CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Amiga at Work

#WordPerfect

89 messages in this thread
#123179From: Henry ColonnaMay 8, 1988 6:48 PM
If anyone can crash the current version of WordPerfect Amiga in any way shape or form (we're talking 4/15/88) I would sure like to know about it. And I don't mean "yeah I heard that someone crashed the new one." Uh-huh. Unfortunately, I think it's become more fashionable, more "in", "popular", "fun", and "clique-ish" to deride an excellent company over a fantastic program. It's amazing the way bad news sticks. I haven't heard anyone really rave on and on about some of their really favorite products here yet. (I'm guilty about the same thing, no doubt). You should've seen some of my initial letters to WP back in October. But things are much different now, and it's time to wake up to that. especially since we're not talking about an itsy bitsy featureless product made in October with no updates that crashed constantly.
#123220From: Ben BlishMay 8, 1988 9:50 PM
I'll see what I can find out; If it _really_ is crash proof, then I'm ready to buy it; if not, well, scribble works. –ben–
#123229From: Henry ColonnaMay 8, 1988 10:02 PM
Please keep in touch about this. If you do crash 4/29/88 tell me exactly how. It won't crash like that again in a few weeks after you tell me. (I'm not being fecetious).
#123229From: Henry ColonnaMay 8, 1988 10:02 PM
Please keep in touch about this. If you do crash 4/29/88 tell me exactly how. It won't crash like that again in a few weeks after you tell me. (I'm not being fecetious).
#123220From: Ben BlishMay 8, 1988 9:50 PM
I'll see what I can find out; If it _really_ is crash proof, then I'm ready to buy it; if not, well, scribble works. –ben–
#123290From: John DraperMay 9, 1988 3:37 AM
Hey, if it starts working well, we will hear about it. Do you have the Amiga version? If so, let us know how great it is. It is good that WP Corp supports the product so well, but if it's unusable to someone because it mungs their data, then they have a legitimate complaint.
#123304From: Henry ColonnaMay 9, 1988 7:19 AM
As I was telling Ben, I've been using 4/15/88 version of WordPerfect Amiga few a few days, and then 4/29/88 WordPerfect for a few weeks. This is on a 512K Amiga with 1 drive, which pushes error checking to its limits. I haven't seen a single guru. I haven't had my data trashed. I have seen 1 cosmetic problem – the slider bar on the side is inaccurate with double spacing. However, I do have up to 5 columns, microspaced justification, complex macros, complex mail merge, table of contents, index generation, thesaurus, 110,000 word speller, print priorities program that works with ALL WP Corp products, footnotes and endnotes that renumber and resize themselves automatically, fantastic header/footer (and pagenumbering) support, and automatic hyphenation. So far all those features have performed flawlessly for me. I haven't tried the Math part – I have no use for it. I don't know about earlier Amiga versions, but I suspect the program wsa corrected earlier, and the bad press "lives on". I know they are still getting trashed in the Atari community for a release that was solid in 1/8/88. I'm not saying this because I'm biased. I simply haven't had a single crash.
#123463From: John DraperMay 10, 1988 1:06 AM
Henry, The bad press comes from a lot of people reporting that they had problems, a lot of news about which update was the atest (you almost need a scorecard), on this and many other networks, in user groups, etc. Now, I will say one thing. WP Corp has a great customer support philosophy, and I applaud them for that. One can excuse a lot of problems if you know they will be made right, but that doesn't mean that everyone who has ever had the program will be happy. I know a few who sold it, because they just couldn't afford, or wouldn't put up with the bugs. Please note that i am not bashing WP or WP Corp. I am merely pointing out that a lot of the criticism has basis in fact. -larry
#123523From: Henry ColonnaMay 10, 1988 7:34 AM
I really can't defend WordPerfect a whole lot for releasing a buggy product. There's not much that can be used to defned a $250 program that crashes all the time. However, it's distressing to hear people say that "it still crashes all the time" or watch the bad press linger around for a very long time after the product has been fixed. We are talking -hard working peoplewho made an honest mistake and have since rectified the problem. I wish good news stuck around as easily as the bad news does. I've bene using WP Amiga ever since I had my Amiga – and have yet to visit Mr. Guru. I've done spelling checking, footnotes, columns, everything available in list files, macros, you name it (except for math) and haven't seen a thing. WP Atari chose -not- to keep releasing new versions every other week. Consequently people perceived them as not working hard enough. It's one or the other – new versions alot or hold off for a few months. What to do? The answer is (of course) to test a produt much more thoroughly before it comes out. Considering the -considerable- revamping of the beta test departments, I doubt if anything else from WP will be severely problematic the first time through. But in any case, let's try to move ahead. WP is an incredible WordProcessor that is solid as we speak. And has been for awhile. It has no compeition currently, and it's a great investment. They plan on continually improving the product and backing it 100%.
