CompuServe Thread

HD backup using video?

46 messages in this thread
#67431From: Grant PrestonAug 27, 1992 3:58 AM
I head something a while ago about a device that would back up an Amiga hard drive using a video recorder and an ordinary VHS tape. Does such a device exist, is it reliable, what does it cost…etc. Or was it just a rumour? e. xit
#67621From: ShraddhanAug 28, 1992 6:47 PM
Grant, Here in Britain, I have an advert that advertises a new product. It says: UK launch of "Video Streamer" – the low cost method of backing up your hard disk. Store 800 Mbytes on a normal VHS tape using your existing video recorder as a tape streamer… Simply connect to the parallel port. Amiga, PC and Atari ST software available. Price 225 pounds I'm very tempted myself, but I too would like to know more about it before committing myself. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67665From: Don Curtis/SYSOPAug 29, 1992 12:34 AM
Shraddhan, Historically…VCR backup schemes have been unreliable. VCR's simply aren't designed to capture perfectly every bit of information put into them. For a TV program…that's ok. The picture quality degrades a bit…but no big deal. With digital data…the loss of even one bit of a single byte is too much loss. It must be reporduced exactly. Also, since VCR's aren't "read after write" devices, there's no way to know that the data was properly written out. The way most VCR backup programs get around that is to make multiple stores of the same data. They'll write the same "frame" over and over again, hoping that at least one of the passes got it right….or at the very least, that between all the passes, all the data was stored and can be reconstructed. Among other things…this causes the backup to be rather slow. I have NO idea if the program you're discussing has somehow or other overcome these problems and now is quick and absolutely reliable…but my strong suspicion is that those problems still exists. Don
#67732From: ShraddhanAug 29, 1992 4:54 PM
Don, Yes, I'd heard some time ago that VCR backup schemes were unreliable. However, I hadn't heard anything about specific packages. If your suspicion is still well founded, that such devices are unreliable, well, I'm going to be having a problem in the near future when my paranoia mounts to the point where I decide that I simply MUST make a backup of my 240Mb hard disk. Seems I'll have a choice of: Using a cheap and potentially unreliable VCR method, Spending a Saturday afternoon and early evening once a week shuffling a stack of floppies (about 25 BOXES of them!), Investing in a tape streamer, or Investing in removable media devices like a Syquest, or… At present, I try to keep my hair fom prematurely falling out by using LZ to make archive files of whatever I happen to be working on at the moment, knowing (or at least hoping) that all the other software can be re-installed, and hoping that the worst won't happen until after I've got a solution to the problem of making backups. I've never yet had any problem whatsoever with a hard disk; neither has there been a power cut when I've been saving anything. Maybe the solution would be to get an uninterruptable power supply? Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67746From: David ArtAug 29, 1992 7:00 PM
Shraddhan, With a hard disk, the question isn't so much "if" if will fail, but rather "when". Also, don't forget than an errant program or controller board failure can do a nice job of trashing a HD, even if there is not a problem with the drive itself. One tactic that uses less disks is to only backup your data files and rely on the originals to restore the programs, but, this becomes difficult to manage as well, since you likely spent a lot of time on creating your disk structure. I've used tape, floppies, and a networked second hard disk (analogous for this purpose to using something like a Syquest) for backups at various times on various systems. Of all of them, I prefer tape. Now, if only an affordable tape unit would show up, I'd be all set. 8) David
#67863From: ShraddhanAug 30, 1992 1:58 PM
David, Thanks for the advice. I know from experience that reinstalling tens of megabytes of software on a hard disk can be a real pain. It seems that the best bet would indeed be to go for a tape streamer. Or a Syquest. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67931From: Patrick DohertyAug 30, 1992 10:13 PM
