CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Software Developers

#Lawyers, ethics & CP

39 messages in this thread
#1882From: Chris BobbittDec 15, 1985 11:49 AM
Ah… John Galt (sweat…sweat) – Wasn't he one of the protaganists of ATLAS SHRUGGED? It's been years since I've read any of her fiction (and Atlas Shrugged was the first I read – once about 4 years ago). Been reading her "serious" (can she write otherwise??) books at my methodical pace for the last year. even though I value Objectivism as my philosophy – I'm not a very good example of the ideal Rand-ian. Occasionally I degenerate into a "witchdoctor" on some things. But I do get in rare form on some issues – and it all comes out. Now for MY question… are YOU reading Ayn Rand for self-education or mud-slinging ammo? (now that I've spilled my guts…) Chris
#1968From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 12:15 AM
Ayn Rand is my hero. (heroine?) You're right… Galt was the central character in Atlas Shrugged. As you may remember 'Who is John Galt' was a slang expression in the setting of the novel.
#2009From: Chris BobbittDec 16, 1985 6:38 PM
Right! – after you asked methat question I did a quick scan through my copy, and kicked myself a few times for not being able to answer such an obvious question. (though I'm no masochist) Ever read "For the New Intellectual", or "The Virtue of Selfishness"? A lot of ammunition for those inevitable arguments (even at the LP meetings!! You would be surprised how many Libertarians, despite the name, are closet fascists or pseudo-socialists). Personally, been trying to find copies of "Night of January 16th" and "We the living". By the way, while I'm on the subject of Ayn Rand and Objectivism — have you heard anything about that proposed (makes you want to spit) "National Public Digital Radio".? From what I believe it will directly compete with CIS (and all the private services), and I shouldn't have to explain to you (of all people) what happens when the Gov. get's their grungy, bloodstained hands into the free market! I've been calling all sorts of people at the FCC to get some accurate information [in vain] – but from what I see there is some money behind getting that particular law … the guys out in WA state that are trying to run their own service apparantly, or maybe one of the multinationals that wants to compete. In any case, if you are interested, there are 2 files in Access [FCC1.DOC amd FCC2.DOC] that do a lot about running around the truth. The guy pushing it is DON STONER. —-> Chris Bobbitt * Replies: 2036, 2037, 2082
#2036From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 11:10 PM
Hadn't heard about the digital socialist radio yet. Thanks for the tip. Yes, i have all her books, and everything else she's published. By the way, I was once a libertarian, but when I learned the truth about the party, I got as FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE! Don't let them fool you!Ther ARE fascists! If you would like to do a little reading along these lines, let me know.
#2111From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:44 PM
Hmmm… And I thought it was just a few bad apples! Yes… can you make any recommendations? (too bad – so many of them are pretty interested in Ayn too). As for 'socialist digital radio' – been thinking of starting some sort of organiation to wrk against it. Unfortunately – as an individual I have about 1 in a trillion chance of getting thegov. to listen – so I figured an organization (all volunteer – no money solicited and all that) might be a good hobby [and yes, it's in my self-interest as well as every other thinking persons]. How does Ayn Rand stnd on such things? I don't think I could take them to court?! –> chris
#2111From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:44 PM
Hmmm… And I thought it was just a few bad apples! Yes… can you make any recommendations? (too bad – so many of them are pretty interested in Ayn too). As for 'socialist digital radio' – been thinking of starting some sort of organiation to wrk against it. Unfortunately – as an individual I have about 1 in a trillion chance of getting thegov. to listen – so I figured an organization (all volunteer – no money solicited and all that) might be a good hobby [and yes, it's in my self-interest as well as every other thinking persons]. How does Ayn Rand stnd on such things? I don't think I could take them to court?! –> chris
#2111From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:44 PM
Hmmm… And I thought it was just a few bad apples! Yes… can you make any recommendations? (too bad – so many of them are pretty interested in Ayn too). As for 'socialist digital radio' – been thinking of starting some sort of organiation to work against it. Unfortunately – as an individual I have about 1 in a trillion chance of getting thegov. to listen – so I figured an organization (all volunteer – no money solicited and all that) might be a good hobby [and yes, it's in my self-interest as well as every other thinking persons]. How does Ayn Rand stnd on such things? I don't think I could take them to court?! –> chris