#123667From: John DraperMay 10, 1988 11:42 PM
Henry, Just two things… 1. Good news does stick around. I recommend programs all the time. For games, I have yet to see a better playing, more well behaved, and un-copy protected game than Mindwalker. I heartily recommend it to anyone looking for a game, and if that doesn't constitute good news 'sticking around', i don't know what does. 2. The bad news sticks around as long as there are still early versions of WP out there, with owners who don't know they can get their problems fixed. Not everyone is online as much as we are, or belongs to a user group. -larry
#123719From: Henry ColonnaMay 11, 1988 10:30 AM
WordPerfect has mailed at least 1 update to all Amiga owners – with no phone calls or anything. Blind mailing. If someone still has an old version, it's because they're a thief or WP Corp lost their information (it does happen – there were reports of customer support having people down as IBM or Amiga owners and not gettipng ST updates, etc. – it does happen). But you know what happened when those people were found? WordPerfect Corp. FEDERAL EXPRESSED them updates overnight, no charge. As a dealer we've gotten several 2 day fed exes from them (without asking)
#123772From: John DraperMay 11, 1988 4:40 PM
If a person walks into a dealer, buys Word perfect, and does not send in the registration card (do you know the average return rate on those cards/), then they will not be on WP Corp's mailing list. it happens. -larry
#123778From: Henry ColonnaMay 11, 1988 4:56 PM
You are very right. That's why every single time I sell a copy of WordPerfect, I say "be sure to send in your warranty card to get the updates and customer service. It's a very essential link between you and the company, and you won't get a significant return on your investment if you don't do it". That seems to work – I have not a single customer who didn't get ST 4/15/88 WordPerfect. Curiously enough, after all that work, they completely forgot about me. 🙂 I think salespersons should stress the importance of those registrations cards with productivity software. I can't tell you how many times I've heard "I can't get the Mark WIlliams C update for $50 because I didn't turn in my warranty card and I found out about the deadline too late. Now I have to pay $100". Or, "Gee I just heard I could get the PUblishing Partner Professional update for $50 and the deadline was yesterday. Now it's $115. Wish I'd sent in that warranty card". Maybe unimportant for games, but important for productivity.
#124172From: New memberMay 13, 1988 4:15 PM
Henry as a service to your customers maybe you could open the package and fill out the card from the recipt. Or better yet have the companys that sell thru you store authorise you to sell updates? That would make my local dealer a heck of a lot more use!!! And good after support promo!
#124253From: Henry ColonnaMay 13, 1988 8:51 PM
Really? Your local dealer doesn't update you?? As a dealer, our letters from WordPerfect say "PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CUSTOMERS." Now that is a hell of alot of support. Alot of companies don't allow that because they don't trust the dealers – they want to be in charge and in control of the update process. If your dealer won't update you, ESPECIALLY if you bought from him, then you need to complain!! By the way, this only holds true for bug fixes. Not for charged updates from 4.2 to 5.0 of course (then you need a new manual). Also, I'm not sure what the policy is for non-bug fix updates that they charge for. Hmmm. Supposedly they only charge for the disks…(mind working…hmm..) which would mean that it would be OK for the dealer to update you even in that situation….and following that logic, it makes it all the more important to buy WP from a dealer and not mail order…which is a way of supporting the dealer. (If this logic is correct). I need to fire another message to Don Curtis about dealer support if this is true!
#124253From: Henry ColonnaMay 13, 1988 8:51 PM
Really? Your local dealer doesn't update you?? As a dealer, our letters from WordPerfect say "PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CUSTOMERS." Now that is a hell of alot of support. Alot of companies don't allow that because they don't trust the dealers – they want to be in charge and in control of the update process. If your dealer won't update you, ESPECIALLY if you bought from him, then you need to complain!! By the way, this only holds true for bug fixes. Not for charged updates from 4.2 to 5.0 of course (then you need a new manual). Also, I'm not sure what the policy is for non-bug fix updates that they charge for. Hmmm. Supposedly they only charge for the disks…(mind working…hmm..) which would mean that it would be OK for the dealer to update you even in that situation….and following that logic, it makes it all the more important to buy WP from a dealer and not mail order…which is a way of supporting the dealer. (If this logic is correct). I need to fire another message to Don Curtis about dealer support if this is true!
#124172From: New memberMay 13, 1988 4:15 PM
Henry as a service to your customers maybe you could open the package and fill out the card from the recipt. Or better yet have the companys that sell thru you store authorise you to sell updates? That would make my local dealer a heck of a lot more use!!! And good after support promo!
