CompuServe Thread

#User Letter to C=

59 messages in this thread
#96582From: Paul IdolApr 21, 1993 7:26 PM
I mentioned this in a reply a while ago, but I guess no one noticed. So here goes again. I think that we – however many of us there are here and interested – should write a group letter to CBM stating what we like and don't like about what we've been doing and what we suggest. If it is well enough reasoned and signed by enough people, it might (we can hope, anyway, can't we?) do some good. In order to get this started, I'd be more than happy to write a draft and send it up here for comment etc. I'd be more than happy to oversee the whole thing through however many drafts there are, if that's what it takes. Any thoughts? Interested? Huh? TELL ME! Paul
#96596From: Christopher TolmieApr 21, 1993 8:55 PM
Paul, I'd like to see a first draft. 🙂 Chris
#96682From: Richard EricksonApr 22, 1993 2:20 AM
Couldn't hurt, let's see a draft then we can add input. Richard -> via the Amiga 1000 AutoPilot
#96761From: Nathan WahlApr 22, 1993 6:45 PM
Good idea, Paul, worth a try. First, praise, thank or congradulate them on the cooperation with NewTek. Mention that their are other vendors who have a good potential for a similar relationship. Second, present them with a list of concerns that we have as users, in the positive light that we can all benefit. Third, temper the message in that we aren't running the business, but may see things that may not be obvious to them. Invite them into this group (are we typical?) here to discuss these things, or at least listen in. For my input, the main concerns here are C='s relationship with the 3rd party developers (which I hear of), and their use of marketing in the big picture, (which may be obvious to all except maybe those who should know). Stress the positive and the possibilities. The negatives have had enough airplay, and serve no purpose except in mentioning. Continuous improvementand mutual benefit, that's the key. Ain't TQ wonderful? If you need a hand with wordsmithing, holler. … Nate, Emerald Video. Flyin' IFR on AP
#96828From: Jorge EscobarApr 22, 1993 11:34 PM
Paul, It is a good idea. The first thing on the list would be a serious study on how the dealer base can be expanded. Other things can be added as we see the pilot draft of the letter. Count me as supporter. Jorge Escobar/MEGABYTE PRODUCTIONS (…and AutoPilot, of course!)
#97211From: Scott HarrisApr 25, 1993 7:53 PM
>The first thing on the list would be a serious study on how the dealer base can be expanded< Interestingly, this is an ideal time for them to attack this, because IBM/Compaq/Apple dealers are more open than ever before to looking at, well, any line they can make a profit on. If Commodore can give them 20%-30% profit margins, these dealers will look at it seriously. Within the last year, all 3 of the aforementioned big players cut dealer's margins tremendously AND started direct-to-customer mail-order catalog selling, and dealers are frustrated. At catalog-matching price (or list price, which is essentially the same), dealers are typically making only in the range of 10% to 17% on most of these company's popular products, which is not a good model for a successful retail business (except maybe for very high volume and/or non-support environments) – and they're competing directly against the manufacturer/supplier besides. The trades tell us that the dealers are unhappy. Give them something they can make money on, and you'll get their attention. This seems like an opportunity. ===Scott
#97225From: Paul IdolApr 25, 1993 9:53 PM
May I take it by this post that you are interested in the User Letter to CBM? Paul
#97255From: Peter M. D'AngeloApr 25, 1993 11:13 PM
Paul, I too would support a user letter. For the most part I have already sent in three. Peter
#97345From: Scott HarrisApr 26, 1993 7:02 PM
>May I take it by this post that you are interested in the User Letter to CBM?< I don't know how much good it can do… But if you'd like to include some of my points, feel free. ===Scott
#97365From: Paul IdolApr 26, 1993 9:07 PM
I want to make the letter as complete as possible, so I definitely expect to include some of your points. But your points are not the point, if you'll forgive the bad joke. It is my hope that a letter coming out of CIS, so to speak, bearing the signatures of a large group of people – perhaps including representatives of companies maintaining a presence here, though they have not as of yet expressed any interest and may have strong reasons for not doing so – would bear more weight with C= than even many letters written by the individuals of the group. And I expect that many people who would not spend the time on a letter of their own would be willing to help with and sign a group letter. I have no idea how many Amigans there are on CIS, and of them how many would be interested in such a project. As of yet I have gotten only nine – thank you all! – definite votes of support, which while nice is not quite the response I was hoping for. Maybe more people will get involved when there is an actual letter to discuss. So to anyone reading this: I am looking not only for opinions but for votes of support. I need both. A perfect letter signed by few people and an awful letter signed by many would probably be equally ineffective. The ongoing discussion of what C= is doing right and wrong is great, but silence on the group letter is like a vote against it, because there are only so many of us. Tell me if you're interested! Everyone! Paul
#97381From: Karl F. KugelApr 26, 1993 11:09 PM
You may certainly include my signature on any letter containing the points discussed in this thread. (that makes 10) // -Karl \X/ Amiga and Autopilot: The *only* way to fly!
