CompuServe Thread

#AC News ESCOM Wins- 4Now

75 messages in this thread
#193565From: DON HICKSApr 20, 1995 4:06 PM
From Amazing Computing For The Commodore Amiga According to our source at the Commodore Auction in New York today, initial bidding was made by only two companies, ESCOM of Germany and DELL Computer. There were sixty attendees at the auction. Most of the attendees were previous stockholders, creditors, and other interested parties. No one else offered the required $1 million deposit, although one CA dealer did express interest and attempted to bid but they were unable to show an ability to pay the $1 million. Although the Dell Computer bid offered more money, the Dell bid required additional time to study the patents. This request was declined and ESCOM's lower bid was accepted. The ESCOM bid will be presented to the Bankruptcy court in New York but there is expected to be strong opposition. In any event, the court presentation tomorrow should be the final act in this continung saga. Don Hicks Managing Editor Amazing Computing
#193582From: David MorrisApr 20, 1995 5:34 PM
Don, Thanks for the news and a great mag. Keep up the good work!
#193583From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 20, 1995 5:36 PM
Don, Thanks for the information! Don
#193585From: Jim MaddoxApr 20, 1995 5:36 PM
>> …initial bidding was made by only two companies, ESCOM of Germany and >> DELL Computer. DELL?! Where'd they come from?! >> In any event, the court presentation tomorrow should be the final act in >> this continung saga. Not if they need two more weeks to study the objections. 😉 – Jim, on AP!
#193603From: James R. OllickApr 20, 1995 7:01 PM
Thanks for the info Don. By the way, can I give you my change of address for my subscription? Jim R. Ollick on a Warped 4000/040/40 Using AP 1.77 from Bergenfield, NJ
#193699From: DON HICKSApr 21, 1995 7:55 AM
Please call 1-800-345-3360 M-F 8:30 to 5:00 EDT with your old and new address. Thanks, Don Hicks Managing Editor Amazing Computing
#193973From: James R. OllickApr 22, 1995 7:35 PM
Will do thanks. Jim R. Ollick on a Warped 4000/040/40 Using AP 1.80 from Bergenfield, NJ
#193620From: AL KOHOUTApr 20, 1995 9:19 PM
Don…Is your magazine one of those being offered in exchange for the now defunct Amiga world… As a video producer..can you tell me how I might benefit form your publication? Also,,if it is one being offerd, how do I sign up?
#193629From: Ian J. EinmanApr 20, 1995 10:03 PM
Amazing Computing is a better publication than AmigaWorld was in my opinion, and you should absolutely sign up. Somebody in the U.S. is still printing a magazine, let's support them.
#193701From: DON HICKSApr 21, 1995 8:00 AM
Amazing is not being offered by AW Amazing is an Independent publication. The reviews and editorial policies of the magazine sre those of the writers and editors only. This allows us the freedom to view all products for their own merit and not how they may be utilized with other third party devices. Amazing handles a variety of topics including graphics, ARexx programming, games, Trade Shows, New Products, and more. Amazing is concerned with the entire Amiga market. Amazing is available from: Amazing Computing PiM Publications Inc. P.O. Box 2140 Fall River, MA 02722 1-800-345-3360 (toll-free US & Canada) 1-508-678-4200 FAX 1-508-675-6002 Office hours 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM Monday-Friday. Visa MasterCard or Discover Checks payable to: PiM Publications, Inc. Amazing Computing $27.00 for 12 issues US $34.00 for 12 issues Canada $44.00 for 12 issues Foreign Surface Thanks Don Hicks Managing Editor Amazing Computinbg
#193766From: Bill ReevesApr 21, 1995 6:36 PM
Don, My subscription is coming due. I need to choose my renewal option. Will The AC Guide be published this summer? Bill
#193631From: Alex BakerApr 20, 1995 10:12 PM
Amazing! <grin> So what happened to Victory Party Dave, and I'm Not Worried Amor? Dell??!!! They needed more time?! They just fall off the sand truck or something? There have been nothing but endless weeks of two week delays. Looks like it's officially good night sweet Amiga. From what I'm given to understand ESCOM is not interested in continuing the Amiga line. Interesting that the UK, and CEI, after all their bravado about making a real effort to bring back the Amiga, didn't even pony up the $1M to bid. And to think off all the time spent listening to those two blow-hards try to outdo each other, and then they don't even bid. Guess we will now be subjected to a round of competition over which one can liscense the technology from ESCOM, but that should only take 2 more weeks. <g>
#193636From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 20, 1995 10:59 PM
"And to think off all the time spent listening to those two blow-hards try to outdo each other, and then they don't even bid." Ain't that the truth? And some other blowhards disappeared as well. I dunno much about Escom, but I think the Amiga can be considered dead at this point, except for maybe game machines. Jerry
#193641From: Alex BakerApr 20, 1995 11:51 PM
Yeah… I'm so disgusted that I'm about to shove the machine in the closet. I was shopping for a 24 bit display card, but think I'll pass. If this is the "leadership" of the Amiga community, then I may as well move on. Then again, we can probably look forward to that Amiga Clone that Jim Drew promised us, if the U.K. didn't win the bid. Since the U.K. didn't bid, it's a pretty safe assumption that they didn't win. How long till the clone rolls out Jim?
