CompuServe Thread

#Ethernet Mac/PC/Amiga

62 messages in this thread
#122010From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 17, 1993 6:27 PM
Does anyone have actual experience with connecting the Amiga to an Ethernet network with Mac's and PC's? What adapters and software get the best marks for reliability? Jerry
#122028From: Alexander G. M. SmithNov 17, 1993 8:17 PM
Let me know if you find an answer! I've got the same task, connecting Amigas, PCs and a Mac together. Currently we have CBM's Envoy networking software and 2095 or whatever it is CBM ethernet cards. It looks like I'd have to use NFS/TCP/IP to get them all talking. There is an Amiga TCP/IP that some students wrote recently. I don't know about any NFS (network file system based on Sun's UNIX standard) software to plug into the sockets that TCP/IP provides. Supposedly there is PC NFS and PC TCP/IP available, and maybe the NCSA can provide TCP/IP for the Mac (not sure there). On the more expensive but easier side, there's always Novell. – Alex
#122042From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 17, 1993 10:21 PM
"On the more expensive but easier side, there's always Novell." Oh, oh – the "N" word. <G> I'm hoping to avoid that solution. Thanks for the input, though. Looks like there may not be too many alternatives on this one. Jerry
#122083From: Dale LarsonNov 18, 1993 7:21 AM
AS225 (Commodore's TCP/IP package) includes NFS client software. Dale Larson – An Amiga Software Engineer with less and less time on his hands.
#122133From: Alexander G. M. SmithNov 18, 1993 5:55 PM
>AS225 (Commodore's TCP/IP package) includes NFS client software. Thanks for the reference. So, now all I have to do is to round up pricing for PC NFS and find something for the Mac. Then get it all working.
#122319From: Jim PhilippouNov 20, 1993 10:25 AM
As much as I dislike the "N" software, it is probably the most common personal computer network OS available. I have AMax II+ in my A3000. AMax II+ has an Apple LocalTalk port on it. I have been using an NEC laser printer attached to the LocalTalk network with no problems for about a year. But that may be too many hoops to jump through to get files from one machine to another. Jim Philippou
#122329From: Michael GerardNov 20, 1993 11:17 AM
AMAX IV software/hardware allows your AMAX set up to access Ethernet networks with any SANA-II compatible controller.
#122082From: Dale LarsonNov 18, 1993 7:21 AM
I'm confused. Ethernet is ethernet. What machines happen to be connected is irrelevant. In terms of software, your choices are limited. If you need to connect to both Mac and PC, you can use TCP/IP on all platforms or you can use Netware with Oxxi's Amiga netware client. Which is better depends entirely on what you plan to do with the network and whether you have already invested in a Netware server (expensive). Dale Larson – An Amiga Software Engineer with less and less time on his hands.
#122112From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 18, 1993 12:58 PM
Thanks, Dale. I'm more concerned with the reliability of the card or external adapter and the client software. We have the Mac's and PC's connected now with Apple LocalTalk which is fine for relatively small files. But it's time to upgrade the whole system and I would love it if all the machines could co-exist peacefully. I was trying to avoid the expense of going Novell, but that's beginning to sound like my best bet.
#122136From: Jeff SchweigerNov 18, 1993 6:45 PM
There are several Amiga ethernet products listed in the Winter 1994 edition of "AC's Guide (for the Commodore Amiga)". You might want to look them up. As you had requested responses from those with experience with Amiga networking I did not respond earlier (I have no such experience).
#122157From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 18, 1993 10:14 PM
Considering the nature of the beast, I want to be cautious in choosing networking gear for the Amiga. Perhaps like yours, my closets are full of stuff that didn't quite work. <G>
#122274From: Robert LittleNov 20, 1993 1:50 AM
J. I couldn't help myself. See how many people are responding… Ahhh…nevermind. Robb
#122168From: Jonathan BlackwellNov 19, 1993 12:11 AM
I don't know if they are still available, but there was a board called DoubleTalk which would allows Amigas to connect to Localtalk networks.
#122188From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 19, 1993 3:09 AM
Thanks, Jonathan! I'll check the ads and the Amiga product directory to see if I can locate the vendor. Jerry
#122221From: Steven D. KapplinNov 19, 1993 2:31 PM
Jerry, If you get a good up to date collection of info on networking products, you might post an info piece. I would be interested in what you find because I'm trying to see about networking into my university's system. I've had little success in finding anyone who knows much about connecting an Amiga. I know that CBM no longer makes the 2065 ethernet card, but someone new has an A2066 card which is supposedly the same product only updated. Lately, I haven't seen any ads for the CBM TCP/IP software, so I wonder if that's going to be difficult to find. Oxxi makes a Novell compliant product.
