CompuServe Thread

#Portable Amiga at WOC

72 messages in this thread
#41073From: pat beaulieuNov 19, 1991 12:34 AM
Here is a little nice press release for you: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NEW AMIGA PORTABLE FROM NEWER TECHNOLOGY TO DEBUT AT THE WORLD OF COMMODORE SHOW IN TORONTO WICHITA, Kan. –11/13/91– Newer Technology announced the development of a new, true portable, Amiga computer. Based on the Motorola 68000 processor running at 7.16MHz, the Model 10 is 100% software compatible and available with the 1.3 or 2.0 Commodore ROMs. A monochrome LCD display is standard and a color LCD will be available soon. The model 10 will bi officiallay announced and on display at the next World of Commodore show in Toronto, Canada December 6-7-8 1991. A second 24MHz 68030 portable — the Model 30 — with an optional 68882 math co-processor, is currently under development but will not be officially announced until January 1992. The Model 30 Amiga portable is the ideal platform for the software developpers, graphics applications, video, animation, CD-TV, audio/MIDI users and AmigaVision users. The completely new design of Model 10 is compact: 2" tall, 11.7" wide and 8.3" deep when closed and weighs from three to six pounds depending upon configuration. It features 2MB of internal memory soldered onto the motherboard with expansion to up to 8MB total. An 86-pin expansion bus is available. One 3.5" 880K floppy drive is also standard. Battery power is completely dependent upon configuration and attached peripherals. Available peripherals from Newer Technology will include and external 40MB hard disk, and internal 20MB hard disk, RAM upgrades to 8MB, battery charger and a PC hardware upgrade. Projected peripherals include a CD-ROM drive, sound output interface, SCSI II Dart RAM drive, external tape drive and an external color display. Pricing and availability will be announced at the Toronto show. ———————————————————————— Isn't that nice!? Can't wait for it!! – via Whap!
#41102From: SPC Superbase Tech SuppNov 19, 1991 12:56 PM
Do you have any GUESS of a ballpark price? $1000? $10000? $5?! 🙂 Darin SPC Technical Support – via Whap!
#41143From: pat beaulieuNov 20, 1991 12:20 AM
Prices are still to come from our distributor… They will probably not be available until the first demonstration of the Model 10 at WOC in two weeks! – via Whap!
#41104From: SyndesisNov 19, 1991 1:03 PM
First thing I want to know is the name of the principals of that company. That city's name should give Amigaphiles the willies. 🙂
#41122From: Mike JeskinNov 19, 1991 6:19 PM
The ghost of Ed Lippert surfaces again eh John??
#41135From: RON TROYNov 19, 1991 8:52 PM
How so the ghost? Ron
#41150From: Elvin E. EmeryNov 20, 1991 2:37 AM
I think the point is that the past 2 times Ed Lippert went into business the companies went belly-up (CardCo and CLtd). Also one company that took over the Kronos went belly-up also (Micro-Dyne) in Wich. KS.
#41189From: Bill PerezNov 20, 1991 7:23 PM
Elvin: So what? I know there are a few professionals out there who are bitter with Ed Lippert. But as the owner of a Kronos controller and a Lazerxpress printer, I sure like the products his enterprises put out. I'm in no position to determine if he short-changed earlier co-venturers as was stated on here a while back, but the mere fact that his early companies when under doesn't mean much in terms of what we as consumers can expect. An awful lot of highly successful business types went under scores of times before hitting on a business that finally took off. Chances are that the businesses you mentioned went under more for lack of operating capital or really skilled management rather than that the products they offered were unacceptable to the market place. Don't be terribly shocked if Ed Lippert doesn't turn up with a winner yet. Bill Perez San Juan, PR
#41200From: Black Belt SystemsNov 20, 1991 8:46 PM
If he turns up at all, I'd probably have to be physically restrained – he destroyed my first Amiga based company, singlehanded. And those products you like – SCSIDos 3, Kronos – guess where the work was financed? Guess who didn't get paid? Ed's likely to stay in hiding. If he's smart. Ben
#41264From: Bill PerezNov 21, 1991 8:31 AM