Shraddhan, I have a Syquest that I bought for backup purposes. What finally dawned on me was that using the Syquest for backup is VERY expensive. So now I use it like an extra hard disk and have three times as much data to back up! Central Coast Software is offering to its customers a 250 Meg SCSI tape drive that is supported by QuarterBackV5.0 for $499.00. So if you own some of their software and the deals still going you might want to check it out. patrick
#68043From: ShraddhanAug 31, 1992 4:26 PM
Patrick, Yes, I agree that using a Syquest for backup purposes _is_ rather expensive. It does seem that the best solution is to use a tape streamer. At least tapes aren't very expensive. As I'm in the UK, I'm reluctant to purchase hardware from the US as this tends to take weeks and is not as cheap as it seems. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#68055From: Mike SchillerAug 31, 1992 6:33 PM
Shraddhan: I use BOTH a tape backup, and SyQuest backups on my system. I try and do a tape backup at least every other day, and a SyQuest backup about every 2 weeks or so. I usually do the SyQuest backup right before I'm gonna do some radical change to my system, so I can quickly restore it to the way it was before the change if it doesn't work out. // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#67943From: David ArtAug 30, 1992 11:08 PM
Shraddhan, I think that I'm going for the tape streamer soon. I lost quite a bit of work last year when my 80 meg drive bit the dust. I had a backup that was less than a couple of weeks old, but had done some major updating and reorganization in that two weeks. (I was _almost_ finished with my reorganization process when a malfunctioning accellerator board trashed the drive.) Once getting the tape drive, one needs to develop the discipline to keep up with a backup regimen as well. David
#67972From: Paul ToalAug 31, 1992 4:37 AM
With a tape drive you DON'T need a regiment of discipline. The tapedrive does an automatic backup each night while you sleep. You set up the calender to once per hour if you wish, then it's free sailing, forever. Neat stuff! –Paul Still on AutoPilot
#68097From: David ArtAug 31, 1992 10:28 PM
Paul (& Shraddhan), I agree that backups can be timed successfully. However, one still has to consider the mechanics of the backup process. If you don't include a regimen of changing tapes, and retiring them before they wear out, you're still at risk. If I remember correctly, recommendations go something like this: 1. have a set of tapes, 1/day of the week for a daily backup (usually partial) 2. have a set of tapes, 1/week of the month for a weekly full backup 3. have two sets of tapes, alternating each month for a monthly full backup. Of course, these recommendations are for a business rather than for a home user, but they serve to illustrate a point. It's best to have a regimen of changing the tape in your drive as well as just having the automatic timed backup. David
#68046From: ShraddhanAug 31, 1992 4:27 PM
David, Only a few hours ago, running a program I'd never used before, the computer locked up while about to save a file. I waited and waited and nothing seemed to be happening, so I reset the computer. During rebooting, a requester popped up to tell me that the disk DH0: (my boot partition) could not be validated, and booting stopped at that point. That's it, I thought, I've been reading and sending messages all weekend about get a backup system for my hard disk, and it's gone and died on me! Not so. I turned the computer off, paced round the room for a few minutes, turned it on again, and everything worked fine! I _must_ be lucky! You mention that one needs to develop the discipline to keep up with a backup regimen as well. Well, some time ago, I wrote a little program for automatically running other programs after a set period (days or weeks). With the CRON-type programs I've seen, you specify the time when an event is to happen and then the event is processed when that time comes round. My program works differently in that it works on elapsed time. So if I schedule a program to be run every four days, and I go away for a week, when I come back and boot the machine, the program will be run automatically, regardless of the time of day or day of the week. If making a backup can be achieved through calling a program (or executing a script) with no further intervention apart from loading a tape into the streamer, then the whole process will be totally automated by adding a line to my user-startup. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#68047From: Christopher TolmieAug 31, 1992 4:39 PM
