CompuServe Thread

#DOS 6/Bridgeboard

56 messages in this thread
#94999From: Nancy DevittApr 10, 1993 10:15 PM
I've been waiting for this question to come up, but it hasn't – so here goes: I've installed DOS 6 on my 386/25 BB, and, naturally, ran DBLSPACE to compress my hard drive. Because of this, I have to use the hard drive auto-config selection in SETUP in order to accommodate this new arrangement. Now, the startup hangs up while the program "reads" the disk, requiring me to reboot. Has anyone figured out a way to configure SETUP so that this doesn't happen? It's not a real hassle, but it's annoying. Thanks in advance…..Nancy
#95019From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 11, 1993 12:25 AM
Nancy, I haven't tried installed DOS 6 on my BB (it's only an A2088 anyway, so no big deal), but have installed it on my NCR laptop. I would strongly suspect you don't need to change setup at all, that you should have left it just as it was before you installed DOS 6. The pysical drive type is still the same..same physical parameters. DoubleSpace doesn't change any of that…including the physical capacity of the drive. What it does is compress before it stores onto the drive, and decompress as it reads from the drive. Quite similar to the way LHARC, ZIP, ARC, etc. files work. All of the data is there, just compressed to fit into a smaller space. So, during bootup, the BIOS ROM has to know what kind of drive is out there, in order to figure out how to read the partition and boot code from the drive. That information is not compressed. Under DOS 6, the boot code looks for the file DBLSPACE.BIN (also not compressed) and if it finds it…loads it. DBLSPACE.BIN then looks for compressed drives, if there, it reads the DBLSPACE.INI file (also not compressed) and mounts drives it finds there and re-arranges drive letters internally (thus..presuming you have a standard setup…renames your real C: drive to H: and then points all calls to C: to the dblspace software and CVF. In other words…for bootup, the system has to know what type of drive is really out there..not what it will eventually become. Try this…(presuming it did the normal thing and created an H: drive) go to the H: drive and type DIR /A and you'll see those uncompressed files it needs for bootup and you'll see the DBLSPACE.000 file which is what you're really working with when you address your compressed C: drive. Don
#95437From: Nancy DevittApr 13, 1993 7:57 PM
I'll try that. It may work. The reason I assumed it wouldn't was because AFTER I installed DBLSPACE I ended up at the setup program at startup. So, I just set it to auto-config. However, under DOS 6, using DBLSPACE, Drive C: boots from the compressed file, so I'm wondering if there's a possibility that the byte count of the unit, as perceived by Startup, might not be diminished by the contents of H:. If this is so, how would that affect the number of sectors, etc? Aside from having to do a warm reboot everytime I go to the PC side, I'm crazy about DBLESPACE, though. My drive went from about 35 meg free to 183 meg free (on a 240 meg actual drive). Not bad, I'd say. Still, it would be nice to be able to go directly into Windows without all this messing around. Hope people keep contributing to this thread until the problem is solved. Thanks a lot for the response…..Nancy
#95487From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 14, 1993 2:17 AM
Don't forget, at boot time…what you see after bootup as drive H: is drive C: at boot time. Part of the boot procedure is that DoubleSpace "swaps" drive letters. Basically, the boot procedure is as follows: Power on Self Test (POST) ROM code goes out and looks for a boot disk in A: If found, boots from the floppy ROM then looks for first HD and if it finds it, looks in CMOS for what type of drive it is. Based on CMOS parameters, looks in partition table for active partition..and if found looks on active partition for io.sys and msdos.sys Presuming it finds them, loads them up and turns control over to them. And this is where the magic occurs…msdos.sys goes out and looks for dblspace.bin on that same drive. If found, it's loaded and then dblspace.bin goes out and looks for dblspace.ini and if it's found, it looks in it and mounts the drives that are described in it. In your case, it would see that the file DBLSPACE.000 should be mounted as drive C: and the .INI file also says that what is currently you C: drive…should now be called H:…so it does it's magic and changes the name of C: to H: and then mounts the compressed volumn as C: It now reverts back to the "normal" boot code and continues with the bootup looking on what is now C: for config.sys, then autoexec.bat and so forth. If you'll look on your H: drive, you'll see all those files there if you use the DIR /A command at the H: prompt. You should see the