#193726From: MediaPhileApr 21, 1995 12:41 PM
Look forward to June or July for new Amigas to ship! Sincerely, Dean
#193742From: Christian BusseApr 21, 1995 3:17 PM
IF (BIG "IF") ESCOM is going to restart manufacturing the Amiga line of products the Amiga might have a better chance than ever to succeed in the market. Escom has hundreds of shops all over Germany (and, I believe, in the Netherlands, home of the Communicator) they have bought a chain of stores in Great Britain which seem to go well. This would make for a strong presence in the Amiga's main markets (yeah, right, shoot me for saying this). Don't know about any activities in North America. At the moment Escom sells their very own "Escom" "brand" (more a 'no-name brand') cheapo PeeCees plus the Siemens-Nixdorf brand line of PCs. I don't think Siemens runs very well though. As Vobis (#1 cheapo clone maker in Germany) also distributes Compaq brand computers Escom probably thought they needed an internationally well-known brand as well an C= was up for grabs… BUT PCs still start off at, say, $1000 in Germany, so the Amiga, starting somewhere around the $200 mark at them mom (CD32) could actually find itself with a new lease of life as the entry-level architecture (might actually be the last 'Home Computer' on the market – I think there's only consoles left in this price segment). Escom certainly has the MEANS to do well for our Amiga – the question is whether Escom actually MEANS to do this or just went for the trade marks… Cheers, (keeping fingers, toes and eyes crossed…) // Christian "ELP" Busse \X/ near Frankfurt, Germany
#193819From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 21, 1995 11:41 PM
Interesting comments, Christian. As with all things, time will tell. Jerry
#193845From: Wayne ColeApr 22, 1995 1:55 AM
Christian, Assuming Escom is not interested in other dealers to sell the line as well, are all the European developers that were making products for the Amiga in Jan of '94 still supporting the Amiga and developing new products? If not, sales will be poor (after all, the software sells a machine) and short-lived. Escom is bright enough to figure that out, methinks. wmc – via Autopilot!
#193676From: Wayne ColeApr 21, 1995 2:22 AM
Maybe they want the delay 'cause they are in cahoots with Mehdi and Irv who don't want a resolution as records passed to new owners might leave them open to prosecution. wmc – via Autopilot!