#123778From: Henry ColonnaMay 11, 1988 4:56 PM
You are very right. That's why every single time I sell a copy of WordPerfect, I say "be sure to send in your warranty card to get the updates and customer service. It's a very essential link between you and the company, and you won't get a significant return on your investment if you don't do it". That seems to work – I have not a single customer who didn't get ST 4/15/88 WordPerfect. Curiously enough, after all that work, they completely forgot about me. 🙂 I think salespersons should stress the importance of those registrations cards with productivity software. I can't tell you how many times I've heard "I can't get the Mark WIlliams C update for $50 because I didn't turn in my warranty card and I found out about the deadline too late. Now I have to pay $100". Or, "Gee I just heard I could get the PUblishing Partner Professional update for $50 and the deadline was yesterday. Now it's $115. Wish I'd sent in that warranty card". Maybe unimportant for games, but important for productivity.
#123788From: Mike JeskinMay 11, 1988 6:16 PM
larry then it's their fault for not registering the product. They cant play the game unless the card is mailed in.
#123878From: John DraperMay 12, 1988 3:16 AM
Of course Mike. But people will be people. I would bet that if I asked 100 AMiga owners how many registration cards they mailed in, there would be a significant number that would say 'none'. There would be an even greater number that would say 'some', and the lowest count would be the group that said 'all of them'. -larry
#123907From: Henry ColonnaMay 12, 1988 9:54 AM
I don't think that's quite true of WordPerfect tho – probably true of games. The manual says to get support, you have to mail in the card, and it's the way it's presented in the manual, it looks like you need to send it in. But I agree with games, many cards get left lying on a table and then swept away.
#123907From: Henry ColonnaMay 12, 1988 9:54 AM
I don't think that's quite true of WordPerfect tho – probably true of games. The manual says to get support, you have to mail in the card, and it's the way it's presented in the manual, it looks like you need to send it in. But I agree with games, many cards get left lying on a table and then swept away.
#124154From: Jim VentolaMay 13, 1988 2:53 PM
Gee, Larry, you seem more tolerant of people who do not take the "responsibility" to register than of those who do not take the "resonsibility"X to notice that screen messages and disk drive lights are at odds. 🙂 // Jim
#124154From: Jim VentolaMay 13, 1988 2:53 PM
Gee, Larry, you seem more tolerant of people who do not take the "responsibility" to register than of those who do not take the "resonsibility"X to notice that screen messages and disk drive lights are at odds. 🙂 // Jim
#123878From: John DraperMay 12, 1988 3:16 AM
Of course Mike. But people will be people. I would bet that if I asked 100 AMiga owners how many registration cards they mailed in, there would be a significant number that would say 'none'. There would be an even greater number that would say 'some', and the lowest count would be the group that said 'all of them'. -larry
#123788From: Mike JeskinMay 11, 1988 6:16 PM
larry then it's their fault for not registering the product. They cant play the game unless the card is mailed in.
#123772From: John DraperMay 11, 1988 4:40 PM
If a person walks into a dealer, buys Word perfect, and does not send in the registration card (do you know the average return rate on those cards/), then they will not be on WP Corp's mailing list. it happens. -larry
#123828From: Anne WilliamsMay 11, 1988 10:03 PM
Henry – Just to jump in here, I'm a registered owner/user of WordPerfect and have _never_ been mailed an update yet (I bought one of the first ones out, 7/something/87. After reading the messages here, I called them yesterday about some problems with printer selection and they cheerfully agreed to send me the update. They claim I am listed in their records, too. I have been very happy with their support, and use WP all the time, putting up with the odd crash or lock, usually to do with printing somehow. I will be very glad to see a version that doesn't crash – I hope the latest version is the one! @ Anne
#123830From: Henry ColonnaMay 11, 1988 10:22 PM
Most of the problems that I've seen with the latest WP are slight cosmetic defects in some of the places. If there's anything nastier, please let me know. I'm glad to here of your good experiences – it's funny that those who badmouth the program don't own it, and those who really like it do own it, isn't it?
#124035From: Anne WilliamsMay 12, 1988 11:37 PM
I have nothing but good things to say about the customer support of WP. However, as a somewhat more cynical person I know pointed out, it's too bad that they have been called upon to provide _lots_ of support for a product released so full of bugs. I'm glad to see most of them worked out, and I get the impression that the current version, for most of us pedestrian users, is stable. Now if WP 5.0 for Amiga ever appears, well…. <grin> @ Anne
#124112From: Henry ColonnaMay 13, 1988 10:07 AM
WordPerfect 5.0 for the Amiga is coming – and it'll be quite superior than the IBM version. This time it's getting written for the Amiga from ghe ground up. Previously they stuck with IBM algorithms to save time and money, because it was a risky venture (that paid off quite nicely).
#124112From: Henry ColonnaMay 13, 1988 10:07 AM
WordPerfect 5.0 for the Amiga is coming – and it'll be quite superior than the IBM version. This time it's getting written for the Amiga from ghe ground up. Previously they stuck with IBM algorithms to save time and money, because it was a risky venture (that paid off quite nicely).