following files: io.sys msdos.sys dblspace.bin dblspace.ini dblspace.000 [and if you've got a windows permanent swap file] 386spart.par and any other files you may have copied to H: So on bootup…what you now see as H: is what the ROM sees as the first HD and that's what must be described in CMOS so the ROM code knows where to find things. It's only after you're past the ROM code (when you see the Starting MS-DOS… line) that drive names change. If SETUP is poping up, it is probably for some reason other than it doesn't understand the HD's configuration. It may have to do with the way you (or DOS 6's setup programs) reconfigured memory. For example, on my DOS machine…I moved some of the memory around so that a different memory configuration than was in CMOS…so the first bootup "yelled" at me until I reconfigured it. Let me know how things work out if you reset SETUP's HD parameters backto the way it was before you installed DOS 6. Don
#95720From: Nancy DevittApr 15, 1993 4:30 PM
Don, I tried it, and, you were right. It works fine. There was one additional glitch – AMOUSE refused to load on boot up. However, when I looked at my AUTOEXEC.BAT file, I discovered that MEMMAKER was loading AMOUSE into high memory. I just took out the LH command, and now everything appears to work fine. I'm going to save your message for future reference, though – I have a hunch some questions will come up on our user group board pertaining to this topic. PS – aren't you the same person who resolved my quandry about the new Janus not synching with the BINDDRIVERS commands under WB 2.04? (When C= was thoroughly stumped!?) Whatta guy! Thank you. …..Nancy In Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
#95808From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 16, 1993 1:23 AM
Nancy, Yup…I'm one in the same. I try to keep up on BB type things but it is a bit difficult when all I've got is the XT BB, but since I also use DOS 6 on my notebook computer, I at least knew what was going on with it. Don
#95863From: Nancy DevittApr 16, 1993 2:40 PM
I'm sure glad you're a whiz. Here's another puzzle: Suddenly my BB has started booting up w/o installing AMouse. It will install, though, on a reboot – although sometimes I get the SETUP program first. (I just press END to reboot.) It could be related to something on the Amiga side, though. A few weeks ago, I had sort of a hard disk catastrophy in that, while I was printing out some pages from ProPage, I decided to do some disk copying. Suddenly my system slowed down, and I "dropped" a floppy icon on one of my Work partitions. Well, that was the end as far as booting was concerned. I could boot from a separate disk, and everything was there, but I couldn't boot from the hard drive. I never did figure it out, although I have, and read, just about every Amiga reference book available. I finally took it to my friendly Amiga tech, and he "fixed" it.. However, my system has never been quite the same since. For example, I had previously had both CNote and ClockDJ running at Startup, but now, if I run them, I get a "recoverable software error." I'm not sure where to even begin trying to tackle this problem. Ideally, I'd like to move right into Windows when I go to the BB. As it is, I get there in fits and starts. Do you have any idea what could be wrong? Gratefully, in advance, …..Nancy From Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
#95927From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 17, 1993 1:15 AM
Nancy, When you dropped the floppy ICON onto the partition, the system started copying all the files from that floppy onto your work partition. And, of course, overwritting same named files with files from the floppy. I'd suggest re-installing the Janus software on the Amiga side. It might not hurt to also re-install the AmigaDOS software from the original floppies. Make sure you've got a backup of your startup files or anything else you've modified just in case. My guess is that you've edited the Startup-Sequence rather than editing the User-Startup file. While that's ok…it can cause problems when upgrading since it's highly possible that the upgrade will also replace Startup-Sequence. As to the BB. It should boot cleanly into Windows…presuming you have it setup to do that. Again, the re-install of the Janus software may clear things up. One other thing that may help is to do the reset and rebind trick. On my BB, I've got a hardware add-on that among other things, gives me password protection during startup. I use it, not to keep others from using my computer, but to halt the BB's bootup before it even gets to config.sys. Then when I reboot it…I'm sure that it's not in the middle of something..particularly a disk write. I don't know if you have that capability in SETUP (to add a password) but if you do, try it. Add the password and then do the reset/2nd binddrivers and see if that helps. If SETUP doesn't allow a password, you can do essentiall the same thing by adding a PAUSE at the top of AutoExec.bat. You'll have to hit a CR to make it continue of course. Don
