This is an archive of CompuServe forum messages from 1985 to 1995, as saved in transcripts by John Foust.
Search Results (14 messages)
#163628-
Mac/Win crosspltform Dev
Message #163858
Howard: Amen! Peter
#163575-
Mac/Win crosspltform Dev
Message #163857
Neil: I fully agree with your comments. Peter
#163551-
Mac/Win crosspltform Dev
Message #163856
Quality is always preferred over quantity! Peter
jud: >> global variables CurDirStore and SFSaveDisk. Thanks for your explanation. However it raises further questions: Why is it that launching the app and navigating to my project to open it seems to save the currdir but launching from the project alias does not? I would have thought it possible…
>> Double-click on a segment name, name it, and then you'll see your name, and the segment number in brackets. Thanks Brian …. I needed that! Ahem…koff koff…. I remember reading the manual and it said you can name segments and change attributes (p 154 wonderful!) but I forgot all…
Thanks for your help… I was intending to after I debugged it. Peter
#Funny paths
Message #7221
Here is the hierarchy of my C++ folders: THINK C++ | ————————————- | | | C++ Projects Think Ref …other folders TPM, xlators etc Proj x Proj y (no projects) only project stuff I also have the following aliases on my DeskTop Proj x alias (of the Proj x Folder)…
#asm code
Message #7220
The following function in THINK C compiles fine: short Foo(register short x) { asm {rol.w #1, x} return (x ^ 0x1021); } it generates the following disassembled code Foo: 00000000: 4E56 0000 LINK A6,#$0000 00000004: 2F07 MOVE.L D7,-(A7) 00000006: 3E2E 0008 MOVE.W $0008(A6),D7 0000000A: E35F ROL.W #$1,D7 0000000C: 3007 MOVE.W…
#asm ( ) vs asm { }
Message #7210
IMHO the Symantec extension for THINK C that allows asm { …} is really a lot more elegant than the ARM and GRAY approved method of asm (0x….). Please consider adding the same extension to C++ pretty please. That way it would work consistently across both compilers which would be…
#Segment numbers
Message #7209
Could it be that the "Show Segment numbers" option in the TPM project window dosn't work or is it me? I donb't see any difference when the box is checked or un-checked. The segment number is displayed in the project window either way. Peter
From:
Peter H. Teeson
MAUG(R)/Macintosh Developers/Programmers Forum
· C and Pascal
July 18, 1993 8:31 AM
Rich, I absolutely agrre with you…I was just surprised to discover you were from the industry. (Plus you are into MIDI! small world to coin a phrase) I used to work on CIM software for making semi-conductors and had the good fortune to visit Japan a number of times. Also…
From:
Peter H. Teeson
MAUG(R)/Macintosh Developers/Programmers Forum
· C and Pascal
July 17, 1993 10:13 AM
Rich: It's not just wafer size. One has to also consider the number of process steps. The number of layers in the device also adds considerably. So perhaps a cost per process step class is a way to get a better grip. For example the chemicals for etching are indeed…
Of course the NSA can though…….
Booch Components?
Message #7017
Further to Reede's comment in the next message >>6921 Consequently, they should (do, according to Rational) work fine with MPW C++.