Shraddhan, Ami-Back comes with a Scheduler program that lets you set the days and times you want the backup(s) to begin. Of course this means that you leave the computer on if your backup is scheduled for 3 AM. Hmmm, I guess you could put your power strip on a timer, and drag Ami-Scheduler into the WBStartup drawer or add it to the startup-script. But I'd get a very good timer switch. Chris
#68098From: David ArtAug 31, 1992 10:28 PM
Shraddhan, Glad that you didn't lose anything. That must have been a sinking feeling, no? Please see my reply to Paul about my meaning. It's best to have a system of multiple backup tapes that works for you, and religiously keep up the regimen to gain the maximum benefits. David
#67764From: Michael GerardAug 29, 1992 10:41 PM
Shraddhan: Since you do so much DTP work and I am sure that you'd like quick access to tons of fonts, you may want to consider a removable media hard disk drive like the Syqyest… that way, you can back up to a couple of carts, and also store lots of fonts and graphics, and be able to access them very quickly. // Michael \X/ …on AutoPilot
#67789From: Don Curtis/SYSOPAug 30, 1992 2:10 AM
Shraddhan, Even with a UPS, that will only prevent problems with short duration power losses. It won't do a thing to prevent your drive from having an error that trashes your disk…or from the drive itself going bad. Same thing with errant software, or a virus program…they could wipe out the information on your disk. I'd suggest a tape drive, but baring that…I'd take the time to do a full backup to floppy, and then do incrementals from that point on. Don
#67866From: ShraddhanAug 30, 1992 2:00 PM
Don, I guess I've just been very lucky over the last couple of years, not having had any problems whatsoever with a hard disk. However, when I bought my previous Amiga, I nearly lost the original system software due to a virus that came with the Amiga. (Yes, on the software packaged with it!) Luckily, I had access to uninfected disks from the Amiga at work and was able to destroy the virus, otherwise I would have been a very irate customer indeed. Now, I certainly don't want to be in that position again. Neither can I really face the prospect of backing up to floppies, so it seems I'm going to have to invest in a tape streamer. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67717From: Aug 29, 1992 1:40 PM
I have seen a similar device (really only a cable for the serial port and the mono video port with some added electronics + some software) here in Denmark at DKK 985 incl. 25% VAT (= USD 180 or 90 pounds). The (unattended) backup speed is about 40 MB pr. hour and actual video pictures are generated and stored on the tape between different backups, so you can use your own TV set to search for backups. Restore of single directories is possible as well as overwriting a backup. It was reviewed by a Danish magazine and was praised as being inexpensive as compared to a tape streamer, but there is always a risk of data loss. It was important to use only high quality tapes e.g SUPER VHS. A 34 MB backup was performed on a high quality video recorder and 1-2 KB were lost using one brand of S-VHS tape, but 3 other brands were OK. Using standard or high grade tapes resulted in data losses in the 0.01-0.2% range regardless of tape brand. Making frequent backups may compensate for the potential data losses, as it probably never will be the same data lost from two different tapes. Also backing up important new files to disk. The product is from Germany and comes with a tape with 160 MB Fred Fish disks and is sold by Scanteam, Aarhus. Phone +45-8618 1600, FAX +45-8618 1601. 10AM – 6.30PM. – J0RGEN …..by Whap! from DENMARK
#67744From: ShraddhanAug 29, 1992 6:28 PM
Joergen, Thanks for the information about the VCR backup device. I like the price, but at 40MB per hour, it would take 6 hours or more to back up my hard disk, longer if I would have to change tapes. As for the loss of data, this worries me as I would like to think that any backup I made would be 100% accurate. Doing two backups in order to make sure would take over 12 hours! However, I'll bear it in mind, in case I get desperate 😉 Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67731From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiAug 29, 1992 4:18 PM
Shraddan, For the equivalent of 225 pounds, you can buy a SCSI tape streamer for your Amiga _and_ pay customs, probably. I've seen 150MB tape backup units here for $350. Note that video tape backups never caught on in the PC market, where they've been available for years. I think there's a reason for this… Speed and reliability don't seem too hot.
