CompuServe Thread

#New Amiga from SGI!

77 messages in this thread
#107646From: Mark D. ManesJul 19, 1993 7:37 PM
Something wonderful has happened this last week folks. Something so wonderful that I doubt most of the major media will pick up it other than as a token event. See how jaded I feel about the computer press? Folks, this last week Silicon Graphics introduced what I believe to be the high-end Amiga, high-end PC, and certainly high-end Macintosh killer if you are into desktop video and multimedia. This box is called the Indy. It has a 64 bit arcitecture, 100Mhz CPU based on the MIPS processor, 8-Bit Graphics (similiar to AGA), upgradeable to 24 bit. 16MB of RAM (uses SIMM modules), SCSI-2, Stereo In, Stereo Out, Video In from three sources, ability to record video directly to disk and play it back at 30fps in S-Video, NTSC, or even HDTV with an optional board for output. (It will display these videos in real time on the monitor w/o output video board). It comes standard with a SGI's UNIX product with a GUI that claims that everything can be done from the GUI, including nasty things like configuring a TCP/IP network. Bundled software includes a sound editor, ShowMan (SCALA-like product) and other operating system tools. The system also comes complete with a digital video camera that can be used for network teleconferencing. The video that is brought in can be digitally edited as well. How much? How does $4995 List strike you? You will have to add a disk drive, and 16MB of RAM may be a bit on the thin side. Just to give you an idea of what a 1.2GB HP SCSI-2 (3.5 Inch) drive goes for, it is less than $2100. SGI recmmends a minimum of 384MB. Who is developing for this box so far? ASDG and the Blue Ribbon Soundworks. I suspect to see more high-end Amiga software companies leap to this machine. The one downside the SGI box has is the cost of the current line of software. However, as this machine reaches the masses the cost of software is likely to drop like a rock. Amiga Developer–you don't gotta wait for AAA or Commodore to get their collective act together. If you have a graphics product, the Indy needs you! Friends, SGI just got real serious. Are we, the loyal Amiga dealer going to pick it up? Uh, will Bill Clinton raise taxes? 🙂 Only Amiga makes it possible indeed. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#107661From: Paul HigginbottomJul 19, 1993 9:31 PM
Hi Mark. The Indy certainly does seem VERY cool. Contrary to Apple and Commodore, SGI's stock has doubled in the past year. I believe SGI is the most innovative, visionary and strategically coordinated computer company out there today. They will certainly be attacked on an ongoing basis by IBM (RS/6000 etc), Sun, HP, DEC, etc., but as long as they can keep their innovative edge, they stand to become a huge player in the years ahead. They're already bigger than Commodore in revenue, although their installed base in tiny (less than 50,000 machines, I believe). Regards, Paul.
#107919From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffJul 22, 1993 5:45 PM
SGI has also been going through well publicized bouts of 'downsizing' woith layoffs, pay and benefit cuts, etc. They are probably betting the company on their ability to get into the consumer level market, after watching their reign in high-end imaging stations eroded by pesky pcs on the low-end. Does this sound at all like apple? will they manage to survive the transition to small margin/large volume products?
#107663From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPJul 19, 1993 9:42 PM
There's been mention of this machine in some of the other forums. Very powerful looking system for sure! I still have a couple of questions that I haven't been able to find an answer to… First, that's a diskless station, right? I presume that means it boots from a network server or another SGI box. Anyway, does the price include the OS, or is that "extra"? (I presume it's included). Second, what kind (if any) of development system comes with it? Does it include Motif? Someone in another forum mentioned that the 24-bit upgrade with a disk is something like $4000. Ouch. If the graphics hardware engine that makes the big SGI boxes fly is in Indy in some form, it'll take more than a quickie port to get some of the packages we use now to take advantage of it. But when they do take advantage of it….phew! That thing will just scream. I can't wait to see one of those things! Steve
#107685From: Wayne ColeJul 20, 1993 2:10 AM
Steve, ASDG had a booth in the SGI section at NAB. I didn't have time to go in, but I assume they were shoeing some form of ADPro/Morph plus (test or shipping) for SGI/Unix. wmc – via Autopilot!
#107739From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPJul 20, 1993 4:15 PM
If I'm not mistaken, ASDG will be at Siggraph '93 as well. Steve
#107833From: Mark D. ManesJul 21, 1993 4:58 PM
Steve, The station is diskless at $4995, however it uses SCSI-2 drives and those prices keeping falling. You can get an HP 1.2GB drive for right at $2k. The OS comes standard along with many software tools built in. I have no idea on the development system, I will find that out though. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#107916From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPJul 22, 1993 5:12 PM
It's possible to use SCSI-1 drives, though…isn't it? The reason I asked about the software development tools is that they do sell some systems without a development environment (no compiler…and possibly no header files), and that might be a major expense. Sure hope it's included. Let me know what you find out! Steve
#108013From: Mark D. ManesJul 23, 1993 10:57 PM
I would guess that you could use SCSI-1 with it, not sure about that though. I will let you know on the developers kit. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#108166From: Paul HigginbottomJul 25, 1993 9:31 AM
How can it be used without a disk, though? If a user adds their own hard disk, how do they get SGI's UNIX onto it? Inquiring minds want to know! Paul.
#108244From: Mark D. ManesJul 25, 1993 11:55 PM
Paul, Good question, good question indeed! Perhaps you are locked into purchasing the disk from SGI. I pray not. 🙂 I'll let you know. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#107684From: Wayne ColeJul 20, 1993 2:10 AM
Mark, I'm very intereseted in this machine. If you are planning to be a dealer in it, I wouldn't mind getting some printed material about it form you. Just two points: To be completely fair, what would the price of the Indy be with top-notch modeller/animation system (Ligtwave/Imagin/Caligari-like, 24 bit of course), able to handle CG, Switching, and digital transition duties in an A/B Roll mode (a la Toaster with Amilink) and audio frame accurate editing a la Studio 16/Amilink A follow V and split editing? I realize an oranges to roganges comparison here is not possible as the Amiga will NEVER be able to do the stuff I saw Indigo do with WaveFront at NAB (bandwidth limit on motorola chips and Amiga bus). Which brings me to my second point. Software will always be m ore expensive on SGI since it is designed to network right out of the box (read multi-user license assumed) and is targetted at the established, professional users rather than the Kool, Vidoe Yippees of NewTek. But there is a symbiotic relationship that could be nice for both machines. I could envision several Amigas networked to and feeding and SGI machine. The AMigas are used for storyborad, preps, model building, scene building, maybe even lo-res approval rendering and some off-line editting. THen the SGI is used for the online, HDTV, high end formats and non-linear editing as well as final animation rendering an lay-off to what have you media. What is the key ingredient that will make this work? Developers that provide products for both platforms. And, as you pointed out, that is already happening. Now can CBM take advantage of this or not…. wmc – via Autopilot!
