CompuServe Thread

#Commodore News

106 messages in this thread
#138478From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPApr 8, 1994 5:26 PM
The following was posted to USENET by Mark Brown, former editor of .info magazine. . ———————— . From: mbrown@icaen.uiowa.edu (Mark Brown) . Subject: THE GOOD NEWS – COMMODORE STILL OPEN FOR BUSINESS . Date: 7 Apr 1994 20:53:56 GMT . . I just got off the phone with A Person at Commodore, and though there is . still much that is up in the air, I came away from the conversation with . several items of GOOD NEWS concerning Commodore's current situation: . . (1) They are still answering the phones at Commodore. The doors aren't . closed. . . (2) Everyone is still at work. Though cash flow problems keep some things . from happening, everyone is still punching the clock and working on . projects, as always. . . (3) #2 above, includes the AAA chipset. Work proceeds, albeit at a . slightly slower pace. Problems are being resolved, etc. The work is . not "Cancelled" as some rumormongers have asserted here on Usenet. . . (4) CBM employees were paid last Friday, as usual. So normal business goes . on, even though budgets are tightened. . . (5) Commodore has been meeting with creditors this week to work out deals on . the money they owe. Creditors and Commodore are still talking and still . negotiating. So it's not the end yet. . Now, my own observations: Bankruptcy and reoorganization still remain GOOD options for Commodore. A reorganization would provide TWO important advantages: (a) protection from creditors, and (b) new leadership. Commodore is a GOOD prospect for bankruptcy protection because of a couple of factors. First, it is easy to prove that current management did NOT run the company in the best, most businesslike manner, to assure good sales and profits. Second, there is a good, proven potential for Amigas and CD32 machines, AND Commodore is holding onto a multimillion dollar contract with Hewlett-Packard for set-top boxes that must be fulfilled. This means GUARANTEED income, plus good POTENTIAL income. Both are important when the courts look at the potential of the company. In short, this may turn out to be the BEST thing that ever happened to Commodore. There are still a lot of "ifs" involved, but keep your fingers crossed. The fat lady hasn't sung yet! -Mark R. Brown former Editor .info magazine
#138507From: Betty Clay/SYSOPApr 8, 1994 10:28 PM
Steve, Thanks for relaying the message from Mark Brown. Gee, I wondered what had happened to Mark lately. —Betty
#138524From: Jim Drew/UUIApr 9, 1994 2:45 AM
Well, an interesting thing happened today… I went to buy more CBM stock, and guess what.. CBM stock was no longer listed… and I don't mean pulled by the NYSE.. I mean no longer listed at all! The reason 'change of corporate ownership'. Commodore has been sold! I did not believe this until one of the remaining guys at Commodore called me up to ask about EMPLANT… he admitted that CBM had been sold, but not even he knew who purchased it. I am suppose to make a presentation to 'somebody' shortly about using the EMPLANT's technology in future machines… I called a dozen different brokers today… they all had the same info… 'change of corporate ownership', no stocks are available for sale and none are being accepted for sale.
#138546From: Hans KeesomApr 9, 1994 12:26 PM
Jim, "He admitted that CBM had been sold, but not even he knew who purchased it." I did a voice-call with a collegue of mine who ussually knows things about the Amiga very new, but even he didn't _know_. But he did have some names he guesses and hopes for, HP. Ithad to do with the deal HP and CBM seemed to have made half a year ago. He thinks this deal was made because HP needes a cheap and powerfull lowend platform/chipset for the NextStep OS. So the scenario could be : "HP has bought CBM so they can use (parts of) the Amiga to create a lowend NexStep computer or platform. Hopefully they'll implement NextStep for the Amiga-platform. Later they'll bring out a new Amiga, lowend's but also highend's using one or more AAA-chips to create stunning graphics, 24 or 64 bit ( at least that's what i understood about AAA)." What you think, would this be, could this be, do we want this to be. Anyhow soon we;ll know more about it. To support the Amiga, one could buy shares, personally i think about some more hardware, for example the anounced CD-extension for the A1200. If only there would be a EMPLANT for the A1200 which could than turn the Amiga into many things. For example a PHILIPS CD-I compatible machine. Gave you any ideas ? Good luck Hans Keesom, Amsterdam
#138596From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 9, 1994 11:43 PM
Hans, Canon owns the rights to the NeXTstep hardware, not HP. Don
