CompuServe Thread

#More PAR Updates!

35 messages in this thread
#37473From: Rick ThornquistJan 11, 1994 4:37 PM
Hey There PAR Users! More info on PAR software from DPS. They are gearing up for a 2.0 release of the PAR software but they are not willing to commit to a date. The current release (as of today, anyway) is 1.61. The major change over previous versions is the support of the Micropolis drives in addition to bug fixes. If you want the new version, call them or fax them and they will send it to you. Rick – On Autopilot from Vancouver
#37496From: Terry L. TaborJan 12, 1994 12:25 AM
Rick, Any news as to what new features or improvements v2 will give over v1.61? I just got the TBC IV today and am thoroughly impressed! I've got the Micropolis 1G (2210a?) and have had no problem recording VHS video at quality factor 23 and block limit 290. Only problem I have seen is that for block sizes over 180, animations "skip" after looping several times during the animation. First time through there is never a problem, just on the loops. Other than that slight problem, the PAR/TBC-IV/Micropolis combination is a fantastic combo. Terry Tabor
#37560From: Rick ThornquistJan 13, 1994 3:37 AM
Terry, I wasn't told exactly what will be in the 2.0 release – only that it will be a major release. For those running on versions < 1.2 or so there has been quite a bit of improvements – the ability to rename projects, moving files, SMPTE, audio board support, support for the Micropolis drives, to name but a few. I assume when they are finished with the enhancements they will release the 2.0 version. I'm envious of you all (can a Canadian say 'you all'?) with the Micropolis drives. I'm an early convert so I have the Seagate – best quality I can do for recorded video is 8. As far as your looping problem is concerned, with my drive there is a noticible pause before looping so if I want my anim to loop I just dup a few copies and join them. Rick – On Autopilot from Vancouver
#37591From: Luke H MontgomeryJan 13, 1994 9:42 PM
On 13-Jan-94 Rick Thornquist wrote: >I'm envious of you all (can a Canadian say 'you all'?) with the Micropolis >drives. I'm an early convert so I have the Seagate – best quality I can [remainder deleted] P.S. If you wanna sound authentic, it's pronounced "y'all" ;->
#37603From: Rick ThornquistJan 14, 1994 1:42 PM
Luke, I knew I'd get it wrong! <G> That's what a Canadian gets for trying to talk American. I'll just stick to my fractured French. Rick – On Autopilot from Vancouver
#37623From: Terry L. TaborJan 14, 1994 8:25 PM
Rick, In sunny Florida I would agree that the proper phrase is "Y'all". But in areas of the states closer to the Great White North (such as Ohio where I grew up), the proper phrase is "You Guys". My brother who currently lives in Minnesota claims that the phrase used in that part of the states is "You'se Guys". On second thought, even in sunny Florida the phrase sometimes ends up being "You Dudes". In Tennessee where I went to school, however, the standard is "Y'all" or the one syllable version, "Yawl", which is often confused here in Florida with a type of sailboat which usually is a "Ketch" anyway, but in Tennessee, the term "Ketch" is usually reserved for someone who would make a good wife. Terry Tabor
#37626From: Rick ThornquistJan 14, 1994 9:33 PM
Terry, This reminds me of friends of mine from Nova Scotia who refer to any male stranger as 'Buddy'- as in "Look at Buddy with the goofy hat". When I first met them I thought that they knew all of these people and that all of thier names were Buddy. Side Note: there is a band from eastern Canada called 'Buddy Whatsizname and the Other Fellers'. I love that name. Rick
#37684From: Terry L. TaborJan 16, 1994 4:43 PM
Rick, … which reminds me of my Aussie friends who refer to any female (whether they know them or not) as "Sheila's"! Terry Tabor
#37647From: Peter GreciJan 15, 1994 11:09 AM
Wait a second here, I thought "you'se Guys" was a product of a Brooklyn Accent as evidenced by the "East Side Kids" with Slip Mahoney and Satch.