#107834From: Mark D. ManesJul 21, 1993 4:58 PM
Wayne, I pointed this out in an earlier message. Software is going to be the pricey side of the Indy. However, if this thing hits like I think it will, the software publishers who specialize in desktop video and multimedia will have a major void to fill. Things will change really quickly in the SGI market. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#107742From: James RoathJul 20, 1993 4:55 PM
The machine sounds grand, it is indeed generating the kind of excitement that the Amiga did when it first hit the scene. BTW: our SGI Iris guys tell me that our SGI dealer will be in the office next week to discuss some hardware upgrades for the Iris machines. I plan to try and get a word with him and see if I can get some info and real pricing on a Indy.
#107755From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPJul 20, 1993 8:50 PM
Hmmmm….come to think of it, there's an SGI dealer around here someplace…I better check. I'm thinking pretty hard about getting one of those things (the Indy). Steve
#107838From: Mark D. ManesJul 21, 1993 5:56 PM
We're lining up with SGI, and hopefully in a couple of weeks will have product literature available. I have some preliminary spec sheets on the box now, in a word… awesome. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#107876From: Mike SchillerJul 22, 1993 4:06 AM
Mark: If the machine lists for 4995.00 what do you think it's street price will be? Did they say when the machine would be available? // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#107924From: R. Simonsen/MicroBoticsJul 22, 1993 6:45 PM
You won't see heavy discounting on the Indy except via corporate sales in volume. This isn't exactly a commodity computer. –Redmond
#107946From: Lou WallaceJul 22, 1993 11:18 PM
For those of you interested in Indy, be advised that Desktop Video World has been in close touch with SGI for a while. The machine ships in September, and our next issue ships in September… Keep your eyes peeled for that issue! Lou Wallace Editor-In-Chief, DTVW
#108015From: Mark D. ManesJul 23, 1993 10:57 PM
What are your first impressions of the machine Lou? I swear, though I haven't seen one yet, this is the first time in YEARS that I have actually been excited about a machine introduction. It is almost like 1985 all over again. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#108474From: Lou WallaceJul 28, 1993 4:58 PM
I'll leave my comments in secret until the next issue comes out… I do suggest you watch for the next Desktop Video World. Lou
#107967From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 23, 1993 4:38 AM
Mike, Mark and everybody else, The new SGI Indy is not quite what the press releases seem to describe, and the real 'street price' is in actuality 8 to 10 times the ballyhooed $4995! We have been intensely evaluating the Indigo and Indigo-2 SGI machines and the Maui Research and Technology Center has just committed to buying several (probably 6) Indigo-2s. During this evaluation we became familiar with the Indy specification. The machine is very powerful – compared to a 68040 based Amiga or Mac or a 486. Its R4000 RISC CPU places it well in front of the Pentium-based machines running Unix or Windows NT. But at $5000, the machine can't get out of its own way. Like the early Amigas it doesen't have anywhere near enough RAM to function. For the kind of programs that one buys such a machine, 32 megs is not a lot and 64 to 128 is a nice comfortable figure. And RAM for the Indy costs $90-100 per meg! Other significant 'peripherals' such as monitors, drives, add-in boards, and the like are very expensive. And then there's the software. Whew! 3D modeling and animation packages start at $8000. Right – eight _thousand_. A page layout program roughly equivalent to Quark Express is $2900. Photoshop is $1100. Adobe Illustrator is about the same. To give you some perspective, my graphics prepress workstations are Macs. A well equipped 800 Quadra with 96 megs of Ram, a 24 bit 15" monitor, about 500 megs of hard drives, running Quark, Photoshop, and Illustrator weighs in at about $7000. It is a good performer, everything works well and I get _gobs_ of work done on it. A similarly equipped Indy costs $30,000! And (parodoxically) the software is not all that dependable. Bugginess in software and hardware is inversely proportional to its cost. Of course if you need the power of the R4000 processor, then the SGI is the way to go. No Mac or PC can touch it in terms of sheer processing power. And its operating system and proprietary graphic software are the best. But this machine [ MORE ]
#107985From: Steve AhlstromJul 23, 1993 12:56 PM
Richard, Indy comes with monitor, with color digital camera, with genlock, with DSP, with 16M ram — at the $4995 price. Yes, Indigo software and peripherals are extremely pricey at this point in time. However, SGI is attempting to enter the consumer market with Indy. It's obvious that a $5k machine will not support an $8k software package (in any kind of quantity). I believe you'll see software/peripheral pricing take a nose dive as more Indys are in consumer's hands. I believe you'll also see a wealth of new companies jumping into the Indigo world with new products are very competitive pricing. -sja
#107994From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 23, 1993 3:22 PM
Steve, I agree that competition will bring the prices down. But I stand by my $30,000 figure to acheive the level of performance that I indicated. Rich
#108028From: Mike SchillerJul 24, 1993 1:27 AM
Rich: I would think that while your $30,000 figure is probably correct NOW, and possibly for the near future, chances are that fairly soon it would go down probably as low as $15,000 or lower. I have this really bad habit which I'm trying to break, which is that I like to buy these hi tech toys when the first come out, and I've seen many things that I've bought drop in price almost 10 fold sometimes! While this isn't SO bad when talking about buying something for $1400.00 and seeing it sell for $499.00 about a year later (this actually happened to me with the 040 accelerator in my A3000) I think I'd cry if I bought something for $30,000.00 and a year later the same thing was selling for $5,000.00! BTW, while talking about things that cost $30k, has the price of imagesetters dropped much? Last time I looked into it at all, used Linotronics were around $25k or so for the full setup (imagesetter, rip, processor, etc). The printer that we use here was thinking of getting an imagesetter a while ago, and they ended up getting one of the so called 1000dpi laser printers, and I'll tell you what, yes it's output is somewhat nicer than the 300dpi output of my laser printer, but not THAT much, and nowhere near the quality of an imagesetter. // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#108097From: Jonathan BlackwellJul 24, 1993 7:27 PM