#124035From: Anne WilliamsMay 12, 1988 11:37 PM
I have nothing but good things to say about the customer support of WP. However, as a somewhat more cynical person I know pointed out, it's too bad that they have been called upon to provide _lots_ of support for a product released so full of bugs. I'm glad to see most of them worked out, and I get the impression that the current version, for most of us pedestrian users, is stable. Now if WP 5.0 for Amiga ever appears, well…. <grin> @ Anne
#124156From: Jim VentolaMay 13, 1988 3:03 PM
I think anyone who owns WP and has dealt with Customer Support would have to be a misanthrope not to like it–a program is more than code, it is the CONTEXT (docs, customer support, copy protection, other users, etc.) of that code; WordPerfect Corp. is really a standard setter in many ways. If you do not own the program and merely see it ina store or friend's house, you will evaluate only the look and feel-which is always subjective. I didn't like Word Perfect so much at first: it takes longer to get from top to bottom of a document than Easy Script on my 64 ever did, for one thing But I like it a LOT now. I like the Company even better. // Jim
#124156From: Jim VentolaMay 13, 1988 3:03 PM
I think anyone who owns WP and has dealt with Customer Support would have to be a misanthrope not to like it–a program is more than code, it is the CONTEXT (docs, customer support, copy protection, other users, etc.) of that code; WordPerfect Corp. is really a standard setter in many ways. If you do not own the program and merely see it ina store or friend's house, you will evaluate only the look and feel-which is always subjective. I didn't like Word Perfect so much at first: it takes longer to get from top to bottom of a document than Easy Script on my 64 ever did, for one thing But I like it a LOT now. I like the Company even better. // Jim
#123830From: Henry ColonnaMay 11, 1988 10:22 PM
Most of the problems that I've seen with the latest WP are slight cosmetic defects in some of the places. If there's anything nastier, please let me know. I'm glad to here of your good experiences – it's funny that those who badmouth the program don't own it, and those who really like it do own it, isn't it?
#123828From: Anne WilliamsMay 11, 1988 10:03 PM
Henry – Just to jump in here, I'm a registered owner/user of WordPerfect and have _never_ been mailed an update yet (I bought one of the first ones out, 7/something/87. After reading the messages here, I called them yesterday about some problems with printer selection and they cheerfully agreed to send me the update. They claim I am listed in their records, too. I have been very happy with their support, and use WP all the time, putting up with the odd crash or lock, usually to do with printing somehow. I will be very glad to see a version that doesn't crash – I hope the latest version is the one! @ Anne
#123719From: Henry ColonnaMay 11, 1988 10:30 AM
WordPerfect has mailed at least 1 update to all Amiga owners – with no phone calls or anything. Blind mailing. If someone still has an old version, it's because they're a thief or WP Corp lost their information (it does happen – there were reports of customer support having people down as IBM or Amiga owners and not gettipng ST updates, etc. – it does happen). But you know what happened when those people were found? WordPerfect Corp. FEDERAL EXPRESSED them updates overnight, no charge. As a dealer we've gotten several 2 day fed exes from them (without asking)
#123667From: John DraperMay 10, 1988 11:42 PM
Henry, Just two things… 1. Good news does stick around. I recommend programs all the time. For games, I have yet to see a better playing, more well behaved, and un-copy protected game than Mindwalker. I heartily recommend it to anyone looking for a game, and if that doesn't constitute good news 'sticking around', i don't know what does. 2. The bad news sticks around as long as there are still early versions of WP out there, with owners who don't know they can get their problems fixed. Not everyone is online as much as we are, or belongs to a user group. -larry
#124411From: Roy S. LauferMay 14, 1988 12:37 PM
I recently received a flyer about WP's soon to be released Word Perfect Library. Since I seem to remember that you've been involved in beta testing for WP, I'd like to know what you think of it. I'm very curious, but some of its features look similar to a series of programs already available in PD and shareware. So what do think? Have you seen it? Is it better than the PD and shareware variety????? Anyone else out there with an opinion about this????
#124411From: Roy S. LauferMay 14, 1988 12:37 PM
I recently received a flyer about WP's soon to be released Word Perfect Library. Since I seem to remember that you've been involved in beta testing for WP, I'd like to know what you think of it. I'm very curious, but some of its features look similar to a series of programs already available in PD and shareware. So what do think? Have you seen it? Is it better than the PD and shareware variety????? Anyone else out there with an opinion about this????