#97399From: jeff HolinskiApr 27, 1993 2:23 AM
Paul, If the letter does anything to get Commodore off their butts and marketing the Amiga instead of letting users trying to sell machines for them I'm in favor of it. Sign me up!
#97406From: David PaschallApr 27, 1993 7:18 AM
Paul, Count me in. David
#97413From: Chris N.JulsonApr 27, 1993 8:36 AM
Paul, You got my vote. CJ
#97423From: Todd EvansApr 27, 1993 10:11 AM
Count me in for a vote of support on the letter. As for supporting the contents of the letter, I'll give that after I've seen it. I think we need to schedule a live conference reference this topic so that we can hash out the main points of the letter and come to a consensus. Its a great idea, but unfortunately Commodore won't listen unless it is done correctly. Releasing the letter to the press (computer mags, SJ Mercury News, Online Today, etc.) might force them to notice the letter and reply. This has to be done correctly though, as to not offend Commodore too much. I speak from experience.
#97476From: Paul IdolApr 27, 1993 7:34 PM
To clear up a point for everyone: obviously I don't want a commitment to a signature now, before the letter has been formed and reviewed. I'm sorry if I was unclear on that – I just want votes of support for the idea, indications that people are willing to take part in the process. And Todd: you are right about releasing the letter to the press – pros and dangers. The idea hadn't even occured to me. But I'm not sure that a conference would be absolutely neccessary. Certainly it would be nice, but expensive. I'll start posting my thoughts on different issues and inviting response and we'll just have to go from there. Paul
#97584From: Steve AhlstromApr 28, 1993 3:06 PM
Paul, You've got my vote of support, but not necessarily my signature, until I see the final product. -sja
#98023From: Bob WalkerMay 1, 1993 9:55 PM
This sounds like a good idea to me. I'll consider signing on review.
#97429From: Gracia M. LittauerApr 27, 1993 11:25 AM
I'm interested. C= (Dionne) has sent form letters to all new owners asking for feedback so it might get some attention. I see from Mark Manes mess. a cynical view of Jim Dionne & crew. Gracia
#97523From: Mark D. ManesApr 28, 1993 12:27 AM
Cynical? No. Not sure how you got that. I just happen to know who makes decisions. Dionne is a good man, and one that deeply cares about the future of the Amiga. It is my opinion that he is not the problem. The lack of ideas is not the problem. The lack of vision from the people above him *is* the problem. I work with Commodore on a daily basis, my comments have merit. I am not being cynical Garcia. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#97431From: Jorge EscobarApr 27, 1993 11:47 AM
I am interested to write a GOOD letter with all the seriousness that can be written. Not the same old bashing at Commodore. So I guess you've got a vote, if we make a good letter. Jorge Escobar/MEGABYTE PRODUCTIONS (…and AutoPilot, of course!)
#97451From: Sean LallyApr 27, 1993 2:47 PM
I'll be signing too. -Sean
#97455From: Lin TollefsenApr 27, 1993 3:26 PM
Having been involved with Amigas (sometimes more intimately than I care to tell) since the advent of the 500, I have watched C='s marketing over the years with disappointment, followed by hope at the advent of a new campaign, followed by disappointment… I would definitely support a letter to C= describing the desires and needs of users and developers, perhaps with gentle suggestions and possibly even _gentle_ rejoinders (we are looking for their support).