#96209From: Nancy DevittApr 19, 1993 1:22 AM
I've "kept" your response, and I'll try it tomorrow. My guess is that it will work. (Makes sense.) But the only time I altered the startup-sequence was when I was trying to get the new Janus to work w/2.04 – and that only amounted to scattering BINDDRIVERS around. (I deleted them.) The fellow who "fixed" my foul-up might have added or deleted something, though. As a matter of fact, I looked at it yesterday and it seemed a bit shorter. (I was working on a job, so I didn't really have time to go into it.) I'll check that out, too. I should be a professional computer person. Lately I'm spending more hours fooling around with the computer than I do working with it. (I'm a writer.) Are you a professional? You just know so much about these things it boggles my mind. …..Nancy From Edmonton, AB, Canada
#95034From: Dave CinegeApr 11, 1993 6:13 AM
You are lucky you even got MS-Trash 6.0 to work….the horror stories I've been hearing are unreal….I have a 486 BB customer who crashed tring to install it, and get's a "MS-DOS 6.0 not installed proporly, insert uninstall disk" opon boot up. He can't get rid of this message even after REPARTITIONING AND FORMATING his drive with DOS 5.0. I dunno what to tell this guy…I'm going to have him send the drive in and see what I can do. I've heard of this happening to several other people….the result being they had to REPLACE their HD. Dave Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95205From: Robert ComerApr 12, 1993 12:11 AM
I'd try removing the partitions with FDISK, then booting from a lower version DOS, say 3.2, Add in the partitions with FDISK, format, then boot with DOS 5.0 and then reformat and install the software. If I see this actually confirmed, I'll never trust Microsoft MSDOS again! It sounds like there doing some wierd cheating at the driver level, that just isn't safe! DrDOS looks better and better when you have to use one of THOSE machines… Bob Comer
#95249From: Deryk RobossonApr 12, 1993 10:36 AM
My personal opinion of DOS 6.0? Trash it if you've bought it! I've had nothing but problems with it and havn't had yet one inch of problems from my DOS 5.1a. DrDos I don't like one bit because it's too cryptic to use and secondly it uses Stacker which I dislike very much. I had Stacker trash a 230 meg hard drive before it was even compresses, now I use SuperStor Pro and havn't had any problems with it or the previous versions. Deryk
#95340From: Robert ComerApr 12, 1993 11:55 PM
Luckily, I haven't bought it yet… 🙂 Bob Comer
#95279From: Dave CinegeApr 12, 1993 6:03 PM
Thats what this guy did…I told him to boot off 5.0….remove the partions…reboot with the setup disk. Worked fine, considering he gets a MS-DOS 6.0 error ,and can't boot off th HD. Well Bill Gates is getting married, if this dosen't prove he's crazy I dunno what does. :> Dave Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95341From: Robert ComerApr 12, 1993 11:55 PM
I don't know about the getting married part, (I want to some day.) But MS definitely has a wierd sense of "system friedly software"! You know the old saying, "power corrupts, and abosolute power corrupts absolutely" or words to that effect anyway… Bob Comer
#95357From: Dave CinegeApr 13, 1993 1:09 AM
All I know is, if I was pulling in oh…just under 6 BILLION a YEAR…and still in my 30's, getting married would be the furthest thing from my mind. Dave the Playboy Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95423From: Ron LegroApr 13, 1993 6:07 PM
Yeah, I'd agree. If I had Gates' billions, I'd be making like Robert Redford to Demi Moore in that current flick, I suspect. <g>
#95450From: Dave CinegeApr 13, 1993 8:46 PM
Not to put Demi down (she used to be hot, I don't like her with short hair)…but for a million bucks…don't you think you could buy better? Samantha Fox, Traci Lords, Marla Maples…oh thats right, Marla is up to 5 million now :> Donald Trump….a man of my own heart
#95348From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 13, 1993 12:16 AM
Dave, Well…now we know why your customer keeps getting the message. You told him to boot from the DOS 6 install disk. Among other things, it goes out and looks to see what's going on with the system. It sees an incomplete DOS 6 install and trys to get the user to uninstall it so they can start over again. Have your user boot and install with DOS 5 and then do the DOS 6 upgrade. As an alternative, have your user create a DOS 6 boot floppy via the /F switch to INSTALL. Don
#95358From: Dave CinegeApr 13, 1993 1:09 AM