#138622From: GTI GermanyApr 10, 1994 8:43 AM
Hi ! Talk here (Germany) circles very much around HP – but that they are only interetsed in AAA and NOT Commodore as such. In any case how can you "buy" (i.e. pay money for) a company with over 100 Mil $ negative net worth ! My guess is that certain parts of Commodore (e.g. Commodore Germany & maybe also Commodore UK) will be sold off as entities. The Commodore Holding company would sell the copyright on the technology to a market major (e.g. HP, Sony or someone like that). The new owners of Commodre in Germany/U.K. for instance would then pay only license fees to the states but apart from that be free to manufacture and market on a local basis. On this basis Commodore Germany could be sold as a going concen. I expect an announcement in the next few days and am not overly worried – GTI is very much Amiga/CD32 committed and will remain so. I see no point in buying shares however – the banks come first in any sale of assets and I doubt if shareholders will find anthying left over for thm after such a company break-up.. Regards Richard Small GTI GmbH
#138626From: Mark D. ManesApr 10, 1994 9:08 AM
You'll be interested to know that I heard the word HP more than once yesterday. It was told to me by someone who is might now (not sure if he does) that Commodore had three offers before them this week. 1. HP 2. NewTek 3. (He couldn't remember the third) I just sorta thought it was the HP rumor regenerated. I guess we shall soon know. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#138653From: Robert ComerApr 10, 1994 1:34 PM
Well, HP's got the bucks! I don't see how Newtek could, but you never know! Anyhow, if someone bought C=, then there'll be big changes ahead. As to wether it's good or bad, your guess is as good as mine! btw, it's sounds awfully supicious that he didn't remeber the 3rd contender, maybe that's the buyer. Bob Comer — Cruising the nets on Autopilot! Cheyenne, Wyoming U.S.A.
#138553From: john bennettApr 9, 1994 2:38 PM
This could be Great news….. And maybe NOT. Our stock has been relatively worthless for weeks now, it couldn't get much worse. But it could get better. Pleeeeease.!!!!! ….John
#138563From: Steve AhlstromApr 9, 1994 4:17 PM
Jim, I'd change brokers if I were you. CBU is was from trading on the NYSE all week. It was trading OTC. There was very heavy activity yesterday (300k+ shares traded … very heavy for CBU, but no biggie as there are 33M outstanding shares). The quote for yesterday's closing is … CBU 0.875 – 0.125 on 4/08 on 303600 shares Type "QUO CBU" at the Forum ! prompt or GO QQUOTES and see for yourself.
#138610From: Ottmar RoehrigApr 10, 1994 4:00 AM
As I'd be interested in buying stocks as well could someone please enlighten me what exactly "trading OTC" is? I understand this means "over the counter" but what is this in respect to "normal" trading which, AFAIK, still is not happening to CBU-stock. Thanks, Ottmar Roehrig from Hamburg, Germany
#138675From: Christian BusseApr 10, 1994 5:38 PM
Ottmar, "OTC" (Over The Counter) usually means that you buy directly from the seller (via phone, Reuters or whatever medium) as opposed to exchange trades where an official broker matches sell and buy orders in a regulated market (for the limited time of the exchange's trade hours), so there's usually a kind of "fair" price for exchange traded stocks (or a "fixed" hypothetic price if no orders could be matched). As customers generally are not allowed to trade at an exchange they still have to employ the services of their broker or bank even for OTC trades. Interbank trading before and after exchange hours is OTC even for stocks traded at the exchange. Many stocks which don't fulfil the requirements for exchange trading can only be bought/sold OTC… // Chris coming in from Germany \X/ on AutoPilot 1.061……….
#138722From: Ottmar RoehrigApr 11, 1994 12:58 AM
Thanks! Ottmar Roehrig from Hamburg, Germany
#138631From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPApr 10, 1994 9:42 AM
>>CBU is was from trading on the NYSE all week.<< Not according to my broker, or QQuotes. CBU was not traded WED-FRI on the NYSE, and the /CONEWS stories associated with QQUOTES also said that CBU was not being traded on the NYSE. My broker (who isn't exactly genius) couldn't find a trade on the NYSE, Boston Exchange, Chicago Exchange, or the Pacific Exchange. I can't find it trading anywhere.
#138638From: Steve AhlstromApr 10, 1994 11:36 AM
What that meant to say was "CBU was held from trading on the NYSE all week". It was trading on the Boston Exchange, Pacific Exchange, and others, just not on the NYSE. Charles Hill (I believe it was Charles) said he was buying stock last week. You might ask him how he went about it.