Ben: I didn't intend to ruffle your feathers. Personally, all I'm responding to is my appreciation of the products which came out of the Lippert ventures. And, certainly you'll agree that most of the time that small businesses go under there's an element of under capitalization involve, and often as not, a good deal of lack of business experience at the management level. That's why many successful entrepenuers fail a number of times before they hit success. Incidentally, Breck Ricketts, who apparently was invovled in the Kronos and LazerXpress projects, told me a while back he was working on the Virtual Page approach to be used with a new laser printer. He also indicated he was working on the same approach for MS-DOS. I don't know how he is doing, since I haven't had any trouble with the Kronos and have not needed to call him. I hope he follows through, since I think that the Virtual Page concept is really terrific. Bill Perez San Juan, PR
#41336From: Black Belt SystemsNov 21, 1991 9:35 PM
Ah, my feathers aren't ruffled. Well, not at you, anyway. :^) Breck's a good guy. Ed is at the absolutel bottom of my doodoo list, in some very scarce company. Ben
#41467From: Bill PerezNov 23, 1991 8:53 AM
Ben: I really don't know anything about Lippert, except what I read here when C-Limited went under. But I began dealing with Breck shortly after that when I had problems with my virtually new Kronos and had nowhere to turn. He and another fellow working with him were extremely attentive and they eventually fixed the controller. Later, my local dealer had been stuck with a LazerXpress printer and I was one of the few, if any, owners of a Kronos on the island. Breck produced a "personality module" for the Kronos, allowing me to buy the printer at an excellent price. Recently, I had trouble getting a new SCSI hard disk formatted and Breck was very patient in talking me through the necessary adjustments to the software to make the thing run. Breck has been a lifesaver to this owner of a fine, but orphaned controller. I hope his projects, particularly the development of a new Virtual Page laser printer, is a great success. Bill Perez San Juan, PR
#41741From: Charles BlaquiereNov 25, 1991 10:08 PM
Ben, (regarding Ed Lipp…err, whatshisname showing up at World of Commodore Toronto, and you being physically restrained) Does that mean YOU'd be at woc TOO? MY Ben, who brought me this WONDERFUL display device and software? <gasp> * I * may be the one to be ohysically restrained. B^> Blaq! – via Whap!
#41750From: Black Belt SystemsNov 25, 1991 10:44 PM
heh heh heh. No, I don't think so. :^) No plans (or time allocated) at present. We're releasing a new product on the first of December, and I'm tying tesseracts in a mobius strip trying to get everything ready for that. It just means that Ed's managed to aggravate more than anyone else in the Amiga community – which takes some doing. Ben
#41306From: Steve AhlstromNov 21, 1991 6:15 PM
If _anyone_ associated with C Ltd has anything to do with this portable, they'll not get another dime from me. -sja
#41450From: Jim OgilvieNov 23, 1991 1:01 AM
Steve.. I'll get the names of all the people from the company showing it. 🙂 Jim – Signed, sealed, Whapped!
#41216From: RON TROYNov 20, 1991 11:09 PM
Is this portable company of like history? Ron
#41343From: Jonathan HirschmanNov 21, 1991 10:52 PM
Sounds like another bad case of Ricketts… Jonathan Jonathan – from Albany, NY, via whap!
#41800From: Jim SakladNov 26, 1991 4:08 PM
> First thing I want to know is the name of the principals of that > company. That city's name should give Amigaphiles the willies. 🙂 No only that: "NEWer TECHnologies"?! . . . . . JimDoc
#41124From: Black Belt SystemsNov 19, 1991 6:40 PM
If this is real – then I may be first on my block, unless my wife gets hers first, that is. :^) Ben
#41127From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiNov 19, 1991 7:40 PM
If it's real, I bet it's gonna cost a pretty penny…
#41141From: Black Belt SystemsNov 20, 1991 12:13 AM
Pretty pennies are for pretty things, neh? Ben
#41144From: pat beaulieuNov 20, 1991 12:20 AM
Rumour is that it will be in the $2000-$3000 range for the model 10… nothing confirmed yet, sorry! – via Whap!
#41161From: SPC Superbase Tech SuppNov 20, 1991 11:45 AM
$2000 for a portable Amiga 500 with a monochrome screen? WAY TOO EXPENSIVE! It should be under $1000. I'd rather get an A3000/25-100 for that price. Count me out if it's that much. Darin SPC Technical Support (Sorry for the negative attitude, but it seems that Amiga products that everyone wants are always over priced, and things that no one wants are affordable. My opinions only.)