#2111From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:44 PM
Hmmm… And I thought it was just a few bad apples! Yes… can you make any recommendations? (too bad – so many of them are pretty interested in Ayn too). As for 'socialist digital radio' – been thinking of starting some sort of organiation to work against it. Unfortunately – as an individual I have about 1 in a trillion chance of getting thegov. to listen – so I figured an organization (all volunteer – no money solicited and all that) might be a good hobby [and yes, it's in my self-interest as well as every other thinking persons]. How does Ayn Rand stnd on such things? I don't think I could take them to court?! –> chris
#2163From: steve polingDec 17, 1985 10:53 PM
i had to take a lie detector test when i was applying for a gov't job and the guy asked if i was ever involved in any Fascist orgs. My reply was "what's a fascist?" i tend to favor Ayn Rand type ideas. sdp * Reply: 2166
#2163From: steve polingDec 17, 1985 10:53 PM
i had to take a lie detector test when i was applying for a gov't job and the guy asked if i was ever involved in any Fascist orgs. My reply was "what's a fascist?" i tend to favor Ayn Rand type ideas. sdp * Reply: 2166
#2036From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 11:10 PM
Hadn't heard about the digital socialist radio yet. Thanks for the tip. Yes, i have all her books, and everything else she's published. By the way, I was once a libertarian, but when I learned the truth about the party, I got as FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE! Don't let them fool you!Ther ARE fascists! If you would like to do a little reading along these lines, let me know. * Reply: 2111
#2036From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 11:10 PM
Hadn't heard about the digital socialist radio yet. Thanks for the tip. Yes, i have all her books, and everything else she's published. By the way, I was once a libertarian, but when I learned the truth about the party, I got as FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE! Don't let them fool you!Ther ARE fascists! If you would like to do a little reading along these lines, let me know.
#2036From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 11:10 PM
Hadn't heard about the digital socialist radio yet. Thanks for the tip. Yes, i have all her books, and everything else she's published. By the way, I was once a libertarian, but when I learned the truth about the party, I got as FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE! Don't let them fool you!Ther ARE fascists! If you would like to do a little reading along these lines, let me know. * Reply: 2111
#2037From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 11:13 PM
By the way, a quick quote from "FRONTLINES" a LP paper….. "Ayn rand's legacy has been a tragic one… a conservatarian millstone around the neck of the Libertarian movement. And that is why (we) say it's time to dissociate ourselves from Rand and everything she stood for." Unquote. Food for thought?
#2112From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:50 PM
Actually, what you just said in an eariler msg pretty much confirmed what I always thought. I've always been uneasy about the fact that Libertarians have always dissassociated ethics from personal actions and governmental judgement (though in the latter case – go. had no ethics to begin with). It also explains why I tend to argue more at LP meetings then anything else – even though we have some of the same goals (free, pure capitalist society, etc.). Your headline quote throws the light of truth on things – thanks for keeping me from making a mistake.And yes, it's a regular banquet… –> Chris
#2112From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:50 PM
Actually, what you just said in an eariler msg pretty much confirmed what I always thought. I've always been uneasy about the fact that Libertarians have always dissassociated ethics from personal actions and governmental judgement (though in the latter case – go. had no ethics to begin with). It also explains why I tend to argue more at LP meetings then anything else – even though we have some of the same goals (free, pure capitalist society, etc.). Your headline quote throws the light of truth on things – thanks for keeping me from making a mistake.And yes, it's a regular banquet… –> Chris
#2112From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:50 PM
Actually, what you just said in an eariler msg pretty much confirmed what I always thought. I've always been uneasy about the fact that Libertarians have always dissassociated ethics from personal actions and governmental judgement (though in the latter case – go. had no ethics to begin with). It also explains why I tend to argue more at LP meetings then anything else – even though we have some of the same goals (free, pure capitalist society, etc.). Your headline quote throws the light of truth on things – thanks for keeping me from making a mistake.And yes, it's a regular banquet… –> Chris
