CompuServe Thread

#Arizona Rockhounding

7 messages in this thread
#165389From: Nathan A. SchachtmanJan 31, 1995 6:42 AM
Rod, Thanks for the Shannon article on Horshoe Dam. I tried valiantly in the rain to get up to the collecting site, but heavy rain filled the washes and made passin a geiger counter (NOT, but it sounds like fun <g>). Thanks, Guy
#166134From: Dr. Rodney K. BurroughsFeb 5, 1995 10:53 AM
Hi Nathan, Have you had a chance to look over the material you collected 'near' the Horseshoe Dam? Also I believe your Shannon Minerals address is the correct one as mine came from an old S.M. business card several years old. Just received my Jan '95 issue of Mineral News & found your article entitled "A Fluorescent Chabazite Locality Near Bancroft, Ontario". It is a very fine article and I would ask you for permission to reprint all or part of it in an upcoming issue of the U.V.Waves. Of course we would give you the credit as the author. I see the article is copyrighted. We are always looking for new material on fluorescent minerals to publish for the benefit of all FMS members. Rod
#166178From: Nathan A. SchachtmanFeb 5, 1995 2:53 PM
Rod, I did look over the material you sent me; it was very helpful in identifying some of the materials I collected. The map in Shannon's article reveals that I was closer to the prime collecting sites than I realized in the early morning foul weather. Some of the vesicular basalt had a few small herschelite crystals! They will make nice micromounts. Also, I am primed to go back with the better directions and mineral guide. Perhaps next time I go back to Arizona, I will also get to the Rowley Mine to collect some wulfenite. Thanks for the kind words about the chabazite article. Lanny and I actually discussed some of the trickier questions of copyright law, such as who has reprint rights to an article. If it's ok with Lanny, I would be glad to have the article in the UV Waves. If Lanny does agree, Waves should give an acknowledgement to the publisher of Mineral News, as well. Cheers. Nathan
#166239From: Al BalmerFeb 5, 1995 8:47 PM
Nathan, >> trickier questions of copyright law, such as who has reprint rights to >> an article. For software products, it's fairly straightforward. If the author is an independent, he owns the product, even if someone is paying him to write it. If an employee (W2 type), the employer owns all rights. From there, of course, rights can be assigned or licensed as desired. I suspect the same conditions hold for magazine articles. There's an attorney on CONSULT forum, Fred Wilf, who could tell you for sure. Al
#166648From: Nathan A. SchachtmanFeb 8, 1995 7:28 AM
Al, Thanks for the comments on independent contractor versus employee status and its bearing on ownership of intellectual property developed during the course of the relationship. The situation in publishing is a little different in that it is customary for the publisher to receive, explicitly or implicitly, an exclusive license. Some years ago, I edited my law school's Law Review and I often had the unpleasant task of explaining to authors that they would have to sign MY license agreement if they wanted to be published in the journal. As I mentioned, I actually discussed the matter with Lanny before publication. Although we have no definite understanding, I would not allow a republication without his permission as well. Nathan
#166679From: Dr. Rodney K. BurroughsFeb 8, 1995 12:32 PM
Oh, hey hi Nathan, Lanny said OK with giving credit like, "Reprinted from Mineral News Vol. 11, No. 1, January 1995, with permission of the author and publisher". Thanks to both of you and we will go ahead and reprint it in an upcoming issue of the U.V. Waves. Rod
#166750From: Al BalmerFeb 8, 1995 8:32 PM
Nathan, The differences in custom for publishing is understandable, I guess. Publishers usually have a number of authors anxious to be published, whereas computer consultants are generally only writing something because the client wants it badly enough to pay for it. It is customary that a client is given an unrestricted, though non-exclusive license. Often, too, actual assignment of the copyright is contracted, but in those situations the software is usually highly specific stuff, with limited reusability. Al