CompuServe Thread

Looking for a LD player

22 messages in this thread
#403From: Steve PietrowiczSep 16, 1990 11:19 AM
There seems to be enough interest about this to start a new thread, so here goes. 🙂 I'm interested in getting an inexpensive laser disk player to hook up to my Amiga for when I get AmigaVision. There is a list of players in the current issue of AmigaWorld, and I'd like any additional information anyone would be willing to contribute. What type of prices should I expect to have to pay? What's the best place to get a used laser disk player? Through the classifieds in the local paper? Are refurbished players available (and if so, where)? What about getting used disks? Thanks for any information! Steve
#422From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPSep 16, 1990 10:23 PM
I'm not certain, but all the units listed in the AmigaVision manual appear to be commercial units as opposed to consumer units. As such, they're probably going to cost a bit more than the consumer units, which run from about $400 to over $1000 list price for a new unit. You might be able to use a consumer unit if you can get the right interface and are willing to write a driver for it. Classifieds in local papers are pretty unlikely places to find used LD players. I'd try the video stores selling the players, or some mail order places. (Sight and Sound, in Waltham, MA. is where I get a lot of my LD stuff, and they sell both new and used consumer LD players. They also sell used LDs, although LDs are relatively cheap, so I usually get them new.) Finally, the industry is a quickly moving target. New models are introduced yearly and older ones discontinued, and prices are dropping on an almost monthly basis. So what is mentioned today may be well out of date in a month or two… –>Steve Bennett
#441From: Steve PietrowiczSep 17, 1990 7:02 PM
Thanks for that information Steve. I'm not super close to getting anything yet, I'm just in information gathering mode at this point. Steve
#683From: Marc Wielage <Sysop>Sep 23, 1990 3:50 PM
Steve, if you want more info on Laserdisc players, be sure to check over in Library #2 of CEFORUM, for the article LV89.TXT. It's a reasonably-good introduction to the subject, and includes several recommended models, etc. This article will be updated in just a few more weeks, BTW. Also, you can ask around for further advice in Section #2 (Video Hardware). We've got tons of laserdisc-nuts on-line, and all of our sysops have at least one LV player. A few (*ahem*) have three or four. 🙂 And there's generally at least one or two used ones for sale every month, in our classified section. –MFW
#688From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPSep 23, 1990 4:17 PM
One of these days I'm going to have to mosey on over to CEFORUM. Most of my laserdisc info comes from being heavily into Japanese Animation (and of course, the preferred method of import is on laser… <grin>) (…at least, amongst us JA people over in COMICS forum…) and from the dealers who import it for us. –>Steve Bennett
#522From: Karl SparklinSep 20, 1990 10:45 AM
Steve, I might be able to get a used Pioneer 3030. I had been looking at the 3070 and grimacing at the price, but the 3030 might be OK. Further, Martin tells us that there's a send-only interface that can be used with at least the 3030 to control the deck from AV. I want an all-format LD player, as I have put off buying a CD player. Is the 3030 this type of machine? What am I giving up by opting for the older 3030, as opposed to the current models? Thanks, Karl
#546From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPSep 20, 1990 7:50 PM
I'm fairly certain the 3030 is a combination player, and in fact a rather high end one, although somewhat dated. (The *3080* is now out and available, so the 3030 is at least two generations old.) I'm not certain what the feature differences between the 3030 and 3070 are offhand. The main differences between the 3070 and 3080 appear to be incredibly enhanced video and sound quality, but Pioneer had been concentrating on other types of features in prior years, so you might want to check with the stores. Prices have dropped, also, so you might be able to get a new 3080 for not too much more than your 3070 was (maybe *less*!) and the 3070's should be dropping in price real quick… –>Steve Bennett
#586From: Karl SparklinSep 21, 1990 10:24 PM
Steve, Yeah, I'm COUNTING on the 3030 to be a generation or two old, so I can justify the expense of getting an LD. I forgot a requirement though. It needs to have digital frame-store, as I want to digitize frames into Amy, and most of the movies seem to be in CLV for length. I wonder if the 3030 has this. Maybe I'll pop over to the CEForum. Yeah, it'd be great if the 3080 has drivent the 3070 down in price to what I was hoping to pay for the 3030! (Then again, what does that make the price of the 3030 now?!?) Have they really "improved" the sound that much on LD the last few years? Were the combi players not up to current CD quality until recently or something? That puzzles me. Karl
#597From: Wayde HiguchiSep 22, 1990 2:55 AM
Karl, I have a Pioneer 3030, and have digitized some frames from a number of CLV (as well as CAV) discs using the digital frame store capability of the player and Digi-View via the Color Splitter. (In other words, the 3030 DOES have a digital frame store.) The differences in features between a 3030 and a 3070 are: (1) the 3070 has an S-VHS output and (2) the 3070 has the capability to play both sides of a disc while the 3030 does not. One of the features that I really like about the 30×0 line of players is the "jog dial." The jog dial allows you to go forward or backward in the video at any speed by rotating a dial clockwise or counter-clockwise — it makes for some VERY interesting effects in the videos that I tend to watch… Wayde
#615From: Karl SparklinSep 22, 1990 2:29 PM