#41162From: Black Belt SystemsNov 20, 1991 12:01 PM
Darin, perhaps you could sit down and do the math for creating such a product. Remember that the Amiga market is tiny; costs to engineer something like a portable can be extremely high, and somehow, presumably thru sales, these have to be paid for. And since dealers – and distributors – all want a cut that is a percentage of the retail, the developer had better make the "to distributor" price something that covers the cost. Even if the unit is direct, you still have to cover the costs. One presumes this isn't an AMiga 500 MB repackaged into a suitcase. One assumes this is a portable Amiga, with it's own tiny little MB, chips moved as appropriate. As the person who has to do the cost math here for our products (and we are VERY efficient compared to other AMiga developers) I can tell you that such a device would be well over 1000$, if it's worth buying. The first IBM portables weren't cheap, either. Ben
#41167From: SyndesisNov 20, 1991 12:28 PM
Gee, Ben, I thought we were all in this for the fun of it. Now you've ruined everything by mentioning profit. Software should be priced like paperback books, right? Why, if ImageMaster were just $5.95 I bet you'd sell a TON of them, and you'd make it up in volume!
#41180From: Black Belt SystemsNov 20, 1991 6:47 PM
Yeah. Thats the ticket. :^) Volume! Ben
#41213From: Michael GerardNov 20, 1991 11:01 PM
Hmmm… A portable Amiga, with high volume. Just add mini headphones, a CD-ROM, and you get a CDTV-AMIGA-GAMEBOY-DISCMAN pick it up at Walmart for $89.99 – Whapp!ng from the North Coast Michael
#41182From: Andy FinkelNov 20, 1991 7:02 PM
5.95 !!! Why, I can buy disks for 50 cents!!!! 🙂 andy
#41177From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiNov 20, 1991 5:18 PM
Ben, Right, economies of scale will push the price up on this. As long as it maintains its NTSC/RGB output, the 030 model would make a darned nice little portable presentation machine, and people will pay top-dollar for that. I'd love an Amiga laptop. But if I get an extra $3000 (hahahah) it's a lot more likely to go towards a 3000T than a portable 68000 Amiga, especially when I could buy a 3000/16 and a PC laptop for the same money. This sounds neat, but since I doubt Commodore has created a CMOS version of the Amiga chipset for these guys, battery power will probably be very short-lived, if it's even possible. For a general use laptop, the price/performance and lack of modern battery operation will probably make this more an item for a very select professional Amiga market than a generally-popular machine. I always miss my Amiga's capabilities when I'm using a laptop on the road, but when you consider the price/performance of MS-DOS or even the Mac PowerBook laptops, I'm afraid I'd have to be able to justify this purchase by NEEDING the Amiga's capabilities on the road. I don't fault the developers if the price IS $2000/3000. It's perfectly understandable given the market and development considerations. I'd kill for a $1500 hd-equipped, long-battery-life Amiga laptop, but only Commodore could afford to do that. And it probably doesn't make marketing sense.
#41183From: Andy FinkelNov 20, 1991 7:05 PM
Hard to say, Denny. Remember, the first Mac laptops were done by 3rd party vendors, not apple. (weren't the 1st 3rd party PC laptops done by 3rd parties too ? 🙂 ) Yes, it might end up as a transportable, rather than a laptop. But still , I could use one. It would make a nice presentation box. andy
#41326From: John PendergrassNov 21, 1991 8:48 PM
Hey andy, you're in CDTV dev, right? It's been a while since anyone asked about the A2000/A3000 compatible CDROM drive that would run CDTV. I thought I understood that Commodore was going to release a standalone CDROM drive that would run the CDTV apps? If so, any timeline? Would it be an internal CDROM (ie. in the 5.25" slots, if available)? –jp–seattle–
#41367From: Andy FinkelNov 22, 1991 9:03 AM
We've shown the A690 at World of Commodore in the UK. No announcement has been made about a cdrom that hooks to the A2000/A3000. This doesn't mean such a thing isn't coming, but merely continues the policy of not commenting on items that may or may not be in developmant. andy
#41373From: Roger F. BeckerNov 22, 1991 10:15 AM
andy: I presume the A690 is a CDTV-compatible CD-ROM drive for the '500? If so, where does it go, on the Expansion Bus? If it does go on the expansion bus, then could it run on a '1000, if the edge connector is flipped somehow? Roger
#41401From: Black Belt SystemsNov 22, 1991 6:20 PM
And a good policy it is, too. :^) Ben
#41408From: John PendergrassNov 22, 1991 7:24 PM
It was worth a shot. Thanks anyway. 🙁 –jp–seattle–
#41357From: John GagerNov 22, 1991 1:29 AM
I was reading the ad's for one of the Mac laptops from a 3rd party vendor. Not only do you get the laptop, but you also get a Mac+ so you can transfer the rom's. After the Rom's are transferred, you have your laptop, and can use the Mac+ as a paperweight, which is appropriate 8^) John – K7KB (via Whap!)
