CompuServe Thread

#What's Impossible?

13 messages in this thread
#30202From: -=R=A=D=I=O=- ACTIVISIONMar 6, 1990 4:38 PM
Picture this (I'm a twilight zone kinda guy) 50 thousand tubes and relays creating an Amiga in 1945, of course, it runs at a pittly 1.34 mhz. but given 30 minutes, it will load dpaint and run it. Kinda of weird, huh? That's the way I am, for example, I produced a game called Prophecy that ran on the IBM. There was this one spell, Baeharlock that, if powered up and casted in a small room, would create so much residual energy that the entire computer] would lock-up. People thoght it was a bug until they figured out how it worked. Also, about the fast buck artist, we hired a guy to create the end splash screen for Prophecy, and he took us for a ride and gave us a silhouette pic that looked like such a rush job (and we weren't pressing) that it was condemned. These instances scare me, because when you see it happening in a lot of games, you get this flashback to a software crash of 1984-85. Anyone remember that? -rad
#30229From: David ArtMar 7, 1990 12:40 AM
Rad, You're missing the point. The available knowledge base in 1945 did not support building an Amiga. (and, since there was no Amiga, there would be no dpaint to load and run on it. 😉 David
#30330From: -=R=A=D=I=O=- ACTIVISIONMar 8, 1990 5:57 PM
(i was joking) -rad
#30354From: David ArtMar 8, 1990 11:27 PM
Rad, ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 😉 Still, there's a lot of people that really do hold to that particular view. Witness how many medical malpractice and product liability suits are based (and won) on the assumption that the current knowledge base should have somehow been known in the past. After all, the facts _obviously_ were true at the earlier time, so the defendent was _obviously_ negligent for not knowing them. I would ;), but I suppose <sigh> is more appropriate. David
#30379From: -=R=A=D=I=O=- ACTIVISIONMar 9, 1990 5:04 PM
wow, this is getting heavy, man! Did you see the news story about the "Silly String" (or is it ("Crazy String?") that was released on the market in the aerosol cans that did't damage the Ozone when sprayed? They showed a birthday party where a kid had a can of it in his hands and as the other kid blew the candles out on the birthday cake, the kid with the can of silly string sprayed it at the cake – it turns out the stuff is flammable and when the string hit the candle flames it ignited and caused 2nd degree burns to the kid who was blowing out the candles. Several companies that market that stuff have since, recalled their product of the shelves. Interesting situation though, I wonder how they'll resolve getting the product back on the market without burning the faces off of kids or holes in the earths ozone? Kinda morbid, huh? -rad
#30381From: RAD Moose @ NewTek, Inc.Mar 9, 1990 6:43 PM
Rad, The "Silly String" was not the problem (or at least from my limited investigations), but a brand called "Super String". They recalled all of the cans manufactured before Nov 1989 that had the problem. The new stuff is not supposed to be flammable. This was a front page item on the local Topeka Capital/Journal a couple months ago. RAD Moose NewTek,Inc. "'o.o'"
#30420From: -=R=A=D=I=O=- ACTIVISIONMar 10, 1990 1:59 PM
Ahh, see I thought that there were several different BRANDS of the same stuff and all the companies that were also using the same chemical to replace the f-carbons that damaged the ozone pulled their product off the shelves as well. Well anywayz,… Hey I just called NewTek about their Digi-brand of stuff, maybe you can answer my question, eh, hmm, uh, eh? -Rad
#30451From: RAD Moose @ NewTek, Inc.Mar 11, 1990 2:41 AM
Rad, I would gladly answer your question, but your last post did not have a question in it. You can ask me here, in AmigaVendor, in CompuServe Mail or call NewTek and ask for Moose. RAD Moose NewTek,Inc.
#30477From: -=R=A=D=I=O=- ACTIVISIONMar 11, 1990 3:03 PM
Cool Moose! Here's my $1,000,000 question. Does any of your software allow for a genlock device? I need to modify digitized "scapes", bend them, twist them, turn them, and then key them onto video. Is this possible with the products you folks produce? Also, I saw that your program, Digi-Paint allows for resolutions upto 1024 x 1024. Could you please describe this a bit? Is this res. in color or b/w? Can I "port" over graphics from the Mac II and manipulate them on the Amiga (and I don't mean low res. shtuff either)? I already know that an Amiga with a resolution of 320 x 200 looks great on TV. Have you looked at your demo on a composite monitor, lately? But I still need as high a resolution that I can get but still maintain the ability to genlock. I would truly appreciate your responce, -Rad
#30924From: Black Belt SystemsMar 21, 1990 7:01 PM
Rad – we received the DVG hardware. Thank you. :^) now I have TWO guys named rad. And I thought it wasn't a real name. Oi! Ben Amateur Radio Callsign is A A 7 A S
#31074From: -=R=A=D=I=O=- ACTIVISIONMar 24, 1990 2:00 AM
Wha, you mean me? No, of course not 🙂 By the by, I gotz DVG too, great program!! -R. Activision 🙂
#30393From: David ArtMar 9, 1990 9:59 PM
Rad, Yes, it certainly is morbid. There are obviously legitimate product liability and medical malpractice claims. It's a shame that the system is abused to the extent that it has been. As to getting canned string back on the market, well, I won't miss it, myself. 😉 David
#30422From: -=R=A=D=I=O=- ACTIVISIONMar 10, 1990 2:14 PM
I saw the story reported on a show called "Hard Copy." I never knew that news could be sensationalized so well! Although I still prefer to read the Weekly World News, "SPACE ALIEN DIES FROM EATING CHEESEBURGER!" or "ANIMAL PSYCHIC REVEALS THAT PIGS ARE ACTUALLY SAINTS!" My life has become so much fuller since I started reading that mag. -Rad