#123523From: Henry ColonnaMay 10, 1988 7:34 AM
I really can't defend WordPerfect a whole lot for releasing a buggy product. There's not much that can be used to defned a $250 program that crashes all the time. However, it's distressing to hear people say that "it still crashes all the time" or watch the bad press linger around for a very long time after the product has been fixed. We are talking -hard working peoplewho made an honest mistake and have since rectified the problem. I wish good news stuck around as easily as the bad news does. I've bene using WP Amiga ever since I had my Amiga – and have yet to visit Mr. Guru. I've done spelling checking, footnotes, columns, everything available in list files, macros, you name it (except for math) and haven't seen a thing. WP Atari chose -not- to keep releasing new versions every other week. Consequently people perceived them as not working hard enough. It's one or the other – new versions alot or hold off for a few months. What to do? The answer is (of course) to test a produt much more thoroughly before it comes out. Considering the -considerable- revamping of the beta test departments, I doubt if anything else from WP will be severely problematic the first time through. But in any case, let's try to move ahead. WP is an incredible WordProcessor that is solid as we speak. And has been for awhile. It has no compeition currently, and it's a great investment. They plan on continually improving the product and backing it 100%.
#123531From: Mike JeskinMay 10, 1988 9:10 AM
Larry the main problem with word perfect came from marketing pressure to get product out. The july release would have been better delayed a month or two to get some of the major headaches removed. All things considered this product has been a superior performer in terms of sales and after sale support.
#123531From: Mike JeskinMay 10, 1988 9:10 AM
Larry the main problem with word perfect came from marketing pressure to get product out. The july release would have been better delayed a month or two to get some of the major headaches removed. All things considered this product has been a superior performer in terms of sales and after sale support.
#123463From: John DraperMay 10, 1988 1:06 AM
Henry, The bad press comes from a lot of people reporting that they had problems, a lot of news about which update was the atest (you almost need a scorecard), on this and many other networks, in user groups, etc. Now, I will say one thing. WP Corp has a great customer support philosophy, and I applaud them for that. One can excuse a lot of problems if you know they will be made right, but that doesn't mean that everyone who has ever had the program will be happy. I know a few who sold it, because they just couldn't afford, or wouldn't put up with the bugs. Please note that i am not bashing WP or WP Corp. I am merely pointing out that a lot of the criticism has basis in fact. -larry
#123304From: Henry ColonnaMay 9, 1988 7:19 AM
As I was telling Ben, I've been using 4/15/88 version of WordPerfect Amiga few a few days, and then 4/29/88 WordPerfect for a few weeks. This is on a 512K Amiga with 1 drive, which pushes error checking to its limits. I haven't seen a single guru. I haven't had my data trashed. I have seen 1 cosmetic problem – the slider bar on the side is inaccurate with double spacing. However, I do have up to 5 columns, microspaced justification, complex macros, complex mail merge, table of contents, index generation, thesaurus, 110,000 word speller, print priorities program that works with ALL WP Corp products, footnotes and endnotes that renumber and resize themselves automatically, fantastic header/footer (and pagenumbering) support, and automatic hyphenation. So far all those features have performed flawlessly for me. I haven't tried the Math part – I have no use for it. I don't know about earlier Amiga versions, but I suspect the program wsa corrected earlier, and the bad press "lives on". I know they are still getting trashed in the Atari community for a release that was solid in 1/8/88. I'm not saying this because I'm biased. I simply haven't had a single crash.
#123404From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 9, 1988 8:11 PM
Larry, I wish someone would POST a list of the things that are supposed to crash WordPerfect. IF they do, I'll try each and every one on my copy (4/15/88). I've had the Amiga version of WordPerfect since it came out. I even waited until January to get my first update – and only because the DATE function wasn't working properly. I use it extensively (although not all of the features yet), and have YET to have it CRASH on me – OR DESTROY DATA. So I get a little tired hearing that it does things to other people that it has never done to me. If someone can list a sequence of actions that will crash or garble data, I'll say O.K., I'm wrong. Until then, I'll believe that it was caused by "external" forces (hardware/software), or Propoganda by people wishing to sell something else. Not that I think WordPerfect is "perfect". I just get tired of hearing the negative comments when *I* can't evaluate the source of those comments. Lloyd
#123410From: Henry ColonnaMay 9, 1988 8:17 PM
Thank you! I've also given the same request to many people. I have YET to get a response! I do believe there is a 4/29/88 WordPerfect Amiga, also. You may want to call customer support.
#123410From: Henry ColonnaMay 9, 1988 8:17 PM
Thank you! I've also given the same request to many people. I have YET to get a response! I do believe there is a 4/29/88 WordPerfect Amiga, also. You may want to call customer support.
#123411From: JEFFREY C. DEGEMay 9, 1988 8:20 PM
Lloyd, I am a new purchaser of WP, and I've had the program crash a few times. How do I tell what version I have? The only place I see a date is on the HELP window, and that is Jan 7, 1988. Is this the version date? If so, who do I talk to to get the latest vesrion. Jeff
#123423From: Henry ColonnaMay 9, 1988 9:37 PM
OOPS! you've got an old one. Call customer service (the number's in the installation section – toll free). You'll get a free update ASAP. You've got old stock.
#123423From: Henry ColonnaMay 9, 1988 9:37 PM
OOPS! you've got an old one. Call customer service (the number's in the installation section – toll free). You'll get a free update ASAP. You've got old stock.