#41368From: Andy FinkelNov 22, 1991 9:04 AM
Isn't that the one with the 'docking unit' concept ? andy
#41370From: Charles HillNov 22, 1991 9:30 AM
John, Two of the companies that make Mac-clone laptops (Wallaby and another one) have a licensing agreement with Apple. Apple sells them 256k ROMs to use in their laptops. I'd like to see ReadySoft look into such an agreement. About a year ago there was an announcement from a company in California called NuTek (no relation) that they had successfully & legally cloned Mac ROMs and that they were going to sell them to all comers. They said they had the capital to fend off Apple lawsuits but I haven't heard anythin in about a year. -Chas
#41529From: John GagerNov 23, 1991 11:33 PM
I read about the NuTek ROM's some time ago, and as you, have not heard any more about their challenge to Apple. Maybe they were not as successful in fending off the Apple lawyers afterall. John – K7KB (via Whap!)
#41186From: John PendergrassNov 20, 1991 7:17 PM
You mentioned A3000T. I haven't heard anything about that in quite a while. Supposedly released. Does anyone have one? Getting one? Want one? Just curious…. Speaking of 'towers'…. I saw an ad for the new Macintosh 'tower' model, just announced. 20mhz 040, upto 64meg ram, many slots, 24bit video on board, etc, etc. I wonder what the cost of that thing is? 🙂 –jp–seattle–
#41214From: Michael GerardNov 20, 1991 11:01 PM
> I wonder what the cost of that thing is? Where do you think they go the name Macintosh Tower? 😉 – Whapp!ng from the North Coast Michael
#41433From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPNov 22, 1991 10:11 PM
NCR. 🙂 That is, if they really used the name "Tower". It wouldn't be the first time Apple has licensed a name. They licensed the name "Classic" too…and not from Coca Cola! 🙂 Steve
#41267From: Andrew BrownNov 21, 1991 8:36 AM
John, I've got one….. (A3000T that is…) I'm just waiting for C= to finish their ethernet software before I install it at the office. The reason I bought it, before you ask, is as a file server for our little Amiga network with room for a tape drive and a removeable drive and big hard drives. Its a very well put together machine, it even came with THE roms ! The only downer is they didn't build a stereo amp into the box ! Andrew. *—-> Wino's BBS +44 71 824 8863 – via Whap!
#41838From: Andre PageNov 27, 1991 12:41 AM
I wanted a Tower but I couldn't stand the wait. I went with the "Power-Up" program and saved money instead!
#41208From: John BianchiNov 20, 1991 9:54 PM
Denny, As 85% of Amiga's are sold in the European market and the Amiga is very strong there, portable Amigas might make a dent and move enough to make this a good marketing idea. And I believe most of the sales are for A500's. This might entice CBM to think about it. I don't see much use for it as portables are best for business applications and there is definately a serious lack of strong business software (in relation to IBM and MAC, for all of you ready to throw flames). JohnB 76256,3436 – via Whap!
#41293From: Mike ToddNov 21, 1991 2:53 PM
I'm not sure what demand there would be over here for a portable Amiga, although I would imagine there'd be just about enough to justify a product. .. as long as the display is PAL sized and not NTSC! Mike (Whapping from the UK)
#41341From: Betty Clay/SYSOPNov 21, 1991 10:50 PM
Sure would be great to take to club meetings if there were a large display available. Betty
#41352From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 22, 1991 12:09 AM
Betty, Presuming a large display were available….what's the advantage to talking a portable vs taking an A500? From what I've read here…that's about all the portable appears to be, a slightly expanded A500. Don
#41358From: John GagerNov 22, 1991 1:29 AM
I would kill for a reasonably priced Amiga portable, and CBM could certainly come up with one in the $1500 price range. As the price of color displays come down, I'm hopeing we will see one soon. John – K7KB (via Whap!)
