CompuServe Thread

#JR-Comm

31 messages in this thread
#37832From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 22, 1991 12:58 AM
I'm having a very frustrating time trying to get my JRComm program to behave as a good comm program should. However, when I log on, I receive a ton of misplaced characters, like the keymap is screwed up. My other telecomm programs work fine on CIS. I've tried setting the keymap, different fonts, stripping escape codes… ..to no avail. I dl'd this comm program hoping I'd be able to speed up my data transfer rates with CompuServe B+ and my new 2400 baud modem. Access! works fine -but- uses XModem only. BTW – A500 + GVP II w/5MB and 80M HD. Help! I spend 31 cents a minute during non-prime time on CIS, and my wife is holding a shotgun at my head (after having seen my phone bill!)
#37849From: John VerkuylenOct 22, 1991 6:08 AM
Try putting JR-Comm in VT100 mode and set 8n1 It should work. I used Jr-Comm before by I use GP-Term a Australian Product.
#37935From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 23, 1991 4:15 AM
John… Thanx, I'll give that a try. – Lorenz K. Sievers –
#37857From: Edward SwatschekOct 22, 1991 11:14 AM
Have you tried logging on despite the garbled characters? When I log on with JRComm at 8n1, I get garbled characters asking for my user number, but once entered, the request for my password comes through clearly. At 7n1 (what I originally signed up with), it all comes through clearly.
#37936From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 23, 1991 4:18 AM
Edward… No, I haven't gone past the User Number request. Sounds like a good plan though… I'll try that as well as the other ideas posted to this thread. Thanks for the help! – Lorenz K. Sievers –
#37864From: BILL LEACHOct 22, 1991 1:15 PM
Lorenz; While I have JRComm, I don't use it so can't help there. However, if you are not using AmigaDOS 2.x, you can still use Access! and have QuickB too. I don't know the file name and am not really sure if its still on CIS but there was a program that added the QuickB protocol to Access! I'm pretty sure that Betty will know about the file. -bill/ARS KB7LX
#37937From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 23, 1991 4:21 AM
Bill… Thanks for the reply. I was searching through the docs to Access! and saw that L-Amiga-b toggles Quick-B, however not sure how that works. I'll give it a try, and if it does… I'll mail Keith Young the $25 shareware registration fee. Thanks again!
#37941From: BILL LEACHOct 23, 1991 8:12 AM
Lorenz; Good move. Many of us would like to see Keith produce an improved and updated version of his program. I am sure that he would like to do so. Sending the registration for the 'current' version would not hurt his attitude about doing a 'future' version. Thanks, -bill/ARS KB7LX
#38032From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 24, 1991 2:20 AM
Bill, I know that I like to get paid when I finish a job. :> – Lorenz K. Sievers –
#38056From: BILL LEACHOct 24, 1991 8:18 AM
Lorenz; I plan to pay for Keith's new version (if and when he does one) even if I choose not to use it. His contribution to the Amiga programming community deserves a 'vote' of thanks (in my opinion). There are a number of people that have produced PD, FreeWare, ShareWare and commercial programs that have, in the process, contributed a tremendous amount of support for our favorite machine. These are people that have been so helpful to the rest of us when we were trying to figure out how to accomplish some task on the Amy (often times with a competing product). There is a pretty high percentage of the folks that I am talking about right here on CIS AmigaForums. -bill/ARS KB7LX
#38183From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 25, 1991 3:21 AM
Bill, Agreed, shareware, freeware, et al… all have helped me learn to expand my machine's horizons, not to mention gaining tremendous personal satisfaction while other folks would sit and gripe about AmigaDOS this and AmigaDOS that. How many times have we seen shareware and freeware ideas automagically appear in later OS revisions! – Lorenz K. Sievers –
#38197From: BILL LEACHOct 25, 1991 8:37 AM
Lorenz; Quite true, many ideas developed by PD/FreeWare/ShareWare authors were later used in the OS and of course, some straight commercial stuff has appeared there too. While 2.x was definately a multi-person effort and many people both within and outside C= itself deserve our thanks for their efforts at making 2.x a solid OS, I believe that Bill Hawes can quite clearly be considered the single most important person outside C= for his prodigious efforts to improve AmigaDOS. His beta test efforts and bug reporting methods helped to find problems that had been illusive for years. -bill/ARS KB7LX
#38201From: KEITH YOUNGOct 25, 1991 9:02 AM
I'd like to second that (re: Bill Hawes)… we are all indebted to him. – Keith
#38285From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 26, 1991 4:34 AM
I wonder what it would take to start a Users Group of two? :> My wife and I would make a majority? – Lorenz K. Sievers – – via Whap!
#38284From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 26, 1991 4:34 AM
Bill, Now that's an area where I am definitely a tourist. AREXX intrigues me and at the same time I am a bit intimidated about learning the language. I guess I need to see someone else using it and observe some practical applications where I could use it here in our facility. Trouble is, there aren't any other Amiga users within 500 miles (at least that I am aware of.) – Lorenz K. Sievers – – via Whap!