#138711From: Charles CastleberryApr 10, 1994 11:39 PM
I believe I read somewhere that C= stock is being traded on NASDAQ but does not yet have a ticker symbol. Something to look into?
#138881From: Zeddock MillerApr 12, 1994 4:58 PM
CBU is the ticker I think 🙂
#138970From: Lee BoschApr 13, 1994 4:02 PM
You need to tell the goons that run the Executive News Service as Commodore stock has been listed as "not traded" for the last two weeks!!! Lee Bosch
#138973From: Steve AhlstromApr 13, 1994 4:52 PM
Lee, It hasn't traded on the NYSE since the 25th of March. It has traded in other exchanges.
#139030From: David HammApr 13, 1994 10:51 PM
Hi Steve, I had a phone confirmation from my broker on a purchase of Commodore stock on April 5th at $.875… Also, he has sent me written confirmation of that order. Symbol CBU, CUSIP #202660106000. Also, although I have several days of "NA" (Not Available) from my data source (Dial Data), I have been getting daily quotes on Commodore stock. – Dave
#139035From: Steve AhlstromApr 13, 1994 11:29 PM
You can get daily quotes here on CIS. I get the opening quote in the AM when I first log on and then the closing quote after 4 PM EDT. Because the stock is not being traded on the NYSE I don't get mid-day quotes. At any Forum ! prompt you can type QUO CBU and get latest update.
#139196From: Chris LesterApr 14, 1994 9:42 PM
CBU today traded on the NYSE finally. Trading was suspended once (twice possibly) due to a lack of SELLERS on the floor! Looks like someone may be snatching up shares for a possible take-over? Chris – Fast and Low on my '020! …Is it significant that my spell checker doesn't know "Intel"?
#139259From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 15, 1994 1:27 AM
"CBU today traded on the NYSE finally." Interesting. Sounds like they got a few bucks in the bank to meet the minimum qualifications and that there may not be any "change of corporate ownership" in the works. Also, they still have the problem of not having an opinion letter on their last audit, but that could be overcome. "Trading was suspended once (twice possibly) due to a lack of SELLERS on the floor!" At its current price, it doesn't make much sense for anyone whose ridden it down this far to sell. The difference between 7/8ths and a total loss is negligible. Stocks priced this low will often bounce upward a time or two before settling into oblivion. And sometimes they take a real run upward. "Looks like someone may be snatching up shares for a possible take-over?" I'm sure you know more about this than anyone anywhere, but if this big snatch is going on, how come the prices haven't risen? Maybe I missed it, but where's the trading volume that would indicate such activity? I know you know everything, but in my experience such moves are accompanied by upward pressure on the stock price as the supply of available shares diminishes. Jerry
#139318From: Steve AhlstromApr 15, 1994 3:08 PM
Chris, CBU was not traded on the NYSE on 14 April 1994. It was traded on the Boston, Chicago, and other exchanges as it has been all along. It closed the day unchanged with 215k shares traded … much higher than the average of the last couple of weeks (30k) but hardly a "snatching up" as there are 33M shares issued. -sja
#138974From: Steve AhlstromApr 13, 1994 4:54 PM
BTW …. CBU 0.875 unchanged at 4:07 on 35900 shares
#139012From: Vic WagnerApr 13, 1994 9:46 PM
Steve, I'd check that closely if I were you. If you go ENS and get the news on CBU you will find the NYSE saying that CBU.N will not be traded and the last price was 3.
#139034From: Steve AhlstromApr 13, 1994 11:27 PM
Vic, I've said many times that CBU has been suspended from trading on the NYSE since the 28th of March. It is being traded on smaller exchanges. If you want to buy, see your broker. Just because it is listed (and held) on the NYSE does not mean you can't buy or sell. Volume today was 30k+ shares.
#138588From: Peter M. D'AngeloApr 9, 1994 9:34 PM
So someone finally picked up Commodore. Sure hope we find out who soon. Anyhow, if they want you to make a presentation, chances are the Amiga has been picked up by someone who would like to see it continue on. Peter M. D'Angelo Cruising Over NY on AutoPilot
#138640From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPApr 10, 1994 12:34 PM
Change of corporate ownership? Whoa! Any guess who might have gotten them?
#138660From: daniel wolfApr 10, 1994 3:41 PM
I've heard the same news was spread around at the LA Toaster User Group on Saturday April 9.
