CompuServe Thread

#New Apple "Performa"

58 messages in this thread
#71951From: paul ciminoSep 30, 1992 7:51 PM
What is the future of the Amiga ? I know, a few years ago, everyone clamored for a new machine, and finally we got the A3000. Many people asked "where's the improved colors ?" "Where's the SCSI-II interface ?" "Where's the high density floppies ?" (A few greedy people even wanted 24 bit color) Last year everyone started saying "Get your but in gear Commodore. Everyone's catching up and you have no marketing strategy. Where's the new products ? And why is a 5 year old design (A2000) still have a 7MHz chip, 1 MB RAM and cost over $1,000 ?" So they released the A600. (Did anyone scream for more ?) And now the A4000, with (take a giant leap backwards) an IDE interface. Where's the 24-bit Commodore ? Where's the SCSI-II ? On top of this, MacIntosh has just released news of their "Performa" line. The specs read suspiciously like an A3000, including the "Accelerator Slot". However, it is cheaper, and comes with an optional internal CD-ROM drive. What this tells me is three things : Commodore has the right idea (technically speaking) Apple is willing to borrow ideas from competitors Commodore had better wake up, or they're going to lose their technical edge. They lost any marketing edge they had a long time ago./exit
#71962From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiSep 30, 1992 10:00 PM
The only retro thing about the A4000 is IDE, and that's being addressed. The A3000 now sells for $1495; quite competitive with the Performa. I'm sure Apple forgot Commodore existed sometime around 1984. Otherwise they'd have sued them by now. 🙂 Commodore hasn't had a marketing edge since Shatner beamed up in the early 80s.
#72148From: Steve SetzerOct 2, 1992 3:57 PM
Denny, I've asked this here before but got no response but does the $1495 include monitor? If so I'm going to get mine now! …Steve On AutoPilot! (at last)
#72156From: paul ciminoOct 2, 1992 4:52 PM
$1,495 include monitor !!! I seriously doubt it, when the A2000 cost $1,000 bare, and that's the street price, isn't the official price still over $1,200 ? An is that $1,495 the street price ? I'm glad my comment started this ball rolling, but let me add that the Performa is a 32 MHz (that's what the article said, 32) 68030, with optional coprocessor. Also, it supports the Apple "32 bit color" standard, what ever that means, I've never seen anything better than VGA equivalent on a Mac, course I don't use one.
#72378From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 4, 1992 12:18 PM
I am not sure about 32 bits on the Mac but on the NeXT, 24 bits is for color, and 8 bits is for transparent colors. It is used for example when you wish to overlay two objects one over the other. One can be made transparent. It is usefull for example, if you design a car. You then design the engine inside the body. Then you can make the body of the car transparent so you can see the engine inside. Pretty fancy!
#72448From: Black Belt SystemsOct 4, 1992 10:04 PM
Yeah, you can do this just fine in Imagemaster, too. It's not something that is in any way limited to the Mac world. Furthermore, you can channel the transparency over 24 bits, not just 8, for a total of 28 bits involved. The Amiga's got a LOT of good image manipulation capability, in some ways a good deal more than the Mac. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#72475From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 5, 1992 12:41 AM
Sounds good, wish the mainstream amiga software could use this resolution. (DPaint, PPAGE, Page Stream, PDRAW, etc…)
#72527From: Jonathan BlackwellOct 5, 1992 4:20 PM
You might want to know about several high end video products that *do* support high color on the Amiga. for one, the EGS board from GVP adds some libraries to the OS that all programs can use to display 24bit. PageStream for example will run in 24bit mode. This board will operate at 24bit colors in resolutions up to 2048X2048! Even higher than that with scrollable windows. The new 3.0 OS with the AGA chipset allows all programs to use the 256color/16m pallette or the 256K/16m pallette. A good example of this is the new ProWrite which takes advantage of this new feature. Hmmm. How much do you know about the Amiga it's hardware and the current available software??? -Jonathan
#72530From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 5, 1992 4:30 PM
3.0 OS ? You mean Workbench 3.0 ? My technical knowledge about the Amiga is somewhat limited or outdated. My Amiga experience is limited to using its software. DPAINT, PDRAW, PPAGE and some others. I also have many old games like Defenders of the Crown. Very old stuff… I would really need help right now. My Amiga is back in one piece. Have been able to connect it to Compuserve, but don't know how to use the Com software "Comm 1.34" from Eyo Sama. It is the only Com software I have right now. I don't know how to log in from the Amiga. I am now back on the Macintosh. The Macintosh does everything for me, and my experience with telecommunication is pretty limited to the regular telephone services… Would appreciate any assistance.