Oh gosh, only $15,000 now I think that is a huge money saver! NOT… -Jonathan
#108123From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 24, 1993 10:46 PM
Mike, I agree that the price of machines like the SGI will come down in price. I hope you are right about the 2 to 1 ratio. But I don't think that the machine/software combo that I priced for $30K is going to get much less than 25K any time soon. Imagesetters seem to have gone _up_ in price. In the last year, the technology has accelerated enormously, rendering machines only a few years old obsolete. My old 4300P Varityper (2400 dpi, Atlas speed RIP, 12 megs of RAM, two 140 meg hard drives) cost $60,000 just a few years ago. It's street price now is below $6000! There are a _lot_ of older imagesetters on the used market now. They are hopelessly outclassed by the newer machines which are faster, have PostScript level 2, and have screening technologies which make the older machines' (halftone color separation) output look like junk. We are taking delivery of an Emerald RIP machine next week which is state of the art. Fortunately, we got a killer deal on it, but it still cost dearly. Until about 2 years ago, the conventional wisdom in purchasing this kind of 'durable equipment' was that your market had to be strong enough so that you could pay for the equipment in 2 years and realize profit for 3 years. At the end of that 5 year cycle, the technolgy was supposed to catch up, requiring an upgrading of the machinery. If you could not pay for the equipment, and realize a profit, you were in deep trouble. Today, the five year cycle is more like 3 years. That means that if a company can't pay off the cost of equipment in a very short time, it can't stay in business. Rich
#108157From: Mike SchillerJul 25, 1993 7:17 AM
Richard: But correct me if I'm wrong, but a VT4300P would do the same job today that it did a few years ago, right? Just because there are newer/better machines available today, couldn't somebody that had a lower volume, less money to spend buy a used VT4300P (Or L300, etc) and use it just fine, and still have output MUCH better than any 300DPI laser? (considering that just a few years ago 300DPI lasers were in the pricerange that used imagesetters are now in). // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#108212From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 25, 1993 7:41 PM
Mike, Sure. The answer to your question is yes. But it's a qualified yes for a number of reasons. My 4300P is just as good right now as it was when it was new. As a matter of fact, it's better. I've spent long hours calculating screen angles for it and I can produce beautiful color separations which result in very high quality work coming off the press. In fact, Varityper will not acknowlege that this machine can produce the quality that I'm getting from it. I would assign a figure of merit to my present color work at about 86-88 with something like Architectural Digest or World Wild Life or National Geographic clocking in at a consistent 97-100. That alone is the problem. I can't compete in the color market if I can't produce the highest quality. Because my customers can _get_ that quality as the result of a phone call and the price of a Fed Ex mailer. Add to that the fact that a 9 x 12 full page four color job takes a good four hours to image (150 line halftones, some graphics with blends and other complicated elements, type matter, etc). That's half a day just to output that one page. If there's anything at all wrong with the output (the designers fault, a typo that got missed in proofing, an inexplicable PostScript error message), at least another half day is shot. That's a full day gone, just for that single page. And, during that time, _no_ other work can come off the machine. In other words, the 4300P is not a production machine in today's printing environment, and it's quality, while very high simply can't compete in an arena where every customer wants rock bottom prices and examines the printed sheet as though his job is a Cartier jewelry ad and he has already paid me millions in previous print jobs. Now, if as you asked, can't these machines be pressed into service to replace 300 dpi laser printers, since used imagesetters are now at the same price point as laser printers were when they first came out ($4000-7500), again the answer depends on the user's ability to tolerate a number of realities. [ MORE ]
#108272From: Paul HigginbottomJul 26, 1993 10:51 AM
Your experience with typesetting equipment prices and the "business case" for return on investment is exactly the same as that for computer equipment. Hobbyists will look at that "loaded" Indy price you quoted of $30K and say "in my dreams only", but those who need to get real work done, may easily be able to justify the price. While Toasters can do 3D rendering, for example, they're very slow (even with GVP's fastest accelerator), compared to workstations. A client will pay a lot for 3D, and the time savings an SGI box can provide can often easily pay back the $30K price. The $3K loaded PC's that are being bought are going to people upgrading from older 286/386 class machines and to new users who've never been in computing. $10K and up machines are going to those with specialized applications where the tool is essential, just like a lathe in a machine tool shop. I know I don't need to tell you this, but I was just trying to put the "high" price of some machines into perspective for all here. As they say, it's all relative. Paul.
#108285From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 26, 1993 1:01 PM
Paul, You're absolutely right. If I have a healthy market for the kind of work that an SGI workstation can produce, then the price of the equipment is _almost_ irrelevant. In fact, trying to get by with less expensive solutions is the worst decision to make, (and actually a much more expensive solution in the end) because the lower priced machine often can't handle the work load. (as in my messages about the speed of my old 4300P).