#138919From: Jim PlantApr 13, 1994 12:25 AM
The latest information I have is that Phillips has made an offer to purchase Commodore, and Commodore management has until the end of this week to respond. JP
#138922From: John DraperApr 13, 1994 1:01 AM
> The latest information I have is that Phillips has made an offer to … Nope. Wouldn't mind doing it, but I doubt I could afford it. Perhaps that Dutch company, Philips, might be interested. <chuckle> -larry
#138938From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPApr 13, 1994 7:27 AM
<g>
#139047From: Black Belt SystemsApr 14, 1994 12:30 AM
Me, I think you should buy it anyway. :^) –Ben …via AutoPilot
#138928From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 13, 1994 1:22 AM
"The latest information I have is that Phillips has made an offer to purchase Commodore, and Commodore management has until the end of this week to respond." Now that is interesting. With it's own technology facing significant difficulties in the marketplace (after what some claim is a billion dollar investment), why would Phillips want to add a competitive line? Phillips' cashflow is huge, so they don't need it for that reason. Their distribution in Europe is strong, so adding Commodore's distribution network would provide no great advantage. In the US, neither Phillips nor Commodore are very strong, so there's no advantage there. Any ideas, Jim? Jerry
#139056From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 14, 1994 12:34 AM
Jerry, Buy out the competion, Use their technology, hedge bets, tax writeoff, etc. All have been done in the past. Don
#139088From: Jim Drew/UUIApr 14, 1994 2:32 AM
CD-32 is competition against CDI… if you can't beat the competition, buy it!
#139147From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 14, 1994 4:52 PM
"CD-32 is competition against CDI… if you can't beat the competition, buy it!" Could be. But do you think it's logical that you want the problem of positioning two essentially different technologies in the same marketplace when you haven't done a good job with the first (CD-I)? It makes a perverse kind of sense, but I have my doubts on that one. Jerry
#139197From: Chris LesterApr 14, 1994 9:42 PM
Maybe they are dropping CD-I in favor of new technology? CD32 would be a good starter for a CD-I 2 system. Chris – Fast and Low on my '020! …Is it significant that my spell checker doesn't know "Intel"?
#139139From: Jerry ThompsonApr 14, 1994 4:30 PM
To get rid of their competition for pennies on the dollar. If the buying company can make it worthwhile for the management team, then the management will convince the shareholders that the sale is a good thing. Then they'll start dumping bodies. I know from first hand experience. -Jerry
#139148From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 14, 1994 4:53 PM
"To get rid of their competition for pennies on the dollar." Now that makes a lot of sense. In Europe, particularly, where Commodore is so much stronger. Good thinking, Jerry. Jerry
#138945From: Joe LoweryApr 13, 1994 8:12 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that as a corporation, CBM is not management's to sell, but rather the stockholder's. Any offer would have to be approved by a shareholder vote. – Joe P.S. How've you been, Jim? Congrats on VTU! What a magnificent monster you've turned it into!
#138968From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPApr 13, 1994 3:51 PM
I believe you are correct. It is interesting, however, to see that the last shareholder vote contained something about turning the approval process from the shareholders to the board of directors. I believe it was voted down.
#139081From: Jim PlantApr 14, 1994 1:37 AM
My sources say that Mehdi (with Phillips offer in hand) is talking to another party, looking for a sweeter offer. No specifics on who the "other party" is…supposedly an "international distributor." That's the latest info (rumor) that I have… Stay tuned. JP P.S. Hi Joe Lowery. Longtime no see/talk. Hope all is well with you. Gimme a call sometime.
#139190From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPApr 14, 1994 9:26 PM
Thanks for posting that info, Jim. Should be interesting to see what happens…..
#139057From: Don Curtis/SYSOPApr 14, 1994 12:35 AM
Joe, Management has to accept the offer and then present it to the stockholders….unless it's a hostile takeover. Don
#139161From: Christian BusseApr 14, 1994 6:35 PM
Joe, sure, it's the stockholders' decision whether they want to sell their shares… Of cource you can't just buy a joint-stock company – you have to make an offer to the shareholders to buy the shares of the company from them. Now, if the management of C= had enough shares to provide control over the company they could of course decide to sell those to another company or whoever at an agreed price. Thus, the other party had effectively "bought" the company… // Chris coming in from Germany \X/ on AutoPilot 1.061……….
#138989From: Paul HigginbottomApr 13, 1994 8:47 PM
That's a pretty wild rumor, Jim. Phillips has its own share of financial troubles, although obviously they have deeper pockets than Commodore right now (heck, you and I do too 🙂 ). I don't quite understand the synergy of Phillips and Commodore although I guess Phillips figures CD32 is better and more successful than CDI (which is true).