#97468From: charlie badalatiApr 27, 1993 5:29 PM
I like the Idea. But reserve my vote until I see the letter. Charlie Badalati APing from Wurselen,Germany
#97497From: Scott HarrisApr 27, 1993 9:37 PM
Sounds fine, I'd just (naturally) want to see the letter before authorizing adding my name. I have to admit I don't put much stock in this sort of thing. I figure, if they care about user feedback, they are already monitoring related public forums like this one, and know what we're saying. If they don't care about that feedback, then the letter won't matter much anyway. But sure, it can't hurt. ===Scott
#97516From: Robert ComerApr 27, 1993 11:57 PM
I'm in… Bob Comer — Cruising the nets on AutoPilot
#97520From: Jonathan BlackwellApr 28, 1993 12:19 AM
Paul: Put my name down… -Jonathan
#97529From: Steve EckhartApr 28, 1993 1:06 AM
I'm interested. Steve
#97544From: john bennettApr 28, 1993 7:01 AM
You got my support, anything that might help. ….John
#97699From: Joe VeazeyApr 29, 1993 6:01 AM
Count me in too!
#97742From: David KieltykaApr 29, 1993 4:49 PM
Paul, Put my name on the list too. I'd be happy to contribute to a group letter. Provided, of course, I think it's constructive rather than just critical. -Dave (via AutoPilot)
#97375From: Mark D. ManesApr 26, 1993 9:55 PM
Paul, May I ask who you would write this letter too? If you are writing to Jim Dionne, you are wasting your time. Jim Dionne, and a lot of the people at Commodore Business Machines know what to do, or at least know what they would like to do. However, there is this one single person who makes _all_ major Commodore decisions. This man is Medhi Ali, and from what I can tell he doesn't give a damn about The Amiga or Commodore's future. Of course this is just my opinion. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#97477From: Paul IdolApr 27, 1993 7:34 PM
I hesitate to ask, but could you elaborate? Who is Medhi Ali, and why does he make all major decisions? Why doesn't Jim? And even if Jim did make all decisions and knew what he wanted, a well executed letter would still help let him in on what we, the users, would like to see. This is very strange and disturbing. I've never even heard Ali's name mentioned before. Paul
#97521From: Mark D. ManesApr 28, 1993 12:26 AM
Medhi Ali is the Chief Financial Officer at Commodore International. Jim Dionne takes his orders from him. I am quite sure, given a budget Dionne has the ability to make decisions. However, there hasn't been a budget to speak off for some time. I have spoken to Mr. Dionne on various occasions and feel rather strongly that he understands the wants/needs and wishes of the average Amiga owner. You should send him anything you send to Medhi Ali. I was just pointing out that things are not always as they seem. Decisions are often not made with anything but the "numbers" in mind. Please also understand that I am speaking based on my personal beliefs about Commodore. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#97568From: Todd EvansApr 28, 1993 11:12 AM
Mr. Dionne has done exceptionally well at following Ali's and Gould's orders, to the extent that he has had the longest tenure as Commodore USA's president. When sales went up under his predecessors, the found themselves in the street. Obviously, they were not following orders from Ali and Gould. Why Ali and Gould want to keep American sales down, I don't know. But it does seem to be their intent based on my observations. I don't envy Jim Dionne's position…he's had to walk a tightrope. Weathering Commodore bashing from all sides (users, press, industry, etc) while trying to keep his job. If we with this letter to receive more than a quick reply from CBM, we must properly orchestrate its release into the press and obtain as many users signatures a possible. Maybe we should be conversing with Amiga users on other online services (Portal, Genie, etc.) and in FidoNet. Then the letter should bear their signatures also…of course we need to work out the logistics of obtaining their actual signatures or the electronic equivalent. I will volunteer to assist in this endeavor. I know my user group will support it. Let's apply the same vision we expect from Commodore to this and we might actually get somewhere.
#97577From: Richard EricksonApr 28, 1993 1:28 PM
We could have signatures sent to a user group P.O. Box, they could act as a clearing house. A fax machine might also be a good idea. Richard -> via the Amiga 1000 AutoPilot
#97605From: Paul IdolApr 28, 1993 5:59 PM
Fax might be the most practical way to go. Paul
#97779From: Donovan WattsApr 29, 1993 9:34 PM
Count me in for a vote of support Paul. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . donovan . . .