#41399From: Black Belt SystemsNov 22, 1991 6:19 PM
I'd like it monochrome – with a real monitor plug for big time work. The vast majority of the productivity stuff I do just requires resolution and (sometimes) grey levels. Color's wonderful, but for business (which is where a laptop primarily aims) monochrome is fine (and cheaper). If we're talking portable display studio… still, most sites like hotels and things will happily rent you a projector for a limb and some attractive young family members. I wouldn't want to lug a monitor around, and color LCD's of the size that fit in a laptop aren't up to the job af quality presentation. Yet. Ben
#41530From: John GagerNov 23, 1991 11:33 PM
Well I would be happy with a monochrome laptop with a RGB port also, and when the price of color LCD's drop, have the option to install one. I guess we will just have to wait and see what this company has up it's sleve's, product wise and who is in charge 8^) John – K7KB (via Whap!)
#41545From: Rick MoyerNov 24, 1991 12:45 AM
Agreed. I'd like an Amiga laptop even with a monochrome display. I need the preemptive multitasking ability on the road more than I need the color display.
#41541From: Rick MoyerNov 24, 1991 12:23 AM
re: An Amiga portable In theory, it already exists… sort of. After seeing what ICD has done in the way of their 'prima' product, I got to thinking. What if someone redesigned the top half of the A500 case to accommodate an internal power supply and possibly a folding/popup LCD display?. Technically, it would be an external expansion device since any active componentry would still be outside of the 500's standard shielding (FCC approval needed of course), but it is doable. I figure such a repackaging could be done in a way that would only add about 2" to the A500's overall height, and maybe 3-5 pounds in weight..certainly within acceptable norms for a 'portable' class machine.
#41555From: John BianchiNov 24, 1991 3:03 AM
1: Hopefully a color LCD (but cheap-just don't ask me where to find one) 2: Where do ya put the mouse? 3: For shows, great, but do you really see someone on a crowded flight putting this on their lap? (to afford it they probably will be in first class so I guess they will have the room). Hey, Lets develop the display technology further, then networking. This will get more amigas out there. The more installed base, the more chance that people will want a portable. Networking will help get the machine in businesses, where most of the portables are used. This is my humble opinion – before you flame me about this: PC games are getting better (and a lot more titles) because there are more of em out there. Business build numbers and numbers decide what to produce (and how much can be made). JohnB
#41998From: Rick MoyerNov 29, 1991 12:20 AM
> where do ya put the mouse? I was thinking along the lines of a mini fold-down trackball, or something like that. As for someone putting it on their lap on a crowded flight… well, I suppose it would be cumbersome in that respect, but then we are talking 'portable' as opposed to 'laptop'. Generally, I've always considered portables to be slightly bigger brothers to laptops, and I have yet to see any portable that is comfortable to use on an airline flight. As for an Amiga _laptop_, I have to agree with Denny. I just don't see it being practical until a CMOS chipset is available. Especially if such a laptop is going to use a 32 bit processor with a memory system that it can use. Battery technology just isn't there yet.
#41305From: Steve AhlstromNov 21, 1991 6:15 PM
Denny, You said "…it probably doesn't make marketing sense". Well, considering that extremely little of what the US marketing company does makes sense, I think you've somehow, in a perverse fashion, predicted that CBM _will_ come out with a laptop! <grin> -sja
#41338From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiNov 21, 1991 10:30 PM
Steve, I thought that right after I posted that message. 😉 What we need to do is start a lot of discussion on all the networks begging CBM not to release a laptop, ESPECIALLY not an inexpensive one. (grin)
#41207From: KeithNov 20, 1991 9:41 PM
As an IBM reseller I can tell ya that the current laptop isn't cheap either! That portable Amiga sounds very good to me! think of the market that could be created for mobile desktop productions… As it is now if you want to use a pc for proposals or demos at a customer sight, ya gotta lag around a pc compatible or one of those MAC boxes. If they can package the amiga sound and graphics into this portable it will be a great marketing tool. As long as the price stays under the MAC portables it'll be a solid "portable multimedia" tool (Ugh! I hope that doesn't start another horrid industry name…). Keith…
#41243From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 21, 1991 1:32 AM
Ben, If they can't bring it out for under $1,000…they more than likely shouldn't bring it out at all. The computer market is very soft right now…and a $1500 to $2000 portable, monochrome A500 more than likely wouldn't sell well enough to be profitable. Don