#72535From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 5, 1992 4:50 PM
However, I have been doing some work with it for the past 5 years. I have used the Amiga long enough to know its position very well. I am not the techno-type of guy, I am a graphic artist ! My interests are in computer graphics and I try to keep track of all the latest computer technology; Amiga or not ! I don't understand the difference between VGA, EGA, XVGA or whatever else. I do however understand things like color and resolution. That is what matters to me. I know software like PDRAW from one end to the other. The same can be said about DPaint and many other software on the Amiga, on PC and the Macintosh. For the past 3 years, I have been teaching WP 5.1 in many offices downtown Montreal. And for very large companies. In some places, I have used the Mac for DTP. I did once learn how to program in Assembly language, but this is very far away now. I forgot most of it (almost five years since I used it). On the Vic-20, I had built a low-resolution graphic package. It could be used with a Joystick (mouses were not availlable for the VIC-20 then). It kind of worked like a very basic Mac Paint. Since the Vic-20, I have always been loyal to Commodore, but Today, I need a Macintosh. I am however considering replacing my aging Amiga soon. I think it would make a terrible duo with the Macintosh for what I do.
#72549From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPOct 5, 1992 6:57 PM
Comm 1.34 was written by Dan James, not Eyo Sama. Steve
#72561From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 5, 1992 7:50 PM
Sorry Steve, you are right. The name Eyo Sama was all over the package!
#72629From: Steve SetzerOct 6, 1992 2:16 PM
Jean-Eric, Use the Mac term program of your choice and download Backtalk here in AmigaUser forum or Autopilot in Amigavendor forum. (I hope you have cross doss or a similiar package for the amy. Use the Mac to save the files in MSDOS format. Use Cross-Doss to get it from msdos to amiga format. Backtalk will get you around here and other BBS's, and Autopilot will automate your sessions here on CI$. If you don't have Cross-Doss or other package to read msdos files, try to get Comm at least to download one or the ohter of the above. The $1499 price for the 3000 includes all the options you said where needed ie flicker fixer, hard drive and controller ect if you have a monitor your ready to go! And that is a bargain! This is the 25 mhz 030 with 4 megs of ram, so you are functional right out of the box!! …Steve On AutoPilot! (at last)
#72638From: Jonathan BlackwellOct 6, 1992 3:51 PM
There is a new ROM and Workbench (3.0) to address the new A4000 and future machines. It supports the 250K colors out of 16million and a bunch of other stuff. The 2.0 OS is old news (several years now.) If you want to pump up your machine, get the 2.04 ROM (3.0 is for AGA machines only) and new software on a big hard drive. Yes, you will have to fork out dough.. That is if you want to upgrade. You can upgrade bit by bit or just get a new machine. A3000's are selling cheap nowadays…. -Jonathan
#72644From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 6, 1992 4:40 PM
Wait until 1993, plan to get A4000 then. I want to see the machine first. I wish the prices you mention were canadian. Prices here are much higher… Thanks for the info Jonathan. Jean-Eric Henault
#72589From: Black Belt SystemsOct 6, 1992 12:34 AM
PageStream uses it just fine, thanks. :^) –Ben …via AutoPilot
#72245From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiOct 3, 1992 11:40 AM
Steve, Nope, the $1495 doesn't include the monitor. I still think it's an awesome deal, though. If I wasn't buying an A4000 I'd be getting one… 😉 You can always use your old monitor and upgrade to a VGA/multiscan later…
#72256From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 3, 1992 12:49 PM
Let me remind you it is very close the suggested retail price suggested by Commodore for an Amiga 2000 with no hard drive not so long ago. The $1495 is also a suggested retail price, the street price will be much lower.
