CompuServe Thread

#Forensic animation cases

26 messages in this thread
#163408From: Brandon BartlettApr 7, 1995 12:11 AM
Hi all, I was just thinking: wouldn't it be nice to have a compiled list of specific legal cases in which computer animations were successfully used here on the forum, like the list of forensic animators? Might that not give animators some good ammo to use when selling the idea to attorneys? Any thoughts… Brandon DesignTec
#163431From: LEE STEELApr 7, 1995 3:03 AM
Might "ALSO" be MOST informative to know which of those cases were specifically 3D Studio. -Lee
#163467From: Brandon BartlettApr 7, 1995 10:01 AM
Yeah, and also maybe a list of cases where animation was *not* successfully used, so we can look them up and see why. Brandon DesignTec
#163572From: Rick MillerApr 7, 1995 6:23 PM
Brandon, I think it sure couldn't hurt, are you volunteering? That what happened to me, if you mention it, you usually end up getting the job <BG>. I also think that its the money they have to spend that keeps them away. Many don't have the financial resources to allow them to spend the money upfront in hopes that they will win. Sometimes its just that they don't know that someone locally is available. Its a marketing problem I'm not sure how to tackle. Any ideas? We need someone thats sharp in a business sense to do a study that will show the attorneys return on their investment, what size of case where they would brake even and so on. Regards………..Rick – Technical Animations
#163634From: Brandon BartlettApr 8, 1995 1:33 AM
Hi Rick, >> are you volunteering? That what happened to me, if you mention it, you usually end up getting the job <BG>.<< Sure, why not. "I officially volunteer". I have downloaded your list of forensic animators. Thanks! As a matter of fact, I think I got your name off of that list and sent you some e-mail in the past couple days about an article I am writing on forensic animation for "The Alabama Lawyer" magazine. Did you get it? >>I also think that its the money >>Sometimes its just that they don't know that someone locally is available. Its a marketing problem I'm not sure how to tackle. Any ideas?<< Yeah, I agree with both. Most state bar associations, if not all, publish magazines or newsletters which *all* licensed attorneys in the state receive. Have you thought about running an advertisement? Or maybe a booth at your state's annual bar association convention? >>We need someone thats sharp in a business sense to do a study that will show the attorneys return on their investment, what size of case where they would brake even and so on.<< Cool idea! I'll look into that. Best Regards, Brandon DesignTec
#163765From: Rick MillerApr 9, 1995 10:57 AM
Brandon, >>I have downloaded your list of forensic animators. Thanks!<< Your are most welcome, I'm glad its being used. >>Sure, why not. "I officially volunteer".<< Exactly what info do you need? >>As a matter of fact, I think I got your name off of that list and sent you some e-mail in the past couple days about an article I am writing on forensic animation for "The Alabama Lawyer" magazine. Did you get it?<< I got your email about the article you are writing, thanks. I'm in the middle of a 9 car accident with an expert that I have never worked with before and I have a relatively short deadline. I hope to reply to at least some of the questions you posed. When do you need my reply and images? >>Most state bar associations, if not all, publish magazines or newsletters which *all* licensed attorneys in the state receive. Have you thought about running an advertisement? Or maybe a booth at your state's annual bar association convention?<< I did place an ad in the "Oklahoma Trial Lawyers Association" magazine with 1 or 2 respones for 3 issues/6 month run. I'm thinking that I need a longer run to show more permanence in market place. I have another ad coming out this month with what I think is a better verbage, it will run for 4 issues/12 months. Amazing what you can learn from a few advertising books. I also as you suggested had a booth at a convention for the OTLA, I talked with several attorneys, but little contact after the convention. I think I need to be more aggresive and follow up with a letter or phone call, maybe that would increase the number of jobs contributable to my advertising. Word of mouth is doing a better than than any other advertising. I just need more mouths<BG>. >>Cool idea! I'll look into that.<< I didn't really think that a study would have a chance, since it would take considerable time and money. If this did happen it would certainly be icing on the cake. Regards………..Rick – Technical Animations
#163834From: Andrew ReeseApr 9, 1995 8:26 PM
If I can be of assistancein compiling and publishing a list of cases — and making some legal sense of why an animation was oe wasn't admitted — I'm more than happy to do so. andy
#163885From: Rick MillerApr 10, 1995 8:24 AM