#41272From: Charles HillNov 21, 1991 10:48 AM
Don, Actually it sounds like a great item to take to shows. I'm a little tired of lugging the A2000 and A3000 around to various shows. A portable (with an external RGB jack) would be a great benefit. Finally, if they can find a way to put an A2000 video slot on it -whether by an external cage (albiet small cage) or internal they could sell a million as portable Toasters. Of course, external TBCs and SFCs would be necessary. Heck, you could pop in an AT-Once board and hook an AMAX-II externally and have an Amiga/PC/Mac laptop! -Chas
#41312From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 21, 1991 6:28 PM
Charles, Presuming "normal" limitations…how much easier would it be to lug a portable to a show than it would be to lug an A500. That of course, presumes the portable would essentially be an A500 type configuration. Don
#41369From: Charles HillNov 22, 1991 9:21 AM
Actually it could be quite easier, since the portable *can* be operated without an external screen and it is posible to operate without AC power, such as on the way to the show. Also, the Model 30 would be nice since it is supposed to be a 68030/882 based machine whereas an A500 would have to be upgraded. Besides, A500s don't have handles! I think I'll have to wait an see the final specs before making a final decision, but if the Model 30 is priced along the lines of an A3000/25 I'll probably end up buying one. -Chas
#41394From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiNov 22, 1991 5:53 PM
I'll be surprised if this thing has any kind of significant battery life, though. The Amiga custom chips are pretty power-intensive. Those MS-DOS laptops that get three hours are almost entirely CMOS.
#41282From: Art SteinmetzNov 21, 1991 11:07 AM
You're right, Don. A portable Amiga (or any product) isn't worth what it costs. It's worth what people are willing to pay for it. When that price is substantially above what it costs to make a beautiful thing happens – a market is created. I don't see those conditions for a low-end portable. A "custom, hand-built" high end model could have some potential because there are a few people for whom price is no object. A production run of one can be profitable in that case. — Art
#41335From: Black Belt SystemsNov 21, 1991 9:34 PM
You're entitled to your opinion. I disagree. I, for one, would buy a good Amiga laptop instantly. I suspect tht goes for a lot of developers and so on who have to travel a lot. Ben
#41351From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 22, 1991 12:06 AM
Ben, I'm not saying it's a bad idea. In fact, I think it's a good idea. I'm just saying that I don't believe there would be enough of them sold if the price were in the $1500 and above price range. What would you call respectable sales? Enough to justify the cost of developing such a machine? 5000, 10000, 100000 units? And what's the development of such a machine? And the production costs? What's a reasonable profit margin? What's the potential sales volumn at $1,000 vs $2,000 each? Don
#41355From: Black Belt SystemsNov 22, 1991 1:27 AM
If the unit is being made by a third party, as the rumor seems to indicate – then respectable sales would be a lot smaller number. If I were doing it, I'd approach it this way; I'd relayout the MB, so it would fit nicely in a lapcase. I'd find a case manufacturer and OEM them pups. I'd buy a500's and rip chips out of them. I figure the cost, per unit, not counting engineering time, would be in the $600-$800 range, in quantities between 100 and 500. I think they could be sold in the 1k-2k range, and you'd likely make money before someone came round and did you "one better". I think sales of 250 would be break even, and above would be profit. However… if you priced the thing above 2k, you'd break even sooner, and it's safer. Most bean counters are very conservative (with pretty good reason) and so I think you'll see a high price. I don't think that it would be worth going to an ASIC group and whacking things into chips. I don't think that swoggling the PALs around would gain you much, but some… I think what you'd have is a portable that needs a wall socket when you were done. If this is close to the scenario, I'll still buy one. :^) Ben
#41360From: Kevin DarlingNov 22, 1991 3:13 AM
Ben, The thing I wonder about is how they interfaced the LCD screen. Like, is it memory-mapped? What resolutions/bitplane-counts are supported? Etc… the usual suspects. kev
#41440From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 23, 1991 12:11 AM
Ben, One would think that Commodore would be willing to sell chip sets, or at least A500 motherboards at quite a discount. After all…they worked out the NewTek Toaster deal. Don
#41801From: Jim SakladNov 26, 1991 4:08 PM
> If they can't bring it out for under $1,000…they more than likely > shouldn't bring it out at all. My two bits worth: go with the higher price, but scrap the 7mHz 68000 completely. $2K for a 68030/68882 at 25mHz ain't bad.
#41228From: Wayne ColeNov 20, 1991 11:55 PM
Hopefully the prices will be alittle easier to take than the Mac 170 notebook… wmc