public land collecting
20 messages in this thread
I am an earth science teacher and I spend quite a lot of time collecting
samples for my classes. If you are not already aware, this is bill proposed in
Congress that would prohibit all collecting on public lands except to what
amounts to an elite group of academics. This month a new bill is close to
being introduced: Paleontological Resources Preservation Act of 1995. It
would in effect, permit teachers and students and anyone interested in rocks,
fossils and minerals to do surface collecting. The main reasoning is that
weathering and erosion would destroy surface samples anyway, and we all know
how important amateurs are in discovering new samples.
The target date for this legislation is late January 1995, and letters to the
Honorable Larry Craig (R-ID) and Edward Kennedy (D-MA) requesting their support
as Senate Prime Sponsors of the Act are urgently needed from the academic
community.
If you support the new Act, please let your own Senate and House members know.
I know that for myself, my career in geology began as a little kid prospecting
around picking bits and pieces of the past that fueled my curiosity.
Chris
Chris,
I'm not clear, here:
> I am an earth science teacher and I spend quite a lot of time collecting
samples for my classes.
> If you are not already aware, this is bill proposed in Congress that would
prohibit all collecting
> on public lands except to what amounts to an elite group of academics.
My understanding is the above is the _current_ situation: Not a proposed
situation. Rules stating the penalties for collecting are posted within ten
miles of my home by the feds.
> This month a new bill is
> close to being introduced: Paleontological Resources Preservation Act of
1995. It would in effect,
> permit teachers and students and anyone interested in rocks, fossils and
minerals to do surface
> collecting. The main reasoning is that weathering and erosion would destroy
surface samples
> anyway, and we all know how important amateurs are in discovering new
samples.
Ok, this is great – it contradicts what you said initially, though… two
different bills?
> The target date for this legislation is late January 1995, and letters to the
Honorable Larry Craig
> (R-ID) and Edward Kennedy (D-MA) requesting their support as Senate Prime
Sponsors of the Act
> are urgently needed from the academic community.
Um, this is for the second one, right? The one that _allows_ collecting,
instead of _disallowing_ it?
> If you support the new Act, please let your own Senate and House members
know. I know that
> for myself, my career in geology began as a little kid prospecting around
picking bits and pieces of
> the past that fueled my curiosity.
I would absolutely support a bill to allow collecting by non professionals –
the current situation is distressingly short-sighted, and for exactly the
reason described above. I have personally seen huge bones erode out of the
shore of Fort Peck Lake and be destroyed by the surf – smashed against the
rocks – simply because there were "more important" collecting sites for the
academics and we, lay people, were forbidden – on truly serious penalty – to
save the specimens ourselves. Many other instances come to mind, but none as
heart-rending.
Ben Williams
Ben:
Sorry for the mixup. There are two bills that are potentially going to be
introduced.
The Baucus type bill would close amateurs out of collecting.
The counter bill is the Paleontological Resources Preservation Act of 1995
I'm fine when it comes to rocks, but politics leaves me in a cloud. For the
details and fine print etc. I suggest you contact:
Marion Zenker
Legislative Coordinator
American Lands Access Association
c/o Black Hills Institute of Geological Research
P.O. Box 643, Hill City SD 57745
(605) 574-4289
Hope this helps, sorry for the mixup, and thanks for the reply, Chris
Christopher,
Thanks for the clarification. I'll make some phone calls.
We don't need any more evil cr*p closing off collecting even further.
Ben Williams
Before I forget… Have you ever been to the La Brea tar pits? I was thinking
ahead to Siggraph 95, and who I might drag along with me to play tourist…
Nope, never been… Might be fun. Planning on a booth?
Ben
Yes, I think so. I haven't officially signed up for one yet, I should get on
that…
I don't know what to expect at the tar pits. A museum, I'm sure…
above-ground excavation sites? $20 beetles in the gift shop?
John,
> I don't know what to expect at the tar pits
I'll take a guess: Either, barriers forbidding entry, complete with threatening
signs, or an edifice geared towards schoolchildren with at best, cement paths
with chains. Plastic replicas of whatever-it-is that is/was there, for which
you will have to pay absurd amounts, crystal pyramids and perhaps a fine
selection of "Botchi" stones.
