CompuServe Thread

#BAD FAITH

16 messages in this thread
#38708From: Robert GloverApr 29, 1992 9:53 PM
[B [B [B [B [B [B [B [B [B [B NewTek Dear Tekkies; I bought one of your Video Toasters on March 16 (6 weeks ago) and I have called your technical support personnel 7 times to try to find out why LightWave.FP crashes my Amiga 2000 every time the program is accessed. The standard LightWave version runs just fine. (My FP version of Imagine runs without any problem.) I have an Amiga 2000 with a CSA Mega Midget Racer running at 40Mhz with a 50Mhz 68882 FPU and 512K SRAM, 2M of 32-bit ram, and 6M of 16-bit ram. Your personnel first told me it must be some kind of problem with my accellerator card. (A call to CSA revealed that they have numerous Mega Midget Racers in the field running Toasters without any problem.) Then I was told that I must not have done the installation proceedure properly. Please do it again. Next I was told that all I had to do was rename LightWave.FP as LightWave and visa versa. No luck there. Still crashes. Next it again had to be an accellerator problem. I'd have to work that out with CSA, I was told. A long call and a bunch of diagnostics confirmed that the accellerator was running perfectly. Next (this is my 6th call to you folks) I was again told that I must have installed the software improperly. Try again. Finally I convinced the tech person that it might just be a corrupt version of LightWave. He finally agreed to drop the program in the mail that day. That was April 8. I waited. I waited some more. After two weeks I called again and was told that "Well, I haven't sent it out yet. We had to get some disks made and that takes a while. Oh, here, I have one on my desk. I'll get it in the mail today. That was 5 days ago, and guess what? That's right, still no software. I've been ill served by other companies (soft and hardware) but I believe NewTek has redefined "technical service." I'm sorry I invested over $2000 in your product and you can bet that if you don't make a sincere effort immediately to rectify this situation I'll do my very best to repay you with BAD PUBLICITY in every venue to which I have access.
#38714From: Mark J. MoralesApr 29, 1992 11:54 PM
Robert, I have the same accelerator config you have and I experienced the exact same problem. After a lot of calls to CSA tech support and a call or 2 to NewTek, and replacing the '882, the solution was to clock the 030 at 38 Mhz. It was real strange since each and every other piece of software that utilises the math co. ran fine with the '030 clocked at 40 Mhz, but not Lightwave or Modeler. A customer of mine had the same problems also, and there also seems to be a problem with (at least some) 040 boards and Lightwave/Modeler. On a similar topic, have you tried either of the 2 mathtrans.library replacements? They do indeed speed up non floating point operations, and everything seems to run fine, except… you guessed it! The toaster won't even boot (that darn green screen!!) with either of them. I'm not pointing any fingers, but there's bad ju-ju going on somewhere. Mark
#38739From: Robert GloverApr 30, 1992 2:50 PM
Mark, thanks so very much for your reply. It should certainly have been info tion that NewTek could have provided. I'll try replacing the crystal with a 38Mhz one and hope that it will work for me as it does for you. Thanks again, Mark!
#38779From: SyndesisMay 1, 1992 10:15 AM
So, what's the verdict? Was it NewTek's fault or the maker of your exotic hardware? Your situation was typical of hardware conflicts on the Amiga: two manufacturers are at odds because Commodore's specs are constantly changing and Amigas are constantly changing from production run to production run. And, again very typically, you were ready to blame one manufacturer or the other. Unfortunately, it's often very, very difficult to point fingers like that. Unless you can quote chapter and verse from a Commodore spec that someone's violated, it's not possible to be sure! When you find a hardware maker who can state "Company X is violating the timing framistat window on line A34 of their accelerator", you're on the right track.
#38781From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffMay 1, 1992 10:49 AM
And of course PC users are accostomed to their hardware configurations being incompatible, so they are more wary about adding things which they haven't got guarantees in advance of their working together. (how ill phrased that sounds) Poor mac users now have to think about programs being "32-bit Clean" cause they now have accelerators. The only Amiga software I have heard of which wasn't 32 bit clean was MicroSoft's AmigaBASIC. Does the Toaster work with an AT-Once PC emu lator?
#38848From: Robert GloverMay 2, 1992 11:46 PM
The verdict is that NewTek is guilty of abysmal technical support in my case. NewTek did not respond to my problem. They made no effort to discover where the problem actually lay and they did not perform as they said they would; to wit, they have never sent the Lightwave software which they have twice (3 weeks ago and again 8 days ago) claimed they were putting in the mail "that day." The problem has not been assigned to either the Toaster or to CSA's Mega Midget Racer. I'm trying to find the problem and get it rectified so I can run Lightwave.FP. I have a reasonable sounding lead from a message left to me by another BBSer. When the verdict is in I'll leave word. I'm still disgusted with NewTek whatever the eventual source of the problem! s
#38875From: SyndesisMay 3, 1992 12:11 PM
Is NewTek really responsible for your hardware problem? From what you say, yes, they've been deficient in sending that software update. Look at it from their perspective. Thousands of LightWave users don't have this problem. You've got unusual hardware. Where's the most likely source of the problem? The most absurd part of your original message was that you were ready to "threaten" NewTek by posting your side of the story in any venue you could. I know that if you were tangling with my company, I'd think you were being rather unfair. Why didn't you blame your hardware manufacturer?