#108471From: Stephen SponagleJul 28, 1993 3:04 PM
But, can a $30k Indy outrun 5 or more toasters each doing a segment of an animation? Five toasters, that's about what $20 grand? What about those SAGE devices? Aren't they in the "workstation" speed realm? -Steve
#108213From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 25, 1993 7:42 PM
[ continuation ] First, an imagesetter is _not_ a laser printer, and cannot replace it as a quick proofing device. The low resolution of the laser printer is actually an advantage as a device to produce multiple, progressive working proofs of a design in progress. The higher resolution of the imagesetter often results in a job bombing that would have imaged on the lower resolution device (on which the potential for the problem at high resolution could have been discovered). There is also a _significant_ learning curve in aquiring the ability to operate these machines. Second, no hard copy actually comes out of an imagesetter. It exposes photographic media (film or paper) which then has to be sent through a processor. A decent rapid access chemistry processor or a litho chemistry processor runs about $7000. Although these machines are also available used. The true cost of a page of output is close to $5 in quantity. Third, the imagesetter is a very complex machine that depends on the simultaneous functioning of fantastically accurate components. Its electronic innards are the equivalent of a mini computer. Every board inside is a proprietary thing that bears no similarity with plug in boards on an Amiga or Mac other than the fact that both have a lot of chips on them. Only the manufacturer can or will repair a malfunctioning board. Go try to get a circuit diagram! The optical elements consist of a laser beam and a spinning octogonal mirror that are aligned to an accuracy measured in fractions of microns. The film drive mechanism has to drive a 12 inch wide roll of film past the laser output port at about half an inch a second so smoothly that there is not the slightest distortion down to a measurement of less than 1/2400 th of an inch. If one has obtained one of these machines for the 'street price' of $4000, that means that it has come from a private sale, not from the manufacturer. (Official factory reconditioned price of a 4300P is about $26,000). That of course means, no [ MORE ]
#108214From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 25, 1993 7:42 PM
[ continuation ] warranty. If repairs are needed (very likely in any piece of equipment more than a few years old) it is very possible that the cost of repairs will exceed the purchase price. So . . . if any one wants to get a used imagesetter, and dabble with it in a non-productivity environment . . . have at it! 8) Rich
#108002From: R. Simonsen/MicroBoticsJul 23, 1993 6:59 PM
You are correct, Steve. Indy sets a price point that many (for example) Amiga third parties would be happy to follow. Amiga software brought over to the Indy and sold at reasonable prices might fair pretty well. Gee, maybe one could actually port AMIGADOS itself! There's a novel concept. Anyway: a relatively low cost platform will inspire lower priced good software if properly marketed. –Redmond
#108029From: Mike SchillerJul 24, 1993 1:28 AM
Redmond: I don't think a ported AmigaDOS would go over too well. I don't know about the SGI market, but if it's anything like the PC market, AmigaDOS would never make it as it's too good, and too simple to setup. After all, if you make an OS that's so simple to setup that almost anyone can do it, where are all the consultants that make their living setting up computers for other people gonna go? It seems that Unix is gaining lots of users on PC systems, and now NextStep has been ported to the 486, and it looks like the next generation of machines will be able to run either windows or the Mac finder interchangably, so who knows, maybe there IS a market for AmigaDOS in the PC world. It sure would be cool to be able to run MS-DOS, AmigaDOS, Unix, MacOS (does the Mac OS actually have a name?), all on the same machine, all in a native mode (isn't this possible using the PowerPC?). I think the next few years will be some very interesting ones for sure. 10 years from now: "Can you believe they actually used to use K to measure the amount of RAM in their computers?" // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#108228From: R. Simonsen/MicroBoticsJul 25, 1993 10:17 PM
Mike: the only "official" name I've ever seen was Mac System 6.x or 7.x. Apple doesn't call it MACOS. Maybe it means something off-color in a foreign language? 😎 –Redmond
#108476From: Lou WallaceJul 28, 1993 5:01 PM
AmigaDOs isn't needed forIndy. It comes with Inigo Magic, a very nice multitasking interface that effectively hides Unix…
#108488From: R. Simonsen/MicroBoticsJul 28, 1993 7:02 PM
Lou: if you had AmigaDOS on the Indy you would not only have a GOOD operating system, but you would also have a SMALL operating system. Then the basic Indy would be immediately useful at the 5000 bux level. AmigaDOS runs in a few megs and a modest amount of HD space. Unix on the other hand… The GUI ain't the issue. –Redmond
#108167From: Paul HigginbottomJul 25, 1993 9:40 AM
Maybe that's why companies like ASDG have (wisely) ported their MorphPlus to SGI, and are charging significantly more for it than they do on the Amiga. Looks like a good business opportunity.
#108234From: R. Simonsen/MicroBoticsJul 25, 1993 10:39 PM
Paul: economics can't be ignored in business (if you want to be in business that is). No matter how loyal we are to the Amiga, one cannot ignore the fact that Commodore management has utterly failed to make a market within which third parties can grow. The installed base of the Amiga is about 1/3 that of the Mac yet the third party marketplace is hardly one-thirtieth as lucrative. If the Amiga had been vigorously marketed (directly) by Commodore in its natural niche in the USA (the "prosumer" video market) there would be at least 500,000 machines in the USA in the hands of people with enough money to really support a vigorous third party aftermarket. Once that was established, all the other good elements of a computer market would have come together and we would easily be rivaling the installed base of the Mac *in North America*. Commodore had a clear shot at this market *UNOPPOSED* for about five years. They did nothing with it except nibble at it. Scattershot ads. No real support. They dropped the ball right on their own foot –and it was a bowling ball! This is the result of "quarterly report" management and a complete failure of vision of upper management. Commodore engineering and sofware literally worked MIRACLES with a literal handful of people to create what I believe to be the best small operating systems and machine architecture in the world to date. Commodore management took these diamonds and hid them in the fog of their "thinking" all these years. Sad ain't it? And if CBM croaks, it won't be the upper management that gets hurt. They'll already have made their getaway money long before the sheriff puts the lock on the door. The people who'll get hurt are the people who actually created the Amiga and AmigaDOS we know today. Plus we third parties and all of us users and lovers of the Amiga. I long for some intelligent company to buy the Amiga and do right by it. Maybe if we all concentrate on that thought, we can bend the engine of reality by sheer will, hmm? –Redmond
#108243From: Robert ComerJul 25, 1993 11:48 PM
No arguments there Redmond, (Unfortunately.) Bob Comer — Cruising the nets on AutoPilot from Cheyenne, Wyoming
#108251From: Robert LittleJul 26, 1993 12:53 AM
Paul (and all), I've had an Amiga since the very early 1000's. I've wondered why alot of times. Not why I own the machine but, why there aren't more people who do! It seems as though I'm seeing here alot of what I've seen with the banking industry. NOT, to compare the two directly in these times but, one particular thing that has got on my nerves after hiring on at Ranier Bank and loving it, then getting bought by Security Pacific and hating it then learning to enjoy it, then being bought by Bank of America and being transferred to Seafirst. I'm only saying all this and using all the big names 'cause it happened! And all the people at the tops of these organizations had thier 'GOLDEN PARACHUTES' worth millions and millions. Once the company went under or was sold they were set for life! It doesn't seem to me that they could care about anyone at my level (or shareholders, or customer base or the original and existing designers/employees, in Amiga's case). Although, it seems that Commodore is a bit smaller in scale, hey, if I had my 2 or 3 Mill what the heck? Just 'cause, ignore, if you will. Robb