#37683From: Terry L. TaborJan 16, 1994 4:42 PM
Peter, I've never been to Brooklyn, but I think you might be right. Although I think there's a slight pronunciation difference. The Minnesota,Wisconsin, Michigan "You'se guys" the "You'se" is pronounced such that it rhymes with "Goose", whereas, I think the Brooklyn "You'se" is pronounced such that it rhymes with "Snooze". Just goes to show that English is a, shall I say, 'interesting' language. Terry Tabor
#37829From: Anthony RamirezJan 21, 1994 9:53 PM
>Just goes to show that English is a, shall I say, 'interesting' >language. I agree. Spanish is my native tongue but I learned English at an early age, 6, so I don't have an accent. I DO find the English language to be FILLED with idiosyncrasies that just don't make any sense. Learning English for older Spanish people is MUCH harder than I had first thought until I tried to teach them, that is when I really started to notice the STRANGE quirks of the English language. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)
#37871From: Terry L. TaborJan 23, 1994 11:04 AM
Tony, The only language other than English that I know is Latin. So the first time I realized that English must be fairly strange was in college when I observed some students trying to teach the "finer" points of English to an Iranian student. He had an extremely hard time understanding the various uses of the word "smoke". Like, "where there's smoke there's fire", and "do you smoke", and "no smoking". Of all the subtleties of the language they presented to him, the only one he understood was "let's party", where he immediately said "Oh yes! That's where everybody gets drunk!".
#37947From: Anthony RamirezJan 25, 1994 9:48 PM
>He had an extremely hard time understanding the various uses of the word >"smoke". That really isn't too dificult of a concept. There are a few words that cause MAJOR confusing to newcommers to English but I can't think of any right now. Alot of these troublesome words sound like others but have a completely different spelling or words that sound alike or are even spelled the same with TOTALLY different meaning. Spanish, on the other hand, is mostly spelled as it is pronounced and have fewer confusions. >the only one he understood was "let's party" I guess some people have different priorities from others. :^)
#37887From: Luke H MontgomeryJan 23, 1994 5:59 PM
Terry, Rick, In sunny Florida I would agree that the proper phrase is "Y'all". But in areas of the states closer to the Great White North (such as Ohio where I grew up), the proper phrase is "You Guys". My brother who currently lives in Minnesota claims that the phrase used in that part of the states is "You'se Guys". On second thought, even in sunny Florida the phrase sometimes ends up being "You Dudes". In Tennessee where I went to school, however, the standard is "Y'all" or the one syllable version, "Yawl", which is often confused here in Florida with a type of sailboat which usually is a "Ketch" anyway, but in Tennessee, the term "Ketch" is usually reserved for someone who would make a good wife. Terry Tabor As one that was "born and reared" in Nashville, I tend to agreee with your part on "ywal". NEVER, but NEVER, when in the South address a group of guys AND gals as "YOU GUYS". If ya do, you'll be sorry!
#37942From: Terry L. TaborJan 25, 1994 7:28 PM
Yep! Learned that the hard way at Tenn. Tech. Univ. . . . Terry Tabor
#38166From: Luke H MontgomeryJan 31, 1994 11:35 AM
#: 37942 S9/Animation [AMIGAA] 25-Jan-94 19:28:13 Sb: #37887-More PAR Updates! Fm: Terry L. Tabor 71170,1170 To: Luke H Montgomery 70274,2177 Yep! Learned that the hard way at Tenn. Tech. Univ. . . . Terry Tabor Well, I came back from 5 years at U of KS., and found that U.T. was the SAME way… Sensitive, sensitive, sensitive. 🙂 Luke (Pat) Montgomery "REAL" E-mail: compvid@tyrell.net CompVid Computer Video Graphics Services CompuServe: 70274,2177 Greater Kansas City Voice: (913) 780-0222 —————————————————————————– There's no place like home… There's no place like home… There's no…
#37590From: Brian JonesJan 13, 1994 9:42 PM
Terry, at these (the highest/best quality?) setting digitizing from the TBCiv, what is your approximate minutes/GB storage capacity when digitizing video. Is the video useable as a video source ? Thanks, brian
#37622From: Terry L. TaborJan 14, 1994 8:06 PM