#139020From: Kevin DarlingApr 13, 1994 10:16 PM
Paul, CD-i has sold way over 300K units and over a million discs… to end users. Its titles (especially forthcoming ones) are said to blow all competition away in depth of authoring (depends on your viewpoint and needs, of course). And Philips is doing very well financially these days after slimming down. So I doubt that Philips figures CD32 is "better and more successful", and I can't think of any reason they'd want Commodore except perhaps because it was such a steal they couldn't resist it. Although they are some Amiga fans at Philips, so maybe those guys want to see it survive. I hope so. kev
#139031From: Charles HillApr 13, 1994 11:00 PM
I heard the same thing…that Phillips offered Commodore $11 million for thier CD32 stuff and Commodore said "no…all or nothing, not just CD32". Word is that Phillips wanted to kill CD32. -Chas
#138564From: richard berryApr 9, 1994 4:43 PM
How would filing for Bankruptcy force Commodore to change their management? I would rather see Newtek buy C=, after all, Newtek is the only reason the Amiga didn't die years ago. ps. I miss the 'INFO' magazine rich
#138627From: Mark D. ManesApr 10, 1994 9:08 AM
Richard, I don't agree that Newtek is the only reason the Amiga didn't die. There are many reasons the Amiga hasn't died.. SCALA is one of them. There are many others like the folks who gave us Pro Video Post, etc. The Amiga survives because it solves unique business problems. Not because of Newtek. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#138641From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPApr 10, 1994 12:34 PM
I'm not upon bankruptcy law, so I don't know the answer to that. Steve
#138657From: Kevin SangwellApr 10, 1994 2:10 PM
Richard, Here in th UK (and the rest of Europe) the Amiga is NOT heavily used for video, therefore NewTek have little to do with it's success. In fact the games developers are the ones who have supported the platform, it is also the reason why CD32 was released here first and is selling well. Kevin 68030/40 A1200… Flying AutoPilot from Surrey in the UK
#138670From: richard berryApr 10, 1994 4:58 PM
I may be wrong about Newtek being the sole reason for the Amiga's survival, but here in the U.S. they have to be the main reason. I heard that Cd-32's were doing well in Europe. I find it strange that Commodore could lose so much money when they were selling so much hardware? C= needs a serious management change. rich
#138858From: Kevin SangwellApr 12, 1994 12:15 PM
Rich, Here here, I couldn't agree more, it seems as though the only profitable C= comapanies are the European ones which ironically have been strongest in the games market, yet I know LOTS of Ami users who rarely play games – myself included, although the wife is partial to a game or two 😉 of Tetris especially… Kevin 68030/40 A1200… Flying AutoPilot from Surrey in the UK
#138862From: GTI GermanyApr 12, 1994 1:02 PM
Hi Here in Germany we have seen the amiga move over the years from being a predominantly games machine to one used mainly for application software. (escpecially in German speaking Europe there is a whole range of VERY GOOD productivity software which never sees the light of day in the UK let alone the States – one exception which proves the rule being the excellent Disk Expander which Tony at Power Computing is now selling in the UK – theres plenty more where that came from !!) At the same time the PC has moved sharply into the consumer market with many now buying PC's "just to play games with". We have many customers who use a PC for games and the Amiga for more serious stuff !! By the way I heard that Commodore was shutting their US Warehouse at the end of this week – have any of the Stateside dealers got confirmation on this ? Still no announcement seen regarding the European operations – they are still delivery product here !! Regards to all Richard
#138868From: Dale LarsonApr 12, 1994 2:31 PM
Commodore hasn't been using any or much of the warehousing facilities in WC for months. Of course, they are still using office space in the same building, but have sublet the rest. — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#138875From: GTI GermanyApr 12, 1994 3:51 PM
Thanks for that info. Commodores warehouse in germany is operating normally – we had a delivery yesterday and are expecting at least 2 more major deliveries this week. A number of dealers here are trying to push as much product through for Commodore as possible. This thing has got to work !!!! regards Richard
#138891From: Dale LarsonApr 12, 1994 6:25 PM
Whether Commodore warehouses product itself is really irrelevant to the health of the company. In the U.S. product just goes straight to distributors now rather than stopping in WC first. Can be more efficient anyway… — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#139290From: Ron LegroApr 15, 1994 10:13 AM
Ditto on DiskExpander. Just installed it and it works very well, with few problems. By the way, for American lurkers reading this, it's available Stateside at around $35 from Safe Harbor mail order.
