CompuServe Thread

#ATVISTA NTSC RES

9 messages in this thread
#26381From: PATRICK MACKINNov 6, 1992 7:33 PM
Sherwood, I have Ani Pro and 3DS2, and record animations in real time to either Hi8 or SVHS using the Truevision VideoVGA card (1mg). I noticed your recent reference to your atvista cards with a high ntsc res. Would adding an atvista card to my system enhance the res of my real time recordings, or would I have to bite the whole bullet and get the equipment required to render frame by frame to get a better quality ntsc resolution? I've enjoyed watching you gestate the past year. What do you do about audio? Thanks for your input. Patrick
#26425From: sherwood egbertNov 7, 1992 12:01 PM
the only advantage of the atvista is its higher ntsc 32 bit color level. if your recording to video real time then i am assuming your using a fli or flc file. so your limited to 256 color anyway, so the atvista would not really give you any increase in video performance. in fact i don't think a driver is available for the atvista for animator pro. so the targa, mediator , or other device is the way to go real time. i personaly use the videologic mediator for real time fli/flc recording when frame by frame recording is not required. if you can i would suggest getting a diaquest controller and a frame accurate deck (bvu-950 3/4 or better yet a betacam sp ) the difference in the rez is like night and day. sherwood – sherwood animations
#26454From: PATRICK MACKINNov 7, 1992 9:14 PM
Sherwood, Thanks for the information. Where can I get the videologic mediator? Is K Krell a good source for the kind of equipment you mentioned (betacam sp, diaquest controller, etc)? I may take this a step at a time and try the mediator first. Would the mediator replace my VideoVGA or supplement it? What does the mediator do? Patrick
#26612From: CSA/CANov 9, 1992 1:59 PM
Patrick, You can upgrade your VideoVGA to the new version w/flicker filter, or use the Videologic Mediator if you want an external VGA->NTSC unit. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates
#26659From: PATRICK MACKINNov 9, 1992 8:29 PM
Kevin, Good to hear from you. If you saw the beginning of the thread, I'm not satisfied with the quality of the resolution I am getting from my VideoVGA in real time recording of flcs generated from both A Pro and 3dS2. Would the Mediator or the upgrade to the VideoVGA flicker filter give me a better resolution? I can record to VHS, SVHS or Hi8. Or, do I have to go to frame recording to get the kind of resolution I want. I can get by with the 256 color limitation; I just not happy with the resolution. Pat
#26708From: Craig Sharp [Mem TM]Nov 10, 1992 8:05 AM
Patrick: Pardon me for jumping in, but the best resolution you can get on tape is, I believe, 400 lines. What you're probably concerned with is the fact that real time is 256 colors. You will find that more colors (16 million, or so) produce images that 'appear' to have better resolution. I don't know of any software for a PC that does real time real color, so yes, I think you will have to get a video contoller and a frame accurate recording device along with a graphics card that does at least 24 bit color. Of course, this means that you will need to make your movies primarily with 3DS since AAPro only does 256 color. C#
#26844From: PATRICK MACKINNov 11, 1992 10:03 AM
Craig: Thanks for your comments. It may be a matter of "appearance". Let me explain my problem this way. When a flc plays on my computer screen, it looks many times better than the way it looks when I recorded it in real time to tape and then play the tape on a vcr. When I record a flc real time to tape, I use the A Pro aniplay.exe program and my Truevision VideoVGA card. The result is not satisfactory, compared to what the flc looks like on the monitor. Let's call the difference between what I see on the monitor and the television, a difference in "quality". I guess the question is whether using the Mediator or VideoVGA16 w/flicker will close this difference in quality so that what I see on the television is what I see on the monitor? When I play a 256 color flc on the monitor, it looks fine. I'm trying to get what I see on the monitor recorded to tape so it will look the same when played on vcr to television. Thanks, Patrick
#26750From: CSA/CANov 10, 1992 1:46 PM
Pat, Either the Mediator or VideoVGA16 w/flicker filter will give you better *QUALITY*, although your maximum _resolution_ is still 640×480. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates
#26843From: PATRICK MACKINNov 11, 1992 10:03 AM
Kevin, I'm trying to get the same quality of what I see on my monitor to show up when I play a tape made with aniplay.exe on my vcr/television. Is this the *QUALITY* increase I will get with either the Mediator or VideoVGA16 w/flicker filter? I think the 256 color limitation and the 640×480 resolution are acceptable if I can get what I see on the monitor to the television screen. Presently there is a big difference (gap in *QUALITY*). Since I already own a VideoVGA would it be more cost and quality effective for me to upgrade to the VideoVGA16 w flicker filter? Thanks for your input Kevin. Pat