I base my guess on my last visit to a major geological site – Meteor Crater, in
AZ. What a powerful dissapointment.
Not that I wouldn't go to take a look, mind you – I'm just more than a little
cynical about public sites.
Ben
My most recent public disappointment was an exhibit at a mall (yes, I knew I
was in for a treat) of "Dina", a preserved frozen baby mammoth, as shown by
some Russian museum. Was it worth $4? No, my wife still teases me about it,
and she didn't even go inside. 🙂 The mammoth was heavily Lenin-ized, looking
more like a wax copy. But there were some other skeletons, paleo artifacts,
and fossils.
Hey, the pits are in California… we should expect "No Smoking" signs and
"Don't Stick This Twig In Your Ear" signs, too. 🙂 So what was at Meteor
Crater?
Meteor crater consists of, _after_ you buy your tickets to enter the complex:
A small museum, really the best thing about it – some metors, some fragments
from the site;
A gift shop containing various and sundry t-shirts and suchlike consumer trash
having little or nothing to do with the site beyond such esoterica as "I wuz
there";
A walk made of cement and steel out into the crater (about 4 feet into it),
with insert-a-coin telescopes for you to take a few metered moments to try and
see detail a zillion yards away. You couldn't go into the crater at all, and
those telescopes didn't do replacement duty for being there.
My fondest memory of the site was meeting a cat outside and having a petting
session for about ten minutes. I remember remarking to my wife that "it wasn't
a total loss" because of that animal. I was exaggerating, but I was pretty
annoyed.
The view from the concrete walk was amazing – that's one darned big hole.
Ben
jan and I didn't even get out on the concrete veranda. When we stopped by
there in '89, they had *just* clocked a wind gust at 118mph and wouldnt let
visitors out on the viewing ledge.
But we got off on the wind! Wild!
John, Ben…
You guys are soooo skeptical…
MeTeor craTer? La Brea Tar piTs? (yes Martha they are spelled with capital "T"
as in "TourisT SiTes").
I've been to both several times since I came to the Land of Nutmeg and Honey in
1953. Tar Pit tidbits first…
You've divined the nature of the localle quite well. There have never been any
excursions into the pits because you'd not get out. There's stuff sticking up
out of the tar here and there like parts of local birds so yes the pits are
chained off, but at least in this case it's for your own good. There is a maze
of cement paths among the several pits; and there is also a "working" pit or at
least there always has been (if I recall, it was manned by UCLA students of
archeology) with video monitors at the surface showing the excavating in
progress. Two things Ben failed to deduce, the aromatic presence of H2S which
continually bubbles up and an active pit "in situ" with all the bones still in
place. Yes there are museums on the property now as well but crystal pyramids
have given way (g).
As for the MeTeor CraTer…first time I was there was also in the 50's and it
was permitted that visitors could hike to the bottom. This was
pre-liability-lawsuit days when you could still follow unusual and dangerous
paths if you were so inclined, so much for "the land of the free" (sigh). At
the time I had a cast on my 6 year old leg and still made it to the bottom on a
July day with the surface temp at the rim above 100'F. Temp at the bottom of
the crater was reported to us by the rangers as being 147'F. The entire surface
of the crater bowl is riddled with old mine shafts sunk in efforts to locate
the presumed main mass of the meteor. Lots of places for a wandering "explorer"
to fall and hurt themselves. So now the whole thing is off limits, and I don't
think they even have ranger guided walks very far down the trail to the bottom.
It was several miles round trip and was steep, rocky and difficult in places.
There is a museum at the surface with the usual fare of explanatory videos and
some nice meteorites on display.
Yes you can buy all sorts of artifacts at the shops in the museums in both
places and much of it is tourist junk.
I was dissapointed by my return visit to the meteor crater. It was sad to perch
on the rail staring down into the crater, how sterile! All I have are fond
memories of tucking myself into the ribbon of shade along an old rusty ore
bucket for protection from the blistering heat of the midday sun. Brings tears
to my eyes now.