I told him to boot from the dos 5.0 disks….he hasn't touched the 6.0 disk since the crash. It won't let him "sys c:" when booting from a 5.0 floppy…..tells him…get this….incorrect DOS version. Kooky message to get when tring to transfer the current DOS version. Dave Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95212From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 12, 1993 12:48 AM
Dave, I've been monitoring the activity on the MSDOS forum relative to DOS 6 and haven't seen any messages about similar problems to the one you related. The VAST majority of problems I see are from people not reading the manual and trying to do things that are specifically spelled out as no no's in the manual (such as trying to use SmartDrv on the compressed volumn itself). I do agree that MSDOS isn't the neatest thing going, but it is a very worthwhile improvement over DOS 5 if for no other reason than the compression software. I installed it on my NCR laptop and every test I've tried has worked just fine…with the system now working as fast…or faster than it did before. And, I went from 4.5Meg free (out of 120 Meg) to 78 Meg of free diskspace. I strongly suspect that your BB customer could very easily get rid of that message if he simply created and booted from a DOS 6 floppy, got rid of the config.sys and autoexec.bat files on his/her HD and SYS'ed it and then started the install from scratch again. Don
#95280From: Dave CinegeApr 12, 1993 6:03 PM
He FORMATTED THE DAMN THING….formatted…that should make everything vanish….and he still gets the same message. This crash happened during install. It's not a case of him screwing up…I walked him through install. Dave Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95346From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 13, 1993 12:15 AM
Dave, He formatted it under DOS 5 (according to your message)…I presume that was after booting from a clean DOS 5 floppy? And that he used the /S option to format to put DOS 5 on the disk? I'm sure you're aware that FORMAT in and of itself does nothing but check the sectors and 0 the FAT and root directory. It does not 0 the sectors on the drive. Use something like WIPEDISK to really 0 all the sectors, then FORMAT it after booting with a DOS 5 floppy. There is nothing that I've seen in DOS 6 that will do ANY physical harm to a system. Don
#95424From: Ron LegroApr 13, 1993 6:08 PM
Some people over on GEnie have been trashing MS-DOS 6.0 on line for similar reasons: Crashes, and then trouble de-installing it. They didn't sound like neos to me, either.
#95486From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 14, 1993 2:17 AM
Ron, People have also been trashing it here in the MSDOS forum. But for the most part, when they explained what they did, it turns out they didn't follow the instructions. Yes, there were some folks who (based on the message…for what that's worth) did everything right and still had problems. But then there were lots of folks (like me) who followed the instructions and aren't having problems at all.
#95344From: John GagerApr 13, 1993 12:08 AM
Wait a minute!! Are you saying that MS-DOS 6.0 is actually trashing HD's making them unusable again? Is this only for those using the autoboot virtual drive or a actual PC hard drive? I have a friend that is considering installing 6.0 for his 2386BB and would like to warn him if there are major problems. // John – K7KB (Flying via AutoPilot) \X/ "Worf: To Hell with the Prime Directive – Give the Borg Windows!"
#95359From: Dave CinegeApr 13, 1993 1:09 AM
The customer I'm refering to has a Western Digital 250MB IDE HD….god knows what it would do to a virtual drive. Dave Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95468From: John GagerApr 13, 1993 10:28 PM
Well my friend already had DOS 6.0 installed and he say's it's working fine, no problems so far. He did mention that if someone was using a program like Stacker previously that you have to be real carefull with the installation of 6.0, like do it by the book.
#95438From: Nancy DevittApr 13, 1993 7:57 PM
That happened to me with SuperStor Pro, but the reason had nothing to do with the BB – rather with my failure to realize that a "last drive=" statement in my config.sys would cause SSP to gasp, roll over and die (eating 95% of my drive in the process). I had to do a low-level format to get rid of it. Your customer will probably have to do the same. But if I were you, I'd double-check to see if he had any memory-resident programs operating, OR a "last drive=" statement operant. I'd bet it was one or the other. BTW, I have SSP installed on my other 2000 (286 BB) and the installation went with out a hitch. But – I don't have Windows on that drive, and did not have any memory managers or pseudo-disks operating. Thanks for the response…..Nancy
#95478From: Dave CinegeApr 14, 1993 12:35 AM
He has an IDE drive…and I on't have an IDE low leveler.