#123613From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 10, 1988 7:57 PM
Jeff, You have an older version, as the other message mentioned. The toll-free number is in the manual – page 551. I don't doubt that WordPerfect can be crashed (anything can), but I'm just trying to get people to tell me HOW it has crashed. I want to see if I can duplicate the crash. Is there any function, or series of actions you can take that will predictably cause WP to crash? If so, please tell me. Lloyd
#123705From: C. Davey UtterMay 11, 1988 4:51 AM
Try loading an ICON…Dave
#123807From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 11, 1988 8:06 PM
I loaded an Icon last night. Now I admit I never tried it with the OLDER versions of WordPerfect, but with the 4/15/88 version it didn't "Crash". Now it DID exhibit a nasty flaw – if you forced the load as a WordPerfect file (after answering the requester that asks you if you wish to continue to load a "non-WP" file), IF you MOVED the CURSOR after the load, the HYPHENATION requester would come up and you wouldn't be able to "get out" of it. IF you CLEAR the file BEFORE you move the cursor – you are OK. But if I moved the cursor I would end up having to reboot to get away from the Hyphenation requester (effectively doing the same thing as a "crash", but still not a real Crash). Now if the ICON was loaded with TEXT IN (CTRL F5) instead, the hyphenation requester COULD eventually be "silenced" long enough to CLEAR the file from memory. This does need looking into, in my opinion. The Hyphenation requester pops up even though it hasn't been "turned on" as an option. But still not a Bona-Fide "crash". Maybe earlier versions would crash – I don't know. I don't save ICONS with my DOCUMENTS, and I have all the DOCUMENTS in their own SUBDIRECTORY. So I never loaded one by accident. Lloyd
#123809From: Henry ColonnaMay 11, 1988 8:13 PM
We had a similar problem with the hyphenation box with Atari WP. We were told that what's happening is that the lines in the file are so long (like can go out to 5,000 characters) that do to autoformatting it keeps popping up to split it up – even if it's not turned on. The only way around it, and the only thing they can do, and the only thing they can suggest doing, is keep "accepting" until it stops (it will eventually, believe me). At that point you can clear. The problem is the autoformatting – it keeps formatting the document at 80 columns (or whatever your margin is) and when it can't deal with a 5,000 character line (with no spaces or CRs) it MUST pop up the hyphenation box. I'm not sure that's the best answer. Perhaps they can insert CR's automatically to break it up, or not allow icons to be loaded in the first place (like maybe there are a few bytes in a file to identify it as an icon?) But it doesn't hang the system – put up with it and it goes away.
#123815From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 11, 1988 8:35 PM
Henry, Like I said, I never loaded an ICON into WordPerfect before, even by accident. There should be a way to "exit" more gracefully though. It's not a big problem to me. Maybe to others it is. Lloyd
#123815From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 11, 1988 8:35 PM
Henry, Like I said, I never loaded an ICON into WordPerfect before, even by accident. There should be a way to "exit" more gracefully though. It's not a big problem to me. Maybe to others it is. Lloyd
#123809From: Henry ColonnaMay 11, 1988 8:13 PM
We had a similar problem with the hyphenation box with Atari WP. We were told that what's happening is that the lines in the file are so long (like can go out to 5,000 characters) that do to autoformatting it keeps popping up to split it up – even if it's not turned on. The only way around it, and the only thing they can do, and the only thing they can suggest doing, is keep "accepting" until it stops (it will eventually, believe me). At that point you can clear. The problem is the autoformatting – it keeps formatting the document at 80 columns (or whatever your margin is) and when it can't deal with a 5,000 character line (with no spaces or CRs) it MUST pop up the hyphenation box. I'm not sure that's the best answer. Perhaps they can insert CR's automatically to break it up, or not allow icons to be loaded in the first place (like maybe there are a few bytes in a file to identify it as an icon?) But it doesn't hang the system – put up with it and it goes away.