#67745From: ShraddhanAug 29, 1992 6:29 PM
Denny, Am I correct in assuming that if I nip out and buy me any old SCSI tape streamer, bring it home, and plug it into the back of my computer, I will be immediately able to back up my hard disk? I mean, the fact that the supplier thought I'd be plugging the thing into a PC would be totally unimportant? I have spent half an hour or more looking for adverts for tape streamers. They're a rare beast. Besides, NONE of the adverts mention whether their units are SCSI. Also, there is a wide variety of prices – from 249 pounds for an external 40/120MB unit for an XT/AT or PS2 to 746 pounds for a 60MB streamer, details unknown. Am I correct in assuming that a tape streamer would have to be able to store the whole contents of the largest partition on my hard disk? Like, I guess I couldn't use a 60MB streamer to back up a 100MB partition on two tapes? As for making backups to a VCR, from information I've received I calculate that this would take more than a full working day to do 🙁 Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67752From: Christopher TolmieAug 29, 1992 9:19 PM
Shraddhan, You can get a Wangtek 5150ES streaming tape drive for around $350 its SCSI it uses 150MB tapes DC6150 variety, and software like AMI-BACK 2.0 will append files to the tape, and allow you to add additional tapes to the backup. There are other streaming tape drives that are SCSI and that use larger tape sizes (250MB). I believe one is a 5250ES by Wangtek. I'd call Moonlighter Software Development and see if they have any streaming tape specials left. These would be remanufactured drives with their software Ami-Back. The VCR sounds interesting if only because many of us own them, but the streaming tape seems the easiest and safest route, and since using one from 1989 I wouldn't want to use anything else for the price of tape is a lot less than SyQuest cartridges and I've got them too to use. I use a Syquest cart to backup a partition on occassion just so I can defrag it. I use verify with Ami-Back make sure that the partition is backed up safely and then reformat and restore that partition from the Syquest. Could use the tape just as easily, then I do another compare, and then reuse the cartridge on the next partition. Easier than using a VCR. Plus I can walk away and watch the telly while the tape is streaming, can't do that with no stinking floppies! We don't need no stinking floppies (badges) Chris
#67864From: ShraddhanAug 30, 1992 1:59 PM
Chris, A 150MB tape streamer for $350 sounds like good value to me. Unfortunately, I'm in Britain, and although computer equipment here tends to be more expensive than the exchange rate would justify, I'd prefer to buy locally – unless of course the savings would be great enough. I've got a catalogue here which quotes 746 pounds for a 60MB streamer, 885 pounds for a 250MB streamer (May 1992). I wonder if they ever sell any?! The Syquest option appears to be rather more expensive. I've spent many a boring hour backing up a 40MB drive onto floppies, and there are few things that I'd like less to do. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67874From: Christopher TolmieAug 30, 1992 4:30 PM
Shraddhan, I can understand your loyalty to the local vendors, but if I had to either face hours of changing floppies ever again or buying a tape streamer from an overseas vendor, my bank draft would be in the next international next day airmail pouch headed abroad. 40MB? Try backing up several 100MB drives and ten Syquest cartridges. Chris
#67880From: ShraddhanAug 30, 1992 5:40 PM
Chris, It's not _only_ a matter of loyalty to local vendors; it's also the fact that if I can buy a tape streamer locally at a reasonable price, I won't have to wait weeks while the tape streamer I bought from the US sits in the customs shed at Heathrow airport, waiting for someone to have a look at it and decide how much is 17.5% of the selling price, so that they can add this on, plus a few more dollars for their trouble! Of course, if I can make enough of a saving by importing the thing, maybe I can afford to wait a few weeks for it to arrive… Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67881From: Christopher TolmieAug 30, 1992 5:50 PM
Shraddhan, Ah, I see, yes customs does slow down commerce, plus the added duties on the price + time would cause me to consider the consequences of such a purchase. Well hope you find a solution, Chris
#68042From: ShraddhanAug 31, 1992 4:25 PM
Chris, As it was the August Bank Holiday here in the UK today (Monday). I have been waiting for tomorrow so I can start hunting down a tape streamer. I might still order from the US if UK prices are too exorbitant! Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67763From: Michael GerardAug 29, 1992 10:41 PM