#97589From: Mr. ChalleronApr 28, 1993 3:31 PM
If I may inject a beginner's (i.e., probably stupid) point of view: Perhaps "Ali and Gould" (I haven't a clue who they are) are trying to "keep American sales down" because they're waiting to see where the American (largely driven by Microsoft) market is going: It doesn't sound likely to me that the A1200 and the A4000 were developed by anyone who doesn't "give a damn" about the Amiga platform; and I might point out that — at least at _my_ local dealership — the number of European magazines just raving about the new AGA chipset, _and_ the amount of European software coming in daily (if _Real_3D_Version_2_ only does _half_ the things its ads claim it will, we're going to have a serious shot at creating animation that is _indistinguishable_ from real-life video), leads one to believe that the Amiga is _real_ solid … everywhere but in the USA. (And I read right here on CIS that Commodore has publicly thrown in with NewTek, so is Commodore _really_ ignoring the American market?) Let me tell you one thing I know as an absolute fact: Commodore has approached the company I work for to be a Value-Added-Reseller (or VAR); the demonstration given, which involved Scala Multimedia Development soft- ware, was _exactly_ on the mark of a product my employer is having some trouble getting to work _with_a_PC_as_the_controller_; and as a matter of fact, the whole sales/engineering staff involved with this particular project _is_ rethinking the platform, and wondering how they're going to sell "upper management" on using a "toy computer" as the system driver. I'll be willing to pitch my support toward a "User Letter to C="; but let's _all_ keep in mind that the Earth is a whole lot bigger than the good ole US of A, and that Commodore just _might_ be looking at a larger "picture" than any of us can imagine.
#97604From: Paul IdolApr 28, 1993 5:59 PM
I don't know much about the corporate structure of C=, but isn't Jim Dionne the CEO of C= USA? (And probably on his way out, given the average life expectancies of C= CEOs lately.) Doesn't he have at least some kind of control over the budget? And who's the head of C= generally? Wouldn't he be the person to contact? Paul
#97539From: Richard EricksonApr 28, 1993 3:31 AM
What might help is if we get the Amiga people over on Genie and BIX in on this. Richard -> via the Amiga 1000 AutoPilot
#97276From: Black Belt SystemsApr 26, 1993 1:15 AM
Those profits can only be "offered" to dealers if the Amiga can be sold to customers. I think that is, at best, questionable. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#97346From: Scott HarrisApr 26, 1993 7:02 PM
Well, Apple dealers would be the ones to target. They have experience in selling the "alternative" solution. They did a good job at convincing many people that they didn't need an IBM compatible, that the Mac had advantages, even years ago when the Mac was not so well established (it was these efforts that helped establish it). Now Apple has made it far less profitable to be an Apple dealer. Yes, Commodore needs the right products with the right software at the right price, and I'm not saying that's not a hurdle in itself. But if they can get that together, they'll still need a marketing channel to make the most of it, and for the first time in years, there's a mainstream channel that would be receptive to it, imo. ===Scott
#97371From: Black Belt SystemsApr 26, 1993 9:24 PM
Well, I wish you luck… I am sad to see the current state of affairs in this market. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#97498From: Scott HarrisApr 27, 1993 9:37 PM
>I am sad to see the current state of affairs in this market.< As am I. You may have heard the joke about Wang and IBM, and I'm afraid it may be frighteningly close to the truth for Amiga. ("What's the difference between IBM and Wang? About six months.") The one thing Amiga has going for it is that they actually do have some unique and useful technology. >Well, I wish you luck…< It's not for me to try (unless C= hires me). It's just something I hope C= can see and manage to take advantage of, because I like the system. I have to expend enough effort just to keep my own ventures going, I can't save C= too! But I'll take that luck, and apply it to those ventures. And same to you. ===Scott
#97622From: Ron LegroApr 28, 1993 7:04 PM
By the way, hope everyone noticed that Apple in its latest corporate report registered an 18% drop in profits. Sure, C= laid off a few staffers, but with the possible exception of Microsoft, that's an industry-wide phenomenon. Computers are a cut-throat business, right now.
#97704From: Paul IdolApr 29, 1993 7:00 AM
Do you have any idea how Mac sales are going? Paul
#97953From: Ron LegroMay 1, 1993 10:25 AM
Well, I hear Mac sales continue to be solid; as for reduced earnings, it's just that Apple, like other computer makers, is into heavy price-cutting because of extreme competition.