Brian, All of the samples I have digitized at the highest quality, I have used much too high a block rate (i.e., 290 when the largest block size needed was 251) which reduces the ultimate amount of storage available. Still, on the gigabyte drive, at a block rate of 290 and at the highest quality setting, the file sizes I have been getting would indicate that you could get almost 5 minutes on the 1 Gig drive. But, and I am not sure if this is a software problem or some real limita- tion, the PAR software for some reason limits recording time to times far less than you can ultimately store. That is, it will reduce your recording time to say 3 and a half minutes even though you eventually record 5 or 6 minutes without ever deleting any files. As far as the quality is concerned, I am VERY impressed. Keep in mind however that so far I have only digitized from VHS using the composite input and I am displaying on a composite monitor. But to my eye, even at substantially reduced quality (16 instead of 23) the output is indistinguishable from the input. And at that quality level, the drive will hold more than 8 minutes! For simple animation playback I think the times are even greater because it determines the quality level you need to represent your image on a frame by frame basis whereas in recording it always records at the quality factor you tell it. This weekend I'm going to experiment with recording S-VHS. I'll report back my findings. Terry Tabor
#37696From: Brian JonesJan 16, 1994 10:02 PM
Terry , thanks for your response. I can't believe that you can only get 5 or 6 minutes per GB. I guess that part of this is due to the fact the whole drive isn't used. If this is the case I will definitely wait till I can get the 1.6 GB Micropolis drive instead of just 1GB. I just can't stand the thought of laying out that much money for a GB drive that isn't a SCSI !. I like my equipment purchases to be transportable to all three platforms. I guess you can store a lot of frame stores in the extra space on a 1 GB drive! Brian
#37727From: Terry L. TaborJan 17, 1994 6:19 PM
Brian, Actually, the 5 or 6 minutes leaves lots of room for stills. But before you the completely write off the 1 GB drive, remember that the 5 or 6 minutes I was talking about is digitized video at the highest quality and a block size which was overkill by about 20 %. I think for single framing computer animations, I'll be able to get alot more. How much? Don't know. I'm still renderring my first MINUTE of animations since I got the darn thing. It used to be easy to render enough to fill up my 16 MB of RAM with Toaster animations. Guess I need a Screamer…(only in my dreams).
#37513From: john bennettJan 12, 1994 9:49 AM
Just a wannabe here :^( Soon…….. Please tell us about the next Rev. :^) I'm REAL close to getting a PAR w/ TBC IV and Microp. 2210A drive for learning Homespun Digital Optical Effects and Rotoscoping. Can anyone Please tell me like it is about the FMV capture quality of such a setup ? I want to be able to maintain SVHS/VHS quality since this will be the source mostly and the final desired result. Can it replace the Toaster as a Framestore I/O device for still images or time-lapse ? Thats about all I use my Toaster dongle for. ….John
#37532From: Paul GerhardtJan 12, 1994 6:35 PM
John, I might suggest that for experimenting and learning Homespun Digital Optical Effects and Rotoscoping you look into getting a V-Lab. I've been having great fun and learning much with V-lab. I've gotten an Imagine virtual aircraft to fly through video clouds, and have experimented with synchronizing the movements of Imagine's virtual camera with the movements of a hand held video shot for a very realistic composite. I will eventually move up to a PAR type system. But I find the $400 price of V-lab an easily justified tuition that allows me to experiment and develop new techniques with worrying about a large investment. Now, once I feel I have mastered "Digital Optical Effects 101" and am ready to move on then, I'll invest the $2500-$3000 needed for you lucky PAR owners. …AutoPilot Engaged… -Paul-
#37536From: JERRY HATCHETTJan 12, 1994 9:53 PM
Paul, I hope there are some examples of the V-Lab's output on your AG submission??? Don't worry; you're in fine shape on submitting something, but I'd LOVE to see something that the V-Lab captured. I've been toying with the idea of getting one for several months now… Jerry
#37566From: Paul GerhardtJan 13, 1994 8:18 AM
Jerry, Yep, there are two Imagine plus V-lab video shots. I also think the Lightwave users will find some of Imagine 2.9's new abilities interesting. I have run into one minor snag. I on some of the under water shots I seem to have a picked a blue green color that VHS hates (there is a lot of yellow/green fringing). I did not notice it since it did not show up on my composite monitor while recording, only later on playback. I guess I'll experiment and re-render the shots I actually use in this project. But for now, when you make your master if you could cut down on the chroma a bit it will be OK. I don't feel TOO bad about this since I've heard that the SeaQuest team had a similar problem with there early shots. I'll have to ask John what RGB settings he uses. …AutoPilot Engaged… -Paul-