#193687From: Paul IdolApr 21, 1995 4:42 AM
But only for 3 years! ;^\ Mr. Zombie
#193692From: Dale LarsonApr 21, 1995 5:38 AM
That might be a good reason for Escom (filled with former Commodore execs) to want to pay $7 million for Commodore. (To keep all the dirty laundry away, though not too worred about Irv or Mehdi's hides in particular). Good theory! dale@iam.com http://www.iam.com Intangible Assets Manufacturing
#193707From: DON HICKSApr 21, 1995 8:18 AM
WAIT! The information we currently have is still being developed. It would be premature and even unfair to discount either the UK interest or CEI. According to an article in this morning's Philadelphia Inquirer by Dan Stets, "Another likely bidder, Creative Equipment International, of Miami, apparently teamed up with Dell in its unsuccessfull bid. The managers of Commodore's United Kingdom team, who have been trying to buy Commodore's assets for months, withdrew before the bidding began." I am not sure about you, but from the movement and the names involved, I believe there is more activity here than we think. Remember, even if ESCOM does get it, they will want to recoup some of their expenses. Why not sell off the Amiga technology, especially if they believe whoever buys it will not be able to out perform them? Don Hicks Managing Editor Amazing Computing
#193719From: DON HICKSApr 21, 1995 11:39 AM
OK, According to today's Philadelphia Inquiry article by Dan Stets, ESCOM is interested in continuing production of Amigas. They will build them in China. More to come, when available. Don Hicks Managing Editor Amazing Computing
#193727From: MediaPhileApr 21, 1995 12:44 PM
or ACER of in Taiwn perhaps! Dean
#193731From: Harry ManolopoulosApr 21, 1995 1:19 PM
Gee, I wonder what the custom chips' names will be? How do yo translate: Chip of many but not enough colors Chip of four old voices etc, etc 🙂 Harry M.
#193789From: John L. RiceApr 21, 1995 7:28 PM
>>Gee, I wonder what the custom chips' names will be? How do yo translate: Chip of many but not enough colors Chip of four old voices etc, etc 🙂 Harry M.<< Thanks Harry, you had me ROFLMAO!!!! John L. Rice
#193928From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaApr 22, 1995 1:06 PM
OTFL! DJ Autopilot 1.80 by Steve Ahlstrom From Queens, Center of the Looniverse …
#193764From: Richard EricksonApr 21, 1995 6:13 PM
Is it just my view but wouldn't the Amiga be Commodore's most valuable assest? I mean except for Commodore's Europe distribution channel, is the logo to a computer company that was mismanaged into bancruptcy that valuable when put on a PC running Windows like so many other computer manufacturers? It sure doesn't make sense to just dump it. Richard -> AutoPilot on the A1000
#193769From: Eduard JosephApr 21, 1995 6:55 PM
Not everyone knows that C= went down the tubes. Brand recognition is something very valuable( that why there are Corvette vacuum cleaners, and Mighty Morphing Power Ranger macaroni and Cheese). And all they have to prove is that they are very much alive (not bankrupt) and people will not think about it twice that C= is still the name they sorta remmember. Anyways, you are not talking about very bright people here if they are thinking of buying PeeCees so is very easy to fool them.
#193856From: Bart Van BockstaeleApr 22, 1995 3:57 AM
>>Anyways, you are not talking about very bright people here if they are thinking of buying PeeCees so is very easy to fool them.<< I'd call them “rather dumb'' people who ask no more than being fooled. Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com … On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
#193901From: Alex BakerApr 22, 1995 12:20 PM
There are two types of people in the world. Those who go after the best, and those who will accept good enough. As in my oft stated comparison to Beta and VHS, the IBM/Clone is good enough for most people. I strongly believe the Amiga and it's OS to be the better technology. Especially before the advent of OS/2, and definetly before the advent of Windows 3.x. However, even in those days, the Amiga was not a major player. Not because it couldn't compete, but because the clones were everywhere, and for most folks they are good enough. Add to that the natural reluctance to switch platforms, and the rest is history.
#193911From: Paul IdolApr 22, 1995 12:45 PM
It's not just that. You have to had to have a certain frontier spirit to seek out and use something like the Amiga, which had so much less support than other platforms. Most people didn't even know Amigas existed, so it wasn't a question of choosing something that was good enough… they didn't know there was anything better. That attitude dribbled down from dealers and other higher-ups to be sure… but most people didn't even reach the point of evaluation. Mr. Zombie
#193963From: Alex BakerApr 22, 1995 7:08 PM
The whole point is that people _DON'T_ evaluate. They ask their friends what they should buy, never thinking for a moment whether or not their needs are the same. They also tend to fall into the more is better line of thinking. If the clones have 40 word processors, and the Amiga has 10, then obviously the clones are better. Personally, I don't know how many different Word processors the average person buys, but I doubt that it is even 10. The other line of thinking, is that if there are 40 word processors for the clones, and only 10 for the Amiga, then obviously 1 of the 40 will be a good program, and none of the 10 will be any good. Magazines have preached for years: "Establish your needs, find software that you like that will fit those needs, and then go buy the computer that runs that software." Unfortunately, people buy the computer, then buy the software the computer will run, and then wonder why the computer won't do what they want. Bottom line is: If everyone thought and evaluated products like us, the Amiga would be a leader in sales today… Obviously the majority of computer buyers do not see the world the same way we do.