#122230From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 19, 1993 4:21 PM
I will, Steven. Finding goods that stand a chance of being supported over the long-term is one of my considerations. I'll let you know what I learn. Jerry
#122349From: Robert LittleNov 20, 1993 1:52 PM
Jerry, If you would, post the results here. I'd love to hear, as well. Robb
#122248From: Erik FlomNov 19, 1993 8:51 PM
PMFJI, but the Emplant and AMAXII+ Mac emulators both have AppleTalk ports on them. Files can be transferred from the Amiga to the Mac partitions using the emulator, and then out to the network using std Mac File Sharing.. While not as transparent as putting the Amigas directly on a network, you do get the added benefit of another Mac in the office. Ethernet is still preferred, but maybe more expensive…. Just my $.02, Erik Flom
#122253From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 19, 1993 10:09 PM
Thanks, Erik. I have more or less rejected the idea of planting an emulator in the Amiga simply because the Mac's are available not more than ten feet away. <G> Right now, though, I really want to go for the added speed of Ethernet. We were using LocalTalk a lot this past week and it simply isn't fast enough anymore. Jerry
#122264From: Erik FlomNov 20, 1993 12:16 AM
Ethernet is really the way to go. Unfortunately, there are few real ethernet solutions for the Amiga, and they all seem real pricey. I've used the Novell Client Server for the Amiga, and it provides everything you'd need, all in a plug-n-play package. Unfortunately, if you don't have a Novell server to begin with, its a real pricey solution. While you could probably kludge something together, most other solutions wouldn't give you the level of support and robustness you'd want. Godd luck. If you find a good cheap solution, let us all know. I, for one, would be happy to hear of it.
#122289From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 20, 1993 4:44 AM
– sigh – Novell. Money. Big money. But it may be the only way to go. I'll post it here if I find a viable less expensive solution. Jerry
#122394From: Erik FlomNov 20, 1993 9:51 PM
Thanks, I'd really like to know if there's a cheap Ethernet solution for the Amiga. Personally, as an ex-Novell network admin, all I can say is that it's a sweet and stable little package. Good Luck, Erik Flom
#122400From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 20, 1993 10:44 PM
Oh, I'm not saying anything against Novell. It's just overkill for a small network. Jerry
#122350From: Robert LittleNov 20, 1993 1:52 PM
Erik, I disagree. I think token ring is much better than Ethernet. So I'll just go out and buy a board for mi-Amiga…NOT. While we're at it let's go for ATM! Ethernet (w/Novell?) is the way to go, I guess, if you can find it, and afford it. 'course, I don't use the Amiga at work… Robb Just had to say something because I'd like to hear about 'real' world solutions as well.
#122395From: Erik FlomNov 20, 1993 9:51 PM
The lack of Ethernet support is really surprising and disappointing. I can understand the lack of support for Ethernet. Until recently, there just wasn't much of a need for that kind of bandwidth. Unfortunately, now that more and more people need the performance of Ethernet, C= has chosen to discontinue its support for their card – one of the few out there. (go Figger!) At least we've got the CIS network….not quite the same, eh? :^) Erik Flom
#122411From: Robert LittleNov 21, 1993 12:16 AM
Uh, no, not quite the same but, at least it's here and we're here using it. Robb
#122170From: Dale LarsonNov 19, 1993 12:36 AM
I've never heard of a reliability problem with any Amiga ethernet card. I've never heard of one failing at all. What are you going to do with the Mac's and PC's over the network? How many of each? How many Amigas? I haven't really heard anything yet that would make me lean toward Novell, which I would avoid for lots of reasons, only one of which is expense (basically, I consider it awful stuff to use as a last-resort 🙂
#122189From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 19, 1993 3:12 AM
It's a smallish network consisting of six Mac's, four PC's and the one Amiga in two different locations within the building. Right now the Mac's and PC's are running LocalTalk but after the last week the need to go Ethernet has become painfully apparent. Shifting 500Meg or so of data around on LocalTalk turned into a massive yawn. As I become more familiar with the Amiga, Video Toaster and other tools, I can see where having the Amiga on the network would be a great timesaver.