Ahh, bless you sir! I hadn't expected to find someone who was doing exactly what I want to do with the same equipment. It sounds like I can do without the 3070, opting for the 3030, as long as the 3030's sound is OK. I wonder what used 3030's are going for these days. Karl
#660From: Wayde HiguchiSep 23, 1990 3:23 AM
Karl, IMHO the sound from the 3030 is pretty good. I had two other (an old Sony portable and an old Technics tabletop) CD players when I bought the 3030. I gave both of them away because, at least to me, the 3030 sounded better. By the way, the 3030 has both analog and digital/analog stereo outputs… Wayde P.S. If you have CD-V discs: the 3030 will do a random search of the video track, pull a frame into the frame store, and display the frame while the audio portion of the disc is played…an interesting use of the frame store don't you think? Of course, not many people (other than me) buy CD-V discs… 🙂
#679From: Karl SparklinSep 23, 1990 3:23 PM
Wayde, Well, thanks to you, the 3030 sounds better and better. If it has digital stereo outputs, I'm not sure how they could be any worse than current models, unless it's a comparison between it and quad-mega-oversampling-with-whipped-cream, or somesuch. Can you explain a little more about the use with CD-V disks? That random-sample feature definitely sounds interesting, though I guess you mean that's what it does if you want to listen to just the music. What "normally" happens when you pop in a CD-V? I guess I assumed that it would play the video and the sound at the same time, but that doesn't make sense, now that I think about it. Karl
#796From: Wayde HiguchiSep 25, 1990 2:42 AM
When you play a CD-V disc on a Pioneer CLD-3030: (1) the player recognizes the format of the disc and immediately goes to the video track (I am not certain, but I believe that the video track is always track 5), (2) it plays the video track, (3) after it has completed playing the video track, it goes back and randomly does a frame store from the video track, (4) it displays the frame, (5) it skips to track 1 (the first audio track), and (6) plays all of the audio tracks (displaying the single frame throughout). By the way, the video track also contains audio. The discs that I have contain what is essentially one music video, a la MTV, and four regular audio tracks, as in a regular audio CD.
#685From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPSep 23, 1990 4:06 PM
Heh. Actually, from what I hear, the 3080 sound quality is beyond the vast majority of CD players. All CD players are not alike, and the 3080 matches the very top end in sound quality. The same applies for image quality as well. –>Steve Bennett
#707From: Vance SchowalterSep 23, 1990 6:50 PM
What's the status on Tandy's THOR technology? When will the "read/write as many times as you like" CD drives be available?? **** Vance ****
#713From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPSep 23, 1990 8:24 PM
THOR? THOR??? Oh… *THAT* THOR. <grin> Frankly, I haven't the foggiest what the situation with THOR is. I just know it ain't out yet. It's one of those things where you worry about it when it's out, and otherwise ignore it. As for read/write as many times as you like CD drives, they're here. You can get one for the Amiga for something like $5000. (In fact, I've even seen one in operation on the Amiga…) NeXT has em also. The thing which makes/made THOR a nice thing to have was that it was supposed to be a *low-cost* Read/Write optical disc.
#1158From: Marc Wielage <Sysop>Oct 3, 1990 4:14 AM
THOR was Tandy's read/write Compact Disc recorder. It's been on the back-burner for about a year, following their 1988 announcement. The Japanese manufacturers were very, very unhappy about these announcements, which they hold responsible for making DAT somewhat of a bomb. –MFW
#763From: Karl SparklinSep 24, 1990 8:42 PM
OK, how about older ones, like the 3030? Anywhere near CD quality? If not, why not?
#774From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPSep 24, 1990 10:23 PM
Heck, ANY and ALL LD players which support Digital sound are going to be at least average CD quality. It's the same technology. (Actually, CDs were derived from LD technology…) And since I'm NOT aware of a combination player which doesn't handle digital sound, then you'll get CD quality at least from any disc encoded with Digital sound. And you'll get awfully close with any disc encoded with analog Dolby CX, which is what most of the non digital discs are. What we're seeing with the new LD players is not LD catching up to CD players, but rather LD pulling way ahead…. <grin> (And if you *really* wanna hear some neat stuff, try a surround encoded disc with the proper surround decoder and it's like being in the theatre…) (…and maybe even better… 🙂
#845From: Karl SparklinSep 26, 1990 9:58 PM
Steve, Yeah, that's what I thought. So when folks have been yakking about older LD players' audio not being as good as current ones, they're really talking about how much better the current ones are, not how "bad" the old ones were. Karl
#1159From: Marc Wielage <Sysop>Oct 3, 1990 4:14 AM
]] "…the 3080 sound quality is beyond the vast majority of CD players." Most of our wacky audio experts over on CEFORUM might dispute that somewhat. I think it's clear that a $1000 combo LV/CD player will not sound or measure as good as a $1000 CD player, for example–all things being equal. One could argue that the differences are so close that they are inaudible, but to me, the jury's still out on that question. On the other hand: I own the CLD-91 (very, very similar to the CLD-3080), and it does look and sound splendiferous. –MFW
#456From: Martin WarnettSep 17, 1990 11:03 PM
As far as buying a used laser disk player, you might check an authorized factory service center, they often have reconditioned players for sale. A pioneer service center here in San Francisco used to have a bunch for sale. -=Martin=-