#193916From: Richard EricksonApr 22, 1995 12:51 PM
Yes but I am still wondering if the brand recogition is still more valuable than the Amiga line of computers? Maybe it is, maybe not. Richard -> AutoPilot on the A1000
#193784From: Alex BakerApr 21, 1995 7:27 PM
Even though C= went belly up, it is still a recognized name. (In the sense that people have heard of it before.) Ever hear of Packard Bell? They were a defunct electronics concern, that was bought for the name, for a computer compnay. Who, by the way, is now #3 in size, and #1 in home sales, in the U.S.. The average new buyer, doesn't know who did what or when. (How many folks know that Compaq at one time was criticized much like GVP for using one of a kind components. You had to buy Compaq hard drive controllers and hard drives, not so long ago.) In the meantime, the C= logo will be emblazoned on the side of the clone boxes, and the average Joe/Jolene will simply vaugely remember seeing that logo someplace before, and assume that the C= clone in front of them is a name brand machine.
#193917From: Richard EricksonApr 22, 1995 12:51 PM
Yes but is the Commodore name and logo stong enough to sell boxes after they get those boxes into stores? Who knows, maybe it is. Richard -> AutoPilot on the A1000
#193964From: Alex BakerApr 22, 1995 7:08 PM
Is the C= name and logo strong enough to sell the computers? Probably not on its own. However, put yourself in the position of a first time buyer who has no deatiled information on C= history. You walk into the store, and you see a C= box, and a Joe's computer box. Which one do you think is a name brand? Here in Sacramento CA, we have a large computer store called Computer Warehouse. They have tried for over 7 years to establish Packintell as a brand that they would like to sell. In the same time frame, the Packard Bell name was bought up, and applied to a clone computer. Since the name had been aorund for year, on radios etc. (till they went belly up), they stuck on the slogan, "America grew up listening to us, it still does." Neither is enough to sell boxes, but it is enough to get people comfortable with the name, and a willingness to consider it as a purchase.
#193846From: Wayne ColeApr 22, 1995 1:55 AM
There may be enough inventory laying about to generat a mill or two of profit. The CD32 as set-top (the only technology with any serious income generating potential) can be licensed and royalties collected whils someone else does the work. I think you may see 9 months to a year of existing AGA machines and parts being sold but then thats it. Escom Clones for China! wmc – via Autopilot!
#193902From: Alex BakerApr 22, 1995 12:20 PM
If they will sell the 4000's at give away prices, that's good enough for me. I'm not about to buy somebody's used 4000 for $2K. But, if ESCOM decides to blow out any existing inventory of 4000s for say $1200, I'll be at the head of the line, with money in hand.
#193927From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaApr 22, 1995 1:06 PM
Don, What a close friend of mine, deeply involved in the Escom deal, tells me tends to corroborate what you say. Apparently the Chinese government is interested in manufacturing the Amiga as the low-cost workstation for the masses. Sounds good to me <g>. I just hope they don't all come with a Chinese language keyboard … See my previous message on this thread. DJ Autopilot 1.80 by Steve Ahlstrom From Queens, Center of the Looniverse …
#193962From: Mark CorboApr 22, 1995 6:46 PM
Does anyone else see the possibilities here? If one in ten Chinese buy an Amiga that adds 100 MILLION users to the user base. I'd think that that would constitute a market n'est ce pas? And taking advantage of the AmigaDos >2.1 localization features software for this market could be used by all of the other markets as well!