#2112From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:50 PM
Actually, what you just said in an eariler msg pretty much confirmed what I always thought. I've always been uneasy about the fact that Libertarians have always dissassociated ethics from personal actions and governmental judgement (though in the latter case – go. had no ethics to begin with). It also explains why I tend to argue more at LP meetings then anything else – even though we have some of the same goals (free, pure capitalist society, etc.). Your headline quote throws the light of truth on things – thanks for keeping me from making a mistake.And yes, it's a regular banquet… –> Chris
#2037From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 11:13 PM
By the way, a quick quote from "FRONTLINES" a LP paper….. "Ayn rand's legacy has been a tragic one… a conservatarian millstone around the neck of the Libertarian movement. And that is why (we) say it's time to dissociate ourselves from Rand and everything she stood for." Unquote. Food for thought? * Reply: 2112
#2037From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 11:13 PM
By the way, a quick quote from "FRONTLINES" a LP paper….. "Ayn rand's legacy has been a tragic one… a conservatarian millstone around the neck of the Libertarian movement. And that is why (we) say it's time to dissociate ourselves from Rand and everything she stood for." Unquote. Food for thought?
#2037From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 11:13 PM
By the way, a quick quote from "FRONTLINES" a LP paper….. "Ayn rand's legacy has been a tragic one… a conservatarian millstone around the neck of the Libertarian movement. And that is why (we) say it's time to dissociate ourselves from Rand and everything she stood for." Unquote. Food for thought? * Reply: 2112
#2082From: Joe O'Hara[MTS]Dec 17, 1985 5:46 AM
Don Stoner is an Amateur radio operator. I beleive his proposal would allow unlicensed operation of a low power UHF radio station for digital communications. Something we 'HAMS' have been doing for years. Our 'packet' radio links allow us to transmit digital data across the country and have the data routed automatically to a desired destination. Pretty much the radio equivalent of what Tymnet, Uninet & telenet currently do. In fact we use essentially the same protocol X25A . best regards, Rick Sterling N2CGI MTS * Reply: 2116
#2116From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:54 PM
He's talking more about setting up a government subsidized net to transmit this data – and to compete with private businesses. Free enterprise can do it a lot cheaper – and CIS won't have to subsidize it's competition to the detriment of services here. For an example of what may happen as a result of something like this … read the history of what happened to radio and TV when the FCC got into things. And you wonder why TV is so bad!?! === Chris
#2467From: David LyallDec 20, 1985 11:55 PM
I'm not familiar with thiset proposal but these 'free enterprise' discussions are getting to me. I think you freedom to money people should do a little reading about 19th century capitalism in the US. The unchecked power of the owners almost drove the country into a revolution. 'Reformed' cCapitalism became money with a human face, supposedly, to try to strike a little balance, or save the country for the owners, depending on your point of veiw. As for the FCC, 'free enterprisers' are now proposing to grant to current license holders the right to buy and sell the airwaves. This would be the greatest giveaway of public property to the profit of a privileged few in te history of the Republic. Since the relaxing of FCC controls started the information content of TV programming has decreased substantially and commercials and sit-coms have started to produce ssme of the stupidest generations since Nero. In closing, it is apparent that right wing factionalsim is as bad as that between the sparticist league and the RCP, or any non-thinking strife groups you might care to name.
#2469From: JIM PRITCHETTDec 21, 1985 12:19 AM
He might go too far to the libertarian side, but do you really believe that garbage you put up here? TV has deterioriated because it is no longer required to censor itself. It is trying to reform America's morals into it's own value set — i.e. no morals at all! Sorry to the rest of you about adding to this nonappropriate subject. This stuff belongs somewhere else. Happy Amigaing… Jim Pritchett * Reply: 2474
#2474From: TARA KELLYDec 21, 1985 12:33 AM
huh? most of the stuff on tv looks pretty moralistic to me. Ever see the bad guy win? ever? Cosby is heavy morality as is Family ties, Night Court, Hill Street, even the fabled Love Boat. What are you talking about? TV is great. And TV not only has to, but does indeed censor itself. What do you want Sesame Street and the 700 hundred club all day. Relax. There is always that switch there.