Andy, Brandon Bartlett is the one that will be compliling the list, I'm sure he would appreciate your help. Be sure and let him know of your intentions. Regards…………Rick – Technical Animations
#164288From: Brandon BartlettApr 12, 1995 2:02 AM
Hi Andrew, Thanks for volunteering to help out! Would you happen to know what pieces of information about a case would need to be know for an attorney to look it up and do research on it? Here's what I'm thinking of including for each entry so far: CASE NAME CASE TYPE (criminal, civil, etc.) PUNITIVE AMOUNT AWARDED (If civil) AMOUNT INVESTED IN ANIMATION STATE DATE ANIM. SOFTWARE USED (if possible) ANIMATOR BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF CASE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ANIMATION What do you think? Best Regards, Brandon DesignTec
#164011From: Brandon BartlettApr 10, 1995 7:43 PM
>>Exactly what info do you need? I don't know, how about the following for starters: CASE NAME STATE DATE TYPE OF ANIM. USED (auto accident, forensic, etc.) ANIM. SOFTWARE USED (if possible) ANIMATOR BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF CASE (preferably mentioning the impact of the anim) what do you think? Anything else we should list? >>When do you need my reply and images? We have got plenty of time, and I really would love to have your comments! My first deadline for copy submittal is May 15, but I can slide to the next which is July 15, because my article probably won't show up in the next issue anyway. >>I think I need to be more aggresive and follow up with a letter or phone call, maybe that would increase the number of jobs contributable to my advertising.<< Yeah, that's where I fall short myself. But some books I have read say that the best results come from continually and periodically throwing your name and materials at your list of potential clients, particularly through the mail. It described some studies carried out by some college (I forget the name) over a period of years, even a couple decades I think, and the study said that the magic number was 5. In other words, you can count on a certain amount of response from each mailing to prosective clients. For instance, on the first you should receive some sort of feedback from approx 2% of those receiving your mailing/brochure/letter. By the 5th cycle, it should be 75%. I haven't got to 5 yet, but 1 and 2 were dead on by my experience. Something to think about… >>I didn't really think that a study would have a chance, since it would take considerable time and money.<< I didn't realize you were talking about a real and official "study", I was simply considering getting someone with good business experience to write down some sort of break-even-point figures, you know "if my case is for X amount, and my attorneys fees will be Y, and my overhead is Z, then I can allocate A amount for animation" or something? Regards, Brandon DesignTec
#164029From: Paul KakertApr 10, 1995 9:46 PM
Advertising: Word of mouth seems to be the best way to get this kind of work. Seems lawyers respect the experts not the advertisers. In fact, the lawyer I just worked for says he often uses the fact that experts are out their actively selling their services against them when they testify. Anyone else experienced that type of response to advertising. Curious. I send out tapes, but mostly when they are requested because someone has passed along my name. I would love to get more work, but don't want to jepardize my position by looking like an "ambulance chaser". Best bet seems to be well known with engineers who are called on for reconstructions and with local police and attorneys. There seems to be a thin line between "getting your name out" and "advertising your services". Any thoughts? Paul Kakert Fresh Look Design
#164164From: Rick MillerApr 11, 1995 1:21 PM
Paul, >>Word of mouth seems to be the best way to get this kind of work.<< I find the same to be true, but I don't think I would give up on other possibilities. An 1/4 page ad in the Oklahoma Trial Lawyer Association magazine cost $420 for 4 issues/12 months, just one job would pay for the cost of the ad. Then there is always future income from the same attorney, much more likely now that he has used animation. >>I would love to get more work, but don't want to jepardize my position by looking like an "ambulance chaser".<< I would not worry about being perceived as an ambulance chaser, you are not showing up at the accident site or talking with the parties involved. When you advertise, you are selling to the attorney. Being well known by the experts is certainly a plus, it will carry more weight when your name cames from him/her. LIke I have said many times, when you talk with an expert you have just contacted many many attorneys. Much better than try to contact each attorney yourself, although if time permits it can't hurt to make a few calls. Regards………Rick – Technical Animations
#164042From: Eugene J. SteveApr 10, 1995 10:26 PM