#122351From: Robert LittleNov 20, 1993 1:52 PM
Dale is definitely the one you want to talk to about this but, that sounds like your exactly right. Ethernet. Although ArcNet might be a less costly solution I don't think you're gonna find it for the Amiga (Macs? I dunno don't do Macs). Honestly, I'm not sure what you mean by LocalTalk. Is that Mac originated (heck I should know this we have a couple thousand Macs at work)? I agree with Dale on avoiding NetWare, if you can, but, if the Network you have can be supported by NetWare you might be able to get an Ethernet card for the Novell server and one that's compatable with your current network on the Novell server and use it as a bridge to the Amiga w/Ethernet.
#122361From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 20, 1993 2:40 PM
LocalTalk is Apple's networking schema that's been built into every Mac since the first one in 1984. It's moderately fast, virtually foolproof and cards are available for the PC. Unfortunately, I haven't found a LocalTalk card for the Amiga – which is kind of surprising considering the potential for Mac/Amiga transfers. I would very much like to avoid NetWare because of the expense and needless complexity for a net as small as this.
#122412From: Robert LittleNov 21, 1993 12:16 AM
Oh, I thought everyone at work called that 'AppleTalk' Hmmm…I guess I will have to get one of those puppies to figure out how they fit in to my world. I don't think anyone's done Mac networking for the Amiga. Not too strange considering that most major networking needs do not involve Amigas at all. It would probably be hard to cost justify the developement. Maybe, an Emplant might do it? Yep, Netware is solid and will, perhaps, suit your needs but, jimminy christmas, it is an expensive proposition for your needs (If you can even find an Ethernet or other commonly supported board for the Amiga). Maybe, someone could write a combo-PARNET-Banyan Vines type program where you could network in via serial port (well, I guess that'd be sernet). Not probable for your situation though.
#122565From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 22, 1993 12:20 AM
Well maybe the most cost effective answer to hard-wire the Mac and Amiga together and just do direct transfers when needed. File transfer capability is all I really need in regard to the Amiga. Jerry
#122577From: Robert LittleNov 22, 1993 1:23 AM
But, hardwiring is a pain! At least that might be a 'make work' solution. It'd probably be easier to hard wire to a PC. I think TwinExpress or something like that is on CI$ to serial a PC and an Amiga together. Another reason, for me, to find out more about them Apples… Maybe there's a simple router box you could get to bridge an Amiga Ethernet or whatever to your Macs. Sysco? Well, might not be too cheap, just an idea. Since I don't have a clue about Macs I'm trying help but…
#122819From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 24, 1993 3:42 AM
"But, hardwiring is a pain! At least that might be a 'make work' solution. It'd probably be easier to hard wire to a PC." Robb: At this point I am thinking the sneakernet might be the easiest way to go with Syquest 44Meg and 88Meg cartridges. For larger files, I can always use a SCSI DAT drive. Jerry
#122419From: Karl F. KugelNov 21, 1993 1:11 AM
There was once, at least, a local talk card. I saw it at an Amiexpo several years ago. // -Karl \X/ Amiga and Autopilot: The *only* way to fly!
#122470From: Michael GerardNov 21, 1993 11:06 AM
Yeah, Progressive Peripherals made the DOUBLETALK card for the A500 and A2000/3000 computers which allowed AppleTalk networking between Amigas & MACS… but I've no idea of the status of t he product, or the company.
#122495From: Dale LarsonNov 21, 1993 1:40 PM
Last time I called Progressive, their voice mail indicated that they were no longer manufacturing Amiga hardware or software and that they had nothing in stock. It didn't indicate that they had anything else they were selling, either. How can they afford to keep their voice mail system up if they aren't selling anything?
#122520From: Michael GerardNov 21, 1993 7:23 PM
>>How can they afford to keep their voice mail system up if they aren't selling anything?<< See how cost effective voicemail is?! <g>
#122567From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 22, 1993 12:22 AM
Progressive Peripherals? Aren't they the folks who do Baud Bandit and a file manager for the Amiga? Jerry
#122589From: Michael GerardNov 22, 1993 8:19 AM
Progressive Peripherals (not to be confused with Practical Peripherals, or OXXI) _used_ to make some pretty neat Amiga Hardware, including accelerator boards. They had a fire in their warehouse early this year or last year and haven't come back from that.
#122566From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 22, 1993 12:21 AM
Ah – sounds like I may be out of luck on this one. <G> Jerry
#122488From: Dale LarsonNov 21, 1993 12:48 PM
If you are dealing with 500megs of shared data, you are looking at buying a fileserver of some type. If you get a Netware server, you can get Oxxi's Netware Client, if you get a Unix server, you can get AS225. If you had several Amigas, I'd recomend against Netware because Oxxi's won't allow you to run any other Amiga networking software at the same time (since they refuse to support SANA-II). It doesn't sound like you have any need for Amiga-specific networking, though, so it comes down to cost and usability of the servers — buy whichever is cheaper and easier for you to support.