#2474From: TARA KELLYDec 21, 1985 12:33 AM
huh? most of the stuff on tv looks pretty moralistic to me. Ever see the bad guy win? ever? Cosby is heavy morality as is Family ties, Night Court, Hill Street, even the fabled Love Boat. What are you talking about? TV is great. And TV not only has to, but does indeed censor itself. What do you want Sesame Street and the 700 hundred club all day. Relax. There is always that switch there.
#2469From: JIM PRITCHETTDec 21, 1985 12:19 AM
He might go too far to the libertarian side, but do you really believe that garbage you put up here? TV has deterioriated because it is no longer required to censor itself. It is trying to reform America's morals into it's own value set — i.e. no morals at all! Sorry to the rest of you about adding to this nonappropriate subject. This stuff belongs somewhere else. Happy Amigaing… Jim Pritchett * Reply: 2474
#2472From: TARA KELLYDec 21, 1985 12:31 AM
since day one people have bought and sold the airwaves. commercial broadcast licenses are just that.
#2472From: TARA KELLYDec 21, 1985 12:31 AM
since day one people have bought and sold the airwaves. commercial broadcast licenses are just that.
#2467From: David LyallDec 20, 1985 11:55 PM
I'm not familiar with thiset proposal but these 'free enterprise' discussions are getting to me. I think you freedom to money people should do a little reading about 19th century capitalism in the US. The unchecked power of the owners almost drove the country into a revolution. 'Reformed' cCapitalism became money with a human face, supposedly, to try to strike a little balance, or save the country for the owners, depending on your point of veiw. As for the FCC, 'free enterprisers' are now proposing to grant to current license holders the right to buy and sell the airwaves. This would be the greatest giveaway of public property to the profit of a privileged few in te history of the Republic. Since the relaxing of FCC controls started the information content of TV programming has decreased substantially and commercials and sit-coms have started to produce ssme of the stupidest generations since Nero. In closing, it is apparent that right wing factionalsim is as bad as that between the sparticist league and the RCP, or any non-thinking strife groups you might care to name.
#2116From: Chris BobbittDec 17, 1985 5:54 PM
He's talking more about setting up a government subsidized net to transmit this data – and to compete with private businesses. Free enterprise can do it a lot cheaper – and CIS won't have to subsidize it's competition to the detriment of services here. For an example of what may happen as a result of something like this … read the history of what happened to radio and TV when the FCC got into things. And you wonder why TV is so bad!?! === Chris
#2082From: Joe O'Hara[MTS]Dec 17, 1985 5:46 AM
Don Stoner is an Amateur radio operator. I beleive his proposal would allow unlicensed operation of a low power UHF radio station for digital communications. Something we 'HAMS' have been doing for years. Our 'packet' radio links allow us to transmit digital data across the country and have the data routed automatically to a desired destination. Pretty much the radio equivalent of what Tymnet, Uninet & telenet currently do. In fact we use essentially the same protocol X25A .
#2082From: Joe O'Hara[MTS]Dec 17, 1985 5:46 AM
Don Stoner is an Amateur radio operator. I beleive his proposal would allow unlicensed operation of a low power UHF radio station for digital communications. Something we 'HAMS' have been doing for years. Our 'packet' radio links allow us to transmit digital data across the country and have the data routed automatically to a desired destination. Pretty much the radio equivalent of what Tymnet, Uninet & telenet currently do. In fact we use essentially the same protocol X25A .