#38888From: Mark J. MoralesMay 3, 1992 10:41 PM
John… As you stated, it's very difficult to point a finger when some sort of incompatability crops up, but when 9 out of 10 pieces of software run on a particular piece of hardware, you start making assumptions. One of the things I've noticed is that all to often the mfrs. point at each other as the source of the trouble and leave the user in the middle, often doing much of the the intermediate testing, rather than working together to resolve the conflict. As a dealer, I've acted as 'go-between' on behalf of a customer and various mfrs. on many occasions, and it often takes many calls and much needling to get the problem resolved. Mark
#38938From: SyndesisMay 4, 1992 11:50 PM
I agree. That's why it's always rude to go off half-cocked and declare you're going to slime someone whereever you can.
#39053From: Robert GloverMay 7, 1992 11:43 PM
My complaint wasn't that NewTek's Video Toaster was faulty but rather that they were faulty in providing technical support to resolve where the problem does lie. With software/hardware having become so complex, especially regarding the Toaster and accellerator boards surely its to be expected that problems will crop up. All I'm asking is help in resolving the problem so I can use the equipment I've paid several thousand dollars for. I believe that is a reasonable expectation. Bye the way the Lightwave software has yet to arrive though I've been assured by yet again another tech support person that it will be shipped immediately. So now nearly a month before I can resolve whether there is a problem with the software or if I have a possible problem with the Toaster or something else in my system. That must seem rather excessive a time span. Since posting that message I have developed another, serious problem with my Toaster, an apparent loss of horizontal sync on all inputs. I called NewTek, explained the problem, returned the unit at their request, and had I been at home today would have received the repaired or replace unit NewTek was very helpful and expeditious with this matter and I applaud them for it. But I still am no nearer to answering my original dilema. s
#39062From: SyndesisMay 8, 1992 8:39 AM
Like most installation software, the Toaster 2.0 install software has checksums to verify that the files are OK. In fact, I know it has at least two levels of checksums: one for each disk track since they "roll-their-own" disk format, and one CRC at the level of the giant LZH file that comes off those disks. I doubt that your LightWave program is corrupt. I've heard they have one-day turn-around on hardware repairs, aka a swap. It's unfortunate that they didn't send you a set of disks, too. How about the manufacturer of your accelerator? Does LightWave function if you remove the accelerator? Have you tried another, different accelerator card? What other boards are in the computer?
#38886From: Mark J. MoralesMay 3, 1992 10:26 PM
Robert… Have you tried the clock yet? I'm very interested in knowing the outcome of your problem. Mark
#39054From: Robert GloverMay 7, 1992 11:47 PM
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to try your suggestion of replacing the crystal with a slower one to get LightWave to work with the MegaMidegtRacer. My Toaster went down on me right after getting your message (an apparent loss of horizontal sync on all inputs) and although I have purchased some slower crystals I haven't a Toaster. I expect it back in my hands tomorrow. NewTek was extremely expeditious about repairing/replacing the unit for me. Hope that your suggestion works. Will let you know in a day or two.
#38918From: Jim OgilvieMay 4, 1992 2:56 PM
Incidentally, where did you buy your Toaster? If it was from a local dealership (I realize not all cities have them, but if you do, you should see them) then they should be able to provide you with a new copy of Lightwave, should they not? It's almost like deja vu. I have a friend who decided that he didn't like the fact that the local toaster dealer was charging more than a mail order company was for the toaster. (We live in Canada, btw) He decided to order a toaster via a US mail order company. When it arrived, the box was damaged and the disks (three of them, I think) were corrupt. We figure that when the customs people inspected it, they must have X-rayed it or something. Who knows. It took him quite a while to get replacement disks. If he had bought locally, he would have been able to just walk into the toaster dealership and get replacements. Further, he is totally frustrated because there is a fellow who works for the toaster dealer who REALLY knows his stuff. But, he can't walk in there and talk to him about the toaster, because the manager knows the whole story of what came down. The manager feels that if he didn't want to buy the toaster from his store, then he can get his technical support directly from NewTek. Buying local from a knowledgeable 'up and running' kind of dealership sure might seem like it costs more moneywise in the short term, but in the end, having someone in your city who is capable and feels obligated to help you because you bought from them, is worth more. Mail order is for people who need little or no assistance, I guess. What does this have to do with you? I dunno…just telling a story. Jim
#38924From: John GrossMay 4, 1992 7:28 PM
Jim, I work for a dealership that won't match mail order prices because we provide top notch service after the sale. What you are saying is definitely true and I hope that people come to understand …you get what you pay for… –JG
#39055From: Robert GloverMay 7, 1992 11:52 PM
Thanks for your story. I did purchase mail order. Both because the money savings were substantial (heck the tax alone is over $200) and because the amount of tech support that the local dealers can offer is fairly insignificant in the case of the more sophisticated hardware. They don't sell enough of it to know it well enough to help with more than the simplest problems. Those I can usually deal with myself. Thanks again for your thought.