#72373From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiOct 4, 1992 11:01 AM
The street price won't be much lower at all. I got the distinct impression there's VERY little margin (money for the dealer) in that $1495 price.
#72377From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 4, 1992 11:43 AM
Add the price of a flicker fixer to your Amiga setup and the prices quiet compare… Don't forget a hard drive. This device is no longer an luxury these days.
#72397From: KEITH YOUNGOct 4, 1992 2:11 PM
Eric, The A3000 comes with a built-in de-interlacer, I also believe that the package in question comes with a HD. From reading your messages in another on-going thread here, I think I've noticed one of the problems with your arguements… you seem to have an A500 as your Amiga (that you felt was inadequite and switched to a Mac… how much did that Mac cost anyway?) and at the same time, you don't seem to be aware of the capabilities of the higher end machines. The A3000 also comes with one of the fastest DMA SCSI implementations on any platform today. It comes with 2.0 (maybe 2.1 now/soon?) in ROM… which brings me to another question from the other thread… were you running 2.0 on your 500 or 1.3 ? If 1.3, that would explain some of the crashes you seem to be talking about, 2.0 is much more stable of an enviroment to work in. While the A500 is a very capable machine (I think you noted that it runs PPAGE faster than your new Mac), you get what you pay for and it was never meant as compitition for PC clones and Macs (ie. you should not be using your experiance with it as your basis for comparison). – Keith Amiga: "The Future's So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades…"
#72403From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 4, 1992 2:23 PM
I am sure the A3000 and up are much better than my former A500. However, most of the problems I had with were neither with its OS or the hardware. My biggest problem was software. I need to know the software I buy will still be supported and updated regularly. I need to know that in a year from now, the company who makes PPAGE and PDRAW (the most important packages for me) will still be there. My mac cost me a lot of money. I wish I could have spent that on an Amiga. But I need a machine who can do high-end color DTP. The Amiga does not yet have the software to do it. Also, there is currently no DTP package on the Amiga that can support more than 16 colors in high-resolution. Yes My A500 is still running under 1.3. Kickstart 1.2. It is a vintage 1987 A500. One of the first to roll out of the assembly line. One meg ram and two drives. But again, it is the software I did not like. If I could make two wishes and it would come true, I would ask that Adobe Illustrator was availlable on the Amiga, and I would have direct access to 24 bit color. This sounds impossible for now. Even with the new A4000. 256,000 colors is nice! But even IBM has been doing it since 1987. I still use my old A500 sometimes to play Populous II. I even reached the last level.
#72449From: Black Belt SystemsOct 4, 1992 10:04 PM
"256000 colors is nice! But even IBM has been doing it since 1987" Hold it, there, Pardner. IBM has been doing 256 (that's two hundred and fifty six) colors since 1987, NOT 256000. THose 256 colors had a _palette_ of 256000, which is quite differnt. The Amiga 4000 has a palette of 16 MILLION colors, and 256000 colors (not 256) it can do at once. Even IBM's newest "thing" has fewers colors, much less the ancient trash from 1987. If you're going to be an advocate, you need to go do some fact collecting. I think the primary reason you're being so negative is that you're not particularly well-informed, yet you are very concerned. Add the information you are lacking, you might not be so concerned, or then again, maybe you would – but then you'd be _right_. :^) –Ben …via AutoPilot
#72451From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 4, 1992 10:08 PM
Sorry, was told the Amiga had only 256,000 colors period. I learned about the 16,000,000 colors just after I left that message. Thanks for the info.
#72790From: Brian CowanOct 7, 1992 10:54 PM
Then there's the fact that most of the 32,000 color IBM cards can only do that in the "standard" VGA resolutions…. Something about the "HiColor" chip that makes the 32,000 color modes die at 800×600 resolution. Never mind that 800x600x32000 is advertised, it doesn't work all that well. // Brian — Cruising on AutoPilot….. \X/ AMIGA Hopefully sparing the wallet some bruising…:^)
#72548From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPOct 5, 1992 6:57 PM
DTP package on the Amiga that can support more than 16 colors in You're remarkably misinformed about the Amiga considering how strongly you've stated your opinions. For example, The magazine INFO was created entirely with Amiga software and hardware, and the results were extremely "high end". Steve
#72560From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 5, 1992 7:49 PM
I see we don't have the same standards about "high-end magazines" steve. Info was probably the most damaging product for the Amiga DTP market.