#193978From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 22, 1995 7:51 PM
"If one in ten Chinese buy an Amiga that adds 100 MILLION users to the user base" Nice dream, but not terribly realistic. How many products do you use that are germane to the Chinese nation? Not many I bet. How many Japanese computer operating systems have caught on in the United States? Not too many. How many European computer brands and systems have caught on elsewhere? Not many. Might be a nice market for the Chinese, but I doubt that you'd see any fallout elsewhere in the world where Windows and MS-DOS are the primary OS's. The Chinese, incidentally, are not noted for their mass marketing acumen. <G> Jerry
#193730From: MARTIN SKOWRONSKIApr 21, 1995 1:01 PM
Don, Do you know which C= patents IBM is claiming interest in ? IBM did not incur the legal fees for prepaing a 100 page brief because they felt their attorneys were wanting for work. After all the MicorSoft suit is far from being settled and the "partnership" with Apple remains an ongoing issue. So, why be concerned with C=? After all, didn't IBM just report market share gains in all their divisions this quarter? It is obvious to me that Big Blue is covering all of its' bases and is taking nothing for granted. FWIW, look for Motorola to become more open about its' lack of satisfaction with the IBM/Apple arrangement. IMHO, the future of PC's is too volatile to take for granted (and IBM knows this). If Intel and HP are successful with P7, will RISC technology look so attractive? If Apple's System 8 meets expectations, what will that mean for MicroSoft? What about the issue of hardware based multi-tasking? Might IBM be interested in adapting this aspect of Amiga architecture in its' own future designs? I indicated in this forum, well over a year ago, that I felt there was a hidden player in the liquidation of C= assets with an equally hidden agenda. I also indicated that MicroSoft and IBM were likely candidates. All of the replies to my post stated that IBM was "too big" to be concerned about the disposition of Amiga technology. It is obvious to me that IBM has learned a valuable Old Testament lesson, and, this time, Goliath is not taking David so lightly. Cheers, Marty ProActive Images Inc. "WE BECOME WHAT WE THINK ABOUT ALL DAY LONG" – RW EMERSON
#193734From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 21, 1995 2:24 PM
"I felt there was a hidden player in the liquidation of C= assets with an equally hidden agenda" I don't think that there's much hidden here. From what I read, IBM belatedly became aware of a small technology sharing agreement it had with Commodore and is essentially arguing that it is not liable under that agreement because of Commodore's bankruptcy. A pretty reasonable issue for a "Deep Pockets" company like IBM to raise and a hundred page brief supporting it isn't unusual. Strikes me that all they're trying to is to insure that no liability will attach to them because of the sale of Commodore's assets. IBM owns more patents than any company in the world. I seriously doubt that the secrets to a re-emergence of IBM as the dominant player in the market hinges upon some aspect of the Amiga technology. Jerry
#193776From: Dale LarsonApr 21, 1995 7:16 PM
I think you misread it. IBM wants to make sure that it continues to have the legal right to use the technology contained in Commodore's patents, regardless of any sale. dale@iam.com http://www.iam.com Intangible Assets Manufacturing
#193820From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 21, 1995 11:42 PM
Nope. I don't think I misread it. We just said the same thing in different words from different perspectives. Jerry
#193930From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaApr 22, 1995 1:06 PM
Jerry, the man of chameleon words 🙂 DJ Autopilot 1.80 by Steve Ahlstrom From Queens, Center of the Looniverse …
#193847From: Wayne ColeApr 22, 1995 1:55 AM
So THATS where they got the OS/2 look and feel, eh? ;^} wmc – via Autopilot!
#193859From: Bart Van BockstaeleApr 22, 1995 3:58 AM
>>So THATS where they got the OS/2 look and feel, eh? ;^}<< Exactly! Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com … On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
#193886From: Harry ManolopoulosApr 22, 1995 9:37 AM
Know where I can read the 100 page objection filed by IBM or what pantents were licensed. OS/2 2.1 and warp sure look a lot like AMIGADOS. Harry Manolopoulos
#193912From: Paul IdolApr 22, 1995 12:45 PM
They do? How? Other than the basic similarities derived from Xerox-PARC that all current GUIs have now, that is. Mr. Zombie
#193858From: Bart Van BockstaeleApr 22, 1995 3:58 AM
>>I seriously doubt that the secrets to a re-emergence of IBM as the dominant player in the market hinges upon some aspect of the Amiga technology.<< Jerry, I doubted too. BUT after seeing Windows and OS/2 I am quite convinced they just don't have the knowledge and/or talent to make something as good as the Amiga. In fact, having knowledge of an experience someone had with IBM, their main problem (not only theirs, though!) seems to be they are unable to cope with people that are intelligent enough to make something like an Amiga. Commodore being small just HAD to be able… Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com … On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
#193938From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 22, 1995 1:24 PM
"BUT after seeing Windows and OS/2 I am quite convinced they just don't have the knowledge and/or talent to make something as good as the Amiga" We're all entitled to our own opinion. Jerry
#193947From: Scott D. SobelApr 22, 1995 4:04 PM
I totally agree with you Mr. Saperstein, personally I have used Amigados , MSDOS, Windows3.11, OS/2 warp, System 7 and the Amigas operating system is by far the best… From my ex[erience it is the best multi-tasking OS I have used and nothing has come close to it… Don't get me wrong each one of those OS's have their benefits but for me I like the Amiga's OS for it 's GUI as well as it's shell and of course it's multi=tasking abilitiy, not to forget it incredible video capabilities.