I would have to recommend that anyone going to the meteor crater plan on doing
other things in the area too, it's only good for a few hours of visit time at
most now.
The tar pits on the other hand remain a fascination….they stand today exactly
as they were when the saber tooth tigers, sloths, birds and other animals were
drawn in by the thin layer of water on the surfaces. Yes they are now
surrounded by the Los Angeles basin and are smack in the middle of it all but
they stand as a tiny oasis of prehistoric pools. I also enjoy the museum a
great deal, and while I've never wished to accept the invitation, the back
rooms are open to museum members on a private tour basis to view the extensive
collection of bones and other artifacts which have been recovered from the pits
over the years.
Now, having said all that, John…
When are you going to be out here? Post a note and I'll try to come to the site
and say hi…it's time I brought my daughter for a second visit.
-Russ
Hi, Ben–
If you are not allowed to enter the crater at Meteor Crater, I hope they at
least allow you to look in from the edge. I might want to pass through there
when I am moving back to CA (soon, I hope) – but not if I cannot see the star
attraction! How long ago was your visit?
–Doug
Yes, they let you look from the edge. It's worth going, once. And of course,
your milage may vary… you might enjoy the museum more than I… it's just
that I didn't divert my path 1000 miles to see a museum. The display in the New
York Museum of Natural History is rather difficult to beat, and in fact, isn't
beaten by this place. The crater was the point, and I *really* wanted to go in,
not just look from the edge. I wanted to stand in the bottom and look out… I
wanted to walk all over it, in fact. Silly me.
Ben
There's a fairly nice museum at the La Brea Tar pits. I enjoyed it. My seven
year old was bored stiff. Aside from that, there's not much to see.
Hi, Ben, and all–
In June, the ALAA set up a BBS at (303) 245-1147, where they had posted the
Paleontological Resources Preservation Act, which the ALAA had a big hand in
shaping. I have not tried the BBS myself, and am now sending a query for more
details. The competing Baucus bill, in a version from some months back, is in
the Science forum library as BAUCUS.*.
I would like to again bring the American Lands Access Association, Inc. (ALAA)
to the attention of collectors of fossils, minerals, and related items.
"The A.L.A.A. is a 501 C 4 organization (permits lobbying) organized for the
purpose of promoting and ensuring the right of amateur hobby collecting,
recreational prospecting, mining and the use of public & private lands for
educational and recreational purposes. To carry the voice of all amateur
collectors and hobbyists to our elected officials, government regulators and
public land managers. Contributions are not deductible as charitable
contributions for Federal Income Tax purposes.
There are many bills in federal and various state legislatures that may
seriously affect collecting in the U.S., perhaps limiting access to sites
severely. While most affect fossil collecting, mineral and other collectors
should be concerned also; there is no sense in waiting to be "picked off" one
by one. Joining the ALAA should be an excellent way to find out what relevant
bills are cooking, regardless of how you may feel about the merits of each.
The annual membership fee is $25, which may be sent to:
A.L.A.A. R. Ed Romack, Treasurer 655 – 8th St. Idaho Falls, ID 83401
–Doug
Thanks, Doug – I'll get on this right away.
I'm surprised I haven't seen this in rock and gem or something like it. Should
be on the masthead of every issue.
Ben
Chris,
This is a subject that elicits strong feelings from some of us here in CIS,
who are interested in collecting. When I hear of such legislation, I
immediately want to know how the categories of permitted collectors and the
outlawed collectors will be defined.
Can you help us out by posting the proposed bill? We can then take a look at
its language and see what it's likely to do to us. (Of course, I am sceptical
that any good could come of anything from the office of Kennedy, "the lady
killer.")
Thanks.
Nathan
Nathan: The proposed bill is REALLY long. I got a copy from the following
person. She will send it on request:
Marion K. Zenker
Legislative Coordinator
American Lands Access Association
c/o Black Hills Institute of Geological Research, Inc.
P.O. Box 643, Hill City SD 57745
(605) 574-4289