#Rendering Farm
8 messages in this thread
Jonas,
I wonder if you could help me out. I teach 3D studio at the Art Institute of
Pittsburgh and we're thinking about creating a rendering farm. My plan is
to put six Pentium motherboards in a cabinet networked together and
have a Par board hooked up for output. My question is what brand of network
hardware works well for 3d Studio's high level of traffic. After reading some
threads on a major problem with Lantastic, I'm a little terrified of bringing
this plan to the school administration and it not working as planned. Any
suggestions or information would be greatly appreciated.
thanx in advance,
Jeff
Hi Jeff,
<< networking and 3ds.. >>
Have you read….
File Info for 3DSNET.TXT
Section: Autodesk 3D Studio Contributor: 76702,531 Size: 42302
Submitted: 1/10/94 Type: Text Accesses: 440
Title: Confessions of a Network Renderer
Keys: 3DS 3D STUDIO NET NETWORK RENDER CONFESSIONS
The non-definitive guide to setting up 3D Studio network rendering. 12 weeks on
the best seller
list, this original manuscript was found in the attic of an an unnamed Autodesk
Product Support
technician prior to its being edited into an "official" document. The official
document (more corporate) is also
available upon request.
(Approximate download time at 2400 bps using CIS B: 2:20)
(An ASCII file; read online, capture to a file, or download with a protocol)
Our forum members use several networking software packages. They may be able to
provide you with real-world feedback on your configuration ideas.
jonas[adesk]
Jeff,
I started one of the recent threads on Lantastic problems, but there are others
out there using it with no problems. If you have been looking into networks,
I'm sure you know the differences between price. Supposedly Lantastic has a 30
day guarantee on their product (I'd verify it with them first). I didn't want
to dedicate a server with Novell, so I went with Lantastic. Now it seems that
I may get Lantastic to work if I dedicate one computer as a server, and the
rest as workstations. Kind of like playing the lottery…
No one is sure if the current problems are a result of hardware or software. I
would recommend keeping your Pentium motherboards the same brand to help reduce
inconsistancies across your network. At the least, get your network going with
like motherboards, and add on more workstations as you verify correct
operation. I've heard that if you spend lots of money and everything works,
it's really great (I've also heard if it doesn't you get real cynical). Good
luck!
byron
engineering arts
Greetings Jeff-
I'm about to embark on a similar school network odyessy ( I teach at Virginia
Commonwealth University's Sculpture Department). I don't have any answers for
you (unfortunately), but I certainly interested in the answers you will recieve
on the forum.
I finally got R4 installed on 6 486's last week. My plan is those 6 plus a
90mhz Pentium, connected via ethernet and running Windows for Workgroups 3.11
in "some sort of DOS" mode. I know its possible because I read about it here.
(g) I'm going to shoot for WFW because its what I have installed, and I've
already got WIN NT 3.5 system running as a server and print spooler on the net.
I've been skimming the network responses on the forum for a couple of months
and I've seen some positive responses from folks.
Message posted by Brian Rudolf in December:
>Yyou can use the NT machine as a SERVER( ie, a place to keep files, and >will
never run on the machine that has NT, it is not compatable.
>the WFW network drivers from DOS, setting them up as a peer to peer >network,
all connecting to a comon directory on the NT server. Set up >you network paths
to point to that directory, and you should be set. >You can also set your
images to render to the NT server hard disk or >keep them local on the slave
machines hard disk.
Good Luck,
Carlton
Jeff,
This is and has been done already. Without going in to a blatent promotion I'd
like you to E-Mail me you Phone Number or you can feel free to contact me
directly.
The Solution I'm referring to is currently under development [trade name
RenderGarden/RenderFarm/RenderJungle] and we've already shown a working model
as early as August 1994 at our 3D Artist Seminar and Conference over a 3 day
period.
James M. Murphy
James Murphy Consulting
(414) 435-7345
(414) 437-3898
Thank you for this consideration.
Murph'
Jim and others,
I would just like to thank everyone for the speedy replies.
This forum is a valuable resource. I hope I can return the favor soon.
Render Jungle sounds like one heck of a system. Looking forward to
seeing the specs.
Jeff
Yo Murph'
>> Without going in to a blatent promotion…
Can you tell us a little about the RenderJungle? Everyone talks about the PAR,
Razor Pro, Bones, etc., everyday, go ahead and give us some details. You can
give us the facts without setting up a sales office on the net.
Maybe someone would be interested in my RenderDesert. After you try to do a
network render, it kind of looks like after Desert Storm…
byron
engineering arts
Byron,
You'll have to hang in there, I've got to get a Spec Sheet together for the
"Current" Build. <BG>
Murph'