CompuServe Thread

#ES-300C & A4000/040

11 messages in this thread
#75036From: Jeannine DeubelFeb 20, 1994 12:10 PM
I saw your problem, and just wanted to let you know that you are NOT alone! I have exactly the same problem, and ASDG gives me the same answer! I purchased the ES-300C when I owned my A500, and then upgraded to my A4000. I even got a new motherboard on my A4000, thinking that would solve all of my problems. The new motherboard solved some problems I was having with Deluxe Paint, but the Epson scanner problem remains. ASDG even supposedly sent me an upgrade which was supposed to "fix" this non-existant problem, and they even talked me through the installation over the telephone. When I still had the same problem, the tech at the other end basically threw up his hands and said he had no idea why I was still having the problem. They claim not to have the problem at their end, but then why are we out here having the problem? I know it's not the motherboard this time, so it has to be a glitch in the program. I'm just hoping that the ADPro 2.5 will fix it.
#75070From: Gracia M. LittauerFeb 20, 1994 9:20 PM
PMFBI If you are referring to to having to do "cpu nodatacache" before using your Epson300C with ADPro & 4000/40, you'll still have to do that with the 2.5 upgrade. Gracia, on AutoPilot from Cooleemee, NC
#75126From: ASDGFeb 21, 1994 2:40 PM
I am sorry all you Epson Scan/ 040 users are having this cache problem but the fact still remains is that we have not been able to reproduce this problem. I would like nothing more than to have this problem resolved but any fixes we attempt would basically be guesswork since we dont have this problem. If it is a glitch in our scanner driver, we would happily update it but until we can get this to happen on our end, there is no ready solution. Please believe me when I say we want this to be resolved every bit as much as the rest of you do. Chris Edgin ASDG tech,
#75166From: Don SuhrFeb 21, 1994 10:22 PM
Chris, I just had a thought… What if it's your scanner? Mabye you have a newer revision that has some improved firmware… Something that doesn't produce our suspect errors… Drop me EMail or post a list of what you have (As far as CXchange software and other packages you have in your startup-sequence and user- startup… I will duplicate your configuration EXACTLY and try out this hypothesis… I have a feeling it might be the answer. Thanks, Don Suhr 73117.1337@compuserve.com
#75193From: ASDGFeb 22, 1994 9:52 AM
I will check the scanner firmware revision and see if it matches yours. As far as add-ons are concerned, we run clean machines with exeception of debugging tools (enforcer, mungwall, etc.). Chris Edgin ASDG tech.
#75217From: Don SuhrFeb 22, 1994 2:16 PM
Chris, Sounds good. I will restore my machine to a clean slate and try v2.3 again… If I can convince my friend to bring his A4000/040 over, I will also be able to report on v2.5. I will also get the firmware/version of my Epson ES-300C… Would be a wonderous thing if we were able to solve this one… Don Suhr 73117.1337@compuserve.com
#75250From: Don SuhrFeb 22, 1994 11:17 PM
Chris, Ok… I couldn't come up with a Firmware # for the scanner, but there were two numbers on it… The first was the serial # 0Y90006173. The second was unmarked on a small label and was B01608001UA168059. My DIP switch settings are: Switch 1: ON/OFF/OFF/ON/OFF/OFF/OFF/OFF Switch 2: ON/OFF/OFF/OFF/OFF/ON/ON/OFF I setup my Amiga 4000/040/25 with only the original software, aside from ADPro. I WAS able to get the scanner to respond ONCE if I turned off the cache then turned it back on, although only for the Preview mode. The fine mode would only cause the scanner to go immediatly into the E-1 alert, unless the data caches were disabled first. For the validity of cross-testing, I just want to be sure that the system you are testing the scanner with is an A4000/040 25mhz with OS3.0… Also, the Copyback data cache needs to be turned on to show this problem. The version of the 68040.library in my system is 37.30… I can't think of anything else to add at this point.
#75308From: John GagerFeb 23, 1994 9:17 PM
Chris: I've been following this thread about the Epson scanner problems with 040 users but wanted to do some testing on my own before I posted the results, and ask a few questions. First off, it seems to happen only when the scanner module is trying to initialize the scanner. As soon as you hit the PREVIEW button, or ACCEPT for the final scan, the scanner immediately displays the E-I Interface error. When the copyback mode is off and you start the scan, you can then go and turn on copyback without any problems from the scanner. In fact, this usually speeds up the scan considerably. So copyback doesn't seem to affect a scan already in progress where the computer is receiving data. I imagine that during the scan, the scanner module is sending some kind of acknowledge for handshaking, or is the scanner the only device sending data? From what I have been able to gather from the operation of the scanner, this is how I guess a scan is done: 1. An initialize command is sent to the scanner to home the carriage and set a default state. 2. Commands are then sent to set resolution, scanning area, brightness, and other modes the user has selected for the preview or final scan. 3. The scan is then performed using some kind of handshaking between the computer and scanner. Mind you, I'm taking a wild guess on the operation considering I haven't used a scope to actually check the sequence, nor do I have a technical manual for the scanner. One thing I tried was to force the EPSON_SCAN loader to load into Chip memory. When the loader is in chip memory, it functions normally although rather slow. So it seems to follow the pattern that the loader is having some kind of problem with data caching since it is disabled for chip memory. So maybe trying a CacheClearE() command before the initialization commands are sent to the scanner? Mind you, I'm not an expert Amiga programmer by any means, but I like to do a little digging before I get on and say "It doesn't work!!" 8^) // John – (Who enjoys harrasing the vendors) \X/ Mercury@ins.infonet.net
#75165From: Don SuhrFeb 21, 1994 10:17 PM
Jeannie, I just tried a friend's copy of ADPro v2.5 with my scanner & HIS A4000/040 .. Guess what… Same problem… It still puts the scanner into an error mode… Sigh… I guess I'll wait for v2.6… (or 2.7/8/9/3.0…) Thanks for the support… Sorry to say it's for a problem… Don Suhr 73117.1337@compuserve.com
#75241From: Jeannine DeubelFeb 22, 1994 8:08 PM
Thanks for the message. Now, I'm not as anxious to get the new 2.5 version as I had been. Hopefully there'll be a time when ASDG can finally realize that there IS a problem, even though they can't "duplicate it there." I see too many messages from Amiga users who have had this problem for it to be our error. It would be nice if ASDG tried to do some field work…asked the users who had the problem what their startup sequence was, or let us see what their startup sequence was. Maybe there's a small glitch in the order of the sequence or something ASDG is overlooking that could solve this problem. I wish I had the money to fly one of their techs to my house so that they wouldn't think we're all halucinating! The more I work with ADPro, the more I want to buy PhotoShop (and I've worked with ADPro for over 3 years!).
#75275From: ASDGFeb 23, 1994 9:56 AM
We KNOW that there is a problem AND we want to fix it! I am absoultely sure that you are not dreaming and I am sure that it is not user error. Every time we look into this, we come up with the same results (different people here have tried this and have come up blank – very frustrating). We HAVE asked what people's user startups & WB startups are like, what boards they have, waht OS, what add-ons (as well as temperature of the room, checks for RF interference, scanner revisions, cables, motherboards, etc.) The bottom line is that we have and are trying to get this thing fixed but until we can make it happen aand we would flying blind if tried to make a fix without know what was causing the problem. We look into this problem every time someone brings it up. Hopefully we will find out what it is. Chris Edgin ASDG tech.