CompuServe Thread

public land collecting

20 messages in this thread
#162483From: christopher . viscJan 10, 1995 7:09 PM
I am an earth science teacher and I spend quite a lot of time collecting samples for my classes. If you are not already aware, this is bill proposed in Congress that would prohibit all collecting on public lands except to what amounts to an elite group of academics. This month a new bill is close to being introduced: Paleontological Resources Preservation Act of 1995. It would in effect, permit teachers and students and anyone interested in rocks, fossils and minerals to do surface collecting. The main reasoning is that weathering and erosion would destroy surface samples anyway, and we all know how important amateurs are in discovering new samples. The target date for this legislation is late January 1995, and letters to the Honorable Larry Craig (R-ID) and Edward Kennedy (D-MA) requesting their support as Senate Prime Sponsors of the Act are urgently needed from the academic community. If you support the new Act, please let your own Senate and House members know. I know that for myself, my career in geology began as a little kid prospecting around picking bits and pieces of the past that fueled my curiosity. Chris
#162577From: Ben WilliamsJan 11, 1995 3:21 PM
Chris, I'm not clear, here: > I am an earth science teacher and I spend quite a lot of time collecting samples for my classes. > If you are not already aware, this is bill proposed in Congress that would prohibit all collecting > on public lands except to what amounts to an elite group of academics. My understanding is the above is the _current_ situation: Not a proposed situation. Rules stating the penalties for collecting are posted within ten miles of my home by the feds. > This month a new bill is > close to being introduced: Paleontological Resources Preservation Act of 1995. It would in effect, > permit teachers and students and anyone interested in rocks, fossils and minerals to do surface > collecting. The main reasoning is that weathering and erosion would destroy surface samples > anyway, and we all know how important amateurs are in discovering new samples. Ok, this is great – it contradicts what you said initially, though… two different bills? > The target date for this legislation is late January 1995, and letters to the Honorable Larry Craig > (R-ID) and Edward Kennedy (D-MA) requesting their support as Senate Prime Sponsors of the Act > are urgently needed from the academic community. Um, this is for the second one, right? The one that _allows_ collecting, instead of _disallowing_ it? > If you support the new Act, please let your own Senate and House members know. I know that > for myself, my career in geology began as a little kid prospecting around picking bits and pieces of > the past that fueled my curiosity. I would absolutely support a bill to allow collecting by non professionals – the current situation is distressingly short-sighted, and for exactly the reason described above. I have personally seen huge bones erode out of the shore of Fort Peck Lake and be destroyed by the surf – smashed against the rocks – simply because there were "more important" collecting sites for the academics and we, lay people, were forbidden – on truly serious penalty – to save the specimens ourselves. Many other instances come to mind, but none as heart-rending. Ben Williams
#162754From: christopher . viscJan 12, 1995 7:36 PM
Ben: Sorry for the mixup. There are two bills that are potentially going to be introduced. The Baucus type bill would close amateurs out of collecting. The counter bill is the Paleontological Resources Preservation Act of 1995 I'm fine when it comes to rocks, but politics leaves me in a cloud. For the details and fine print etc. I suggest you contact: Marion Zenker Legislative Coordinator American Lands Access Association c/o Black Hills Institute of Geological Research P.O. Box 643, Hill City SD 57745 (605) 574-4289 Hope this helps, sorry for the mixup, and thanks for the reply, Chris
#162842From: Ben WilliamsJan 13, 1995 2:47 PM
Christopher, Thanks for the clarification. I'll make some phone calls. We don't need any more evil cr*p closing off collecting even further. Ben Williams
#163043From: SyndesisJan 14, 1995 10:45 PM
Before I forget… Have you ever been to the La Brea tar pits? I was thinking ahead to Siggraph 95, and who I might drag along with me to play tourist…
#163112From: Ben WilliamsJan 15, 1995 3:29 PM
Nope, never been… Might be fun. Planning on a booth? Ben
#163182From: SyndesisJan 15, 1995 10:29 PM
Yes, I think so. I haven't officially signed up for one yet, I should get on that… I don't know what to expect at the tar pits. A museum, I'm sure… above-ground excavation sites? $20 beetles in the gift shop?
