much. I'm going to buy the 14,400 V.32bis as soon as available. I've had the Supra 2400 for years and never had an ounce of trouble. I like their tech support as well for the few times that I've called them. You can call Supra toll free. Their number is either 1-800-72-SUPRA or 1-800-27-SUPRA. I can't remember which. George
#42751From: Vic WagnerDec 7, 1991 6:19 PM
George, I don't want to get into 'standards' wars, but you SHOULD know that CIS is using V42.bis NOT V32
#42767From: Paul DowgewiczDec 7, 1991 9:37 PM
Vic: I think you've got that backwards. CIS uses V.32 format at 9600 bps. V.42 bis refers to the data compression method that they do not use because they claim it does not have any benefit for all the compressed files here. In my opinion their pricing structure is the reason they don't support compression. They'd want to charge more for higher throughput. I've read that V.42bis is smart enough to know if it's hindering a transfer, and it turns itself off. MNP-5 compression can make a compressed file transfer slower. Paul
#42801From: Vic WagnerDec 8, 1991 2:55 AM
Ok, I stand corrected. BTW, although CIS _may_ claim they don't use… the compression, my modem tells me that I'm running a compression (and the lights on the modem tell me that also) when I'm connected. I'll try to remember to 'snap' what the modem says as I connect the next time I'm at the office
#42907From: Steve AhlstromDec 9, 1991 10:33 AM
Vic, I think both you aren Paul and confused. V.32 is a data transmission protocol and v.42bis is a compression protocol. CompuServe supports both (kinda — at this time CompuServe supports v.42bis between you and your node, but not yet from CompuServe to the node). -sja
#42919From: Vic WagnerDec 9, 1991 4:39 PM
Steve, when it comes to telecommunications stuff, I'm easily confused by the terminology. It's a 'secret language' that I'm not real comfortable with yet.
#42906From: Steve AhlstromDec 9, 1991 10:33 AM
Paul, Both you and Vic are incorrect. At 9600, CIS supports V.32 and V.42bis. CIS does not support MNP-5 because of the compression problem you state — most users aren't knowledgable enough to realize that for binary transfers they'd be costing themselves more money by using it. -sja
#42783From: Jeff SchweigerDec 7, 1991 11:39 PM
Re: v.32 Vic, CIS does use V.32 as its 9600bps transmittion protocol. V.42bis is a data compression standard. Jeff Schweiger
#42190From: Kirk AdamsDec 1, 1991 6:14 PM
John, I just bought an Okidata 9.6 modem that is fully Hayes compatible and supports all the protocol standars v.32, v.42, v.42bis etc. It is in th current DAMARK catalog for 269.99. I love it. E-mail me if you want specifics. Kirk
#42195From: Michael DavisDec 1, 1991 6:45 PM
Hi, Just to throw something out, DAMARK, one of the close out sellers on page 16 of the newest catalog has, OKIDATE 9600 baud modem. 110,300,1200,2400,4800,9600 Baud. MNP 2 thur 5. 103, 212A, v32, v42bis compatible. Hayes AT commands and registers. Factory NEW!. $299.99 + $8.50 shipping, item number B-482-194321 Michael Davis // \X/ AMIGA POWER
#42208From: Paul DowgewiczDec 1, 1991 7:25 PM
Brian: The cheapest 9600 bps modem I've seem so far is the Okidata. It has V.32, V.42bis, and MNP 2-5. It's advertised in the Dec. Computer Shopper on page 863 by a company called Tredex 5306 Beethoven Ave, LA, CA 90066 800-338-0939. They show a price of $300, but it's crossed out with 'even less!' printed in. The Damark catalog also has it listed for $270 + $8.50 shipping. 800-729-9000. I haven't got one of these yet, but it seems to be the cheapest around for an external. Of course, that will probably change next month. Paul