#138924From: John DraperApr 13, 1994 1:05 AM
That reminds me a lot of a chatr I had with an Electronic Arts person at a show in 1986. He said something like "If it wasn't for EA, the Amiga would be nothing." Well, that's just ego speaking in his case, and basically, anyone who thinks that any one company is responsible for the survival of the machine, is ndulging in much the same thing. If you do a lot of video stuff, and hang around with people who do likewise, it is not surprising that you might think the way you do. I can assure you that NewTek and/or their products are far from the minds of most of the Amiga owners I know, and the interests expressed by those same folks are as varied as the people themselves are. -larry
#138934From: Jim OgilvieApr 13, 1994 6:43 AM
Larry… Exactly! If EA, or Newtek for that matter, had never entered the market, then someone else might have with similar products. There is no way to know for certain. Sometimes the existence of strong products in any given field will scare others with similar (or better) products to not even try, and thusly a monopoly develops. But I do believe that EA and Newtek both were major contributors. As were Gold Disk, PP&S, ASDG, and a bunch of others. Jim
#138948From: John DraperApr 13, 1994 10:01 AM
I have no qualms calling EA or NewTek, or any one of a number of other companies, major contributors. In fact, there are even a number of people I would place in the same category. -larry
#138961From: GTI GermanyApr 13, 1994 3:02 PM
Hi Good news !!!!!!! We got a letter from Commodore Germany today introducing the new head of sales who is a very experienced person with a lot of experience by the Nintendo European Distribution Company. This guy has just been hired and is already in place !!! Either he's from another planet or he knows something we don't. I surmise the latter This is NOT rumour but fact !! Amiga lives on ………… Richard
#139048From: Black Belt SystemsApr 14, 1994 12:30 AM
William Hawes; John Tobbes… people like that. :^) –Ben …via AutoPilot
#138992From: Paul HigginbottomApr 13, 1994 8:51 PM
You should include GVP in that list. They're far and away the biggest Amiga developer.
#139089From: Jim Drew/UUIApr 14, 1994 2:39 AM
I don't think GVP is the largest Amiga developer… according to their sales report (obtained 2nd hand), we did substantially more business with just EMPLANT alone than all of GVPs products combined. We sold over 10,000 EMPLANT boards in the last 90 days, and I don't see it slowing down even if CBM goes completely under… all the more reason to keep your Amiga instead of having to fork out more money for another complete system. 🙂
#139101From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPApr 14, 1994 4:36 AM
>>We sold over 10,000 EMPLANT boards in the last 90 days<< Jim, Holy smoke. Where are all of these people going to find the ROM's? Congratulations on such phenomenal success!
#139319From: Rafael VicariaApr 15, 1994 3:13 PM
I was asked for up to 399$ today! Rafa <Motorola Inside> …via AutoPilot 1.061 now from Berlin
#139165From: John M. VreelandApr 14, 1994 6:56 PM
10,000 Emplant boards in ninety days. Very impressive, you should all be congratulated. I guess that sort of success carries its own rewards, eh? -Vree in VA
#139179From: Clarence SaundersApr 14, 1994 8:05 PM
Will the EMPLANT support the 486 instruction set anytime soon!!! Just wondering…. Catya,
#139170From: Paul IdolApr 14, 1994 7:21 PM
Gadzooks!!!! Any word on the PCMCIA version yet? Paul
#139198From: Chris LesterApr 14, 1994 9:42 PM
I don't suppose an A1200 version is anywhere close to done is it? Chris – Fast and Low on my '020! …Is it significant that my spell checker doesn't know "Intel"?
#139212From: Paul HigginbottomApr 14, 1994 9:55 PM
Congratulations. I'm amazed, frankly.
#139246From: Robert LittleApr 15, 1994 12:54 AM
Jim, I'm amazed (although, not entirely surprised)! I hope you keep doing as well, in whatever circumstances are to come! Robb
#139269From: Trent K. JohnsonApr 15, 1994 6:04 AM
Yikes! Better get me an Emplant! I heard nothing but good things! Congrats! TJ
#139326From: GEIR OTTO MOLSTADApr 15, 1994 6:08 PM
>just EMPLANT alone than all of GVPs products combined. We sold over >10,000 EMPLANT boards in the last 90 days, and I don't see it slowing PLEASE ELABORATE Which country got the 9998 that wasnt sold in Norway? Geir Molstad, FAMO as, Fax +47 22357797
#139386From: Jim Drew/UUIApr 16, 1994 2:45 AM
Last I knew, we had sold around 50 EMPLANT boards to Norway (direct ordering from UU). I know we now have a dealer there, but I do not know the status of them. We have sold many thousands of boards to the UK and Germany, with the rest being sold in the US (mostly to Hollywood, TV stations, and higher end businesses).. I think we have only sold 5 or 6 thousand boards to the general public since EMPLANT's release, but that number appears to be growing rapidly. With more than 4 million Amigas that EMPLANT can work in, selling 10,000 boards is a very small percentage.