#72511From: Vic WagnerOct 5, 1992 3:13 PM
Keith. >>Amiga: "The Future's So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades…" I _love_ that comment.
#72593From: KEITH YOUNGOct 6, 1992 12:42 AM
Thanks <grin>… who'd I steal it from… Huey Lewis, maybe?
#72619From: New Horizons SoftwareOct 6, 1992 1:41 PM
Keith, TIMBUK 3 actually. Randy Brooks
#72689From: Robert ComerOct 7, 1992 3:36 AM
Wasn't Huey! But I can't remember just now… It was one of my favorite songs! Bob Comer (someday I'll make a .tag file 🙂
#72528From: Jonathan BlackwellOct 5, 1992 4:22 PM
The $1495 list price is for an A3000 with hard drive. 25Mhz '030 as well. The A3000 has a built in de-interlacer! Do you know the product line at all?????? -Jonathan
#72531From: JEAN-ERIC HENAULTOct 5, 1992 4:32 PM
What I know is that the A3000 costs a fortune around here, even before the sales tax. Last time I asked for the price, it was around 3,000 – 4,000 $ for the basic package. That was about 6 months ago. I live in Montreal, Canada. I don't expect to buy a new Amiga before New Years day.
#72640From: Jonathan BlackwellOct 6, 1992 3:56 PM
I don't know who you asked, but the price should be pretty close it… It's $1499 *LIST* here in US dollars. You make the conversion. What does it come out to? I called a mail oder house, and he is selling A3000's for $1399 plus shipping or with a VGA monitor for $1549. That is a complete system….. -Jonathan
#72792From: Brian CowanOct 7, 1992 10:55 PM
Get some American $, drive across the border, buy one in the US, and drive back across the border. Of course, you _should_ declare it @ the border crossing, but it might cost you less to do it this way….. // Brian — Cruising on AutoPilot….. \X/ AMIGA Hopefully sparing the wallet some bruising…:^)
#72379From: Mark D. ManesOct 4, 1992 1:03 PM
The $1495 is a promotion and not a price change that has been made permanent. At least not yet. There is *very* little markup — so I doubt you will see 'street' prices much different. -mark=
#71990From: Robert ComerOct 1, 1992 12:36 AM
The A600 is pretty much for new users and game players, Did I scream for more? No! I'm not a first time computer user, nor do I play to many Games. A4000 and IDE — Not a GIANT leap backwards, It's true that I'd prefer SCSI-II, but I can understand the logic that put the IDE in the 4000. 24 bit color — The A4000 is a close to 24 bit as almost all monitors can display, PLUS TREMENDOUS versatility (display wise), that no other computer has! SCSI-II will come soon, and I don't mind putting it in a ZIII slot. (If I need the slot, I'll buy a tower!) The mac Performa isn't all that good… Not very much expansion capability, slow compared to an A3000, no CD-ROM on the ones I've seen, and no where that I could see to put one (I may be wrong on that), and worst of all, it runs Mac software 🙂 Besides, the new pricing on the A3000 brings it down into their price range… Sorry about flaming there, (long day at the office…) but all is NOT doom and gloom Bob Comer
#71999From: Kevin DarlingOct 1, 1992 6:12 AM
Speaking of Performas, I happened to be in a supply store yesterday (the huge "Office Warehouse" chain)… and they had a Performa 400 (same as Mac II LC?) running a neat little audio/video demo. It was marked as normally $2995 (?), but their price was $1495. I believe that includes 4MB ram, 40MB hard disk and 12" color monitor. Pretty impressive price.