#193953From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 22, 1995 5:06 PM
Well, I work with all of 'em and don't have any favorites. They all work for me – and they all have limitations – and strong points as well. Jerry
#193929From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaApr 22, 1995 1:06 PM
IBM used to spend on R&D what most other competing corps in the field used to gross. DJ Autopilot 1.80 by Steve Ahlstrom From Queens, Center of the Looniverse …
#193939From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 22, 1995 1:25 PM
"IBM used to spend on R&D what most other competing corps in the field used to gross" Even though their R&D budget has been cut, they still spend a huge amount of money. Jerry
#193775From: Dale LarsonApr 21, 1995 7:16 PM
You need to understand the whole issue of patents in general and software patents in general, then to understand IBM's strategy of having cross-licensing agreements with everyone so that IBM is never infringing on patents and no one is ever infringing theirs. dale@iam.com http://www.iam.com Intangible Assets Manufacturing
#193861From: Bart Van BockstaeleApr 22, 1995 3:58 AM
>>You need to understand the whole issue of patents in general and software patents in general, then to understand IBM's strategy of having cross-licensing agreements with everyone so that IBM is never infringing on patents and no one is ever infringing theirs.<< It is called “intellectual theft'' Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com … On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
#193933From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaApr 22, 1995 1:06 PM
Bart, when you have patent agreements it's called sharing. Everybody involved is getting some value. A bit different from patent infringement. DJ Autopilot 1.80 by Steve Ahlstrom From Queens, Center of the Looniverse …
#193940From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 22, 1995 1:26 PM
"It is called “intellectual theft" When you do something with another's permission, it's hardly theft. Such arrangements are reasonably common in the computer and other industries and are really productive for all concerned. Jerry
#193857From: Bart Van BockstaeleApr 22, 1995 3:58 AM
DON, >>All of the replies to my post stated that IBM was "too big" to be concerned about the disposition of Amiga technology.<< I wasn't hooked on CompuServe by that time BUT this is what I wrote some days ago. >>##From AmigaUser at 03:29:24 13-Apr-95 … #: 192190 S22/Ramblings 12-Apr-95 04:11:02 Sb: #192181-#AV Video drops the Amiga Fm: Bart Van Bockstaele 100574,2352 To: Eduard Joseph 74603,3262 (X) What I don't understand is that IBM doesn't buy the Amiga. I have been told that they use it, they've got plenty of money even now and they *could* launch it as if it were their own invention so why not? I think that even after having created a misconception as the peecee that they should have enough credibility and/or influence left to do it with a *good* computer.<< After all, Philips always says that “Philips invents for you'' and what have they *really* invented? Just about nothing… Bart Van Bockstaele at 100574.2352@compuserve.com … On AutoPilot and Amiga all the way from Belgium …
#193896From: MARTIN SKOWRONSKIApr 22, 1995 11:12 AM
Bart, <<What I don't understand is that IBM doesn't buy the Amiga.>> IBM has reported market share gains by all of its' divisions in the last fiscal quarter. I have also wondered why IBM just doesn't buy the C= assets and either bury or use them. Afterall, 16 mill is petty cash for Big Blue. It would certainly eliminate the need for 100 page legal briefs. Cheers, Marty ProActive Images Inc. "WE BECOME WHAT WE THINK ABOUT ALL DAY LONG" – RW EMERSON
#193934From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaApr 22, 1995 1:06 PM
How about the audio cassette, DCC and (with Sony) the audio CD? DJ Autopilot 1.80 by Steve Ahlstrom From Queens, Center of the Looniverse …
#193739From: Marion J DelandApr 21, 1995 2:35 PM