#95490From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 14, 1993 2:17 AM
Dave, Have your customer do this (or you do it for him) 1. Boot from the DOS 6 install disk 1 2. During bootup, when you see the 'Starting MS-DOS…' prompt Hit the F5 key to force it to bypass config.sys and autoexec.bat and "clean boot" 3. At the A: prompt type INSTALL /F 4. It will create a bootable floppy with a minimal set of files on the floppy. It will not create a full set of install disks…but you don't need them. 5. Now, reboot from that floppy and FORMAT /S the user's HD 6. After it copies the system files to the HD reboot from the HD 7. Now you should be able to put the install disk back in A: and redo the installation of DOS 6. Of course your user will then have to restore his files, making sure he doesn't restore the DOS directory or the system files including config.sys and autoexec.bat (he can restore those two files to different names and then resolve the new and old versions by hand). I HAVE NOT TRIED THIS, but it should work…it was the procedure reccomended by [I forget who…but someone who should know] when some other user trashed their HD due to a power glitch at the wrong time. Don
#95190From: Tom JonesApr 11, 1993 11:20 PM
I maybe should not say this, but my company just sent me E-mail telling me not to use DoubleSpace if I had 6.0, period. They quoted disasterous loss of data with no particulars. And my local dealer is dumping 6.0 upgrade packs at below cost for some reason. Have you any comments on the upgrade? Tom Jones, Oklahoma City
#95202From: Dave CinegeApr 12, 1993 12:02 AM
What programs like stacker do is, look at each sector as 2 sectors…effectivly doubling the space, but it is very risky…I lost 300 megs with stacker 2.0 Dave Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95213From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 12, 1993 12:48 AM
Dave, No it's not…what programs like Stacker (and DoubleSpace) do is sit in the food chain between DOS and the drive and compress data as it goes onto the drive and decompress it as it comes off…very similar to what LHARC, ZIP, ARC and the like do. Yes..there is more to it than that…but that's the basics. It has nothing to do with looking at 1 sector as if it were two sectors. Don
#95281From: Dave CinegeApr 12, 1993 6:03 PM
Thats not what my stacker manual said…I shouldn't have said programs like stacker…I should just say stacker. Thats why stacker is the for runner in compression….and in HD crashes. Dave Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95347From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 13, 1993 12:15 AM
Dave, Re-read your stacker manual. It makes it *appear* as if for each sector, you now have two sectors. It does not make 2 sectors out of one, in fact, it doesn't even give you a true doubling of space. It depends on what type of file you're adding to a compressed drive. Get the amount of free space on a compressed drive…then copy a 1 Meg ZIP'ed file onto that drive and then get the amount of free space again. You'll find the numbers differ by 2 Meg. Your 1 Meg file took up 2 Meg of space on the compressed drive. That's because the amount of free space reported is based on the presumption that any new files you add will be close to the average 2:1 compression ration. ZIP files won't compress…and thus eat up the full 1 Meg of space…which means you lose 2 Meg of space if you were adding "typical" files that would be able to compress at 2:1. There's no black magic involved in the compression itself…it's the same thing programs like ZIP do. The magic involved is inserting the code to do the compression/decompression appropriately in the food chain between the OS and the disk so that it's transparent to anything that doesn't try to write directly to the hardware. Don
#95360From: Dave CinegeApr 13, 1993 1:10 AM
Details, Details…..all I know was I lost 300 megs with it….and I knew what I was doing. It didn't crash during install. Several days later I started getting errors like crazy…chkdsk 50 files…then another 50 would go bad…then it just up and died when I was tring to transfer the files to another drive in order to back them up. Dave PS…can't be just ZIP type compression…all 300 megs were .GIF's on a 200megs drive (you can't compress .GIF's) Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95380From: Steve AhlstromApr 13, 1993 11:17 AM
Yes, you can compress .GIF files. They may not compress much, about 5%, but they can be compressed. -sja
#95451From: Dave CinegeApr 13, 1993 8:46 PM
You missed the point…I had 300 megs of .GIFs on a 200 meg drive. Thats 50% compression with stacker and a repoted 100 megs left.