#123990From: C. Davey UtterMay 12, 1988 4:58 PM
Lloyd, that's how I got in trouble. The ICON was left over from a file that I had in there before I stopped saving ICONs. The version I am using is the very latest (later than the 4-15 version I think, I'll look). When I did it I got no requestor, just a total lock up of the system that had to be rebooted. I'll try it again and see what it is realy doing, I just deleated the .info file and proceeded. It's an off-the-wall event anyway, I don't think many people will be using the ICON option, but it should be fixed…Dave
#124005From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 12, 1988 7:39 PM
No "lockup" here, but I couldn't really get out of that Hyphenation requester. It should be worked on – either to IGNORE files with .info at the end, or to allow a graceful exit from a mistake. Lloyd
#124086From: C. Davey UtterMay 13, 1988 4:55 AM
Lloyd, seems like one should not be allowed to load an .info file…Dave
#124086From: C. Davey UtterMay 13, 1988 4:55 AM
Lloyd, seems like one should not be allowed to load an .info file…Dave
#124005From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 12, 1988 7:39 PM
No "lockup" here, but I couldn't really get out of that Hyphenation requester. It should be worked on – either to IGNORE files with .info at the end, or to allow a graceful exit from a mistake. Lloyd
#123990From: C. Davey UtterMay 12, 1988 4:58 PM
Lloyd, that's how I got in trouble. The ICON was left over from a file that I had in there before I stopped saving ICONs. The version I am using is the very latest (later than the 4-15 version I think, I'll look). When I did it I got no requestor, just a total lock up of the system that had to be rebooted. I'll try it again and see what it is realy doing, I just deleated the .info file and proceeded. It's an off-the-wall event anyway, I don't think many people will be using the ICON option, but it should be fixed…Dave
#124036From: Jon BryanMay 12, 1988 11:39 PM
WP has had the problem you're describing since the very first release.
#124110From: Henry ColonnaMay 13, 1988 10:03 AM
The "problem" with the hyphenation requester isn't a problem at all, but an annoying side-effect with autoformatting. I saw a long explanation about it once, and to be frank, it's been several months ago. But the gist of it is that there is absolutely no way around it, and if you are patient with it it will go away. The only time anyone should ever run into it is when loading machine language files or something bizarre like that. Now, there was a bug from a very long time ago that's been fixed, when the hyphenation would pop up when it shouldn't have….but that was a different problem that's now gone.
#124301From: Jon BryanMay 13, 1988 11:28 PM
Who wants to spend ten minutes (or who knows how long) clicking the mouse? Seems like there ought to be _some_ sort of protection or way out.
#124463From: Henry ColonnaMay 14, 1988 7:36 PM
pp I agree! My only point is that it hasn't really crashed. I'll see what's up with that.
#124463From: Henry ColonnaMay 14, 1988 7:36 PM
pp I agree! My only point is that it hasn't really crashed. I'll see what's up with that.
#124301From: Jon BryanMay 13, 1988 11:28 PM
Who wants to spend ten minutes (or who knows how long) clicking the mouse? Seems like there ought to be _some_ sort of protection or way out.
#124110From: Henry ColonnaMay 13, 1988 10:03 AM
The "problem" with the hyphenation requester isn't a problem at all, but an annoying side-effect with autoformatting. I saw a long explanation about it once, and to be frank, it's been several months ago. But the gist of it is that there is absolutely no way around it, and if you are patient with it it will go away. The only time anyone should ever run into it is when loading machine language files or something bizarre like that. Now, there was a bug from a very long time ago that's been fixed, when the hyphenation would pop up when it shouldn't have….but that was a different problem that's now gone.
#124036From: Jon BryanMay 12, 1988 11:39 PM
WP has had the problem you're describing since the very first release.
#123807From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 11, 1988 8:06 PM
I loaded an Icon last night. Now I admit I never tried it with the OLDER versions of WordPerfect, but with the 4/15/88 version it didn't "Crash". Now it DID exhibit a nasty flaw – if you forced the load as a WordPerfect file (after answering the requester that asks you if you wish to continue to load a "non-WP" file), IF you MOVED the CURSOR after the load, the HYPHENATION requester would come up and you wouldn't be able to "get out" of it. IF you CLEAR the file BEFORE you move the cursor – you are OK. But if I moved the cursor I would end up having to reboot to get away from the Hyphenation requester (effectively doing the same thing as a "crash", but still not a real Crash). Now if the ICON was loaded with TEXT IN (CTRL F5) instead, the hyphenation requester COULD eventually be "silenced" long enough to CLEAR the file from memory. This does need looking into, in my opinion. The Hyphenation requester pops up even though it hasn't been "turned on" as an option. But still not a Bona-Fide "crash". Maybe earlier versions would crash – I don't know. I don't save ICONS with my DOCUMENTS, and I have all the DOCUMENTS in their own SUBDIRECTORY. So I never loaded one by accident. Lloyd
#123705From: C. Davey UtterMay 11, 1988 4:51 AM
Try loading an ICON…Dave
#123613From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 10, 1988 7:57 PM
Jeff, You have an older version, as the other message mentioned. The toll-free number is in the manual – page 551. I don't doubt that WordPerfect can be crashed (anything can), but I'm just trying to get people to tell me HOW it has crashed. I want to see if I can duplicate the crash. Is there any function, or series of actions you can take that will predictably cause WP to crash? If so, please tell me. Lloyd
#123411From: JEFFREY C. DEGEMay 9, 1988 8:20 PM
Lloyd, I am a new purchaser of WP, and I've had the program crash a few times. How do I tell what version I have? The only place I see a date is on the HELP window, and that is Jan 7, 1988. Is this the version date? If so, who do I talk to to get the latest vesrion. Jeff
#123470From: BILL LEACHMay 10, 1988 1:08 AM
Lloyd: While I am not about to try to intentionally create the condition that caused loss of data again on purpose (I did spend several days doing just that for WP Corp and that was enough), I definately lost data. Basically three different things were causing data loss: 1. Deleting a code while in two column that should not have been deleted. This is WP's fault (IMNSHO) as their Delete/Cut/Copy operations should check for such codes and at least warn the user. Most importantly though is this IS NOT an ami specific problem. 2. Timed backup munged files, this has been corrected in the latest release. 3. Exceeding WP's path length limits. This was sometimes a recoverable loss if the OS could revalidate the directory. One nice thing about WP in this regard is that if you use logical assigns WP does USE them. I personally have not had a crash that I could attribute to WP since this latest release though I am not using it nearly as much as before. 73, bill
#123514From: C. Davey UtterMay 10, 1988 6:04 AM
Bill, loading an ICON (opps) as a text file will lock up the program too…Dave
#123514From: C. Davey UtterMay 10, 1988 6:04 AM
Bill, loading an ICON (opps) as a text file will lock up the program too…Dave
#123524From: Henry ColonnaMay 10, 1988 7:37 AM
Yeah, if YOU spent several days trying to duplicate the condition, I think it must have been an obscure problem. I'm sure that it existed, but your description is far from "it crashes all the time" which I'm still hearing from others.