#108263From: Brian BartlettJul 26, 1993 2:09 AM
Redmond, I have one slight argument with your points. I do not find it suprising at all that the Amiga market is but 1/3rd that of the Mac while the third party is hardly one-thirtieth as lucrative. If any industry exhibits significant economies of scale, it is the computer market. Nothing we can do, nor Commodore in a very real sense, will change those facts. Only if the installed base increases significantly, and I do not mean by 50% but on the close order of 300%, will significant economies of scale occur. The barriers to entry are high and I do not think that C= has the management to pull off a marketing coup. They seem to have a significant presence in the video market, at least to judge from the number of Amigas I've spotted in video studios in news reports, but this is a very small market niche. Given the state of the market, C= doesn't have a choice chance in hell of penetrating the consumer market unless it is willing to play with the big boys with their significantly tighter profit margins. They can't do that, period. If they try, they will be in bankruptcy proceedings so fast it'd make your head spin as they can't afford the advertising budget required. As evidence, I offer the campaign by Intel. There is no way C= could afford a comparable campaign, and this is in comparison to a chip company, which is but a small part of C=, not to a full-fledged OEM. In comparison to an OEM, C= also fails the test. There is no way they can afford an advertising budget similiar to Apple or IBM, period (again). Face it, we are stuck with a niche machine with a evangelistic following that will never break into the "mainstream." Wishing won't make a difference nor will advertising by a company that can not afford the effort. As for myself, I'm going to sit here enjoying a five year old machine that is easily comparable to a 20 MHz '486 and, for now, cheaper. Brian
#108271From: Mark D. ManesJul 26, 1993 10:51 AM
Brian, I like your post and agree. Let me add one thing though. Let us just suppose that Commoodre through some miracle could afford the ad campaign. What would be the point of the campaign if there were not distribution points where a customer could see this wonderful machine? There are simply not enough distribution points for the Amiga now to make it worth the expense. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#108273From: Paul HigginbottomJul 26, 1993 11:03 AM
You are absolutely correct. Economies of scale have made the PC industry what it is. This is most evident in the case of hardware development (which of course, GVP is keenly involved in). Hardware development is EXPENSIVE. Contributing factors are board prototype runs, testing equipment, regulatory issues (FCC, UL, etc.), and the requirement of thousands of components. Compare this with software! Anyway, we at GVP are somewhat lucky in being the biggest Amiga vendor, but we could probably bring SIGNIFICANTLY better prices to the market if it were SIGNIFICANTLY bigger. I don't foresee this situation changing, however. We're not that psyched about doing add-ons for the game machine! Paul.
#108302From: R. Simonsen/MicroBoticsJul 26, 1993 7:02 PM
Brian: I agree with some of your points. But I can tell you as someone who has been engaged in advertising and marketing for a long time (25yrs) that CBM could have EASILY afforded a "signficant" print campaign targeted at the "prosumer" (not CONsumer) video market. They wasted almost 15 million on a pointless television campaign that got them almost zero sales (they sold 55,000 Amiga 500's the year they did "tv"). For the same amount of money they could have bought several YEARS of targeted print and direct mail selling and gotten a huge US installed base of folk who were actually using their machines above the hobbyist level. This would have caused a flood of software and peripherals to be created which would have further enriched the installed base. Sure Commondore has done "ok" in the video market –and they didn't even try! Think of how well they could have done with even reasonably competent marketing? There are 20+ million video camera owners in the USA. About 15% of them have "high end" vcr's and cameras. Every one of those folk are candidates for an Amiga with the right software bundle (and a simple IR interface). With a decent effort and a few million a year in real advertising and marketing, CBM could have cemented the Amiga into that prosumer market segment as the general purpose editing/digitizing/titling/effects machine. A hunderd grand a month in print ads in selected video publications (repeatedly, not just once or twice) and a half million to a million in direct mail annually. It would have taken a few years to "stick" but it would have stuck and paid off bigtime. Commodore was/is unwilling to think about more than one-quarter at a time in their "marketing". When they did spend significant money, they did exactly the WRONG thing –they tried to buy the mass market with a lame campaign that cost them too much and did nothing except confuse people. –Redmond
#108286From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 26, 1993 1:01 PM
Redmond, This forum has seen a lot of messages about CBM's unforgivable management of this marvelous machine called the Amiga. Your message is about as accurate and relevant as any I have seen here on the subject. The Amiga, sadly is a non-entity in the business world in any framework that one wishes to place it. It is a minor curiosity with an interesting video add in board (Toaster), nothing more and this situation will never change. Still mourning the NeXT machine's passing, I think the Amiga will follow. Rich
#108345From: Richard EricksonJul 27, 1993 2:51 AM
While it will never be a busines machine, I don't think it's just a minor curosity. The Indy is a really nice machine, but I doubt it will make changes in regard to the Amiga, I expect it to effect the Quadra market more. The picture isn't good, but I haven't written off the Amiga just yet. Richard -> via the Amiga 1000 AutoPilot
#108362From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 27, 1993 12:30 PM
Richard, I've re-read my message. And I retract some of it. The Amiga will probably _not_ suffer the fate of the NeXT machine. It will remain in existence for a long time. Look at the C-64! CBM will be able to maintain a niche market as it always has. Unfortunately, and sadly, the CBM-Amiga will never become any more significant in the computing world than it now is. Rich
#108426From: Richard EricksonJul 28, 1993 2:21 AM
Rich, No it's highly doubtful the Amiga will ever break into the mainstream. I am wondering how CBM and the Amiga will fit in after the chip and OS changes that are on the horizon. Richard -> via the Amiga 1000 AutoPilot
#108296From: Christian BusseJul 26, 1993 6:47 PM
Of course software for UPmarket systems like the Indigo has to be more expensive than software for cheaper (and thus, widely-spread) systems like the Amiga or Mac or PC. There's 100 Miliion PCs out there (oh, well…), 10 Million Apples and 5 Million Amigas and maybe just as many Ataris. Spread the cost to develop a software for a system among the number of sales it's likely to get and take into consideration the price of the system itself (people with 15,000$ systems are usually willing to pay more than people with 600$ systems) and there you are… Funny that the prices for PC 'standard software' are still so high – oh, well, as long as people are actually paying the asked prices, who cares? (Superbase 4 Pro for the Amiga (english version) sells for about 175$ in Germany, the German version for about 235$, and the PC version for about 765$ which is 3 to 4 times the price of the Amiga version, and the PC version has SOLD over one million(!) copies there.) // Chris coming in from Germany \X/ on AutoPilot 1.051……….