#122568From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 22, 1993 12:24 AM
"If you are dealing with 500megs of shared data" That was strictly between the Mac and PC, Dale. It convinced me that we needed a more powerful networking solution than LocalTalk. Thought it would be nice if I could include the Amiga as well. I think just hardwiring the Amiga to one of the Mac's is going to be the most cost effective solution.
#122280From: Mike SchillerNov 20, 1993 1:51 AM
You should really look into TCP/IP before you assume that Novell is the best bet. TCP/IP is a mature protocol, and more importantly an OPEN one, if a particular implementation of either the PC or Mac doesn't suit your likes you can get another one. The same is even true with the Amiga, there are currently 2 versions of TCP/IP, the Commodore one (AS225) and one that is freeware from Sweden (I think it's from Sweden).
#122290From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 20, 1993 4:45 AM
Sounds good, Mike, even if it is one more protocol to learn. I figure it's going to take a good deal of reading and exploratory work to find what I need, but I guess that's the price of it all. Jerry
#122435From: Jim DuttonNov 21, 1993 2:11 AM
Jerry, There are several "free" TCP/IP implementations for the Amiga: 1) AmiTCP V2.1 – available here on CIS, I believe, and "Aminet" sites on Internet – VERY LARGE FILE – DOES support Ethernet cards via SANA-II driver – also supports serial.device and SLIP connections (eg; dial-up) – has no "native" NFS support, and no "add-on" that I have seen – does have FTP which ALL TCP/IP implementations have, so files COULD be "shared", by "uploading" and "downloading" via FTP – does have an "add-on" terminal emulation program for DEC VT102 2) AmigaNOS V2.9n – available, via Internet FTP from John Heaton who maintains the program at 131.88.200.4 (dir.mcc.ac.uk) – does NOT support Ethernet cards nor SANA-II drivers – does support serial.device and SLIP connections – also has FTP – TELNET is "pseudo" DEC VT100 – internally multitasking – also supports: NNTP, Mailbox, SMTP, POP2, TTYlink, Finger, Rlogin, Hopcheck – has no NFS capability 3) AmigaNOSGW (V.5 ?) – available via Internet FTP from Graham Walter: ftp.demon.co.uk – a version of an older version of AmigaNOS that is SPECIFICALLY designed for Gopher use – Graham also has a Gopher client – I presume that it has all of the basic features of AmigaNOS, but have not been able to get it to work, so can't say – caution: I and others have had problems with the archived file; it appears to be corrupted and I haven't heard whether it has been replaced or not One caveat about AmiTCP: it does not provide all of the "additional" TCP/IP protocols (eg; applications). These, if any, are being developed by other individuals. Some of these "add-ons" that have shown up require part of CBM's Ethernet software (eg; libraries), are hence, unusable as stand-alone applications (eg; SMTP). If ALL you need is the ability to get a file from "here" to "there", then having ANY TCP/IP implementation on your various platforms will allow you to do this via the FTP (File Transfer Protocol) mechanism. This is NOT, however, the same as having a remote file system "mounted" locally
#122496From: Dale LarsonNov 21, 1993 1:40 PM
FTP is useless for real work. For transfering single files infrequently, fine, but most people with a network share a lot more than occational single files. If you are doing TCP/IP, you want NFS, which means you want AS225.
#122569From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 22, 1993 12:25 AM
Wow! Thanks, Jim!
#122615From: Jochen HaeberleNov 22, 1993 12:35 PM
Hi Jerry! It's me again. I think going for UNIX as network server is always the best solution. This machines are multi-user oriented and do you much less harm as PCs made to a server by Novell!
#122277From: Mike SchillerNov 20, 1993 1:51 AM
I have my Amiga hooked up with ethernet to a PC. However the PC isn't running DOS, but rather Nextstep, the NeXT GUI on top of Mach (a unix like OS). I have Commodore's AS225, and I have the PC's whole .5 gig drive mounted on the Amiga via NFS as well. The networking software on the PC all comes standard with Nextstep, so nothing extra is needed there.
#122291From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 20, 1993 4:47 AM
NeXTStep? Gee, that might be the solution right there! Thanks for the suggestion, Mike. I'll call them on Monday. If I remember correctly, NeXTStep already has the hooks built-in for the Mac.