#95527From: Steve AhlstromApr 14, 1993 11:27 AM
Dave, No, I didn't miss the point. You said "(You can't compress .GIFs)". Yes you can. -sja
#95351From: Tom JonesApr 13, 1993 12:18 AM
Thanks Dave, sort of confirms what the company said then. I have not heard such bad reports from the Amiga compression programs yet. $265.00, huh? Talk to you later. Tom
#95372From: John DublerApr 13, 1993 8:22 AM
Tom, A special intro promotion is selling DOS 6 for under $50, is this what you're referring to about dumping? If you're sources are speculating about the dumping, I'd begin to wonder if someone isn't trying to poison the upgrade market… *** jd
#95455From: Tom JonesApr 13, 1993 8:55 PM
Didn't mean to poison the well John, a dealer in town told me he was selling Dos6 for $49 only because a competitor had forced him to do it by "dumping" (his words) it for that price. Probably sour grapes that the intro offer has temporarily slashed his prices against his desires.
#95491From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 14, 1993 2:17 AM
$49.95 is the suggested list price of the upgrade until May 31st. After that, it's supposed to go to a suggested list price of $129.95.
#95899From: Tom JonesApr 16, 1993 8:48 PM
That is $12.95 just for the upgrade packet, not full Dos6.0 then? Interesting that in this day the local PC dealers are asking exactly MSRP. Kairetsu anyone? Tom
#95928From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 17, 1993 1:16 AM
Tom, $12.95…NO $129.95. You're off by a factor of 10! That's the list price after May 31st. Before then…the list price (or introductory price if you will) is $49.95. I've seen it advertised for a few dollars cheaper..but not much cheaper than that. After May 31st, I'm sure you'll see it for much less than the $129.95 list price. I presume MicroSoft's dealer pricing doesn't allow much profit at the $49.95 level, but probably allows quite a bit at the $129.95 level. And yes, that's the UPGRADE, at least that's the way it's licensed. In fact, I belive you can force it to do a clean install from scratch but you have to do a few things by hand. Don
#95938From: Dave CinegeApr 17, 1993 1:49 AM
If it is like the Windows 3.1 upgrade, it is a complete version, with nothing to change for a normal install. Elite MicroComputers – Flying high on AutoPilot
#95587From: Christopher TolmieApr 14, 1993 8:54 PM
I can get DOS 6.0 around here for $42 + change. In Delaware Chris
#95900From: Tom JonesApr 16, 1993 8:48 PM
At least there is competition in Delaware then. :-})
#95439From: Nancy DevittApr 13, 1993 7:57 PM
It seems to work fine, except for the problem w/C='s startup program. Mind you, I had had a previous very poor experience with SuperStor Pro – caused by my usual casual "know-it-all" reading of the dox – so before I installed it I read the instructions very carefully. Mind you, I haven't tried all the programs on that drive yet – so I can't say for sure that everything is fine – but so far I have had no problems. I wonder what the word is on the PC forums. (I spend so much money over here, I don't do anything in the PC area but download.)
#95893From: Tom JonesApr 16, 1993 8:25 PM
Don't know, I like you don't read PC forums. Maybe we should. Tom
#96207From: Nancy DevittApr 19, 1993 1:22 AM
If you have a Bridgeboard, you should definitely check out some of the PC forums. You'll go crazy. Good ones are WINADV, PICS, DTP, WINWORD, WP, COREL, ADOBE – and there are some others. There are some super programs posted. BTW, one of the best source for graphics anywhere is the WPUsers forum on another big international communications network. There are upwards of 500 archives of really nice graphics on there. I'm on the PC forums all the time. My CI$ bill has gone sky high since I discovered them. (And my hard drive keeps filling up.) …..Nancy From Edmonton, AB, Canada
#96572From: Tom JonesApr 21, 1993 6:46 PM
Thanks for the tips Nancy, I expect to receive one soon. Since I won't be playing with a 4000/30 until they get it right this may keep me entertained. Tom, Oklahoma City
#97459From: BILL LEACHApr 27, 1993 4:23 PM
Tom; Please forgive this message but I am trying to do some testing to see if I can properly reply to a message on this forum. -bill
#97486From: Tom JonesApr 27, 1993 8:21 PM
Guess you did it right Bill, I got it. Tom
#97599From: BILL LEACHApr 28, 1993 5:03 PM
Thanks. Actually I did not need a response as the problem that I was troubleshooting was one where an error occurred while trying to reply… thus it would have been obvious to me if the message had not worked. I appreciate your bothering to let me know though, since obviously you would not have known that I already knew it worked. The fact that the reply to you did work lead me almost directly to the source of the problems that I was having. -bill