#163202From: Ben WilliamsJan 16, 1995 2:13 AM
John, > I don't know what to expect at the tar pits I'll take a guess: Either, barriers forbidding entry, complete with threatening signs, or an edifice geared towards schoolchildren with at best, cement paths with chains. Plastic replicas of whatever-it-is that is/was there, for which you will have to pay absurd amounts, crystal pyramids and perhaps a fine selection of "Botchi" stones. I base my guess on my last visit to a major geological site – Meteor Crater, in AZ. What a powerful dissapointment. Not that I wouldn't go to take a look, mind you – I'm just more than a little cynical about public sites. Ben
#163262From: SyndesisJan 16, 1995 4:05 PM
My most recent public disappointment was an exhibit at a mall (yes, I knew I was in for a treat) of "Dina", a preserved frozen baby mammoth, as shown by some Russian museum. Was it worth $4? No, my wife still teases me about it, and she didn't even go inside. 🙂 The mammoth was heavily Lenin-ized, looking more like a wax copy. But there were some other skeletons, paleo artifacts, and fossils. Hey, the pits are in California… we should expect "No Smoking" signs and "Don't Stick This Twig In Your Ear" signs, too. 🙂 So what was at Meteor Crater?
#163389From: Ben WilliamsJan 17, 1995 1:25 PM
Meteor crater consists of, _after_ you buy your tickets to enter the complex: A small museum, really the best thing about it – some metors, some fragments from the site; A gift shop containing various and sundry t-shirts and suchlike consumer trash having little or nothing to do with the site beyond such esoterica as "I wuz there"; A walk made of cement and steel out into the crater (about 4 feet into it), with insert-a-coin telescopes for you to take a few metered moments to try and see detail a zillion yards away. You couldn't go into the crater at all, and those telescopes didn't do replacement duty for being there. My fondest memory of the site was meeting a cat outside and having a petting session for about ten minutes. I remember remarking to my wife that "it wasn't a total loss" because of that animal. I was exaggerating, but I was pretty annoyed. The view from the concrete walk was amazing – that's one darned big hole. Ben
#164002From: Michael SternbergJan 21, 1995 5:07 PM
jan and I didn't even get out on the concrete veranda. When we stopped by there in '89, they had *just* clocked a wind gust at 118mph and wouldnt let visitors out on the viewing ledge. But we got off on the wind! Wild!
#163399From: Russ MadsenJan 17, 1995 3:09 PM
John, Ben… You guys are soooo skeptical… MeTeor craTer? La Brea Tar piTs? (yes Martha they are spelled with capital "T" as in "TourisT SiTes"). I've been to both several times since I came to the Land of Nutmeg and Honey in 1953. Tar Pit tidbits first… You've divined the nature of the localle quite well. There have never been any excursions into the pits because you'd not get out. There's stuff sticking up out of the tar here and there like parts of local birds so yes the pits are chained off, but at least in this case it's for your own good. There is a maze of cement paths among the several pits; and there is also a "working" pit or at least there always has been (if I recall, it was manned by UCLA students of archeology) with video monitors at the surface showing the excavating in progress. Two things Ben failed to deduce, the aromatic presence of H2S which continually bubbles up and an active pit "in situ" with all the bones still in place. Yes there are museums on the property now as well but crystal pyramids have given way (g). As for the MeTeor CraTer…first time I was there was also in the 50's and it was permitted that visitors could hike to the bottom. This was pre-liability-lawsuit days when you could still follow unusual and dangerous paths if you were so inclined, so much for "the land of the free" (sigh). At the time I had a cast on my 6 year old leg and still made it to the bottom on a July day with the surface temp at the rim above 100'F. Temp at the bottom of the crater was reported to us by the rangers as being 147'F. The entire surface of the crater bowl is riddled with old mine shafts sunk in efforts to locate the presumed main mass of the meteor. Lots of places for a wandering "explorer" to fall and hurt themselves. So now the whole thing is off limits, and I don't think they even have ranger guided walks very far down the trail to the bottom. It was several miles round trip and was steep, rocky and difficult in places. There is a museum at the surface with the usual fare of explanatory videos and some nice meteorites on display. Yes you can buy all sorts of artifacts at the shops in the museums in both places and much of it is tourist junk. I was dissapointed by my return visit to the meteor crater. It was sad to perch on the rail staring down into the crater, how sterile! All I have are fond memories of tucking myself into the ribbon of shade along an old rusty ore bucket for protection from the blistering heat of the midday sun. Brings tears to my eyes now. I would have to recommend that anyone going to the meteor crater plan on doing other things in the area too, it's only good for a few hours of visit time at most now. The tar pits on the other hand remain a fascination….they stand today exactly as they were when the saber tooth tigers, sloths, birds and other animals were drawn in by the thin layer of water on the surfaces. Yes they are now surrounded by the Los Angeles basin and are smack in the middle of it all but they stand as a tiny oasis of prehistoric pools. I also enjoy the museum a great deal, and while I've never wished to accept the invitation, the back rooms are open to museum members on a private tour basis to view the extensive collection of bones and other artifacts which have been recovered from the pits over the years. Now, having said all that, John… When are you going to be out here? Post a note and I'll try to come to the site and say hi…it's time I brought my daughter for a second visit. -Russ
#163411From: SyndesisJan 17, 1995 4:25 PM
I suspect our mutual skepticism is one of the things that's made Ben & I friends over the years. 🙂 We've both got small computer graphics software companies, so we make an annual pilgrimmage to Siggraph. This August, it's at the LA Convention Center.
