worse than shovelware
07-Jun-93 09:56:32
Sb: #49920-worse than shovelware
Fm: John L. Sands 71214,2750
To: Chris Ness 71321,673
Chris, It was probably a repress. They apparently bought the rights to the disc
from Nimbus. It would be more difficult to re-label an already labeled disc as
it would raise questions as to why you were doing this. I know for a fact that
we ran out of Vol 5 and there were no discs pressed that had no labels.
You are right. Discs should have certain things on the label to inform the
consumer as to: 1. What system it runs on; 2. Whether it is a repress of an
older disc; 3. Whether the docs are on the disc; 4. Date of publication; 5. Who
published it.
Cheers, John