CompuServe Thread

#Screen Fonts

3 messages in this thread
#7310From: Wayne FoltaDec 17, 1988 12:36 PM
I gather from your previous reply that the difference between Apple's LaserWriter screen fonts and Adobe's is that you include the italic, bold, and bold-italic typestyles, while Apple does not. Does this affect my final output? That is, do programs, such as Word or PageMaker, depend on the screen fonts (or FOND or NFNT, whatever) for spacing information, getting screwed-up if I do not have the true italic typestyle installed?
#7356From: Lori HainesDec 20, 1988 1:31 PM
As far as I know, the final output quality would not be affected. What would be (possibly) is the spacing going from screen to printed page and the look of the fonts on your screen. Either way, what prints out is going to be the PostScript font built into your PostScript printer.
#7439From: James M. Crump IIIDec 24, 1988 3:19 PM
The Apple vs Adobe screen font question comes from printing at sites other than your own. If you have composed your document using Apple LW font, and print to a device that uses Adobe LW screen font, you will obtain disasterous results. The main difference is kerning information is contained in the Screen font, and each version is different. Second, Choosing Bold in the apple menu when using apple LW font causes the computer to scale the bold version; but in Adobe the bold version of that typeface is selected i.e – B Times 9PT rather than bolding a Times 9 Pt type. In some cases there will be little difference, in others major. Note the problem Garamond users have when they print to a service bureau using older version, and get type kerning problems. So specify what you are using, and make sure the system you are printing from uses the same typeface….or create a suitcase of your typefaces and take with you when you go to another machine to print.