#97999From: Paul IdolMay 1, 1993 5:27 PM
Hmm… that could be taken as either good or bad news – that Mac sales are solid. I guess it's good for Amigans on the balance, because at least it means there's room in the world for C= and the Amiga. Paul
#97405From: john bennettApr 27, 1993 6:29 AM
Could the Amiga be made to run an alternative OS like Windoze, as part of their Amiga DOS? I guess they've tried with the BB devices but it was always so exspensive. Amigas don't sell themselves like PC's do, Normally they're not even considered as an alternative anymore than an Atari or SGI. For Video and CGI the Amigas the way to go, Even Mac people know that. The Amiga is many generations ahead in development of BQ Video applications. To bad they are ported to other platforms so quickly when they become succesful on the amiga. ….John
#97438From: Black Belt SystemsApr 27, 1993 1:58 PM
Yes, in short – however, Windows applications expect an 86xxx series CPU and will not run otherwise. WindowsNT, on the other hand, is planned to be able to run on a variety of playforms – and 86xxx applications will be run on the "alien" machines by virtue of an emulation scheme that is built directly into WindowsNT. The current plans call for RISC machines and so on. Because the bottom line ops are based on emulation in many cases, that means that IF it were to be ported to the Amiga, you'd need a VERY fast Amiga; 25 mhz '040 machines are probably bottom-of-the-line for potential hosts; even then emulation of high-end 86xxx CPU's would be, well, "painful". Other operating systems – Unix, OS-9, MacSystem7, etc – can and even have already been, ported or run under emulation, as you're probably aware. It is clear that even with the additional software base provided, these things are not enough to keep the machine going. Consider; we have 486 level bridges; we've had B&W mac stuff for a long while, color Mac is now coming online; the Amiga is still in a major backwater, some would go further and call it a "slump" (looking at CBM's recent numbers, "slump" is what *I* would call it). Although extending the machine in this manner certainly adds utility for some users, its not a general solution that could "bring the Amiga back". The only thing that I can think of that would make the Amiga a viable platform is the availability of powerful application software on a par with the PC/windows systems. And between CBM and general resistance to funding new development in the US, I don't think it will happen. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#97502From: John BonoApr 27, 1993 10:00 PM
There is an OS that could be ported rather painlessly to the Amiga, and give it a *major* shot in the arm when it comes to the "respectability quotient." If CBM purchased from NeXT the rights to a port of NeXTStep to the Amiga, the Amiga would get major shot in the arm as far as visibility goes. Since NeXT is in sore need of $$ right now, and since the Amiga and the NeXT are so similar hardware wise, it would be a major boost for the Amy and for NeXT. The Amiga definitely has the horsepower to run NeXTstep, and NeXTstep has a very strong niche in custom software development. Combined with the Amiga's low cost, and it could be a *very* attractive proposition to those folks that need a NeXT, but can't afford the CPU. John
#97505From: Black Belt SystemsApr 27, 1993 10:29 PM
John, That's actually a rather fascinating idea – but I can hear it now "Yeah, the ded computer buys a dead OS" – or something similar. An orphan OS is definitely a two-edged sword. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#97621From: John BonoApr 28, 1993 7:02 PM
But it is an OS with name recognition, and a strong niche separate from the Amiga's traditional markets. This means an increase in the userbase. John
#97671From: Black Belt SystemsApr 28, 1993 11:21 PM
Name recognition – a strong association with failure, you mean? I dunno, can't see it. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#97289From: Mark D. ManesApr 26, 1993 7:36 AM
Commodore currently gives excellent profit margins, but the mail order folks eat it up. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#96829From: Edson K. GrayApr 22, 1993 11:36 PM
Hi Paul, Sounds like a good idea to me. You can count me in. I don't know how much I can contribute, as I am not as CBM literate as most of the Amiga users on CI$, but am willing to throw in my 2 cents if I feel it is a contribution to the discussion. Edson (!!agimA na ni deppart m'I !pleH) Gray Montreal,PQ. Canada
#97315From: Mathew MowerApr 26, 1993 12:11 PM
Paul, I read that new A4000 purchasers were recieving a letter from C= asking for just that. I'd like to see your ideas and /or first draft and run from there. I'm sure that you'd receive plenty of comments. Perhaps more than you'd like! 8). Were'nt you the one that caught all the heat when you responded to my multimedia Mac posting. I thought you were right on the money . . . if that was you. Matt
#97332From: Paul IdolApr 26, 1993 4:35 PM
I don't think that was me. But you're on my list of Letter Supporters! Paul