#72006From: Scott HaasOct 1, 1992 8:00 AM
The Performa 400 is a '030/16, 8 bit video, 3 NuBus slots, accelerator slot, and expandable video (not sure about the video). 16-bit data bus…Still, same price as 3000/25 4/50 W/O monitor (+$400)? -SLH
#72165From: Jonathan HirschmanOct 2, 1992 5:22 PM
Kevin, I believe that the price on the Performa 400 (I still think that "Performa" sounds like a condom) goes for around $1500…without the monitor. Keep in mind that this machine it pretty much non-expandable, and has a 16-bit memory bus. Now…look at some PC prices. I just got a Gateway 2000 brochure that is selling a *loaded* 486 66/33 DX2, with GUI accelerator (the latest ATI card with VRAM…very fast, and local bus), 8 megs ram, 340 meg IDE HD (again, local bus controller), monitor, software…for under $3000. Jonathan Jonathan, via AutoPilot // Only Amiga makes \\// it possible…
#72032From: Vic WagnerOct 1, 1992 2:02 PM
I'd really like to see CD-ROM for the high end machines tho. Really, _really_, REALLY!!!
#72105From: Robert ComerOct 2, 1992 1:32 AM
If your talking about Amiga's, I don't blame you, it's not high on my list of wants, but I'd want one eventually… Bob Comer
#72145From: Vic WagnerOct 2, 1992 3:37 PM
Robert, I was over in my local 'technical bookstore' the other day, and they have 3 CDs _filled_ with Unix/Gnu source and a bunch of UseNet stuff. The price is US$60. Now there's gotta be SOMETHING on those disks worth $60. I did a brief look through the permuted index of files and it appeared that the entire GNU source was on there. If nothing else, a fair amount of it could be used (not the GNU stuff neccessarily) as an example of how NOT to code in C <evil grin>
#72283From: Robert ComerOct 3, 1992 3:47 PM
$60? Not bad! It'd be worth if you ever need to look at some compiler/OS stuff! Maybe I'll have to think about getting a CD after all 🙂 But my next purchase is going to be a new A3000 or A4000, I haven't decided yet. (All I have now is and "expanded" 500 🙂 Bob Comer
#72134From: Leslie T. BartiromoOct 2, 1992 1:59 PM
I'd like to see a stand alone CD-ROM for the high end machines too WITH a PCMIA <sp?> card slot too!
#72284From: Robert ComerOct 3, 1992 3:48 PM
I think I'd like a PCMCIA also, good Idea! Love those nifty little flash memory type cards… Bob Comer
#72330From: Leslie T. BartiromoOct 3, 1992 9:33 PM
Right! A PCMCIA slot wouldn't take up much room <g>.
#72047From: Wayne SteeleOct 1, 1992 6:33 PM
Paul: You have some valid points. I think Commodore has made a step in the right direction with the A4000. With the exception of IDE, the A4000 seems right as the next logical step in the Amiga evolution. I also think that the A4000 is just the beginning. When machines designed around an advanced version of AGA hit the market, I think the Amiga will take a giant leap forward. For now, the A4000 can hold its own against the offerings of other manufacturers. As a design consideration, I hope that Commodore makes future Amiga chip-sets easily upgradable so that when the PeeCee or the Mac (or whatever else) starts to catch up, we can just plug the latest chip-set into our Amigas to leap ahead again. I think the new modular approach in the A4000 is a step in this direction. As for marketing, I think Commodore has to wake up. They need to do more to promote the Amiga. They also need to build a better dealer base and work on attracting new developers. They need to better understand the people who use the Amiga and be more in tune with those people's future needs. Wayne Steele Saving $ with AutoPilot
#72158From: paul ciminoOct 2, 1992 4:58 PM
I agree, although there will always be evolution in design that prohibits upgrades. The Amiga chip set went to the enhanced chip set, but eventually you have to expand the bus of the chips, which means more pins. So unless you design lots of extra unused pins for future expansion that won't happen, plus all thos extra pins have to be hooked up to something on the motherboard, or they won't do anything when a chip finally comes along mto use them. CBMs marketing sucks, and always has and probably always will. It's one of those constant things in the universe.
#72175From: Wayne SteeleOct 2, 1992 7:15 PM
Paul: Agreed. I just hope AGA has a better upgrade path than the original chips did. ECS is hardly what I'd call a major leap in technology. 🙂 Wayne Steele Saving $ with AutoPilot
#72307From: Vic WagnerOct 3, 1992 6:36 PM
Wayne, But it was about the maximum they could do with the pins/busses which were in already existing machines.
