CompuServe Thread

#Beta vs VHS

11 messages in this thread
#179924From: DegeDec 28, 1994 11:56 AM
I just have to jump in here!! You state: >If the quality isn't there or the compatibility isn't sufficient, what happens? WE DON'T BUY IT> Wrong. We little old comsumers buy what we are "hyped" to buy. We buy what is advertised and "sold" to us. Look at Beta vs VHS. No my friend, Amiga didn't die because is was an inferior product. It died because more money was thrown at a vastly inferior product. AND WE BOUGHT IT!
#180096From: Dan RoeslerDec 29, 1994 11:21 AM
Then you, my friend, are part of the problem if you buy what the market spoon-feeds you. And get your information straight. I never said that the Amiga was an inferior product. If it was, I wouldn't own one. The focus of this argument is competition. Whatever suits the market and is supported properly will dominate said market. The message that started this debate suggested that Amiga clones would destroy the Amiga because inferior machines would enter the market place. I gave the benefit of the doubt to Amiga-users and stated that they would weed-out the inferior products and they would drop-out of the market. However, if you are representative of the majority of Amiga users (and I hope you are not) then maybe clones of Amiga machines are not a good idea.
#180104From: DegeDec 29, 1994 12:03 PM
Relax. We ALL buy what the market feeds us. From the Car we drive to the food we eat. To the cheap clones we buy. I agree with you that we need cheap clones in the Amiga marketplace. I own a 1000 (bought in 1885) two 2000's, a 3000 and a CDTV. I have more Amigas in my house than there are in the town I live in, but I am a SMALL minority. I used to try to sell the Amiga to friends but no more. It is impossible to point out the good points of the machine when they can't buy software, hardware not to be seen, no repair shops, don't see'm at work, and on an on. The major portion of the world is not computer literate. They buy what they are sold. As in advertising. Not because they are stupid, but because they don't know. If I hadn't been interested in computers enough to explore the possiblities, I would have owned some 8088 clone. Then a 286, then a 386, then a 486……. If the masses could choose the operating system they actually wanted, do you honestly think they would buy window?? Of course not. I stand by what I said. The Amiga lost the fight because it was never a fight about technology, it was a fight about marketing. Dege
#180113From: Dale LarsonDec 29, 1994 12:35 PM
>I own a 1000 (bought in 1885) Cool! I knew our favorite machine was ahead of its time, but I always thou ht it was 100 years less than that ahead of its time… 🙂
#180118From: Eduard JosephDec 29, 1994 2:05 PM
LOL I guess Dege, had the best computer in the world for alomost a century. :-}
#180209From: DegeDec 30, 1994 2:55 AM
Sorry, I meant to say "1785".
#180210From: John DraperDec 30, 1994 2:59 AM
>> I own a 1000 (bought in 1885) > Cool! I knew our favorite machine was ahead of its time, .. Yep, and we had it rough in those days, too. Why I can remember trying to get my vinyl cutter to follow the HPGL, but the rotten sod just kept complaining that it wasn't the King's English and would slice it into little doilys.
#180312From: Trent HawkinsDec 31, 1994 2:11 AM
=>it wasn't the King's English Uh, Larry, it's been the Queen's English since the 50's. Will be until either Chuck or Willy take the job <g>.
#180359From: John DraperDec 31, 1994 12:28 PM
Uh, Trent, check the date I was talking about. 🙂 -larry
#180466From: Trent HawkinsJan 2, 1995 1:19 AM
Damn! And here I thought I had caught you in one of your rare flubs <bg>. Trent One of the "Frozen Chosen"
#180329From: arthur argoteDec 31, 1994 5:13 AM
re: "I have more Amigas in my house than there are in the town I live in" I know it wasn't meant to be funny….but I can't stop laughing. CyberCruising at ya from Brooklyn, NY on Autopilot, —Archie