Brandon – Mailings to prospective customers are less than effective in this situation. Experience says that this is a visual, person to person sell. In order to get a repsonse via the mail, you must offer an incentive, be it discount, or whatever. Most often the mailing will be trashed. The xpectations for mailer responsed in the markets I have been in are less than 35% return, if you ask them to respond and incentivise them. 75% is almost never achieved…that's astronomical!!!! If however, you make 5 calls on a client, help him move into a new way of thinking and using your product/service, chances are by the third call you are engaged, and by the fifth call you have a contract. Maybe that is what is being referred to as the magic 5. Realize this means footwork and staff. The best sell is demos, and offering an intial incentive. Realize that part of the case is being intrusted to you at that point – leap of faith for most clients. But….it is getting better. Your list of information requested is a good one – definitely include the comments so we can see what length, what kind of animation was used, and so forth. I have had success with integrating real video clips, time stamped to animated backgrounds to add credibility to the "animation", master clocking the whole thing together so the jury sees an "in sync" view. A simplistic version is the OJ drive from OJ's house to the crime scene, done solely to show it could be done in x-monutes. More involved ones have been crash simulations of GM truck gas tanks, time to implode, etc…. Gene
#164066From: Brandon BartlettApr 11, 1995 12:46 AM
>>Mailings to prospective customers are less than effective in this situation. Experience says that this is a visual, person to person sell.<< You're right. The book I was referring to was speaking in reference to software sales, not service marketing. But in our initial efforts in the architectural animation side of things, their figures were right on, although it was across a mailing that consisted of only a little over one hundred pieces being mailed. And yes, of course, mail isn't enough. Each letter/package/sample was followed up by a phone call. I simply haven't finished the "official equation" out to the fifth try, and that's my fault. >> I have had success with integrating real video clips, time stamped to animated backgrounds to add credibility to the "animation", master clocking the whole thing together so the jury sees an "in sync" view<< Sounds like excellent methodology. I didn't see your name listed in Rick Miller's list of forensic animators. Tell us a little about what you do, if you don't mind, and would you be interested in receiving my questionaire and contributing to the magazine article I am preparing on forensic animation? Best Regards, Brandon DesignTec
#164239From: Doug BoverApr 11, 1995 7:46 PM
Brandon, FYI….RE: your magazine article…The september 1994 issue of TRIAL magazine(202-965-3500) was devoted to demonstrative evidence, and included several articles on computer generated "evidence".. Regards, Doug – JGI
#164289From: Brandon BartlettApr 12, 1995 2:02 AM
Thanks Doug, I'll definitely check that out. Thanks again! Best Regards, Brandon DesignTec
#164426From: Eugene J. SteveApr 12, 1995 6:49 PM
Brandon – be happy to fill out your questionnaire. I am new to the 3DS forum and to 3DS itself. I am setting up shop now, migrating some folks from SGI and host based systems to PC platforms that we can afford as a small business. Almost there, and when we are on our own, I will upload our resume/business info. Right now I am working for several clients that require forms of animation to fill out the cases, while I finish the rest of the market analysis. Thanks…..Gene
#164163From: Rick MillerApr 11, 1995 1:21 PM
Brandon, >>I don't know, how about the following for starters:<< I figured there was ___specific___ info that would be required for anyone to look up the case for themselves. If this is your goal, then you might need the county, parish etc. I'm not sure, I have never done any legal research. >>BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF CASE (preferably mentioning the impact of the anim)<< I think it would be hard to comment on the impact of the animation, that would have to come from the attorney. The attorney might talk with jurors or opposing attorneys after the trial is over. Possibly some animators might get feedback from the attorney. I would also add a field for the dollar value of the case and another field for any punitive damages. It would be nice to have info on just how small a case attorneys are using animation on. This could be used to sell other attorneys. I would suggest you take input like you are doing now then setup a format for everyone to follow when supplying information to you, this will save you alot work re-formating their text and possible changing it in some way. >>I didn't realize you were talking about a real and official "study"….<< To impress an attorney with a study, it would have to be documented, don't you think? May 15 certainly gives me some time, I will try to get an answer by then. Thats pretty much when my deadline for multi-car accident is. Regards………..Rick – Technical Animations