Shraddhan: "…I will be immediately able to back up my hard disk?" Well, you'll need some software (don't use HDBackup that comes with 2.04. If you have to use it, use BRU directly or you may have problems). You should have no trouble hooking up any QIC tape drive that supports: a) SCSI-1 direct or SCSI-2 direct commands b) ASYNCHRONOUS communication (synchronous will work but is not as flexible) MoonLighter Software Development bundles AMI-BACK 2.0 with a refurbished Archive Viper 250 Meg tape drive for US$350.00. I have this system and I really like it. With a single 250 meg tape, I can do individual backups of all my partitions (4 partitions over two drives), and then update the individual partitions as I see fit. Some software (like AMIBACK) allows for data compression, so you could conceivably fit 100MB of data on a 60 MB disk. Most of the drives out there that you'll see advertised are for PC's and are connected to them via their floppy controller. Currently, there is no software support on the Amiga (that I am aware of) for these types of Tape Drives. // Michael \X/ …on AutoPilot
#67865From: ShraddhanAug 30, 1992 1:59 PM
Michael, Thanks for the information and advice. You're right about DTP – the main reason I rushed into buying a new Amiga with a larger hard disk was that my old 42M disk was on the verge of overflowing, what with all the fonts and whatever, and I calculated that it would take me just two months to fill up a 100MB hard disk. The idea of having exchangeable 44MB or 88MB disks looks quite appealing – until the day when I need two fonts, one of which is on one disk, and the other on the other one. Then I would wonder if I had not been better to have invested in a second 200MB hard disk. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67936From: Patrick DohertyAug 30, 1992 10:26 PM
Shraddhan, The Syquest would work great for your fonts etc. What you have to do is have enough room on your hard drive or RAM: to hold the data for a particular project. You can change the Syquest carts anytime so all you need is a handy spot to put the data when it happens to be on two (or more) carts. One caution though – you MUST format and partition all your syquest carts. exactly the same! I then use rename to give each one a unique name so I can keep them straight. I keep about 40megs free on my HD for when what I need is on a different cart. Syquest is cost effective as a HD replacement (it gets cheaper per unit the more carts you buy) but not as a backup solution. Patrick
#68045From: ShraddhanAug 31, 1992 4:26 PM
Patrick, Thanks for the tip. I reckon that for the time being at least, a tape streamer is what I need. When my hard disk begins to overflow with rarely used files, I assume I will be able to keep the least used files archived on tape. This might not be as convenient as a Syquest, but a lot cheaper. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67887From: Wayne SteeleAug 30, 1992 6:27 PM
Michael: Is the "Archive Viper" you mentioned internal or external? I'd have to have an external unit. All bays in my A2000 are filled. 🙁 Wayne
#67896From: Michael GerardAug 30, 1992 7:26 PM
Wayne… the Archive Viper I have, I received as a 'bare' drive. I purchased an external case that could hold two 5.25" devices and mounted it in there along with a Toshiba XM3201B CD-ROM Drive. I' very happy with the setup. I could easily unplug the external case from the Amiga and plug it into a scsi controller on my PC and have immediate acces to the Tape Drive and CDROM drive on that machine as well. There is a file in the AmigaUser Library called EXTEXP.LHA that describes how I set up the external case, tape drive and CD-ROM drive. // Michael \X/ …on AutoPilot
#68067From: Wayne SteeleAug 31, 1992 7:54 PM
Michael: Thanks for the info. It sounds like an external, two-bay case would work perfectly for me as well. I'd like to add both CD-ROM and Streaming Tape to my setup. Wayne
#67941From: Malcolm O'BrienAug 30, 1992 10:41 PM
Michael, I've seen a couple of messages saying to not use HDBackup. What's the matter with it? I've been meaning to back up my drive and reformat under the new FFS for more space and speed and HDBackup is what I have to use. Why should I not use it? (I DO have one other program that was given to me at a developer's meeting in Toronto. It's called Back-Pac. Anyone have any comments on that?) Malcolm
#67965From: Michael GerardAug 31, 1992 2:05 AM