#2082From: Joe O'Hara[MTS]Dec 17, 1985 5:46 AM
Don Stoner is an Amateur radio operator. I beleive his proposal would allow unlicensed operation of a low power UHF radio station for digital communications. Something we 'HAMS' have been doing for years. Our 'packet' radio links allow us to transmit digital data across the country and have the data routed automatically to a desired destination. Pretty much the radio equivalent of what Tymnet, Uninet & telenet currently do. In fact we use essentially the same protocol X25A . best regards, Rick Sterling N2CGI MTS * Reply: 2116
#2009From: Chris BobbittDec 16, 1985 6:38 PM
Right! – after you asked methat question I did a quick scan through my copy, and kicked myself a few times for not being able to answer such an obvious question. (though I'm no masochist) Ever read "For the New Intellectual", or "The Virtue of Selfishness"? A lot of ammunition for those inevitable arguments (even at the LP meetings!! You would be surprised how many Libertarians, despite the name, are closet fascists or pseudo-socialists). Personally, been trying to find copies of "Night of January 16th" and "We the living". By the way, while I'm on the subject of Ayn Rand and Objectivism — have you heard anything about that proposed (makes you want to spit) "National Public Digital Radio".? From what I believe it will directly compete with CIS (and all the private services), and I shouldn't have to explain to you (of all people) what happens when the Gov. get's their grungy, bloodstained hands into the free market! I've been calling all sorts of people at the FCC to get some accurate information [in vain] – but from what I see there is some money behind getting that particular law … the guys out in WA state that are trying to run their own service apparantly, or maybe one of the multinationals that wants to compete. In any case, if you are interested, there are 2 files in Access [FCC1.DOC amd FCC2.DOC] that do a lot about running around the truth. The guy pushing it is DON STONER.
#2009From: Chris BobbittDec 16, 1985 6:38 PM
Right! – after you asked methat question I did a quick scan through my copy, and kicked myself a few times for not being able to answer such an obvious question. (though I'm no masochist) Ever read "For the New Intellectual", or "The Virtue of Selfishness"? A lot of ammunition for those inevitable arguments (even at the LP meetings!! You would be surprised how many Libertarians, despite the name, are closet fascists or pseudo-socialists). Personally, been trying to find copies of "Night of January 16th" and "We the living". By the way, while I'm on the subject of Ayn Rand and Objectivism — have you heard anything about that proposed (makes you want to spit) "National Public Digital Radio".? From what I believe it will directly compete with CIS (and all the private services), and I shouldn't have to explain to you (of all people) what happens when the Gov. get's their grungy, bloodstained hands into the free market! I've been calling all sorts of people at the FCC to get some accurate information [in vain] – but from what I see there is some money behind getting that particular law … the guys out in WA state that are trying to run their own service apparantly, or maybe one of the multinationals that wants to compete. In any case, if you are interested, there are 2 files in Access [FCC1.DOC amd FCC2.DOC] that do a lot about running around the truth. The guy pushing it is DON STONER. —-> Chris Bobbitt * Replies: 2036, 2037, 2082
#2009From: Chris BobbittDec 16, 1985 6:38 PM
Right! – after you asked methat question I did a quick scan through my copy, and kicked myself a few times for not being able to answer such an obvious question. (though I'm no masochist) Ever read "For the New Intellectual", or "The Virtue of Selfishness"? A lot of ammunition for those inevitable arguments (even at the LP meetings!! You would be surprised how many Libertarians, despite the name, are closet fascists or pseudo-socialists). Personally, been trying to find copies of "Night of January 16th" and "We the living". By the way, while I'm on the subject of Ayn Rand and Objectivism — have you heard anything about that proposed (makes you want to spit) "National Public Digital Radio".? From what I believe it will directly compete with CIS (and all the private services), and I shouldn't have to explain to you (of all people) what happens when the Gov. get's their grungy, bloodstained hands into the free market! I've been calling all sorts of people at the FCC to get some accurate information [in vain] – but from what I see there is some money behind getting that particular law … the guys out in WA state that are trying to run their own service apparantly, or maybe one of the multinationals that wants to compete. In any case, if you are interested, there are 2 files in Access [FCC1.DOC amd FCC2.DOC] that do a lot about running around the truth. The guy pushing it is DON STONER.
#1968From: TIM JENISONDec 16, 1985 12:15 AM
Ayn Rand is my hero. (heroine?) You're right… Galt was the central character in Atlas Shrugged. As you may remember 'Who is John Galt' was a slang expression in the setting of the novel.