#164287From: Brandon BartlettApr 12, 1995 2:02 AM
>>I figured there was ___specific___ info that would be required for anyone to look up the case for themselves.<< I thought so too, but since I haven't done any legal research either, someone else needs to tell us whether we're compiling the right statistics or not. Anybody out there that can tell us? >>I would also add a field for the dollar value of the case and another field for any punitive damages.<< Excellent. Consider it done. I think I'm going to wait a few days, while we all discuss this a little further and I have more time to think, and then I'm going to post a new message calling for forensic cases and outlining the info fields and their format. >>To impress an attorney with a study, it would have to be documented, don't you think?<< Yeah, you're probably right<sigh>, oh well… any ideas? Re: The deadline. If May 15 is a problem, don't worry. I can easily slide to my second deadline to accomodate everyones personal time tables. I'm pretty sure my article wouldn't get into the June issue if I submitted it by the 15th of May anyway, based upon my last conversation with the editor. Best Regards, Brandon
#164321From: Rick MillerApr 12, 1995 9:14 AM
Brandon, >>I think I'm going to wait a few days, while we all discuss this a little further and I have more time to think, and then I'm going to post a new message calling for forensic cases and outlining the info fields and their format.<< I'm sure you will be glad that you put some upfront planning into this list, it will save you considerable time in the long run. >>Yeah, you're probably right<sigh>, oh well… any ideas?<< Its a fact of life, you cannot do everything. I'm very happy with scope of your list now. Someone said "How do you eat an elephant, one bite at a time." I say, "lets start with a small elephant first, then work our way up to the big ones." >>I can easily slide to my second deadline to accomodate everyones personal time tables.<< Do whats best for the group, if they benefit from it, it can only help me too. Regards…………Rick – Technical Animations
#164251From: Andrew ReeseApr 11, 1995 9:09 PM
Brandon — I'm volunteering to help compile a case list for forensic animation cases. I'm doing a book for animators on forensic animation and am in a pretty good position to assemble and make some sense of the data. Here are my suggestions: These let any other attorney or animator locate the case: STATE, COURT and CASE NUMBER COMPLETE TITLE OF THE CASE DATE OF JUDGMENT, if applicable These let the attorney and animator determine if the case is similar and useful, and provides contact points for other attorneys who want to discuss the issues: TYPE OF CASE (personal injury, criminal, real estate, etc.) BRIEF STATEMENT OF FACTS PARTY OFFERING ANIMATION TYPE OF ANIMATION (simulation, illustration, tutorial) PURPOSE OF ANIMATION DATE ANIMATION ADMITTED/EXCLUDED ANIM. SOFTWARE USED (if possible) ATTORNEY OR EXPERT CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER (good for endorsements also!!) ANIMATION FIRM, ANIMATOR, and PHONE NUMBER LEt me know how we can work together. andy
#164290From: Brandon BartlettApr 12, 1995 2:08 AM
Thanks Andrew, some wonderful info! BTW, I just posted another message asking you to do what you just did before I saw your last message, so you can ignore it. I will definitely incorporate your suggestions! I wish you the best of success on your forensic animation book. Do you have any suggestions about how to research this and compile the list? I have never done legal research before, so unless I learn otherwise, I am simply planning on relying on individuals on-line to submit what they know, what they've been involved in or heard of. I have already gotten a couple listings that way. Thanks again for your help on this. Would you also like to contribute to, and be mentioned in, a magazine article I am preparing for the state bar association journal "The Alabama Lawyer"? I have a questionaire I could e-mail you if you're interested. Thanks and best regards, Brandon DesignTec
#164411From: Andrew ReeseApr 12, 1995 4:40 PM
Glad to help. In terms of legal research, I'm a lawyer, so I can review the offered listings and make some sense of them — or know what to pursue. I think that the best way to start is to request listings from animators on and off the forum. We won't get a complete list, but it's a start. Thanks for the good wishes. I'll let you know more when we get closer to publication. What would you like for the article? Let me know. andy
#164035From: Eugene J. SteveApr 10, 1995 10:15 PM