#122320From: Werner KazmierzakNov 20, 1993 10:57 AM
although the C= Ethernet Card A2065 isn't vailable any more, there is an Ethernet Board available manufactured by Hydra Systems. As for Networking Software, you may use ENLAN-DFS devloped by Interwoks, which is using the DECnet network protocol. But I don't know if DECnet protocol networking software is available for the MACs.
#122360From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 20, 1993 2:37 PM
Thanks for the info, Werner.
#122492From: Rob EllisonNov 21, 1993 1:24 PM
I believe that DECnet protocol networking software IS available because Digital's PATHWORKS software supports MAC Connections. This would indicate to me that such networking is available and in use. For DEC to support MAC Networking, you know that there has to be a large market for it. Cruising on AutoPilot in the Nickel City!
#122357From: Alexander G. M. SmithNov 20, 1993 2:16 PM
What's AS255? Is that the networking software package that includes Envoy? Or is it separate?
#122433From: Mike SchillerNov 21, 1993 1:42 AM
AS225 is Commodore's part number for their port of TCP/IP for the Amiga. Envoy is something else, I'm not exactly sure what, I think it's an Amiga only network or something, whatever it is, it's not released yet (that I know of), so can't be counted.
#122614From: Jochen HaeberleNov 22, 1993 12:35 PM
I have! I'm what you call freelancer (I think) and have integrated an Amiga in Ethernet based Networks with Macs and PCs 1.) with TCP/IP and NFS with the Commodore Ehternet-Card and TCP-Soft (I can't remember Commos number-codes, sorry). The mainly Mac-Based Network runs on AppleTalk, which is implemented with a Software called EtherShare on a SUN Sparc-Station. The Amiga goes in via NFS and shares the same Volumes and printerspoolers as the Macs. This one works very, very good and is my favourite. Although the installation was quite hard. The Commo handbook for the TCP-Soft allways pointed to the UNIX-references and send me to the net administrator for "further device". But he couldn't help very much – because that was me at the moment! 2.) with Novell-Client-soft for the Amiga by ACS, distributed by Oxxy, I think. Ehternet-card used was Hydra. This works okay, but I don't like the Novell tools very much. The biggest fault of the environment is the lack of multiple printers on the Amiga side. Although it is able to give printer output from the Amiga prt: to any network printer, you have to totally reconfigure the software, if you want to change the printer. Hope this helps. Feel free to answer any specials, I will answer if I can … over the ocean Jochen, Stuttgart, Germany with AutoPilot
#122818From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 24, 1993 3:41 AM
For my particular needs, which would be transferring occasional files from the Mac to the Amiga, I think I'm just going to go with hardwiring the two machines together. The network is too small and the Amiga port needs too few to get involved overkill. As I get further into analyzing the situation, I may simply opt for Syquest 44Meg and 88Meg cartridges written in PC format (via AccesPC) and go with SneakerNet. Jerry
#122847From: Jochen HaeberleNov 24, 1993 4:20 PM
mmh, well you might be right. For occasional transferrence, that might be okay. Do you have a solution, that makes ist possible to read PC or Mac formatted Syquest-Cartridges readable on the Amiga?? I couldn't think of any, but would be quite interested… but depending on the filesize and the speed, you could still connect the two machines together with a null-modem-cable. Thats an easy but working solution. For transferring files from Mac to Amiga, you have the advantage that you do not have to deal with resource and data forks. And you coud use stuffers for speed gain. I use Stuffit and lharc on both sides, Amiga and Mac for transfer (lharc on PC as well) works okay for me (Tiffs, Targa, EPS and Postscript code) let me hear from you … over the ocean Jochen, Stuttgart, Germany with AutoPilot
#123002From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 25, 1993 9:01 PM
I think I'll just use a direct-connect. For the amount of material I'll be transferring, it seems to be the simplest solution. Jerry
#123040From: Rafael VicariaNov 26, 1993 1:52 PM
Better than the sneakernet, try TWINEX.LZH. It connects PCs and Amigas through the serial port, with a transfer rate up to 200k/sec, and is able to launch CLI/DOS commands from one machine to another. You will need both versions (Amiga and PC). It is available in CIS I cannot remember where. Rafa <Motorola Inside> …via AutoPilot 1.061 now from M|nchen
#123063From: J Saperstein/FontBankNov 26, 1993 11:41 PM
Thanks, Rafael! That definitely sounds worth both a look and a try! Jerry