#38300From: BILL LEACHOct 26, 1991 8:20 AM
Lorenz; Of course you can get help here naturally. Most of us would be willing to try to assist you in learning the language. Probably the first thing to do is to type: rx "trace ?r;nop" This will allow you to interactively enter some of the rexx commands directly to the interpreter. Popping a CLI and a text editor up together to allow you to enter a program, save and execute all with pretty simple operations. Also, recommend getting some of the simpler rexx program examples from here, Fish, or some of the magazines. Play around with modifications, and insert trace statements to see how they actually work. I think you will be surprised at just how fast you will be able to pick up on how rexx programming works… remember though, that its' ease is deceptive. While doing things in Rexx is really easy, there are often much better ways to perform operations than the first obvious choice(s). Don't let that deter you though. -bill/ARS KB7LX
#38321From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 26, 1991 4:10 PM
Bill, How do I get a liscensed version of AREXX? – Lorenz K. Sievers – – via Whap!
#38017From: KEITH YOUNGOct 24, 1991 12:36 AM
Lorenz, Depending on which version of Access! you have, Quick-B may be enabled by default (if you hit L-Amiga-b and it says "..now disabled" then it was already enabled by default). The reason it wasn't listed in the menus is that that protocol is an 'auto-initiated' protocol… once you've told Compuserve what file you want and have told Compuserve that you want to use Quick-B (or B-Plus, depending on what version of Access you have, see the docs) it will ask you for a "filename for your computer:". Give it the full path/filename where you want the file on your machine and sit back — it's all automatic from then on. Cheers, Keith
#38038From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 24, 1991 2:26 AM
Keith, I'm experimenting with version 1.42 of Access! It appears that Quick-B is the supported protocol (verified by L-Amiga-b.) I really enjoy the polished appearance and thus-far "glitch free" operation. I will send you the cash this week. BTW, I don't have the docs handy, (although they are around here somewhere.) Could you post the address to send it to? Thanx again. – Lorenz K. Sievers –
#38042From: KEITH YOUNGOct 24, 1991 2:36 AM
Lorenz, Thanks for the comments… while mail going to the address in the 'About' menu still forwards correctly to me, my new address is: Keith Young 5912A Victoria dr. Upper Marlboro, Md. 20772 – Keith
#38052From: BILL LEACHOct 24, 1991 7:34 AM
Lorenz; I seem to remember that now… You hit the LCommand B and basically nothing happens except that when you go online to dl a file, Access! automagically has it sent via QuickB. -bill/ARS KB7LX
#38180From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 25, 1991 3:16 AM
Bill, .and here I've been using XModem for the past three weeks or so! It's like my wallet suddenly breathes new life! – Lorenz K. Sievers –
#38196From: BILL LEACHOct 25, 1991 8:36 AM
Lorenz; Oh yea! XModem (or at least Ward Christinsen sp?) deserves a major vote of thanks from the telcom community. XModem was the first really practical transfer protocol for binary files on micros. ZModem is a vast improvement over XModem and QB is faster yet. -bill/ARS KB7LX
#38283From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 26, 1991 4:34 AM
Bill, I remember using the old "Starterm" program in 1985 and thinking… "Gee Wally, this is really swell… being able to use the computer on the phone and junk!" Several years and many term programs and computers later, I must also tip my hat to those memories and early programs. They are what wet my appetite to continue plodding along with AmigaDOS 1.0 an such. It's a little over six years later, and here I am… still kicking and glad I didn't sell that A1000 to buy a Laird CG. – Lorenz K. Sievers – – via Whap!
#38299From: BILL LEACHOct 26, 1991 8:20 AM
Lorenz; I believe that Access! prevented my going to Starterm. I do remember the program as I remember my search for something that would work better than OnLine! (that part wasn't too difficult as everything worked better than OnLine!). I think I was so enamored by Access! that I just looked at most of the 'competition' and went back to Access! -bill/ARS KB7LX
#38107From: Betty Clay/SYSOPOct 24, 1991 7:44 PM
Lorenz, Access! uses QuickB protocols as default. When you are ready to download, tell CIS you want QuickB protocols, and the download will proceed automatically once you have given the path and name for your computer to use. Betty
#38184From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 25, 1991 3:23 AM
Betty, On the DL menu I see B, B+ and QB. Which is best (or should I say supported by Access!)? I've successfully used B, but will QB work as well? Thanks in advance. – Lorenz K. Sievers –
#38189From: KEITH YOUNGOct 25, 1991 5:48 AM
Lorenz, B+ is the best to use followed by QB and then B. You'll need to check the docs (Update.txt and/or Access!me) to see which protocol that version supports (Access! v1.42 supports B+). The B protocols are backwardly compatable in the order I listed them, so if the term supports B+, you can use any of the above, if it supports QB, you can use QB or B and if it only supports B, you can only use B. – Keith
#38281From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 26, 1991 4:33 AM
Keith, Thanks for the information. It's really tremendous being able to continue using CIS after the time I would normally log off due to cost constraints. – Lorenz K. Sievers – – via Whap!
#38249From: Betty Clay/SYSOPOct 25, 1991 10:22 PM
Lorenz, I think it depends on the version of Access you are using. I think version 1.4 uses QuickB, and I believe Keith said that 1.42 uses B+. The difference between the two is that B+ will let you restart an interrupted download at the place where transmission stopped rather than having to redo the entire file. For that reason, B+ is the most desirable, followed by QuickB. Betty
#38282From: Lorenz K. SieversOct 26, 1991 4:33 AM
Betty, Thanks for the reply. As I told Keith, it's absolutely amazing the time and cash I am already seeing saved by using B+. I Appreciate the help. – Lorenz K. Sievers – – via Whap!