#72322From: Wayne SteeleOct 3, 1992 8:21 PM
Vic: I knew that. 🙂 I just hope that AGA machines have a little more room to grow than the original machines did. Wayne Steele Saving $ with AutoPilot
#72121From: John DublerOct 2, 1992 8:16 AM
Paul, I wouldn't get too excited about Apple's new Performa line. MacWeek, a pretty credible source in the area of Apple news, says the Performa 200 is a repackaged Mac Classic II, the Performa 400 is a Mac II LC, and the only *new* computer is the 600, offered with optional CD-Rom (that will supposedly be one of the first with multi-session Photo-CD capabilities). Apple's intent with the Performa line is to tap into households that don't own computers, to simplify their purchase decisions (OS is already installed on hard drives, etc.). Sounds a little like several flavors of the PS/1. Anybody know how that is selling (I really don't know)? At WOA, CBM said "exciting" things would be happening in the next 6-12 months. I'm willing to give them that, and don't want to hear how they're doing anything wrong until at least 6 months from now, when we can see firsthand what they're doing wrong. 🙂 *** jd, using AP from LA, CA!
#72160From: paul ciminoOct 2, 1992 5:09 PM
I've been giving them 6 years. And just when things look bleakest they come out with another tidbit. My contention has always been that they are not agressive enough. R&D, where's the CD ROM that was supposed to come out to make the A500s CDTV compatible ? Where is a 14 MHz 68010 Amiga (should be the standard, all the hardware hackings been done for them) How abot drives that don't click ? (All the software hacking has been done for them) How abot those little improvements that would add little $$$ to the manufacturing cost, but create interest, add polish to the machine ? Marketing : I've never heard anyone give CBM credit for effective marketing CBM proponents always say "We're making a profit", when they should be out killing the competition. Sales always go up around Xmas, which is also the time of year they push the A500s. Is this coincidence ? If it is, why run the ads at all ? Is this a strategy ? Sure, not a good one, but a strategy. Does anyone remember Apples first ad campaigns ? IBM was the Big Brother syndrome, everything was black and white until one individual breaks the mold. The motto was "See why 1984 won't be like '1984'" They didn't even show the computer in the entire series of commercials. Was it effective ? Sure was. I'm not in advertising and don't wish to be. But it seems CBM should give their few advertising $$$ to a small creative firm, that is hungry for the business and in touch with the younger market. Forget going after the older market, once a person gets comfortable with a machine or software, they don't like to change. Start young, the Nickolodean game show is a good start. Do more with schools, edge Apple out of edge Apple out of that market. MORE EFFECTIVE ADVERTISING CBM, not necessarily more expensive.
#72458From: John DublerOct 4, 1992 11:53 PM
Paul, I too have been an Amiga owner for over 6 years, and have been satisfied that the computer I've had has done what I've wanted in a home computer. I also have felt the future was murky and at times dim, but that was the future. I've wanted better software, but that's not CBM's line of work. You have some good points. The problem is, I don't work for CBM. I don't know if anyone from CBM is even on CIS in any official capacity any longer. If you *really* want to offer your advice and be heard, you should send a letter to CBM in Westchester. There ought to be other people here who can help you send it to the right person. Even if they ignore your letter, at least you might feel better and would at least be getting your opinion known to people that count rather than turning off potential buyers (and shooting Amigans who want to see a prosperous future in the foot). *** jd, using AP from LA, CA!
#72630From: paul ciminoOct 6, 1992 3:07 PM
Don't think I haven't tried to write to CBM. Usually deaf ears. One time Computer Graphics magazine did an article on Unix Based Multimedia. I wrote them a letter asking why they didn't review the A3000 U/X. They called me on the phone and told me they tried to contact CBM, who only would give them the specs, no help on say loaning them a machine to try out!!!
#72191From: Black Belt SystemsOct 2, 1992 9:44 PM
Something else to note: At WOA< they said they would ship in the first week of October – and my dealer has his 4000's right _now_. Gives them a great deal of credibility in my eyes – and I may be oen of the world's worst cynics. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#72195From: Christopher TolmieOct 2, 1992 9:54 PM
Ben, "… may be one of the world's worst cynics…" ??!! try THE World's… !!! B^) stay first, Chris