#108315From: Stan Kalisher (Impulse)Jul 26, 1993 8:39 PM
I recently bought Superbase 2.0 for Windows at CompUSA for only $149. That was as an upgrade to my Amiga version. The competitive upgrade was $199. Although PC software still posts a very high list price, you can find amazing values out there that make Amiga prices look inflated! –Rick Rodriguez
#108376From: Paul HigginbottomJul 27, 1993 4:14 PM
I think you'll find that Superbase is now having MAJOR problems against Microsoft's Access for Windows, Microsoft's FoxPro for Windows, and Borland's Paradox for Windows. Lotus is about to jump in the pool too, having recently purchased the company that makes the award winning Approach database for Windows. PC software is also pretty cheap here in the U.S. Many of the big name packages can be had at their "upgrade" prices without any proof of owning a prior version (they might ask if you've HEARD of the package before <g>!). I paid $84 for Access, and a friend got Lotus AmiPro (killer wordprocessor) and Lotus Improv spreadsheet for about $90 each. I don't know what kind of cause and effect relationship there is due to the MASSIVE amounts of piracy that goes on in Europe (far worse than the U.S, according to SPA). Paul.
#108480From: Christian BusseJul 28, 1993 5:51 PM
Paul, I don't know why, but here in Europe (or at least in Germany) we don't get the special (competitive) 'upgrade' ;v) offers that you do in U.S. or at least not at your prices. That MAY be to do with the german regulations regarding 'dumping prices', I don't know. Maybe that's why so much software is pirated over here. In US, the companies think, ok, we sell this new software cheap but we'll have the customers by the b*lls for updates/upgrades later. I think that's where the software companies make their money nowadays. Once you have a software package you rather stick with it than change except the other is REALLY much better AND you get it at a low price (= reason for 'competitive upgrades'). If its data compatible to your old software the better… // Chris coming in from Germany \X/ on AutoPilot 1.051……….
#108016From: Mark D. ManesJul 23, 1993 10:57 PM
Steve, Absolutely my take as well. In fact, I suspect that with this machine introduction that many of the top notch Amiga developers will leap to this platform if they product graphics, or desktop-video related products. I am not sure SGI realizes what they have done. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#108035From: Paul ToalJul 24, 1993 3:33 AM
Indy doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell. The consumer computer market ends at $2300, not $5000. Software will never drop more than 12% in price from todays level. 128 megs of RAM is required. Only a few thousand Indy's will sell, average configuration will be $18,000 for a starters kit. The big Software companies (SGI guys) are damn good at what they do and they know of what they speak. This comes from them. In two years you'll see Indy just getting warmed up with needed support and developement. This will absolutely not be a storm of excitement. Just barely a trickle of interest at it's highest. You'll see, probably closer than you wished. –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#108049From: Mark D. ManesJul 24, 1993 9:10 AM
Paul, First off, I don't think SGI has built a 'consumer' home computer, nor have they built a killer box for 90% of business. What they have done though, is build a desktop video machine that clearly destroys the high-end Amiga and Macintosh market. You may not realize this, but a nicely layed out toaster system is usually in the 10k range. I have customers who WANT more capability than what the Amiga can deliver. I intend to continue to carry Amiga and Video Toaster as they are quite viable products. I see the Indy as my high-end solution to users who need more than what the current Video Toaster has to offer. I also see the Indy as a system that preserves system value and as a box that will allow a reseller to make a profit, unlike the toaster business today. My excitement lies in the fact that SGI has dropped into the high-end of our desktop video market and basically have dared the other hardware manufacturers to beat them. Tell me, if Commodore was to build an AAA system and it listed for $4995, would you buy SGI or Amiga if the SGI were only a few thousand more. Most of my corporate buyers would NOT give the Amiga a second look, nor would you if your business was based on a need to produce video. Not that the Amiga would not produce video, but given the fact that most of our corporate customers either already have an Amiga, or generally have budgetted $20k toward a video solution, the Indy will shine in their eyes as they all know who and what SGI is. I think you need to understand something, something that apparently you do not see, and perhaps even SGI itself doesn't see. The mere fact that SGI has a entry-level box in the under $5k mark has redefined the playing field. I am exited as I have not seen a company attempt to redefine the market since Commodore did it in 1985 with the Amiga. The difference here is that SGI has the potential to literally dominate the market due to their already established good name, and the fact that their dealer network is designed to allow resellers to make money. This is not the case when an Amiga dealer works with NewTek. Let me address your software concerns. It is my belief that this box has the potential to DRAW a large group of graphics oriented developers who ARE NOT, in general, making money in the Amiga market to the Indy. These companies will fill the void that the big name software companies on SGI boxes are not willing to fill. ASDG and the Blue Ribbon Soundworks are already developing for it. If the Indy sells like I think it might, there will be a lot of money to be made in the less than $1k software range. Many will be willing to stoop over and pick up those dollars. Perhaps this makes my feelings clear on this. It is not the Amiga killer, today, a year from now–I guarentee it is from a desktop video perspective anyway. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#108054From: Robert ComerJul 24, 1993 9:14 AM
I agree totally! Heck, PC people percieve the Amiga as to expensive right now, no way are they going to buy an Indy. I'd be interested, but even I couldn't justify spending the required cash to get a capable machine. Bob Comer — Cruising the nets on AutoPilot from Cheyenne, Wyoming
#108169From: Paul HigginbottomJul 25, 1993 9:46 AM
I certainly don't think Indy will set the world on fire, so I basically agree with you. I find Indy to remind me a lot of the first NeXT machine. Cool stuff, but not that many people need it or can afford it in a usable configuration. I believe that video capture / compression etc., will only really take off when it is seamlessly integrated with corporate networks, because then "video chatting" will be a reality and save a TON of "hall walking". Paul.