#37615From: JERRY HATCHETTJan 14, 1994 5:58 PM
Paul, I look forward to seeing the V-Lab/Imagine stuff, and will turn down the chroma a touch on those fringing shots. The latest VTU has some pretty detailed settings listed for the Seaquest shots… Jerry
#37644From: Paul GerhardtJan 15, 1994 9:03 AM
Jerry, I am putting the tape together this weekend. You should see it sometime next week. There is not as much as last time, but I think it will be interesting to all the others. And there is not a one space space shot in the lot! 😉 With all I am learning about using real video captured with Vlab in my renders and the soon to arrive Imagine 3.0 just wait until the *next* summer edition. 🙂 BTW Peter mentioned $12.50. Is that the correct amount this time? …AutoPilot Engaged… -Paul-
#37650From: JERRY HATCHETTJan 15, 1994 2:19 PM
Yes, $12.50 is correct, Paul. Jerry
#37664From: Paul GerhardtJan 15, 1994 9:28 PM
OK you'll get one of my first checks printed from Quicken running on Emplant. 🙂 …AutoPilot Engaged… -Paul-
#37561From: Rick ThornquistJan 13, 1994 3:37 AM
John, That's all the news on the next rev that I have. The rotoscoping quality of the Micropolis drives is supposed to be quite good – I have a Seagate and it's OK but you can see some artifacting. It might be wise for somebody to make you a videotape to show you how good it is. You can use the PAR as a framestore I/O device. The drive will hold thousands of framestores. Rick – On Autopilot from Vancouver
#37525From: Luke H MontgomeryJan 12, 1994 2:56 PM
Hi Rick! I'm gettin ready to get a PAR/TBC IV, so I appreciate the alert on the software update… Have you heard of any plans for support of the new "A/V Drives" from Maxtor, I think. Or was it Micropolis? They are 1GB drives with hot access & I/O times… BTW, what was this I heard about the Seagate drives automagically doing a park every 120 seconds??? Seems that would really screw things up for segments over 120 secs! I'm goin nuts trying to decide on which IDE to get with my the new PAR… Too bad they haven't developed a SCSI-2 version… 🙂 Regards Luke (Pat) Montgomery "REAL" E-mail: compvid@tyrell.net CompVid Computer Video Graphics Services CompuServe: 70274,2177 Greater Kansas City Voice: (913) 780-0222 —————————————————————————– There's no place like home… There's no place like home… There's no…
#37562From: Rick ThornquistJan 13, 1994 3:37 AM
Luke, My news is that DPS is now supporting the Micropolis as the drive of choice. I have no news of any other drives being supported. You can, of course, use the old Seagates. You know, I heard about this head parking thing awhile back. I actually don't know if it is true or not – my anims scarcely get to 10 or 15 seconds never mind 2 minutes. When the Screamer is released that may be a different story… Rick – On Autopilot from Vancouver
#37588From: Luke H MontgomeryJan 13, 1994 9:27 PM
Thanks Rick… I know what you mean about those loooong anims… Who's got the time without a Screamer? Regards, Luke (Pat) Montgomery "REAL" E-mail: compvid@tyrell.net CompVid Computer Video Graphics Services CompuServe: 70274,2177 Greater Kansas City Voice: (913) 780-0222 —————————————————————————– There's no place like home… There's no place like home… There's no…
#37680From: Anthony RamirezJan 16, 1994 1:38 PM
>I heard about this head parking thing awhile back. I actually don't know >if it is true or not Yes, the 3655 Seagate parks its head every 2 minutes so when playing back or scoping there is a skip when the head parks. >my anims scarcely get to 10 or 15 seconds never mind 2 minutes. True, most people never make anims 2 minutes long but some may rotoscope something that long easily. >When the Screamer is released that may be a different story… You sure? I seem to have outgrown every system I have had and even though the Screamer is a Massive PowerHouse I am sure we will finally outgrow it too. With all that horsepower we will want to add MORE lights and MORE objects, then we will want to Trace shadows, ect… <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)
#37705From: Rick ThornquistJan 17, 1994 1:24 AM
Tony, All of what you say is right on. Rick – On Autopilot from Vancouver
#37694From: Brian JonesJan 16, 1994 10:01 PM
Has anyone actually asked DPS about a version that supports SCSI drives ? I guess the limits of the IDE i/f data rates are what make only a percentage of the drive available for animations. Brian