CompuServe Thread

#Installing 3.1 ROMs

8 messages in this thread
#160050From: Norman HamerAug 17, 1994 2:13 PM
Dick: Here is a cut from another message in the forum which say a little more about the ROM 3.1 problem. >> ROMS are dependent on machine type, kit for 500/2000 seperate kits for 3000 and 4000. No kit for 1200, perhaps you can use 4000 kit? ROM installation painless on 2000 but confusing on 3000. My 3000 takes ROM 0 in socket marked ROM 1, the socket numbers are correct tho. Software install was faultless, even WBStartup and icon tool types were updated O.K. The kit comes with manuals for Workbench,DOS and REXX. Pretty mutch the same as the 2.1 items, as is most of the software in C: LIBS: ,but if it aint broke, why fix it.<< >> Problems…. Afraid so, well nothing ever is perfect is it? The 3000 is fine bar two problems. At first the thing wouldnt boot at all, HD light came on and stayed on, the floppy wouldnt boot either. Had to switch it on and off quickly (dodgy practice) to get the ROM boot screen, then boot from floppy. Seems that having sychronous SCSI set caused this problem. << It seems the name of the sockets ROM 0 or ROM 1 are wrong but the socket numbers are correct. You might want to check this. I am not sure what the "sy[n]chronous SCSI set" means. Also check the rest of the message (message #159807) for a longer discussion of 3.1. I hope this helps a little, until I can try things myself. Regards, Norm
#160178From: Dick SchnaseAug 18, 1994 6:48 AM
NH>It seems the name of the sockets ROM 0 or ROM 1 are wrong but the socket numbers are correct. You might want to check this. The old ROMs were in (what could be called) reverse order and that is the way the instructions said to put in the new ROMs which I did. I read somewhere else where putting them in in logical order (i.e., ROM 0 in U180 and ROM 1 in U181) didn't work at all; no ability to use the install or anything until the reversal (illogical) of the ROMs. NH>Seems that having sychronous SCSI set caused this problem. Don't know what is meant here, either. But as I indicated, my A3K is almost vanilla. I have a total of 10 Megs of RAM, otherwise, vanilla. Norman, I didn't get anything diffinitive from anyone, so will have to wait to see how you come out. One thing I did forget was holding down both left and right mouse buttons at bootup to get the machine to do a 'heads up' with a selection screen. Don't know if that is a consideration with 3.1 as it was with the software KS in 2.04. Geesse, I wish someone would give me some good words here. Later.
#160297From: Norman HamerAug 18, 1994 10:58 PM
Dick: The story is I am up and running with no problems at all, well none with the WB. The ROMs went into the sockets as stated in the instructions: the ROM0 in the higher numbered socket (and named ROM1) and the ROM1 in the lower numbered socket (with the name ROM0). After that I rebooted, the old workbench came up and it seemed to run fine with the old workbench (2.04). However, after a while it crashed. I then rebooted with the install disk in and loaded 3.1 according to the screen instructions; all pretty straightforward. The final step was to click on the proceed button and the machine rebooted. It came up fine. The install even modified my existing startup files so that the system came up pretty much like it was before installing 3.1. However, the whole reason for getting 3.1 was to run AMax IV, but AMax IV does not run. It comes up with the correct screen, then the smiling Apple face and then it crashes giving an Error 8000 0003. I guess I will have to see if ReadySoft can come up with a solution. In your case what happens if you powerup and hold both mouse buttons down, do you go into the pre-boot screen? If this is the case, try booting from a floppy. If it doesn't go to the pre-boot screen, it would appear that it is more than the 3.1 software being installed as the machine does not go to any drive if it is in pre-boot stage. Try it and see what you get. The pre-boot screen has quite a number of options to work with. Maybe we can figure something out after you try this. Regards, and good luck, Norm
#160340From: Dick SchnaseAug 19, 1994 9:20 AM
NH>Maybe we can figure something out after you try this. NH>Regards, and good luck, Thanks, Norman. I'm glad your A3K boots. As you might imagine, I am somewhat gunshy at this point. Here is one msg I got: *************************** AFINKEL [andy] Dick: 1) make sure reselection is off on all drives 2) 3.1 obeys the battmem bit indicating that a hard drive supports sync transfers. Download one of the battmem utilities (unless there's one in the 3.1 distribution) and make sure that bit is OFF. I bet the problem is the battmem sync bit. andy ****************************** One thing I need to ask: Do you have a prototype SCSI chip in your machine? That is the same size chip as the 3.1 ROM chips just to the inside of the ROM tower. Mine is a prototype and there has been some activity on FidoNet about getting new chips from Western Digital. The designator on the new chip is: WD33C93A-PL 00-08 {the old one (proto) ended in 04 and is marked 'PROTO' [appropo, eh?]} Anyway, I shall try again when I get the balls to have a go. Later. Dick
#160469From: matthew straneyAug 20, 1994 4:01 AM
my machine has PROTO chip and works fine. What kind of drive? Matt Straney, 3 hours late, without your luggage from Grand Ledge — on AutoPilot ——–>
#160473From: Dick SchnaseAug 20, 1994 6:38 AM
Matt, the drive is the one that came stock with my A3000 when I bought it. It is a Quantum ProDrive LPS 52 Megs. Have you installed 3.1? Later. Dick
#160533From: matthew straneyAug 20, 1994 4:30 PM
Yes I have. What is this PCB thing you are talking about, my ROMs plug into the mother board, why do you have it. or am I thinking of someone else. Matt Straney, 3 hours late, without your luggage from Grand Ledge — on AutoPilot ——–>
#160591From: Dick SchnaseAug 21, 1994 6:15 AM
Matt, the differences in yours and my machine could have all to do with when they were manufactured. I bought mine in Oct '90. In my machine, just above and slightly to the right side (toward the back of the machine) of the mountings for the ROMs (as I imagine it is in your machine) is what is called the ROM tower. That's where the PCB is located. No clue as to why CBM did it that way. Heat maybe? Dunno.