#108478From: Lou WallaceJul 28, 1993 5:05 PM
Paul, Indy is not a 'consumer' machine. It is a workstation that offers features of very high end systems at prices unheard of before. It will compete with Quadras, pentium and maybe even 040 Toasters. It is not a home machine. Lou
#108491From: R. Simonsen/MicroBoticsJul 28, 1993 7:09 PM
Don't limit yourself to the seller's definition, Lou. If the right software and peripherals come along, the Indy is cheap enough to sell as a pure "end user" machine. Many video "pro-sumers" would be interested in the capabilities of the Indy (for example). –Redmond
#108168From: Paul HigginbottomJul 25, 1993 9:43 AM
I think SGI know's EXACTLY what they've done. At NAB, they had a very big booth in the multimedia hall, right near all those Toaster-related vendors, among others, and they were giving out gobs of developer application forms as far as I could tell.
#108024From: Mike SchillerJul 24, 1993 1:27 AM
Rich: Yes, I do think the Indy will end up costing much more than the 5k base price, oh well, I don't need it THAT badly. I did order NextStep 3.1 for 486 today tho. They currently have a special deal on where you can get NS3.1 for $299.00 for the complete system, both user & development systems. It comes on 2 CDROMs, and a 3.5" boot disk, and I'll be replacing the Interactive Unix on my PC with it. The only 'gotcha' to the deal is that it's NOT upgradable, when NS3.2 comes out, and you wanna get it, you gotta pay full price. Of course there's nothing stopping you from continuing on with NS3.1 as long as you want. I think it's funny that now that the NeXT machine isn't a threat to the Amiga anymore, I don't mind looking at it's OS as a replacement for the character based Unix I was using (NextStep is basically an X windows like GUI on top of BSD Unix), especially considering that with their special deal the entire NextStep 3.1 OS is cheaper than I'd have to pay for any version of X for my PC (either from Interactive [now Sun], or 3rd party). As for the pricing of apps for the Indy (or any other computer), I think it's absolutely DISGUSTING how the software companies RAPE the users of non MS-DOS machines. I looked into a couple of software packages for my Unix 486 machine, and was shocked at the prices! While I realise there are costs to porting software, I can't believe that something that sells for $500.00 on a PC (already overpriced if you ask me!) should sell for double or more on a Unix machine? As I'm gonna have to get a larger HD than I currently have in my PC to run NextStep, I'm probably going to have a small (around 50M or so) DOS partition, and for the first time in a LONG time have a machine that can bootup into real MS-DOS. It's gotten to the point that even with DOS being brain dead, some of the games available on it look really nice. // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#108051From: Mark D. ManesJul 24, 1993 9:10 AM
Mike, Quite thinking for a moment as a consumer. Think a moment as a manufactuer. Price is set at what the market will pay. The market clearly pays for the software on UNIX machines, and thus, the companies exist. Price is set based on market-size, the amount of support necessary and finally what the precieved profit will be. The UNIX market on the PC is not a large one, and thus the very market is designed for the vertical marketeers. I really wish the consumer in general would get off of this 'software should be less kick'. It sounds as if many think, not necessarily you Mike, but many think that software companies should be more of a social program than a profitable company. The market demands what happens to software, not really based on consumer outcry, but rather on actual cold cash in the coffers. If the coffer gets a bit empty, the price will drop. If the coffer remains full, the cries will never be heard, nor should they. It is my thinking that the Indy will draw a lot of the high-end, top notch Amiga developers who are looking for someplace to go. You'll get the software in the range that is clearly less expensive than the current line up of software products. You'll be amazed, things can change in the blink of an eye. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#108124From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 24, 1993 10:46 PM
Mike, Thanks for the information about NextStep. $299 for a 486 machine, huh? I've got to take a look at that. The sticker shock for software for Unix-based machines is heart-stopping! Rich
#108442From: SyndesisJul 28, 1993 10:08 AM
I don't get it… you move from a more popular market to a more obscure market (PC to Unix) and expect the software prices to be the same. For sake of argument, let's say the development expenses (marketing, sales, programming) are exactly the same for those two markets. (They're not.) Consider the actual and potential sales penetration for each market. Divide the total cost (let's call it 100K per employee per year, in a small company with five people) by the total sales. You still think it's "rape and pillage"?
