CompuServe Thread

#AFT v1.2

5 messages in this thread
#123108From: Gary HinesNov 27, 1993 1:27 PM
Andrew, I have recently downloaded your AFT genealogy program, v1.2, and am very impressed with the ease of data input and the speed and flexibility of the tree display. I have a few suggestions for improving the program: 1. Add marriage date and place to GEDCOM export and import. This will be very useful to those who want to use a GEDCOM file exported from AFT to feed utilities for printed output such as ahnentafels and pedigree charts. 2. Fix bug in GEDCOM export of DATEs. This problem occurs when a record is being output for an INDIvidual for whom the birth date or death date is unknown. A date is output from a previous INDIvidual's record, and this date appears as both a birth date and death date. It behaves as if the DATE field is not being cleared as a new INDIvidual's record is being assigned. Better yet, if it is easy to discern this, you could suppress output of DATE fields when they are unknown, instead of outputting blanks. (Note that this problem does not occur for PLACe fields, only for DATEs) 3. In the tree display, sometimes a second spouse is not visible and can't be selected. They are out of view on the right. Is there a way to allow scrolling when someone is out of view? (A workaround is to use SuperHiRes screen mode and resize the window larger, but please save my eyes!) Thanks again for a great program.
#123189From: Andrew HounsellNov 28, 1993 10:18 AM
Gary, Unfortunately, due to work pressure, I have not been able to work on AFT at all since version 1.2 was released. I hope to get some free time soon to fix some outstanding bugs. I have rechecked the first two points you raised, and these are both bugs which I will try to fix when I get the chance. As to the third point regarding the window size, it is not necessary to use the superhires screen mode in order to resize the window. In the screenmode preferences program you can make the workbench screen any size you like, memory permitting. You can then scroll the tree display simply by moving the mouse pointer to the edge of the screen. – Andrew
#123350From: Gary HinesNov 29, 1993 7:23 PM
Andrew, I've had my A3000 for over a year and a half and didn't know you could set the screen size larger than the viewable area and use the mouse to scroll! I tried this with AFT and found (with the screen width at 1024 or so) that I could now scroll to view a second spouse on the tree display. It seems when the user resizes the AFT window that children are redrawn to fit the new window size, but that spouses aren't. I suppose what I originally wanted to request was that the distance between spouses on the tree be scalable the same way the distance between siblings is currently scalable. For instance, a family with five children is drawn in two rows, one with 3, the other with 2. However, on a larger window that same family is drawn with the children in one row of 5 children. Could a similar thing be implemented for an individual with more than one spouse? Thanks for your quick reply and the tip about screen size. Gary –Gary Hines –on AutoPilot over Fort Wayne, IN
#123443From: Andrew HounsellNov 30, 1993 1:28 PM
Gary, After giving it some thought, it should be possible to move the spouses closer together in some cases, however, the present spacing is worked out to give enough room for both parents of both spouses to also be displayed, this is what really takes up the room. If one or other of the spouses has no parent information entered, I suppose they could be moved closer together but much of the time you cant really do this. – Andrew
#123712From: Gary HinesDec 2, 1993 5:43 PM
Andrew, Ah, so the spouses have to be spaced such that both of their parents are visible in the row above them. I will probably use AFT mostly to enter pedigree charts (as opposed to family groups), so I will want that capability to traverse to the ancestors of both spouses. Maybe you should forget my last suggestion and leave the spacing alone! The GEDCOM changes will pay off much more, anyway, given limited time to make changes. Thanks for your quick replies. I'll keep you posted on my experiences using the program. –Gary Hines –on AutoPilot over Fort Wayne, IN