#139486From: Paul IdolApr 16, 1994 10:24 PM
Again, any word on the PCMCIA version? Paul
#139291From: Ron LegroApr 15, 1994 10:13 AM
I just think the problem generally (excepting Commodore's own marketing/management problems) springs from the fact that the Amiga in many ways was ahead of its time; the marketplace wasn't quite ready. E.g., A-Squared's LIVE! boards handled real-time digitized video in full-screen color back in the late '80s, but now (I believe) the operation is defunct, just as boards of this type are just surfacing on PCs and Macs, with Amiga second-generation stuff promised. Sad. OTOH, I know LIVE! boards were put to good use and probably still are being used, just not by enough people.
#138991From: Paul HigginbottomApr 13, 1994 8:50 PM
What you say is absolutely true. It's DEFINITELY true that products make a difference, but no one product makes all the difference. Obviously the Toaster hasn't made THAT much of a difference or Commodore US would be much stronger.
#139133From: SyndesisApr 14, 1994 1:34 PM
On one hand, you say no one product can make much difference… on the other, you say that if the Toaster was strong enough, Commodore US would be saved. Which is it? If the Toaster hasn't made much difference, then which products or applications have made a difference?
#139213From: Paul HigginbottomApr 14, 1994 9:58 PM
The Toaster, while phenominally successful for NewTek, has not been sufficiently successful to help Commodore in US in what they would consider a significant enough way. The Toaster is definitely a big fish in the very small US sales pond.
#139273From: SyndesisApr 15, 1994 8:43 AM
I see, you define "importance" as how a product has directly influenced Commodore's sales figures. I've heard guesses that NewTek moved roughly a thousand Toasters a month on a regular basis, and since CBM was shipping XXX numbers of 2000/3000/4000s, we can somehow say that the Toaster wasn't influential if the ratio is small. I don't think it's that clear-cut. I think Amiga dealers would give a different answer… iif it wasn't for the videots who continued to buy other software packages at a regular rate, I think a lot of them would have dropped the Amiga products a long time ago. Is there more profit selling GVP accelerators or $20 games? So can you think of other products or companies that you'd rank as "important"?
#139336From: J Saperstein/FontBankApr 15, 1994 7:28 PM
"I've heard guesses that NewTek moved roughly a thousand Toasters a month on a regular basis, and since CBM was shipping XXX numbers of 2000/3000/4000s, we can somehow say that the Toaster wasn't influential if the ratio is small. I don't think it's that clear-cut." I think it was Computer World or one of the other trade magazines that listed Commodore's total shipments as 937,000 machines of all kinds for 1993. There was no breakdown by type. Jerry
#139432From: Paul HigginbottomApr 16, 1994 1:55 PM
I guess you're still not seeing my point. Of the total number of Amigas sold in the US, the Toaster has been a VERY significant factor. I think we agree on this. My point though, is that the total number sold is STILL SMALL compared to what Commodore sells in Europe, for example.
#139433From: Paul HigginbottomApr 16, 1994 1:56 PM
One more thing – if NewTek sold 1000 Toaster a month, which is GREAT for NewTek, that means, at the very best case, that this causes Commodore to sell 12000 Amigas a year. Big deal.
#139270From: Trent K. JohnsonApr 15, 1994 6:07 AM
ICP, of course! Trent Johnson ReAnimators (Syndesis groupies :-> )
#139280From: SyndesisApr 15, 1994 8:47 AM
Someone complimented me the other day by saying "Well, you've carved out a niche, and you outlasted Commodore." 🙂
#139396From: Trent K. JohnsonApr 16, 1994 5:17 AM
Tis true! TJ
#139166From: John M. VreelandApr 14, 1994 6:56 PM
I've noticed that Toaster User is easer to find than Amiga World. -Vree in VA
#139199From: Chris LesterApr 14, 1994 9:42 PM
NO KIDDING! AmigaWorld here (Southern Pines NC) makes it about 2 days on the stand. (10+ copies), Toaster User lasts 2 months! I'm still trying to get the latest AW! Chris – Fast and Low on my '020! …Is it significant that my spell checker doesn't know "Intel"?