Malcolm… HDBackup is the interface to the underlying BRU program (as I understand it anyway). Many folks have reported that trying to restore using HDBackup simply doesn't work, but they also report that using BRU directly is ok. Personally, I use AmiBack from MoonLighter. // Michael \X/ …on AutoPilot
#68075From: Malcolm O'BrienAug 31, 1992 9:05 PM
Michael, Thanks for the info. Malcolm
#68001From: Jim Nangano/SYSOPAug 31, 1992 10:12 AM
Malcolm, I can speak a little about Back-Pac – it's a relative of mine. It started out in life called "saf-T-net", which I wrote, and which was one of the first commercial hard disk backup utilities available. It's only competition at the time of publication were two programs: a commercial offering called HardHat, which basically took approximately 20 minutes to fill a single floppy disk, and a freely-distributable alpha release of a program called BRU, written by Fred Fish. HardHat disappeared, and BRU eventually grew up a little bit, and is now the backbone behind the HDBackup front-end. BRU was the reason I wrote saf-T-net. <grin> It's also the major reason why I'd advise against using HDBackup. Aside from some basic design decisions in BRU that are done for cross-machine portablitiy issues, BRU is a reasonable implementation. Unfortunately, the biggest problem with it is that it uses a lot of space for the backed up data – much more than any of the other available choices. On top of that, I've heard of too many horror stories of folks who have trusted HDBackup, only to run into severe problems when they needed to restore their data from backup. As to BackPac, I can't speak for the changes that the current developer made to my original, as I've not seen the product — only the demo version that was uploaded here a while ago. I know he re-designed the interface a little bit (for the better), adding a more 2.0-like 3-D look. The basic engine of the program was always quite reliable for me (I used saf-T-net quite a lot :-), and I trusted it. It's major problem was a limited design that kept it from growing – it didn't support any backup medium other than floppy disks. I stopped using it when I added a tape drive to my system. Hope this helps… – BobR
#68076From: Malcolm O'BrienAug 31, 1992 9:05 PM
Bob, Oh, yes. I remember now that I was told that Back-Pac was an descendant of saf-T-net. It's probably what I'll use. Thanks for the info. Malcolm
#68068From: Wayne SteeleAug 31, 1992 7:54 PM
Malcolm: I've been using HDBackup for several months. I don't really like it, but it does work. I've used it to do exactly what you want to do… Backup, reformat FFS, and restore. I don't have any fancy backup drive. I just use floppies. Trying to use both floppy drives at the same time seemed a bit clumsy so I just use one. Wayne
#68078From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiAug 31, 1992 9:10 PM
Shraddhan, Ami-Back 2.0 will support streaming onto multiple tapes, so you could use tapes smaller than your partition. But I'd try to get a tape drive of the same capacity or bigger for simplicity's sake. I know Ami-Back works with just about any SCSI tape backup automatically. I haven't tried Quarterback with SCSI tape backups, but I understand it's pretty good at working with most drives as well.
#67831From: daniel wolfAug 30, 1992 4:13 AM
I also heard of a 'do it yourself' version of VHS tape backup and possibly another outfit in Germany doing a similar product.
#67867From: ShraddhanAug 30, 1992 2:00 PM
Daniel, Having heard of the lack of reliability of VCR backup, and their slow speed, I think I'll steer well clear. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK
#67933From: Mike ToddAug 30, 1992 10:19 PM
Shraddhan I've only just picked up this thread, but I have heard various stories about VCR backup systems. The problem is that VHS quality is often very poor, with lots of tape dropouts (that you don't see, because of the dropout compensation) … as has already been said, a single bit lost in data is one bit too many. Personally, I would'nt trust valuable data to a system that relied on a domestic video machine. I might consider it with a Betamax machine, or an S-VHS .. but not with conventional VHS. I know that there is at least one relatively cheap tape streamer available in the UK … Tim Arnot (editor of the ICPUG journal) has one, and uses it to do HD backups. Unfortunately, I can't recall the details. Mike (UK … but currently in Texas)
#68044From: ShraddhanAug 31, 1992 4:26 PM
Mike, In view of the known unreliability of VCR backup systems, it seems that I have no choice but to go for a tape streamer. I hope you're having a good time in Texas. Regards, Shraddhan – via Whap! from Hertfordshire in the UK