#108041From: Brian BartlettJul 24, 1993 4:57 AM
Richard, I seem to remember a certain machine that cost $1995 with only _one_ floppy drive, 256K RAM (expandable to 512K), and a questionable, at best, paint program. You had to pay _significantly_ more for an extremely buggy compiler and a word processing program, also buggy, as was the documentation. The machine, my '85 Amiga 1000. Frankly, anytime you are on the 'bleeding edge' you should expect to pay a price, but I have serious questions on your evaluation of the "minimum" configuration, again harkening back to my experience with another introductory machine. I do page layout here on a 2.5 MB machine feeding a laser printer, an impossibility to some. 96 MB??? Sheesh! I think you will find that this machine will enter a particular niche which will attract quality developers that are not satisfied with the current status quo on pricing. Just my two cents. Brian
#108125From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 24, 1993 10:46 PM
Brian, I don't need 96 megs for page layout. But I _do_ need that much RAM and more to handle the image manipulation that I do of the scanned images that I place in those page layouts. For electronic pre-press work, 256 megabytes will soon become the 'standard' work station RAM configuration. Rich
#107968From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 23, 1993 4:38 AM
[ continuation ] is not the Mac killer, or the PC killer that SGI's ads would like the world to believe. Other forces are killing the Mac. But SGI's star is certainly in an ascending mode lately. Rich
#107978From: Lou WallaceJul 23, 1993 8:59 AM
To be perfectly fair Richard, a 24 bit Indy with harddisk (340 MB) will cost $9500. This includes the 15 inch monitor, 16 MB ram, camera abd a fair amoount of software. But you are right that SGI peroripheals cost a lot more then those on other platforms. However, Indy – if it is the 'volume' machine SGI hopes, should change that to a more normal cost structure. Lou
#107993From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 23, 1993 3:22 PM
Lou, I stand by my estimate of $30,000 to have a useable Indy work station. I have no doubt that SGI is serious about penetrating the 'low end' market. But the uses that SGI envisions for this machine _require_ RAM in the _hundreds_ of megabytes. Graphics processing demands resources that are orders of magnitudes greater than what most people are used to using. The $30,000 figure comes from a long discussion that I had with our dealer. We compared the Indy to my 'middle of the road' pre-press setup (also vulgarly known in the industry as DTP). To acheive the same level of functionality as my Quadra 800 set up, the Indy _easily_ costs as much as I've indicated. Those are _his_ figures – and believe me, he is a motivated salesman. He _wants_ to sell me an Indy. But he's also honest and realistic. He knows my operation well and has no desire to mislead. There is no denying that getting the Indy outfitted as I've described gives it the ability to outperform the Mac in many other ways. To try to so equip the Mac would be even _more_ expensive, and probably not possible at all. Rich
#108042From: Brian BartlettJul 24, 1993 4:57 AM
Richard, I must be confused because I find your statement "[g]raphics processing demands resources that are orders of magnitudes greater than most people are used to using" curious, at best. I'm running only a 9 MB Amiga here and I have yet to run out of memory on ADPro or any of the other graphics programs I have. This in 24 bit mode. Now, I can picture a few reasons for my confusion, so I thought I'd enumerate them. One, I'm not reaching the high-end. What _are_ you doing with all that RAM? Am I missing something here? Two, the machines, the Mac and the Indy, require many times more resources to accomplish a transformation. That doesn't quite make sense, especially if a transformation is involved. Shouldn't the machine dedicate itself to this particular task? Three, as a matter of convienence, are you keeping massive amounts of images in memory at the same time? Why is this significant? As I stated, I must be missing something here if the minimum configuration is as you state. Brian
#108046From: Charles HillJul 24, 1993 8:33 AM
Brian, The answer is #1, you are not reaching the high-end. 🙂 Try the following: load a 300 dpi 5×7 or 8×10 (inches) image into ADPro (24-bit color) and see what happens to your 9 megs. 🙂 That is what is necessary for color DTP. If you do DTP professionally, it will be a common occurance. (Heck, try an 8×10 in 8-bit grey!) Also…many renderings in 3D (using Lightwave, Aladdin or Real 3D 1.3 or 2.0) suck up a LOT of RAM. 18 Mb makes Lightwave comfortable; 12 for Aladdin; 24+ Mb for Real 2.0 (more if you want to do massive collision detection within a particle system — with transparency, etc.) I've seen a person with 32 Mb of RAM crash Real 3D 2.0 for lack of RAM. 🙂 (Gigamem is a nice solution.) Nine is fine for most normal business use (WP, Database, Spreadsheets, games, etc.) but not for professional graphics. It is borderline low. -Chas
#108126From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 24, 1993 10:47 PM
Brian, My business is electronic pre-press. We prepare images for reproduction on printing presses. (We also are a printing house, but that's another story). If you look at a magazine like Vogue, or Architectural Digest, or National Geographic you will see Four Color Process printing at its best. Pictures in those magazines are four-color halftones which have a 'resolution' of 150 to 200 lines per inch. That is, if you examine the fine dot pattern that makes up the pictures, you will count 150 dots to the inch in a 150 lpi picture. Those pictures result from original continuous-tone transparencies that have been scanned on a drum scanner. In general, the scanner must produce an electronic file containg a scan frequency which is twice the lpi figure of the desired final halftone. That is, if a halftone of 150 lpi is needed, the scanner must scan the original at 300 dots per inch (pixels per inch). Each scanner pixel contains one byte of data. That byte is able to specify one of 256 levels of gray at the position in the original that it represents. The file size for such a sampling of data is given by the following formula: horizontal scan resolution x vertical scan resolution x area scanned. One square inch scanned at 300 dpi therefore results in a file size of 300 x 300 x 1 or 90,000 bytes. a full page scan (8 x 10) is 300 x 300 x 80 or 7.2 megs. For a full color scan (24 bit RGB), that figure becomes 300 x 300 x 80 x 3 or 21.6 megs. So, for an 8 x 10 full color image at 300 dpi, I have to have _at least_ 22 megs of RAM for the image _alone_, to say nothing of the operating system or the image manipulation program. To handle such an image, that is, to allow the manipulations that one performs on such an image, the image manipulation program requires about five times as much RAM (or virtual memory) as the image itself. For the 22 meg image, over 100 megabytes of RAM is a _must_. Virtual memory (hard drive) is hopelessly slow for this kind of work. [ MORE ]
#108127From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Jul 24, 1993 10:47 PM
[ continuation ] Now add these realities to the game. The RGB image needs to be converted to CMYK. That makes the 22 meg image 29 megs. Five times 29 megs is 144 megs of needed system ram! And that's just for one 8 x 10 image at 150 lpi. Magazines are going to 175 and 200 line halftones almost routinely now. An 8 x 10, 175 line halftone in full color results in a file of 40 megs. Want to try the math for a double page spread, full bleed 11 x 17 at 200 lpi (400 dpi)? The file itself is over 120 megabytes. See why so much RAM is needed for this kind of work? 8) Rich
#108011From: Mark D. ManesJul 23, 1993 10:57 PM
I expect the street price to be around $4995. The difference in the SGI market versus the Amiga market is that in the SGI market, you, the dealer, are expected to make a profit. 🙂 Honestly I don't know, mostly it will depend on the cost of the system. I already know that it will not be made available for mail order, something I particularlly like. -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..