#139222From: Soft-Logik Tech SupportApr 14, 1994 10:55 PM
VideoToasterUser has a larger circulation than AmigaWorld. VTU should not be on the newstand for more than a month because resellers normally take unsold copies off and return the cover for credit I believe. At least that's the way it used to work. We have a nice PageStream 3.0 ad in the next issue of VTU. Michael @ Soft-Logik Publishing Corp.
#139242From: Black Belt SystemsApr 15, 1994 12:43 AM
"we have a nice PageStream 3.0 ad in the next issue of VTU" Hm. Well, <he said in quiet voice> when can I order my upgrade, or new product, or whatever? PS 3.0 is not something I'll do without, based on my experiences with PS 2.0… Can you say, yet? –Ben …via AutoPilot
#139277From: Dale LarsonApr 15, 1994 8:45 AM
You can order your upgrade now. You can't get it this week or next, and probably not the week after that. Past then, who knows… — Dale L. Larson, Intangible Assets Manufacturing — INTERNET:dale@iam.com
#139312From: Soft-Logik Tech SupportApr 15, 1994 1:03 PM
No, we're just not ready. We'll never say one day that on the xxth day of the month we'll be shipping. One day we'll just magically start shipping. We do have a new target date, of course, but we're loathe to publicize it because people will bug us if we miss it. End of May is our best guess right now. We've got boxes stacked to the ceiling, all nicely folded. And shipping is stuffing literature envelopes and labelling disks. Generally, we're doing everything possible so that when the disks come out of the duplicators we can stick them in boxes and ship them out the door. But in the meantime, we have cool PageStream3 T-Shirts! 😉 Michael @ Soft-Logik Publishing Corp.
#139349From: Chris LesterApr 15, 1994 8:58 PM
It may be a product of our WB outlet. They recently had AW show up for a week, only to have it replaced the following week with a newer edition! Chris – Fast and Low on my '020! …Is it significant that my spell checker doesn't know "Intel"?
#139790From: richard berryApr 19, 1994 5:25 PM
Well, one thing I can tell you for certainty, Commodore is NOT responsible for the length the Amiga has lived. rich
#138701From: Ron LegroApr 10, 1994 10:19 PM
That may change since Newtek is now actively supporting the new standards converter box (NTSC, PAL, SECAM, whatever) from that third party company whose name escapes me — Prime Image, I think. If Newtek thinks it can work with the Toaster, that means in effect a PAL Toaster market.
#138859From: Kevin SangwellApr 12, 1994 12:15 PM
Ron, You are right, the Ami is breaking into the Video market over here at last, although the convertor box does not offer the same quality as a Toaster in nativ NTSC mode so it's still regarded as a halfway house over here apparently (I've had no experience with the Toaster so cannot comment on this, I'm only saying what I've heard and read) Kevin 68030/40 A1200… Flying AutoPilot from Surrey in the UK
#139292From: Ron LegroApr 15, 1994 10:13 AM
Of course, the Opalvision video module (which apparently is now available) could be a viable alternative to the Toaster in Europe.
#139121From: Wes TattersApr 14, 1994 8:25 AM
Not in Australia. Newtek dont work here 🙂 PS How about a PAL toaster. –> Television without lights is Bad Radio 🙂 –> WES TATTERS, BRIZ 31, AUSTRALIA –<
#139271From: Trent K. JohnsonApr 15, 1994 6:09 AM
Actually, the latest issue of Video Toaster User has an article about an agreement between NewTek and Prime Image, which should make PAL Toast a reality… Trent
#139474From: Wes TattersApr 16, 1994 8:55 PM
The last I heard they were walking about doing some sloppy standards conversion. Ie not building a real PAL toaster be just doing some conversions. If this is true knowing the problems inherrent in the PAL -> NTSC process I guess I'll have to wait for OPAL Vision. Hmmm no Lightware though – sigh . . . –> Television without lights is Bad Radio 🙂 –> WES TATTERS, BRIZ 31, AUSTRALIA –<
#139517From: Trent K. JohnsonApr 17, 1994 3:25 AM
According to the article, it really isn't a PAL version of the Toaster. Apparently Prime Inage has developed an add-on card. (whether it's a poor standards converter, I don't know) Trent/ReAnimators