#163279From: Doug MitchellJan 16, 1995 5:14 PM
Hi, Ben– If you are not allowed to enter the crater at Meteor Crater, I hope they at least allow you to look in from the edge. I might want to pass through there when I am moving back to CA (soon, I hope) – but not if I cannot see the star attraction! How long ago was your visit? –Doug
#163390From: Ben WilliamsJan 17, 1995 1:25 PM
Yes, they let you look from the edge. It's worth going, once. And of course, your milage may vary… you might enjoy the museum more than I… it's just that I didn't divert my path 1000 miles to see a museum. The display in the New York Museum of Natural History is rather difficult to beat, and in fact, isn't beaten by this place. The crater was the point, and I *really* wanted to go in, not just look from the edge. I wanted to stand in the bottom and look out… I wanted to walk all over it, in fact. Silly me. Ben
#163341From: Don KenneyJan 17, 1995 3:44 AM
There's a fairly nice museum at the La Brea Tar pits. I enjoyed it. My seven year old was bored stiff. Aside from that, there's not much to see.
#163153From: Doug MitchellJan 15, 1995 8:04 PM
Hi, Ben, and all– In June, the ALAA set up a BBS at (303) 245-1147, where they had posted the Paleontological Resources Preservation Act, which the ALAA had a big hand in shaping. I have not tried the BBS myself, and am now sending a query for more details. The competing Baucus bill, in a version from some months back, is in the Science forum library as BAUCUS.*. I would like to again bring the American Lands Access Association, Inc. (ALAA) to the attention of collectors of fossils, minerals, and related items. "The A.L.A.A. is a 501 C 4 organization (permits lobbying) organized for the purpose of promoting and ensuring the right of amateur hobby collecting, recreational prospecting, mining and the use of public & private lands for educational and recreational purposes. To carry the voice of all amateur collectors and hobbyists to our elected officials, government regulators and public land managers. Contributions are not deductible as charitable contributions for Federal Income Tax purposes. There are many bills in federal and various state legislatures that may seriously affect collecting in the U.S., perhaps limiting access to sites severely. While most affect fossil collecting, mineral and other collectors should be concerned also; there is no sense in waiting to be "picked off" one by one. Joining the ALAA should be an excellent way to find out what relevant bills are cooking, regardless of how you may feel about the merits of each. The annual membership fee is $25, which may be sent to: A.L.A.A. R. Ed Romack, Treasurer 655 – 8th St. Idaho Falls, ID 83401 –Doug
#163203From: Ben WilliamsJan 16, 1995 2:13 AM
Thanks, Doug – I'll get on this right away. I'm surprised I haven't seen this in rock and gem or something like it. Should be on the masthead of every issue. Ben
#162663From: Nathan A. SchachtmanJan 12, 1995 6:47 AM
Chris, This is a subject that elicits strong feelings from some of us here in CIS, who are interested in collecting. When I hear of such legislation, I immediately want to know how the categories of permitted collectors and the outlawed collectors will be defined. Can you help us out by posting the proposed bill? We can then take a look at its language and see what it's likely to do to us. (Of course, I am sceptical that any good could come of anything from the office of Kennedy, "the lady killer.") Thanks. Nathan
#162753From: christopher . viscJan 12, 1995 7:36 PM
Nathan: The proposed bill is REALLY long. I got a copy from the following person. She will send it on request: Marion K. Zenker Legislative Coordinator American Lands Access Association c/o Black Hills Institute of Geological Research, Inc. P.O. Box 643, Hill City SD 57745 (605) 574-4289