Brandon- I am just opening a Forensic lab in Virginia, having been a new business Exec for IBM for 22 years (still am). My first love is my PI job on the side, and my second is animating. After doing a business case ananlysis on this it is clear to me that we have classic technologists and experts in the field of animation trying to market to the most conservative bunch of people in the world – lawyers!! Two things have to come together – affordability – the lawyer has to be able to recover his cost or direct charge it to the client, as in PI work (my other life). Either is acceptable, but onthe latter, you have to sell the client, and getting to him/her/them is tought – the lawyer will front it. You have to take in demos, ones that have sold in court, and you ahve to get onto platforms that are not SGI, RISC based systems so the cost of the operation comes down. Second, the operating point for our end has to be determined based on return on OUR investment. Where you direct the lawyer is to the most attractive return for us, and a good return for him. His return is intangible – win/lose, he get's paid. Win he gets paid more, but try to show a lawyer that the animated reconstruction made his case and not his skill and ability and you lose, we lose. There are a myriad of types of animations that can be offered, each one applies more readily to a specific set of case types. The more animation you need, the more time to be re-created, etc, the more it costs. Car accidents are tough to sell into, on the other hand, large suits for punitive damages, etc, can be ideal for showing that the turck, train, or whatever, was doing this, while the client was doing that…..etc. I have spent a lot of time marketing, now I'm up to my A__ in ideas and demands, and still have not gotten a multi-point lab setup on PC's. I am hoping someone can tell me that 3DS has been able to handle most of the load. Everyone has their preferences for hardware/software, and that compounds the problem of return for us. You must use the gear that getst the job done, well, and timely, but not overdo it or you will never make the magic break-even point in the time alloted by the banks. I could do a course on new startups and ROI, but not here. How about talking first about what the typical lab should have so a price point can be baselined? Once we have that, we can each delta up or down what we have invested, and figure out what we have to recover in our rates. Then you go to the spreadsheet and figure out what has to happen to the sales to make it. Lastly, you look at the market and see what enables and inhibits achievement of that level of market penetration. THis is wide open fellas – a little bit of science and a lot of business horse sense will make us all leaders in an emrging field. Any comments.???
#164067From: Brandon BartlettApr 11, 1995 12:46 AM
>>I have spent a lot of time marketing, now I'm up to my A__ in ideas and demands, and still have not gotten a multi-point lab setup on PC's. I am hoping someone can tell me that 3DS has been able to handle most of the load.<< What have you got setup so far, and what seems to be the trouble? As far as I have heard and experienced, 3DS should be able to handle just about anything, except maybe some of these airline-data-recorder-fed-perfectly-accurate-workstation-calculated animations we see on NBC a few months after a big crash. As far as what a typical lab should consist of, we need to define size first. Is this a one man freelance operation we're discussing, or is it a "three or four friends pool their savings and incorporate" situation? That's going to define, I think, more than anything else the hardware/software composition of any forensic animation lab. >>THis is wide open fellas – a little bit of science and a lot of business horse sense will make us all leaders in an emrging field.<< I'm all for that scenerio<g>. Anybody got any extra "horse sense" they can lend me<g>? >> trying to market to the most conservative bunch of people in the world – lawyers!!<< I don't know, architects might just give them a run-for-their-money when it comes to being conservative, as one architect admitted that they were "extremely cost conscious to the point of economical myopia."<g>. Best Regards, Brandon DesignTec
#164428From: Eugene J. SteveApr 12, 1995 6:58 PM
Brandon – Right now I will have on staff three people, all PI's, all experienced on PC's, but animation on PC's is not where we have been. Most of the talent lies in SGI based products which is uaffordable for us at this time. From what I've learned so far, a 486 ro Pentium, at 66 to 100MHZ with as much memory as we can afford should be a good start. We have a variety of output methods – the main one being considered right now is a master SVGA system….not a LAN, just a distribution and amplification/correction installation that we can tote from site to site, court to client, etc. We can output in Hi-res with overhead projectors also – though not as a preference for me….mostly to accommodate lo-tech sites. Ok – no more horse sense comments from me. I merely meant that the models for establishing forensic animation businesses is complex, but starts with the basics used for any new market. Kind of boring I guess…………Thanks….Gene