#123524From: Henry ColonnaMay 10, 1988 7:37 AM
Yeah, if YOU spent several days trying to duplicate the condition, I think it must have been an obscure problem. I'm sure that it existed, but your description is far from "it crashes all the time" which I'm still hearing from others.
#123614From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 10, 1988 8:05 PM
Bill, Thanks for something concrete. I'll try the first item you mentioned. I've used multiple columns with no problems, but haven't done block-deletes in them. I'll see. I've always used timed backups, however, with no problems. I was using 10 min. intervals when I first started using WP, now I use 15. That third item is also something that I haven't had any problem with, so I'll have to try an extra long path to test it. I try to keep my subdirectory names on the short side anyway – just to save typing. But I will try it. Once again, thanks for the concrete examples. Lloyd
#123614From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 10, 1988 8:05 PM
Bill, Thanks for something concrete. I'll try the first item you mentioned. I've used multiple columns with no problems, but haven't done block-deletes in them. I'll see. I've always used timed backups, however, with no problems. I was using 10 min. intervals when I first started using WP, now I use 15. That third item is also something that I haven't had any problem with, so I'll have to try an extra long path to test it. I try to keep my subdirectory names on the short side anyway – just to save typing. But I will try it. Once again, thanks for the concrete examples. Lloyd
#123470From: BILL LEACHMay 10, 1988 1:08 AM
Lloyd: While I am not about to try to intentionally create the condition that caused loss of data again on purpose (I did spend several days doing just that for WP Corp and that was enough), I definately lost data. Basically three different things were causing data loss: 1. Deleting a code while in two column that should not have been deleted. This is WP's fault (IMNSHO) as their Delete/Cut/Copy operations should check for such codes and at least warn the user. Most importantly though is this IS NOT an ami specific problem. 2. Timed backup munged files, this has been corrected in the latest release. 3. Exceeding WP's path length limits. This was sometimes a recoverable loss if the OS could revalidate the directory. One nice thing about WP in this regard is that if you use logical assigns WP does USE them. I personally have not had a crash that I could attribute to WP since this latest release though I am not using it nearly as much as before. 73, bill
#123513From: C. Davey UtterMay 10, 1988 6:04 AM
Lloyd, same here, it's workin' like a champ for me…Dave
#123513From: C. Davey UtterMay 10, 1988 6:04 AM
Lloyd, same here, it's workin' like a champ for me…Dave
#123404From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIMay 9, 1988 8:11 PM
Larry, I wish someone would POST a list of the things that are supposed to crash WordPerfect. IF they do, I'll try each and every one on my copy (4/15/88). I've had the Amiga version of WordPerfect since it came out. I even waited until January to get my first update – and only because the DATE function wasn't working properly. I use it extensively (although not all of the features yet), and have YET to have it CRASH on me – OR DESTROY DATA. So I get a little tired hearing that it does things to other people that it has never done to me. If someone can list a sequence of actions that will crash or garble data, I'll say O.K., I'm wrong. Until then, I'll believe that it was caused by "external" forces (hardware/software), or Propoganda by people wishing to sell something else. Not that I think WordPerfect is "perfect". I just get tired of hearing the negative comments when *I* can't evaluate the source of those comments. Lloyd
#123290From: John DraperMay 9, 1988 3:37 AM
Hey, if it starts working well, we will hear about it. Do you have the Amiga version? If so, let us know how great it is. It is good that WP Corp supports the product so well, but if it's unusable to someone because it mungs their data, then they have a legitimate complaint.