Hi Don, Thanks for the auction information, posted so quickly! I was planning to get down there to watch the fun, but I had a hard choice to make — the auction or two days' consulting work. The money won! Marion Deland CROSSINGS – Newsletter for Amiga/PC/Mac compatibility
#193926From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaApr 22, 1995 1:06 PM
Alex, The following is a messaged I just received from a very close friend of mine who is very close to the Escom deal: >> Left you a voice mail message. Escom got it. Alex went in with Dell Computer with a stupid bid. No other valid bids. My company has a Letter of Intent to do a joint venture with Escom whereby we assemble a team of ex-Commodre/Amiga experts to help them re-start the R&D and production and provide other services in return for a license to use the Amiga technology in interactive set-tops world wide. Our guys are going to Germany in about 10 days to hammer-out details. << The voice mail said basically the same. I take this at face value. This guy is no BSer. Another thing he mentioned a couple of weeks ago was that there are potential patent or copyright infringements which might possibly be litigated successfully, in particular dealing with 3DO, but he wasn't sure how far it could be taken under the current circumstances. I'll keep you guys posted when I hear anything more. Also noticed the delays are down to 10 days from two weeks <g>. DJ Autopilot 1.80 by Steve Ahlstrom From Queens, Center of the Looniverse …
#193651From: Eulogio (DJ) GarciaApr 21, 1995 12:30 AM
Thanks, Don! BTW, what happened to the Bandito? Did he deflect to PC Magazine? DJ Autopilot 1.80 by Steve Ahlstrom From Queens, Center of the Looniverse …
#193688From: Paul IdolApr 21, 1995 4:42 AM
There's nothing left for him(her) to write about. Every column would be about the dang two weeks. <g> Mr. Zombie
#193785From: Alex BakerApr 21, 1995 7:27 PM
While I wish Amazing, well. (I personally thought it to be better in the technical dept, than AW.) I hope that someday the Bandito is revealed. If it ever gets to the day when they are putting together the last issue, it would be nice to find out who the peron(s) was/were to write the column.
#193806From: Paul IdolApr 21, 1995 9:30 PM
Now that's the truth! I'm *really* curious about who they were. I think John Foust of Syndesis once said that he had done some writing of the Bandito's column at one point, but that was a long time ago… Mr. Zombie
#193835From: Alex BakerApr 22, 1995 12:21 AM
Perhaps they could reveal the Bandito(s), in the same way that Larry, Darrel, and Darrel spoke on the last Newhart, or the way that Wilson will be revealed in the last Home Improvement.
#193909From: Paul IdolApr 22, 1995 12:25 PM
They could also pull an incorporation trick–you know, change their company without changing anything–just to be technically able to unmask the Banditos. <g> Mr. Zombie
#193675From: Wayne ColeApr 21, 1995 2:22 AM
>>The ESCOM bid will be presented to the Bankruptcy court in New York but >>there is expected to be strong opposition. In any event, the court >>presentation tomorrow should be the final act in this continung saga. Au contraire! Lawyers from all over thw world are crawoing out of the wood work. Next will be a series of appeals, injunctions, restraining orders, out-of-court settlement meetings…. Dan Wolfe was right: we'll probably be able to read about the outcome in a little item on page 42 of the April 30 edition of the Wall Stree Journal – in 1999. wmc – via Autopilot!
#193697From: Andres StaubliApr 21, 1995 7:16 AM
"Dan Wolfe was right: we'll probably be able to read about the outcome in a little item on page 42 of the April 30 edition of the Wall Stree Journal – in 1999. " dollar 1 for you when this true and an Amiga CD 32 Happy Zeitgeist Andres Staubli, Switzerland
#193724From: MediaPhileApr 21, 1995 12:35 PM
Dear Mr. Hicks, I noticed your message on ESCOM and it is right on the money so to speak. IMS, Inc. has close contact with ESCOM its just a formality now. Spoke with Mansford S. , Thurs. night in NY. Sincerely, Dean